ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aouifi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lehot, J.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aouifi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lehot, J.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:678-683
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Abdellah Aouifi, MDa, Pascale Blanc, MDa, Vincent Piriou, MD, PhDa, Olivier H. Bastien, MDa, Patrick Ffrench, MDb, Michel Hanss, MDb, Jean-Jacques Lehot, MD, PhDa

a Service d’Anesthésie—Réanimation and E.A. 1896, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
b Laboratoire d’Hématologie, Hôpital Cardiovasculaire et Pneumologique L. Pradel, Lyon, France

Accepted for publication May 25, 2000.

Address reprint requests to Dr Aouifi, Service d’anesthésie—Réanimation, Infirmerie Protestante de LYON, 1–3 Chemin du Penthod, 69300 Caluire et Cuire, France
e-mail: a.aouifi{at}free.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. The use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with a history of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) may be associated with complications related to their anticoagulation management.

Methods. Between January 1997 and December 1999, among 4,850 adults patients who underwent cardiac surgery in our institution, 10 patients presented with preoperative type II HIT. In 4 patients, anticoagulation during CPB was achieved with danaparoid sodium. In 6 other patients, heparin sodium was used after pretreatment with epoprostenol sodium.

Results. No significant change in platelet count occurred in any patient. No intraoperative thrombotic complication was encountered. Total postoperative chest drainage ranged from 250 to 1,100 ml in patients pretreated with epoprostenol and 1,700 to 2,470 ml in patients who received danaparoid sodium during CPB (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test).

Conclusions. During CPB, inhibition of platelet aggregation by prostacyclin may be a safe anticoagulation approach in patients with type II HIT.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Heparin is one of the most commonly used anticoagulant drugs in cardiac patients. Unfortunately, a small number of patients receiving heparin develop a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Based on the severity of thrombocytopenia, HIT is differentiated into two types. In HIT type I, thrombocytopenia is moderate (>100 109/L), early, asymptomatic, and transient, resolving spontaneously despite further heparin administration. In type II, thrombocytopenia is severe (<100 109/L), persistent, and often associated with thrombo-embolic and hemorrhagic events [1].

During cardiac surgery, heparin is the standard anticoagulant for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). For this procedure, heparin has become essential because of its predictability effectiveness, rapid action, and reversibility with protamine. In patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB, type II HIT is a rare but potentially dangerous state. Heparin use in this circumstance can lead to thrombo-embolic events, severe bleeding, and sudden death [2]. Because of these potentially catastrophic complications, alternative strategies avoiding reexposure to heparin or inhibiting platelet aggregation induced by heparin during CPB should be available to practitioners. In this report, we describe our experience of CPB anticoagulation in 10 patients with type II HIT who underwent cardiac surgery over the last 3 years. The different alternatives to heparin in these situations are described, and recommendations for intraperative anticoagulation are provided.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Between January 1997 and December 1999, among 4,850 adult cardiac surgical patients, 10 with preoperative documented HIT type II underwent a cardiac surgical procedure with CPB in our institution (0.2%). Age ranged from 53 to 84 years, and 6 patients were male. Characteristics of these patients are shown in Tables 1 and 2. HIT type II was confirmed in all patients by a positive result of platelet aggregation assay, which exhibits aggregation of normal donor platelets, by patient’s plasma in the presence of heparin. Concomitantly, plasma of all patients was screened for a potential cross-reaction with low molecular weight (LMW) heparin and danaparoid sodium.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Data of the 4 Patients with HIT Type II Who Received Danaparoid During CPB

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Data of the 6 Patients With HIT Type II Who Received Heparin and Epoprostenol During CPB

 
Anesthesia was midazolam, sufentanil, and pancuronium bromide based. Non-heparin-coated Swan-Ganz catheters (Baxter, Irvine, CA) were used to monitor pulmonary arterial pressures. Catheter rinsing fluids were heparin-free. Surgery was performed under moderate hypothermic CPB. For all procedures, non-heparin-coated CPB circuits and membrane fiber oxygenators were used.

In 4 patients (1–4), in the absence of positive cross-reaction, danaparoid sodium (Orgaran, Riom Laboratoires-CERM, Riom, France) was used for anticoagulation during CPB. Danaparoid sodium 3U/ml was added to the priming solution of CPB. Before commencing CPB, the 4 patients received an additional intravenous bolus (125 U/kg). Anti-Xa activity was checked prior to CPB, then 10, 30, and 60 minutes after institution of CPB. Celite activated clotting time (ACT) was measured concomitantly (Hemochron, Technidyne, Edison, NJ).

In the 6 other patients (5–10), anticoagulation during CPB was achieved with heparin sodium (Heparin Choay, Sanofi Wintrop, Gentilly, France), but administered following pretreatment with epoprostenol sodium (Flolan, Glaxo Wellcome, Paris, France). The anticoagulation regimen was as follows: continuous infusion of epoprostenol sodium started after induction of anesthesia at a rate of 5 ng/kg/min, infusion rate increased by stages of 5 µg/kg every 5 minutes, and when the infusion rate reached 30 ng/kg/min, a bolus of 300 U/kg of heparin was intravenously administered. When required, norepinephrine (0.05 to 0.1 µg/kg/min) was infused to maintain mean arterial pressure greater than 75 mmHg. CPB was started when ACT exceeded 480 seconds. After emergence from CPB, heparin was reversed with protamine (3 mg/kg). Fifteen minutes after protamine reversal, epoprostenol sodium infusion was reduced by stages of 5 ng/kg until stopped.

Antifibrinolytics were not used intraoperatively. During the postoperative period, 2 patients (2 and 8) who underwent mechanical valve replacement and 1 patient (9) who underwent mitral valvuloplasty were administered danaparoid sodium (150 U/h) intravenously, started on the 8th and the 12th postoperative hour, respectively.

On postoperative day 1, in the absence of active hemorrhage (chest drainage less than 20 ml/h during 2 consecutive hours), oral warfarin or intravenous aspirin was started, according to surgical indications.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
In patients receiving danaparoid sodium intraoperatively, anti-Xa activity ranged between 1.7 and 2.3 U/ml, and ACT between 196 and 370 seconds. In patients who were administered epoprostenol sodium and heparin, ACT remained greater than 520 seconds during CPB. No clotting occurred during CPB in any patient. Postoperatively, platelet count ranged between 28 and 173 109/L except patient 4 who had a low preoperative platelet count (18 109/L) which remained at 15 109/L after CPB (Table 1).

Total postoperative bleeding ranged from 1,700 to 2,470 ml in the 4 patients receiving danaparoid sodium, and from 250 to 1,100 ml in the 6 patients treated with epoprostenol sodium and heparin (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). All patients receiving danaparoid sodium required transfusion of blood products. From 5 to 12 units of packed red cells were required to maintain hematocrit greater than 25%, and from 2 to 5 units of fresh frozen plasma were needed for each patient to reduce postoperative bleeding. In patients receiving epoprostenol, 2 to 4 units of packed red cells were transfused in patients 5, 6, 7, and 9 (Table 1). Patients 8 and 10 did not required any transfusion.

Patient 1, who underwent redo aortic valve replacement (AVR) developed multiple organ failure and died on the 45th postoperative day. Patients 2 and 3 required chest reexploration for bleeding on the 3rd and 15th postoperative day. Patient 4, who presented with infective endocarditis and refractory septic shock, died on the 8th postoperative hour.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
HIT type II is due to an immune mediated reaction leading to thrombocytopenia between 4 to 14 days after exposure to heparin [1]. In 1992, Amiral and colleagues [3] showed that the heparin-platelet factor 4 (H-PF4) complex was the antigen responsible in 75% of cases. The antibody is an immunoglobulin (Ig), usually IgG, which recognizes the complex H-PF4 [4]. During type II HIT, antibodies to the H-PF4 complex induce platelet activation and aggregation through the platelet Fc receptor [3].

Incidence of type II HIT in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB is not precisely known. Previous data of the literature indicated an incidence ranging from 0.12% to 1.3% [5, 6]. This incidence was 0.2% in our institution. Whereas incidence of HIT type II in patients scheduled for CPB is low, postoperative prevalence of antibodies to H-PF4 after CPB is surprisingly high. In a prospective study measuring antibodies to H-PF4 on the 5th postoperative day in 111 patients, Bauer and associates [7] found that antibodies to H-PF4 were present in 51% of patients exposed to CPB. Nevertheless, in this study, the presence of antibodies was not necessarily associated with a platelet count decrease or a thrombo-embolic event.

Alternative therapeutic options in patients with HIT type II
In patients with HIT type II, there are several alternatives for anticoagulation during CPB: (a) use of heparin associated with a potent platelet inhibitor such as prostacyclin; (b) use of another anticoagulant such as danaparoid sodium or recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin); and (c) preoperative use of the defibrinogenating agent such as ancrod.

Prevention of heparin-induced platelet activation during CPB using prostacyclin was used during the 1980s [8]. Iloprost, an analogue of prostacyclin, was used during CPB by Addonizio and colleagues [9] in 3 patients with confirmed preoperative type II HIT. In these 3 patients, biological assays demonstrated the effectiveness of Iloprost for prevention of platelet activation by heparin during CPB. Subsequently, Iloprost was used safely during CPB, in patients with HIT, by several other authors [10, 11]. In 1990, Kappa and associates [11] reported the use of Iloprost in 9 patients scheduled for various types of cardiac surgery. In these 9 patients, anticoagulation was effective and safe without severe postoperative bleeding. Epoprostenol sodium, a prostaglandin (PGI2), vasodilator, initially used in patients with pulmonary hypertension, is also a potent platelet inhibitor [12]. In our institution, since 1991, epoprostenol sodium was successfully used in association with heparin in patients with type II HIT requiring anticoagulation for hemodialysis, or vascular or cardiac surgery. In this report, we confirmed that epoprostenol sodium seems effective and safe with acceptable postoperative blood losses. Nevertheless, epoprostenol sodium, just as Iloprost, may induce hypotension which may be deleterious in hemodynamically unstable patients. This hypotension, due to a vasodilator action, may require the use of a vasoconstrictor such as norepinephrine.

During the last decade, danaparoid sodium and r-hirudin, were developed as two alternative drugs to heparin. Danaparoid sodium is an heparinoid comprising a mixture of polysulfated glycosaminoglycans (heparan sulfate 84%, dermatan sulfate 12%, and chondroitin sulfate 4%) [13]. It is a potent inhibitor of thrombin formation. This heparinoid was initially suggested as an alternative to heparin in medical patients with HIT for prevention of thrombo-embolic events [14]. The first use of danaparoid sodium during CPB was reported by Doherty and coworkers in 1990 [15]. In 1993, in an overview of 230 patients with HIT type II treated with danaparoid sodium, Magnani and colleagues [14] reported 19 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB. In this review, the anticoagulant effect of danaparoid sodium during CPB was found to be effective, but with postoperative blood losses larger than those usually observed with heparin. Furthermore, several other case reports described the use of this anticoagulant during CPB [1519] (Table 3). Unfortunately, two major pharmacological properties limit the use of this drug during CPB: the first one is the lack of a specific antidote, the second is its prolonged anti-Xa activity (25 hours approximately) [20]. The consequence is an excessive postoperative bleeding risk and need for transfusion of blood products as reported in the data of the literature (Table 3) and in our 4 patients. Another problem with danaparoid sodium is a possible cross-reaction with heparin which occurs in 10% of cases. A preoperative in vitro screening test is mandatory. This screening test should be performed at the same time as the in vitro assay for confirmation of HIT type II.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Anticoagulation With Danaparoid During CPB in Patients With HIT Type IIa

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Comparison Between Heparin Plus Prostacyclin, Danaparoid Sodium, and r-Hirudin

 
Recombinant hirudin is a specific direct thrombin inhibitor. It is immunologically distinct from heparin and does not cause thrombocytopenia. The first use of r-hirudin during CPB was reported by Pötzsch and associates in 1994 [21]. Subsequently, several case reports describing the use of this drug during CPB in patients with HIT have been published [22, 23]. In these studies, anticoagulation was effective and postoperative bleeding acceptable. Recently, in a multicenter study [24], r-hirudin was used during CPB in 8 patients. These different reports suggest that r-hirudin may be a promising alternative to heparin during CPB. Nevertheless, despite a short half-life time (2 hours), the use of this drug remains difficult because of the lack of a specific neutralizing agent and the lack of an easy and standardized monitoring of the anticoagulant activity during CPB. Indeed, this agent may be unsuitable for use in patients with renal failure. r-Hirudin has only become available for the last 3 months in our institution, hence its exclusion in the present study. Comparison between prostacyclin, danaparoids, and r-hirudin is provided in Table 4.

Ancrod is a defibrinogenating agent derived from the Malayan pit viper. It was used as an anticoagulant during CPB in a limited number of patients because of the lack of an effective neutralizing agent [25]. Moreover, the patient’s plasma fibrinogen must be decreased to 0.5 g/L before initiating CPB, preparation often requiring more than 12 hours, thus excluding emergencies. This drug is currently considered as a less favorable alternative to anticoagulation during cardiac surgery [10].

Management of anticoagulation for CPB in patients with HIT type II
The most essential decision in a patient with HIT type II is the absolute discontinuation of heparin including in the catheter flush solutions. Heparin-coated pulmonary catheter and CPB circuits must also be avoided [26]. Platelet transfusions are not indicated because this may induce or worsen thrombosis [10].

Because of the rare occurrence of HIT type II in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB, no study comparing the different alternative anticoagulation options is available. In the literature, most data are reported as case studies, therefore comparison between the different anticoagulant protocols is impossible. Nevertheless, based on these data, the following decisional approach may be proposed (Fig 1).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Algorithm for anticoagulation management in patients with HIT type II scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB. (CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass; HIT = heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.)

 
In patients with a history of HIT type II in which the platelet aggregation assay is currently negative, a single bolus of heparin is authorized during CPB. However, further postoperative reexposure to heparin must be avoided. This approach was successfully conducted in 1984 by Olinger and colleagues [27] in 3 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

When HIT type II is recent and the platelet aggregation assay still positive, it is preferable, when possible, to postpone the date of surgery until disappearance of H-PF4 antibodies as suggested by Warkentin and colleagues [28]. In patients requiring emergent cardiac surgery, CPB may be performed with one of the following protocols. The association of heparin with prostacyclin appears to have the better risk/benefit ratio, because of the easy protamine reversal and the limited postoperative blood losses. In patients who might poorly tolerate the hypotension associated with a prostaglandin’s administration, danaparoid sodium or r-hirudin may be used, but with excessive bleeding.

Conclusion
HIT type II in a patient scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB is a rare but potentially life-threatening situation, which requires special intraoperative anticoagulation management. Various types of anticoagulation approaches are available such as prevention of platelet aggregation by prostacyclin or the use of danaparoid sodium or r-hirudin. The use of a combination of prostacyclin and heparin seems to be safe and effective. Intraoperative use of danaparoid is often associated with excessive bleeding and greater blood transfusion need.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The authors acknowledge Dr Rhys Evans from the Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, United Kingdom, for help during the manuscript preparation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Visentin G.P., Aster R.H. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Curr Opin Hematol 1995;2:351-357.[Medline]
  2. Heck H.A., Jr, Lutcher C.L., Falls D.G. Fatal thrombocytopenic coagulopathy after cardiopulmonary bypass: clinicopathologic correlations implicating heparin. South Med J 1994;87:789-793.[Medline]
  3. Amiral J., Bridey F., Dreyfus M., et al. Platelet factor 4 complexed to heparin is the target for antibodies generated in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 1992;68:95-96.[Medline]
  4. Greinacher A., Pötzsch B., Amiral J., Dummel V., Eichner A., Mueller-Eckhardt C. Heparin-associated thrombocytopenia: isolation of the antibody and characterization of a multimolecular PF4-heparin complex as the major antigen. Thromb Haemost 1994;71:247-251.[Medline]
  5. Singer R.L., Mannion J.D., Bauer T.L., Armenti F.R., Edie R.N. Complications from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Chest 1993;104:1436-1440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Sodian R., Loebe M., Gorman K.F., Riess H., Hetzer R. Heparin induced thrombocytopenia. Experiences in 12 heart surgery patients. Asaio J 1997;43:M430-M433.[Medline]
  7. Bauer T.L., Arepally G., Konkle B.A., et al. Prevalence of heparin-associated antibodies without thrombosis in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Circulation 1997;95:1242-1246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Longmore D.B., Bennett J.G., Hoyle P.M., et al. Prostacyclin administration during cardiopulmonary bypass in man. Lancet 1981;1:800-804.[Medline]
  9. Addonizio V.P., Jr, Fisher C.A., Kappa J.R., Ellison N. Prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during open heart surgery with iloprost (ZK36374). Surgery 1987;102:796-807.[Medline]
  10. Shorten G., Comunale M.E., Johnson R.G. Management of cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia using prostaglandin E1 and aspirin. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1994;8:556-558.[Medline]
  11. Kappa J.R., Fisher C.A., Todd B., et al. Intraoperative management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:714-722.[Abstract]
  12. Burghuber O.C., Silberbauer K., Haber P., Sinzinger H., Elliott M., Leithner C. Pulmonary and antiaggregatory effects of prostacyclin after inhalation and intravenous infusion. Respiration 1984;45:450-454.[Medline]
  13. Meuleman D.G. Orgaran (Org 10172): its pharmacological profile in experimental models. Haemostasis 1992;22:58-65.[Medline]
  14. Magnani H.N. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT): an overview of 230 patients treated with orgaran (Org 10172). Thromb Haemost 1993;70:554-561.[Medline]
  15. Doherty D.C., Ortel T.L., Bruijn N., Greenberg C.S., Trigt P. "Heparin-free" cardiopulmonary bypass: first reported use of heparinoid (Org 10172) to provide anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 1990;73:562-565.[Medline]
  16. Insler S.R., Kraenzler E.J., Bartholomew J.R., Kottke-Marchant K., Lytle B., Starr N.J. Thrombosis during the use of the heparinoid Organon 10172 in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Anesthesiology 1997;86:495-498.[Medline]
  17. Schmahl K.S., Ganjoo A.K., Harloff M.G. Orgaran (Org 10172) for cardiopulmonary bypass in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: role of adjunctive plasmapheresis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997;11:262-263.[Medline]
  18. Grocott H.P., Root J., Berkowitz S.D., deBruijn N., Landolfo K. Coagulation complicating cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia receiving the heparinoid, danaparoid sodium. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997;11:875-877.[Medline]
  19. Westphal K., Martens S., Strouhal U., et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II: perioperative management using danaparoid in a coronary artery bypass patient with renal failure. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;45:318-320.[Medline]
  20. Danhof M., de Boer A., Magnani H.N., Stiekema J.C. Pharmacokinetic considerations on orgaran (Org 10172) therapy. Haemostasis 1992;22:73-84.[Medline]
  21. Pötzsch B., Iversen S., Riess F.C., et al. Recombinant hirudin as an anticoagulant in open heart surgery: a case report. Ann Hematol 1994;68:A53.
  22. Riess F.C., Pötzsch B., Bader R., et al. A case report on the use of recombinant hirudin as an anticoagulant for cardiopulmonary bypass in open heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996;10:386-388.[Medline]
  23. Koster A., Kuppe H., Hetzer R., Sodian R., Crystal G.J., Mertzlufft F. Emergent cardiopulmonary bypass in five patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II employing recombinant hirudin. Anesthesiology 1998;89:777-780.[Medline]
  24. Greinacher A., Volpel H., Janssens U., et al. Recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) provides safe and effective anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a prospective study. Circulation 1999;99:73-80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Teasdale S.J., Zulys V.J., Mycyk T., Baird R.J., Glynn M.F. Ancrod anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:712-713.[Abstract]
  26. Laster J., Silver D. Heparin-coated catheters and heparin induced thrombocytopenia. J Vasc Surg 1988;7:667-672.[Medline]
  27. Olinger G.N., Hussey C.V., Olive J.A., Malik M.I. Cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with previously documented heparin-induced platelet aggregation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;87:673-677.[Abstract]
  28. Warkentin T.E., Chong B.H., Greinacher A. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: towards consensus. Thromb Haemost 1998;79:1-7.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
T. E. Warkentin, A. Greinacher, A. Koster, and A. M. Lincoff
Treatment and Prevention of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 340S - 380S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Bauer, Z. Vichova, P. Ffrench, C. Hercule, O. Jegaden, O. Bastien, and J.-J. Lehot
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation with Danaparoid Sodium After Massive Pulmonary Embolism
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1101 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
S. J. Durham and J. P. Gold
Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 535 - 548.
[Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. Hassell
The Management of Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Who Require Anticoagulant Therapy
Chest, February 1, 2005; 127(2_suppl): 1S - 8S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
T. E. Warkentin and A. Greinacher
Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Recognition, Treatment, and Prevention: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 311S - 337S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. M. Palatianos, C. N. Foroulis, M. I. Vassili, P. Matsouka, G. M. Astras, G. H. Kantidakis, E. Iliopoulou, and E. N. Melissari
Preoperative detection and management of immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing heart surgery with iloprost
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2004; 127(2): 548 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
A. Koster and T. Fischer
Management of Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia During Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2003; 7(4): 411 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. E. Warkentin and A. Greinacher
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 2121 - 2131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. A. Morgan, A. R. Kherani, D. W. Vigilance, F. H. Cheema, N. J. Colletti, D. I. Sahar, K.-M. Jan, D. L. Diuguid, R. Nowygrod, M. C. Oz, et al.
Off-pump right atrial thrombectomy for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 615 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. E. Warkentin and A. Greinacher
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 638 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
V. Vijay and J. P. Gold
Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 521 - 537.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. C. Vasquez, A. Vichiendilokkul, S. Mahmood, and F. A. Baciewicz Jr
Anticoagulation with bivalirudin during cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2177 - 2179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
K. R. McCrae, J. B. Bussel, P. M. Mannucci, G. Remuzzi, and D. B. Cines
Platelets: An Update on Diagnosis and Management of Thrombocytopenic Disorders
Hematology, January 1, 2001; 2001(1): 282 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aouifi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lehot, J.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aouifi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lehot, J.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS