|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:761
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Klinik und Poliklinik für Thorax-, Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str 33, 48149 Münster, Germany
To the Editor
With great interest we read the paper of Hemmer and colleagues [1] dealing with leaflet escape in an original Duromedics bileaflet and a Tekna valve in the mitral position, because recently we had to replace a Tekna valve for leaflet escape in the aortic position.
A 38-year-old patient was admitted to our university for change of an aortic prosthesis because he suffered from a high-grade insufficiency of the aortic prosthesis. The patient had undergone aortic valve replacement with a Tekna valve (25 mm, Baxter Healthcare, Santa Ana, CA) for a congenital aortic stenosis 42 months ago. Due to an acute cardiac failure he had to be resuscitated. After hemodynamic stabilization a high-grade aortic insufficiency and a severe pulmonary congestion were diagnosed, so the aortic prosthesis was changed. Intraoperatively the diagnosis of leaflet escape was made. The leaflet, which had been situated below the ostium of the left coronary artery, was missing. The Tekna valve was replaced by an SJM valve (23 mm, St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN). The absent leaflet was broken: one part was located at the bifurcation of the left common iliac artery and the other part on the opposite side. Both parts were removed by means of an arteriotomy after recovery from cardiac surgery. The postoperative course was uneventful and the explanted valve fragments (Fig 1) were sent to the manufacturer.
|
References
Related Article
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |