|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:678-683
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Service dAnesthésieRéanimation and E.A. 1896, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
b Laboratoire dHématologie, Hôpital Cardiovasculaire et Pneumologique L. Pradel, Lyon, France
Accepted for publication May 25, 2000.
Address reprint requests to Dr Aouifi, Service danesthésieRéanimation, Infirmerie Protestante de LYON, 13 Chemin du Penthod, 69300 Caluire et Cuire, France
e-mail: a.aouifi{at}free.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. Between January 1997 and December 1999, among 4,850 adults patients who underwent cardiac surgery in our institution, 10 patients presented with preoperative type II HIT. In 4 patients, anticoagulation during CPB was achieved with danaparoid sodium. In 6 other patients, heparin sodium was used after pretreatment with epoprostenol sodium.
Results. No significant change in platelet count occurred in any patient. No intraoperative thrombotic complication was encountered. Total postoperative chest drainage ranged from 250 to 1,100 ml in patients pretreated with epoprostenol and 1,700 to 2,470 ml in patients who received danaparoid sodium during CPB (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test).
Conclusions. During CPB, inhibition of platelet aggregation by prostacyclin may be a safe anticoagulation approach in patients with type II HIT.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During cardiac surgery, heparin is the standard anticoagulant for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). For this procedure, heparin has become essential because of its predictability effectiveness, rapid action, and reversibility with protamine. In patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB, type II HIT is a rare but potentially dangerous state. Heparin use in this circumstance can lead to thrombo-embolic events, severe bleeding, and sudden death [2]. Because of these potentially catastrophic complications, alternative strategies avoiding reexposure to heparin or inhibiting platelet aggregation induced by heparin during CPB should be available to practitioners. In this report, we describe our experience of CPB anticoagulation in 10 patients with type II HIT who underwent cardiac surgery over the last 3 years. The different alternatives to heparin in these situations are described, and recommendations for intraperative anticoagulation are provided.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
In 4 patients (14), in the absence of positive cross-reaction, danaparoid sodium (Orgaran, Riom Laboratoires-CERM, Riom, France) was used for anticoagulation during CPB. Danaparoid sodium 3U/ml was added to the priming solution of CPB. Before commencing CPB, the 4 patients received an additional intravenous bolus (125 U/kg). Anti-Xa activity was checked prior to CPB, then 10, 30, and 60 minutes after institution of CPB. Celite activated clotting time (ACT) was measured concomitantly (Hemochron, Technidyne, Edison, NJ).
In the 6 other patients (510), anticoagulation during CPB was achieved with heparin sodium (Heparin Choay, Sanofi Wintrop, Gentilly, France), but administered following pretreatment with epoprostenol sodium (Flolan, Glaxo Wellcome, Paris, France). The anticoagulation regimen was as follows: continuous infusion of epoprostenol sodium started after induction of anesthesia at a rate of 5 ng/kg/min, infusion rate increased by stages of 5 µg/kg every 5 minutes, and when the infusion rate reached 30 ng/kg/min, a bolus of 300 U/kg of heparin was intravenously administered. When required, norepinephrine (0.05 to 0.1 µg/kg/min) was infused to maintain mean arterial pressure greater than 75 mmHg. CPB was started when ACT exceeded 480 seconds. After emergence from CPB, heparin was reversed with protamine (3 mg/kg). Fifteen minutes after protamine reversal, epoprostenol sodium infusion was reduced by stages of 5 ng/kg until stopped.
Antifibrinolytics were not used intraoperatively. During the postoperative period, 2 patients (2 and 8) who underwent mechanical valve replacement and 1 patient (9) who underwent mitral valvuloplasty were administered danaparoid sodium (150 U/h) intravenously, started on the 8th and the 12th postoperative hour, respectively.
On postoperative day 1, in the absence of active hemorrhage (chest drainage less than 20 ml/h during 2 consecutive hours), oral warfarin or intravenous aspirin was started, according to surgical indications.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Total postoperative bleeding ranged from 1,700 to 2,470 ml in the 4 patients receiving danaparoid sodium, and from 250 to 1,100 ml in the 6 patients treated with epoprostenol sodium and heparin (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). All patients receiving danaparoid sodium required transfusion of blood products. From 5 to 12 units of packed red cells were required to maintain hematocrit greater than 25%, and from 2 to 5 units of fresh frozen plasma were needed for each patient to reduce postoperative bleeding. In patients receiving epoprostenol, 2 to 4 units of packed red cells were transfused in patients 5, 6, 7, and 9 (Table 1). Patients 8 and 10 did not required any transfusion.
Patient 1, who underwent redo aortic valve replacement (AVR) developed multiple organ failure and died on the 45th postoperative day. Patients 2 and 3 required chest reexploration for bleeding on the 3rd and 15th postoperative day. Patient 4, who presented with infective endocarditis and refractory septic shock, died on the 8th postoperative hour.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Incidence of type II HIT in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB is not precisely known. Previous data of the literature indicated an incidence ranging from 0.12% to 1.3% [5, 6]. This incidence was 0.2% in our institution. Whereas incidence of HIT type II in patients scheduled for CPB is low, postoperative prevalence of antibodies to H-PF4 after CPB is surprisingly high. In a prospective study measuring antibodies to H-PF4 on the 5th postoperative day in 111 patients, Bauer and associates [7] found that antibodies to H-PF4 were present in 51% of patients exposed to CPB. Nevertheless, in this study, the presence of antibodies was not necessarily associated with a platelet count decrease or a thrombo-embolic event.
Alternative therapeutic options in patients with HIT type II
In patients with HIT type II, there are several alternatives for anticoagulation during CPB: (a) use of heparin associated with a potent platelet inhibitor such as prostacyclin; (b) use of another anticoagulant such as danaparoid sodium or recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin); and (c) preoperative use of the defibrinogenating agent such as ancrod.
Prevention of heparin-induced platelet activation during CPB using prostacyclin was used during the 1980s [8]. Iloprost, an analogue of prostacyclin, was used during CPB by Addonizio and colleagues [9] in 3 patients with confirmed preoperative type II HIT. In these 3 patients, biological assays demonstrated the effectiveness of Iloprost for prevention of platelet activation by heparin during CPB. Subsequently, Iloprost was used safely during CPB, in patients with HIT, by several other authors [10, 11]. In 1990, Kappa and associates [11] reported the use of Iloprost in 9 patients scheduled for various types of cardiac surgery. In these 9 patients, anticoagulation was effective and safe without severe postoperative bleeding. Epoprostenol sodium, a prostaglandin (PGI2), vasodilator, initially used in patients with pulmonary hypertension, is also a potent platelet inhibitor [12]. In our institution, since 1991, epoprostenol sodium was successfully used in association with heparin in patients with type II HIT requiring anticoagulation for hemodialysis, or vascular or cardiac surgery. In this report, we confirmed that epoprostenol sodium seems effective and safe with acceptable postoperative blood losses. Nevertheless, epoprostenol sodium, just as Iloprost, may induce hypotension which may be deleterious in hemodynamically unstable patients. This hypotension, due to a vasodilator action, may require the use of a vasoconstrictor such as norepinephrine.
During the last decade, danaparoid sodium and r-hirudin, were developed as two alternative drugs to heparin. Danaparoid sodium is an heparinoid comprising a mixture of polysulfated glycosaminoglycans (heparan sulfate 84%, dermatan sulfate 12%, and chondroitin sulfate 4%) [13]. It is a potent inhibitor of thrombin formation. This heparinoid was initially suggested as an alternative to heparin in medical patients with HIT for prevention of thrombo-embolic events [14]. The first use of danaparoid sodium during CPB was reported by Doherty and coworkers in 1990 [15]. In 1993, in an overview of 230 patients with HIT type II treated with danaparoid sodium, Magnani and colleagues [14] reported 19 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB. In this review, the anticoagulant effect of danaparoid sodium during CPB was found to be effective, but with postoperative blood losses larger than those usually observed with heparin. Furthermore, several other case reports described the use of this anticoagulant during CPB [1519] (Table 3). Unfortunately, two major pharmacological properties limit the use of this drug during CPB: the first one is the lack of a specific antidote, the second is its prolonged anti-Xa activity (25 hours approximately) [20]. The consequence is an excessive postoperative bleeding risk and need for transfusion of blood products as reported in the data of the literature (Table 3) and in our 4 patients. Another problem with danaparoid sodium is a possible cross-reaction with heparin which occurs in 10% of cases. A preoperative in vitro screening test is mandatory. This screening test should be performed at the same time as the in vitro assay for confirmation of HIT type II.
|
|
Ancrod is a defibrinogenating agent derived from the Malayan pit viper. It was used as an anticoagulant during CPB in a limited number of patients because of the lack of an effective neutralizing agent [25]. Moreover, the patients plasma fibrinogen must be decreased to 0.5 g/L before initiating CPB, preparation often requiring more than 12 hours, thus excluding emergencies. This drug is currently considered as a less favorable alternative to anticoagulation during cardiac surgery [10].
Management of anticoagulation for CPB in patients with HIT type II
The most essential decision in a patient with HIT type II is the absolute discontinuation of heparin including in the catheter flush solutions. Heparin-coated pulmonary catheter and CPB circuits must also be avoided [26]. Platelet transfusions are not indicated because this may induce or worsen thrombosis [10].
Because of the rare occurrence of HIT type II in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB, no study comparing the different alternative anticoagulation options is available. In the literature, most data are reported as case studies, therefore comparison between the different anticoagulant protocols is impossible. Nevertheless, based on these data, the following decisional approach may be proposed (Fig 1).
|
When HIT type II is recent and the platelet aggregation assay still positive, it is preferable, when possible, to postpone the date of surgery until disappearance of H-PF4 antibodies as suggested by Warkentin and colleagues [28]. In patients requiring emergent cardiac surgery, CPB may be performed with one of the following protocols. The association of heparin with prostacyclin appears to have the better risk/benefit ratio, because of the easy protamine reversal and the limited postoperative blood losses. In patients who might poorly tolerate the hypotension associated with a prostaglandins administration, danaparoid sodium or r-hirudin may be used, but with excessive bleeding.
Conclusion
HIT type II in a patient scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB is a rare but potentially life-threatening situation, which requires special intraoperative anticoagulation management. Various types of anticoagulation approaches are available such as prevention of platelet aggregation by prostacyclin or the use of danaparoid sodium or r-hirudin. The use of a combination of prostacyclin and heparin seems to be safe and effective. Intraoperative use of danaparoid is often associated with excessive bleeding and greater blood transfusion need.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. E. Warkentin, A. Greinacher, A. Koster, and A. M. Lincoff Treatment and Prevention of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 340S - 380S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bauer, Z. Vichova, P. Ffrench, C. Hercule, O. Jegaden, O. Bastien, and J.-J. Lehot Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation with Danaparoid Sodium After Massive Pulmonary Embolism Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1101 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Durham and J. P. Gold Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 535 - 548. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hassell The Management of Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Who Require Anticoagulant Therapy Chest, February 1, 2005; 127(2_suppl): 1S - 8S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Warkentin and A. Greinacher Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Recognition, Treatment, and Prevention: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 311S - 337S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Palatianos, C. N. Foroulis, M. I. Vassili, P. Matsouka, G. M. Astras, G. H. Kantidakis, E. Iliopoulou, and E. N. Melissari Preoperative detection and management of immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing heart surgery with iloprost J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2004; 127(2): 548 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Koster and T. Fischer Management of Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia During Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2003; 7(4): 411 - 416. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Warkentin and A. Greinacher Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 2121 - 2131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Morgan, A. R. Kherani, D. W. Vigilance, F. H. Cheema, N. J. Colletti, D. I. Sahar, K.-M. Jan, D. L. Diuguid, R. Nowygrod, M. C. Oz, et al. Off-pump right atrial thrombectomy for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 615 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Warkentin and A. Greinacher Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 638 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vijay and J. P. Gold Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 521 - 537. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Vasquez, A. Vichiendilokkul, S. Mahmood, and F. A. Baciewicz Jr Anticoagulation with bivalirudin during cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2177 - 2179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. McCrae, J. B. Bussel, P. M. Mannucci, G. Remuzzi, and D. B. Cines Platelets: An Update on Diagnosis and Management of Thrombocytopenic Disorders Hematology, January 1, 2001; 2001(1): 282 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |