ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marisa De Feo
Attilio Renzulli
Gennaro Ismeno
Maurizio Cotrufo
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Feo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cotrufo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Feo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cotrufo, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mediastinum

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:324-331
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: general thoracic

Variables predicting adverse outcome in patients with deep sternal wound infection

Marisa De Feo, MDa, Attilio Renzulli, MDa, Gennaro Ismeno, MDa, Rosario Gregorio, MDa, Alessandro Della Corte, MDb, Riccardo Utili, MDa, Maurizio Cotrufo, MDa,b

a Institute of Cardiac Surgery, V. Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
b Infectious Diseases, Institute of Medical Therapy, Gesù e Maria Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy

Accepted for publication May 10, 2000.

Address reprint requests to Dr Renzulli, via Aquila 144, 80143, Naples, Italy
e-mail: arenzul{at}tin.it
e-mail: renzulliattilio{at}usa.net


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. Mortality after deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) ranges between 5% and 47%. Variables predicting hospital mortality and prolonged hospital stay are still to be assessed.

Methods. Among 13,420 patients who underwent cardiac surgery in our institution between 1979 and 1999, DSWI developed in 112 cases (0.8%). Multiple variables were recorded prospectively and analyzed retrospectively as predictors of hospital death and prolonged (>30 days) hospital stay. The analyzed variables were divided into three groups: (1) related to the patient, including demographic variables and preoperative conditions; (2) related to cardiac operation; and (3) related to infection. Predictive variables were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results. Hospital mortality was 16.9%. The hospital stay of the 93 discharged patients ranged between 16 and 180 days (mean 31.3 ± 15.2). Length of cardiac operation, length of stay in intensive care unit, interval between symptoms of DSWI and wound debridement were found to be the most significant predictors of bad outcome following DSWI.

Conclusions. In our study demographic variables and preoperative conditions did not affect the prognosis of DSWI. Lower mortality rate and shorter hospital stay could be achieved with earlier and aggressive treatment of DSWI.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI), or mediastinitis, is a serious and life-threatening complication after open heart surgery; despite appropriate antibiotic treatment and wound debridement, infection can propagate within the mediastinum and involve the cardiac suture lines leading to septic shock or catastrophic hemorrhage [1, 2].

The incidence of postcardiotomy mediastinal infections ranges between 0.15% [3] and 8% [4] and is approximately 1% to 2% in the most recently reported series [510]. Many studies [212] have identified risk factors for development of postoperative DSWI: many of the analyzed variables are patient-related; others are related to the surgical procedure or to postoperative clinical course. Unfortunately, only a few of these risk factors are modifiable [13]. Moreover, because of modern progresses in cardiac surgery, an increasing number of elderly and immunodepressed patients with multiple risk factors are treated surgically for cardiac diseases. Therefore, in spite of accurate hospital infection control, improved antibiotic therapy, and perioperative asepsis, the incidence of poststernotomy DSWI has remained constant over the years [4, 13].

The prognosis of DSWI is serious; despite early wound debridement, mediastinal irrigation with antiseptic or antibiotic solutions, plastic reconstruction with muscle or omental flaps, intravenous antibiotic therapy, mortality for DSWI is still high, ranging between 5% and 47% [5, 6, 10, 14]. Moreover, intensive care unit and hospital stay are significantly prolonged in patients who acquire postoperative DSWI [8, 10].

The outcome of sternal infections is often unpredictable: many patients, in spite of a slightly protracted hospital stay, achieve complete wound healing; on the contrary in other patients multiple procedures such as repetitive wound debridement, open wound dressing, plastic reconstruction procedures, local and systemic antibiotic therapy result unsuccessful, ending in hospital mortality or leading to very prolonged hospital stay with extreme distress for the patient and waste of financial resources [1, 15].

Although many authors have already investigated risk factors for development of DSWI, no studies have been performed in order to find out which variables can affect the course and outcome of DSWI. Moreover, the impact of demographic variables, preoperative conditions, and type of cardiac operation on DSWI patients’ survival has not been fully assessed yet. The purpose of the present study was to review our experience in the treatment of DSWI over a 20-year period and to assess the variables predicting hospital mortality and prolonged hospital stay.


    Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Between January 1979 and January 1999, 13,420 patients underwent open heart surgery through a complete median sternotomy at our institution: the perioperative protocol of infection control remained almost unchanged over the years.

Elective patients were showered and shaved the day of their operation. In all cases, since the morning of the operation, patients received intravenous cephalosporins and intramuscolar aminoglycosides, until central line and drains were removed.

The operative field was painted with povidone-iodine solution and the skin was covered with an adhesive plastic sheet. The skin was incised with a scalpel and electrocautery was used to open the presternal layers and the pericardium. Bone wax was used only when sternal bleeding was profuse. Internal mammary arteries (IMA), when used for coronary bypass, were harvested as pedicled in situ grafts. A chest tube was placed whenever the pleural cavity was opened. The sternum was closed with stainless steel wires. The presternal space was obliterated with two layers of adsorbable suture, and the skin was closed with a subcuticular adsorbable suture. Chest tubes were connected to 15 cm of water suction postoperatively. Patients were extubated when they were hemodynamically stable, normothermic, and ventilating spontaneously. All drains were removed on the second postoperative day or when drainage was lower than 25 mL/h. Wound dressing was removed on the second postoperative day and redressed only once. Further dressing was performed only if there was wound discharge.

Management of infection
All patients operated on at our institution were seen at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively in the outpatient department. Clinical status of patients breaking an appointment was assessed by phone interviews. Additional outpatient visits were prescribed when needed. Deep sternal wound infection (defined according to the guidelines of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention [16] was observed in 112 cases (0.8%). Diagnosis of DSWI required at least one of the following criteria: (1) an organism was isolated from culture of mediastinal tissue or fluid; (2) evidence of mediastinitis was seen during operation; or (3) one of the following: chest pain, sternal instability, or fever (> 38°C), was present and there was either purulent discharge from the mediastinum or an organism isolated from blood culture or culture of drainage of the mediastinal area.

As far as the demographic variables of the patients are concerned, 82 were male (73.2%) and 30 were female (26.8%) with an age ranging between 18 and 75 years (mean 58.13 ± 9.8). Nineteen patients required hospital readmission when the diagnosis of DSWI was made during their follow-up period.

As soon as the clinical diagnosis of suspected wound infection was made, swabs for culture were taken from wound secretion and sent for microbiology and patients were started on broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.

Our policy in the treatment of mediastinitis can be divided into two periods. Until January 1995 a trial of conservative treatment was made: systemic and local antibiotic therapy together with povidone-iodine dressing was performed in all cases and the indications for surgical debridement were delayed until wound dehiscence, sternal instability, and signs of systemic infection were grossly evident. In January 1995 we changed our policy: all patients with wound discharge and even minimal sternal instability underwent wound debridement and mediastinal irrigation with povidone-iodine solution on emergency basis. Patients were taken to the operating room and wound reopening was performed. All sternal wires and fascial or subcutaneous sutures were removed, samples of mediastinal fluids were taken for culture, the pericardial sac was washed with antibiotic and povidone-iodine solutions. A drain for mediastinal irrigation and two tubes for drainage, one in the pericardium and one in the anterior mediastinum, were placed. If a pleural space was open, an additional drain was positioned just above the diaphragm. Sternal and wound debridement were performed. The sternum was not approximated. Skin and subcutaneous layers were full-thickness closed with nonabsorbable interrupted stitches. Mediastinal irrigation was performed alternating every 6 hours at 100 mL/h of 5% povidone-iodine saline solution and 100 mL/h of saline solution with antibiotics according to in vitro sensitivity. Intravenous antibiotic therapy according to the results of microbiology tests was continued all during mediastinal irrigation. On the seventh postoperative day the infusion was stopped, and swabs for culture were taken from the drains. If cultures were sterile, wound healing was satisfactory, fever and leukocytosis disappeared, then the drains were removed and the patient was discharged. If wound drainage or bacterial growth from cultures were observed, mediastinal irrigation was restarted and carried on another 7 days, and then drains were removed. When the infection recurred in spite of mediastinal irrigation, several alternative treatments were performed: secondary wound debridement and mediastinal irrigation for 7 days in 15 cases, open wound dressing with granulated sugar alone in 9 cases, open wound dressing with granulated sugar and hyperbaric therapy in 8, and plastic reconstruction with pectoralis flaps in 6 cases.

Definitions
Multiple variables were recorded prospectively and analyzed retrospectively as predictors of hospital death and prolonged (> 30 days) hospital stay. Hospital death was defined as death occurring during the hospital stay or within 30 days from the last surgical procedure. Comparisons of baseline demographics and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were made between patients who died during their hospital stay and patients who were discharged. Further comparisons were performed between patients discharged before versus after postoperative day 30. Patients who died during their hospital stay were excluded from the analysis of length of hospital stay. Variables and their definitions are listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Variables Assessed in Predictive Models

 
Statistical analysis
Univariate categorical data were analyzed through contingency table methods. Continuous variables were divided into quartiles for contingency table analysis, and were also analyzed as continuous variables by univariate logistic regression. The p values were computed using {chi}2 statistics for contingency tables, and odds ratios were test based. Multivariate analysis was conducted by multiple logistic regression. The p values for logistic regression analyses were computed by maximum-likelihood methods. All analyses were performed using the SPSS software version 8.0 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL).

Limitation of the study
Although our diagnostic criteria and treatment protocols have mostly remained unchanged over the years, this study reviews a 20-year experience; therefore, modifications in diagnostic and surgical techniques can have added some bias to our results.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Nineteen patients (16.9%) died during their hospital stay. Causes of death included sepsis in 8 cases, respiratory failure in 4, multiorgan failure in 4, massive bleeding from the aortic cannulation site in 1 and from right ventricular tear in 1, and cardiac failure in 1.

Wound healing was observed in 93 cases. Hospital stay ranged between 16 and 180 days (mean 31.3 ± 15.2). Germs isolated from wound secretions or from mediastinal fluid are reported in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Bacterial Species Isolated From Wound Secretions or From Mediastinal Fluid

 
Follow-up time ranged between 6 months and 20 years (mean 167 ± 13 months). Nineteen cases of late mortality have been observed: 14 cases because of cardiac causes (cardiac failure in 6, prosthetic thrombosis in 2, myocardial infarction in 6) and 5 because of extracardiac causes (2 cases for cancer, 2 for chronic renal failure, 1 for stroke).

Univariate analysis (Table 3) showed that length of cardiac operation more than 6 hours, cardiac transplant, blood losses in the early 24 postoperative hours more than 1,000 mL, length of postoperative intubation less than 24 hours, length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) more than 96 hours, interval between onset of symptoms and wound debridement more than 20 days, positive wound cultures, positivity of cultures for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species, culture positivity for Staphylococcus aureus, persistence of fever, and leukocytosis after wound debridement were associated with a significantly higher hospital mortality for DSWI.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Variables Studied as Univariate Predictors of Death in Patients With Deep Sternal Wound Infection

 
Multivariate statistical analysis (Table 4) showed that length of stay in ICU more than 96 hours, postoperative bleeding more than 1,000 mL, positive cultures from the wound, and prolonged time between the initial symptoms and wound debridement were determinants of hospital death following mediastinal infection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Multiple Logistic Regression Model: Variables Predicting Hospital Death

 
At univariate analysis (Table 5) age over 58 years, length of cardiac operation, length of stay in ICU, length of the interval from symptoms to wound debridement, and persistence of leukocytosis were found to be determinants of prolonged hospital stay in patients with DSWI. In multivariate analysis (Table 6) long operative time and delayed wound debridement were found to be associated with significantly longer hospital stay.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Variables Studied as Univariate Predictors of Prolonged Hospital Stay in Surviving Patients

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Multiple Logistic Regression Model: Variables Predicting Prolonged Hospital Stay

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Mediastinal infection is a dreadful complication of open-heart surgery. Simple medical treatment is often ineffective; infection may cause septicemia or propagate to the cardiac sutures leading to massive hemorrhage [1, 2]. Reoperation is mandatory; nevertheless infection may continue, leading to local and systemic complications. Treatment is distressing for both the patient and the surgeon, because the rate of failure is high and the dressing may be painful and time consuming. Hospitalization time is considerably prolonged and a large amount of resources is wasted [5, 6, 8, 10].

Many studies [213] have been performed to find out the risk factors for development of postoperative mediastinitis to lessen the incidence of such complications. Many factors have been found to increase the incidence of postoperative sternal infections. Some authors [9, 17] classified risk factors as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. Although those risk factors have been well identified as causes of DSWI, unfortunately only few of these are modifiable [13]. Moreover, almost all patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the 1990s had at least two risk factors for developing postoperative DSWI.

The appropriate treatment of DSWI is still a matter of controversy: since Shumaker and Mandelbaum [18] proposed closed chest catheter irrigation, this has been the treatment of choice for DSWI, but in the recent years plastic procedures either with omental or pectoralis muscle flaps have reported to have a high rate of success and short hospital stay [17, 19, 20, 21]. Open wound dressing is no longer employed as the primary treatment of DSWI, having a high rate of morbidity and unacceptably longer hospital stay [24].

Mortality after DSWI is still high, ranging between 5% and 47% in spite of early diagnosis and appropriate treatment [5, 6, 10, 14, 17]. Although some authors [19] reported no hospital mortality in small series including patients with sterile sternal dehiscence and with DSWI undergoing either closed chest irrigation and pectoral muscle flap, mortality for DSWI is still high. The Duke’s series of patients who underwent CABG [21] reports an 8.1% mortality rate in patients with DSWI. Mortality rates in large series reported in the last decade range between 4.8% and 10.8% both in patients undergoing plastic procedures and in those treated with closed chest irrigation [20, 22, 23]; therefore neither plastic procedures nor closed chest irrigation has proved in large series to reduce the mortality rate for DSWI below 4%.

Our series reports a mortality of 16.9% over 20 years, including patients who had undergone cardiac transplant and those operated upon during deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest for type A aortic dissection. Moreover, only patients with DSWI were included in our series, and those with sterile sternal instability were not considered in this study.

Our study shows that although demographic variables or those related to associated diseases such as diabetes and renal and hepatic insufficiency are risk factors in determining DSWI, they are not significant predictors of hospital death and prolonged hospitalization. It is surprising to note that although bilateral mammary artery harvesting in CABG procedures is associated with a significantly higher incidence of postcardiotomy DSWI in diabetic patients [18], it was not found to affect the outcome of the infection in our series.

The most significant variables predicting a bad outcome after DSWI were those related to postoperative management. Appropriate postoperative management can heavily influence DSWI prognosis. In our study the time between the onset of symptoms and wound debridement has been one of the most important factors affecting DSWI prognosis. Delay in reoperation allows time for the infection to spread deeply into the chest cavity causing sepsis, involvement of cardiac sutures, and sternal osteomyelitis. Moreover persistence of fever and leukocytosis after wound debridement adversely affects DSWI prognosis. It is obvious that such conditions are signs of inappropriate wound debridement and this should lead to a policy of timely surgical reexploration and accurate wound debridement.

Postoperative bleeding has been associated with significantly higher mortality in patients with DSWI. Although reoperation for bleeding does not influence DSWI prognosis, an amount of postoperative bleeding more than 1,000 mL/24 hours has been a strong determinant for DSWI outcome. Such results support evidence that timely surgical reexploration for bleeding may improve the prognosis of patients with DSWI. On the other hand, delay in surgical hemostasis can lead to retrosternal blood collection and consequent need for blood transfusion. Such conditions provide optimal local conditions for bacterial growth together with systemic immunodepression [25], thus worsening the prognosis of the infection.

Length of postoperative intubation and stay in intensive care are predictors of bad outcome after DSWI. Although such conditions are generally associated with poor preoperative cardiac function and severely disabling cardiac disease, they also allow postoperative wound contamination from the upper airways and secondary immunodepression caused by aggressive antibiotic therapy. Therefore fast-track protocols may improve DSWI prognosis.

In conclusion, risk factors for the development of complications of postoperative mediastinitis are mostly not modifiable. Furthermore, widening of indications for cardiac surgery will increase the number of patients with multiple risk factors. Nevertheless, our study shows that the prognosis of DSWI can be influenced by adequacy and quickness of treatment. Demographic variables and associated diseases do not affect DSWI prognosis, whereas prompt surgical reexploration for bleeding and early and proper wound debridement may significantly reduce mortality and morbidity after DSWI.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Loop F.D., Lytle B.W., Cosgrove D.M., et al. Sternal wound complications after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: early and late mortality, morbidity, and cost of care. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:179-187.[Abstract]
  2. Milano C.A., Kesler K., Archibald N., Sexton D., Jones R.H. Mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: risk factors and long-term survival. Circulation 1995;92:2245-2251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Blanchard A., Hurni M., Ruchat P., Stumpe F., Fischer A., Sadeghi H. Incidence of deep and superficial sternal infection after open heart surgery: a ten year retrospective study 1981 to 1991. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:153-157.[Abstract]
  4. Culliford A.T., Cunningham J.N., Zeff R.H., et al. Sternal and costochondral infections following open-heart surgery: a review of 2,594 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976;72:714-726.[Abstract]
  5. Ottino G., De Paulis R., Pansini S., et al. Major sternal wound infection after open-heart surgery: a multivariate analysis of risk factors in 2,579 consecutive operative procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:173-179.[Abstract]
  6. Grossi E.A., Esposito R., Harris L.J., et al. Sternal wound infections and use of internal mammary artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:342-347.[Abstract]
  7. Demmy T.L., Park S.B., Liebler G.A., et al. Recent experience with major sternal wound complications. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:458-462.[Abstract]
  8. Borger M.A., Rao V., Weisel R.D., et al. Deep sternal wound infection: risk factors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1050-1056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Parisian Mediastinitis Study Group. Risk factors for deep sternal wound infection after sternotomy: a prospective, multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:1200-1207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bitkover C.Y., Grlund B. Mediastinitis after cardiovascular operations: a case-control study for risk factors. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:36-40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kouchoukos N.T., Wareing T.H., Murphy S.F., Pelate C., Marshall W.G., Jr Risks of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:210-219.[Abstract]
  12. Cohen A., Katz M., Katz R., Hauptman E., Schachner A. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:574-581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Baskett R.J.F., MacDougall C.E., Ross D.B. Is mediastinitis a preventable complication? A 10-year review. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:462-465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Newman L.S., Szczukowski L.C., Bain R.P., Perlino C.A. Suppurative mediastinitis after open heart surgery. A case control study of risk factors. Chest 1988;94:546-553.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Nelson R.M., Dries D.J. The economic implications of infection in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;42:240-246.[Abstract]
  16. Garner J.S., Jarvis W.R., Emori T.G., Horan T.C., Hughes J.M. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128-140.[Medline]
  17. Krabatsch T., Hetzer R. Poststernotomy mediastinitis treated by transposition of the greater omentum. J Card Surg 1995;10:637-643.[Medline]
  18. Shumaker H.B., Jr, Mandelbaum I. Continous antibiotic irrigation in the treatment of infection. Arch Surg 1963;86:384-387.
  19. El Gamel A., Yonan N.A., Hassan R., et al. Treatment of mediastinitis: early modified Robicsek closure and pectoralis major advancement flaps. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:41-47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rand G., Cochran R.P., Aziz S., et al. Prospective trial of catheter irrigation and muscle flaps for sternal wound infection. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1046-1049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Milano C.A., Georgiade G., Muhlbaier L.H., Smith P.K., Wolfe W.G. Comparison of omental and pectoralis flaps for poststernotomy mediastinitis. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:377-381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Grossi E.A., Culliford A.T., Krieger K.H., et al. A survey of 77 major infectious complications of median sternotomy: a review of 7,949 consecutive operative procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;40:214-223.[Abstract]
  23. Nahai F., Rand R.P., Hester T.R., Bostwick J., Jurkiewicz M.J. Primary treatment of the infected sternotomy wound with muscle flaps: a review of 211 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:434-441.[Medline]
  24. Gottlieb LJ, Beahm EK, Krizek TJ, et al. Approaches to sternal wound infections. In: Advances in cardiac surgery. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1996:147–58.
  25. Blumberg N., Heal J.M. Transfusion and recipient immune function. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989;113:246-253.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Sachithanandan, P. Nanjaiah, P. Nightingale, I. C. Wilson, T. R. Graham, S. J. Rooney, B. E. Keogh, and D. Pagano
Deep sternal wound infection requiring revision surgery: impact on mid-term survival following cardiac surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 673 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. B. Rahmanian, D. H. Adams, J. G. Castillo, J. Chikwe, and F. Filsoufi
Tracheostomy is Not a Risk Factor for Deep Sternal Wound Infection After Cardiac Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 1984 - 1991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
K. Athanassiadi, N. Theakos, G. Benakis, S. Kakaris, and I. Skottis
Omental Transposition: the Final Solution for Major Sternal Wound Infection
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2007; 15(3): 200 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Mills and P. Bryson
The role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of sternal wound infection.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 153 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
T. Fleck, R. Moidl, P. Giovanoli, O. Aszmann, A. Bartunek, A. Blacky, M. Grabenwoger, and E. Wolner
A conclusion from the first 125 patients treated with the vacuum assisted closure system for postoperative sternal wound infection
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2006; 5(2): 145 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
L. F. L. Almodovar, A. C. Canas, P. P. Lima Canadas, and M. C. Hernandez
Vacuum-assisted therapy with a handcrafted system for the treatment of wound infection after median sternotomy
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2005; 4(5): 412 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Sjogren, R. Gustafsson, J. Nilsson, M. Malmsjo, and R. Ingemansson
Clinical Outcome After Poststernotomy Mediastinitis: Vacuum-Assisted Closure Versus Conventional Treatment
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 2049 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. De Feo
INVITED COMMENTARY
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1730 - 1731.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J.-L. Trouillet, A. Vuagnat, A. Combes, V. Bors, J. Chastre, I. Gandjbakhch, and C. Gibert
Acute poststernotomy mediastinitis managed with debridement and closed-drainage aspiration: Factors associated with death in the intensive care unit
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2005; 129(3): 518 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
U. Fuchs, A. Zittermann, B. Stuettgen, A. Groening, K. Minami, and R. Koerfer
Clinical Outcome of Patients With Deep Sternal Wound Infection Managed by Vacuum-Assisted Closure Compared to Conventional Therapy With Open Packing: A Retrospective Analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 526 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
I. K. Toumpoulis, C. E. Anagnostopoulos, J. J. DeRose Jr, and D. G. Swistel
The Impact of Deep Sternal Wound Infection on Long-term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Chest, February 1, 2005; 127(2): 464 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
J. Sjogren, R. Gustafsson, A. Wackenfors, M. Malmsjo, L. Algotsson, and R. Ingemansson
Effects of vacuum-assisted closure on central hemodynamics in a sternotomy wound model
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2004; 3(4): 666 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
R. Wynne and M. Botti
Postoperative Pulmonary Dysfunction in Adults After Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Clinical Significance and Implications for Practice
Am. J. Crit. Care., September 1, 2004; 13(5): 384 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. S. Abboud, S. B. Wey, and V. T. Baltar
Risk factors for mediastinitis after cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 676 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
T. Walther and M. Elliott
Endogenously acquired deep sternal wound infection after congenital cardiac surgery
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2003; 2(2): 131 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. De Feo, L. S. De Santo, G. Romano, A. Renzulli, A. Della Corte, R. Utili, and M. Cotrufo
Treatment of recurrent staphylococcal mediastinitis: still a controversial issue
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 538 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. M. Fleck, M. Fleck, R. Moidl, M. Czerny, R. Koller, P. Giovanoli, M. J. Hiesmayer, D. Zimpfer, E. Wolner, and M. Grabenwoger
The vacuum-assisted closure system for the treatment of deep sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 74(5): 1596 - 1600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
L. Ridderstolpe, H. Gill, H. Granfeldt, H. Ahlfeldt, and H. Rutberg
Superficial and deep sternal wound complications: incidence, risk factors and mortality
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 20(6): 1168 - 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Combes, J.-L. Trouillet, J. Baudot, M. Mokhtari, J. Chastre, and C. Gibert
Is it possible to cure mediastinitis in patients with major postcardiac surgery complications?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): 1592 - 1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marisa De Feo
Attilio Renzulli
Gennaro Ismeno
Maurizio Cotrufo
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Feo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cotrufo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Feo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cotrufo, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mediastinum


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS