ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, I.
Right arrow Articles by Seita, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, I.
Right arrow Articles by Seita, J.

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:2034-2039
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Carotid and aortic screening for coronary artery bypass grafting

Ikuo Fukuda, MD, PhDa, Seigo Gomi, MDa, Ko Watanabe, MDa, Jun Seita, MDa

a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan

Accepted for publication May 24, 2000.

Address reprint requests to Dr Fukuda, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan
e-mail: fukuda{at}tmch.or.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. To identify risk factors for preexisting carotid and aortic disease in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), preoperative parameters were analyzed.

Methods. Three-hundred eight consecutive patients undergoing elective isolated CABG were investigated through preoperative duplex scanning of the carotid artery, computed tomography of the chest, and intraoperative ultrasonography of the ascending aorta.

Results. Prevalence of carotid stenosis and ascending aortic atherosclerosis was 14.3% (44 of 308) and 30.2% (93 of 308), respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that significant independent risk factors for carotid stenosis were atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta (p = 0.028, odds ratio [OR] = 2.16), peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.008, OR = 4.08), and history of stroke (p = 0.0004, OR = 3.73). Significant independent risk factors for ascending aortic atherosclerosis were peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.029, OR = 3.05), age older than 60 years (p = 0.009, OR = 2.94), and carotid stenosis (p = 0.018, OR = 2.27). Modifications on the operative procedure for aortic atherosclerosis were carried out in 49 patients. Overall hospital mortality and morbidity for stroke were 0.97% and 0.65%, respectively.

Conclusions. Prevalence of carotid and aortic disease was not low among candidates for CABG. Carotid and aortic screening may help to modify the operative strategy to reduce morbidity of stroke.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most common operations in the field of cardiovascular surgery today. Despite the increasing number of high-risk patients among CABG candidates, a decrease in mortality in CABG has been observed in recent years, with the exception of patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, morbidity of stroke after CABG remains relatively high due to advanced age and diffuse atherosclerotic disease in candidates for CABG. The incidence of cerebral infarction after CABG is 0.9% to 6.7% as described in recent reports [14]. Advanced age [1, 4, 5], peripheral vascular disease [5, 6], prior history of cerebral ischemia [1, 4, 5], and atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta [7] have been identified as risk factors for cerebral infarction after CABG. Because the mechanism responsible for stroke may be different for each risk factor, preoperative surgical strategy accounting for individual mechanisms and risk factors appears to be very important. Therefore, predicting risk factors for stroke based on the preoperative parameters before CABG is necessary for cardiovascular surgeons. The aim of this study was to identify high-risk patients for carotid and aortic atherosclerosis based upon preoperative screenings.


    Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Prospective investigation and data collection were performed on 308 consecutive patients undergoing elective isolated CABG between January 1990 and July 1998 at Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital. All patients who underwent scheduled CABG during this time frame were involved regardless of age and symptoms of brain ischemia. One hundred and forty-eight patients requiring urgent CABG during the same period were excluded from this study. Prior to surgery, carotid screening for stenosis of the internal carotid artery and aortic screening for calcification of the ascending aorta was performed on all patients. Intraoperative direct ultrasonographic evaluation of the ascending aorta was also completed as intraoperative screening of ascending aortic atherosclerosis.

Carotid screening
B-mode and duplex ultrasonography of the bilateral carotid arteries were performed for carotid screening by the same radiologist before CABG. Criteria in establishing moderate or severe carotid stenosis on the duplex scanning were as follows [3]: (1) increased peak flow velocity of the internal carotid artery greater than 120 cm/sec; (2) decreased peak flow velocity slower than 25 cm/sec; (3) no detection of blood flow signal in the internal carotid artery, which was filled with echogenic material. In the 69 patients who were suspected of having moderate or severe carotid stenosis on the duplex scanning based upon these criteria, cerebral angiography was performed before CABG to evaluate the significance of internal carotid artery stenosis and intracranial vascular lesions. Among these patients, 44 patients who were diagnosed as having stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) greater than 50% (group A) were compared with 264 patients who had no or mild ICA stenosis (group B). There were no complications relevant to cerebral angiography.

During the same time period, only 1 patient among those who were referred for CABG was rejected for CABG because of an evolving cerebral infarction due to multiple intracranial arterial stenosis and bilateral internal carotid stenosis.

Aortic screening
Plain computed tomography (CT) of the chest was performed before surgery to identify the degree of ascending aortic calcification. The ascending aorta was scanned a slice every 1.5 cm and evaluated by a radiologist. Findings of aortic calcification were classified by the following criteria: grade 0, no calcification on the entire ascending aorta (212 patients); grade 1, scattered calcification smaller than one fourth of ascending aortic circumference (57 patients); grade 2, plate-like calcification larger than one fourth of the ascending aortic circumference and identified on consecutive slices (29 patients); grade 3, so-called "porcelain aorta" of which the calcification involved the whole circumference and whole length of the ascending aorta (10 patients).

Intraoperative direct ultrasonography of the ascending aorta was also performed to evaluate the severity of ascending aortic atherosclerosis before institution of extracorporeal circulation. The atherosclerotic aorta was finally diagnosed based upon intraoperative palpation of the ascending aorta and ultrasonography. The ascending aortic disease was classified by the most prominent feature of the lesion as follows: palpable echogenic plaque of the ascending aorta greater than one fourth of its circumference (n = 49), intimal irregularity reflecting atheromatous ulcer of the ascending aorta (n = 13), or aortic wall thickening greater than 3.0 mm (n = 31). Ninety-three patients who had aortic calcification of grade 2 or 3, or those who had an atherosclerotic aorta, including 9 patients for grade 0 and 45 patients for grade 1 were classified as group C in order to compare with 215 patients whose ascending aortic atherosclerosis was minimal or mild (group D).

Definitions of preoperative variables
Demographic and medical history variables considered to be relevant to the internal carotid artery stenosis (ICA stenosis) and the ascending aortic atherosclerosis (AA atherosclerosis) were collected (Table 1). Hypercholesterolemia was defined as blood cholesterol levels greater than 250 mg/dL at the time of surgical consultation. Obesity was defined as body mass index greater than 33. Significance of coronary lesion was expressed whether or not they had three-vessel disease or left main trunk lesion, or both. The number of anastomoses was also evaluated. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was defined as occlusion or stenosis of iliac or femoral arteries diagnosed upon physical findings, angiography, and history of previous peripheral vascular surgery. Angiography of iliac arteries was performed by a cardiologist during coronary angiography when peripheral vascular disease was suspected to coexist.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic Data of Patients

 
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were completed using the SPSS statistical package for Macintosh version 6.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Two separate multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors for carotid stenosis or ascending aortic atherosclerosis. A univariate analysis was done that analyzed the possible relationships among AA atherosclerosis, ICA stenosis, and the variables collected. Contingency table analyses for categorical data and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables were used. Any variable that achieved a p value of 0.1 or less in the univariate analysis was entered for analysis by multivariate logistic regression with stepwise addition of variables.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Risk factors for carotid and aortic disease
Demographic data for the analysis of the ICA stenosis are presented in Table 2. Through univariate analysis, significant risk factors for ICA stenosis greater than 50% in CABG candidates were AA atherosclerosis (22 of 44 in group A versus 71 of 264 in group B, p = 0.002), PVD (8 of 44 versus 11 of 264, p = 0.0035), history of stroke (17 of 44 versus 35 of 264, p = 0.00003), and diabetes (25 of 44 versus 102 of 264, p = 0.023). In the multivariate analysis, significant independent risk factors for ICA stenosis were AA atherosclerosis (p = 0.028, odds ratio = [OR] 2.16), PVD (p = 0.008, OR = 4.08) and history of stroke (p = 0.0004, OR = 3.73). In the multivariate logistic regression model, a probability of prevalence of ICA stenosis in patients who had these three factors was 0.72. This value was about 10 times greater than that for patients without the above factors (Fig 1). Prevalence of carotid occlusion in each age group of every ten years is shown in Table 3. The prevalence of significant ICA stenosis among patients in their 40s was 18.2%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Risk Factors for Carotid Stenosis Greater Than 50%

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Logistic regression model for probability of carotid stenosis greater than 50% for each risk factor. AA lesion = atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta; PVD = peripheral vascular disease.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Prevalence of Carotid Stenosis Among Age Groups

 
Demographic data for the analysis of AA atherosclerosis are presented in Table 4. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for AA atherosclerosis were age older than 60 years (78 of 93 versus 78 of 215, p = 0.0005), PVD (11 of 93 versus 8 of 215, p = 0.0066), ICA stenosis (22 of 93 versus 22 of 215, p = 0.002), history of stroke (22 of 93 versus 30 of 215, p = 0.036) and abdominal aneurysm (4 of 93 versus 1 of 215, p = 0.015). Significant independent risk factors for AA atherosclerosis were PVD (p = 0.029, OR = 3.05), age older than sixty years (p = 0.009, OR = 2.94) and ICA stenosis (p = 0.018, OR = 2.27).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Risk Factors for Ascending Aortic Atherosclerosis

 
Carotid screening and surgical modifications
Among 44 patients in group A, 7 patients had symptoms of recent brain ischemia including stroke or transient ischemic attack within the previous 6 months. On the other hand, 5 patients in group B had symptoms of recent brain ischemia. In group A, preoperative cerebral angiography demonstrated that 22 patients had carotid stenosis greater than 80%, and 22 patients had carotid stenosis of 50% to 79%. Five of 9 patients who had bilateral carotid stenosis and 2 of 13 patients who had unilateral carotid stenosis greater than 80% had symptoms of recent brain ischemia. Among 22 patients who had carotid stenosis greater than 80%, 5 patients had complete occlusion of a unilateral internal carotid artery and 2 patients had asymptomatic carotid stenosis of 80% to 89%. On the other hand, 15 patients had hemodynamically significant or symptomatic ICA stenosis, which implicated symptomatic ICA stenosis greater than 80% (n = 1), ICA stenosis greater than 90% with or without symptoms of brain ischemia (n = 5), and bilateral ICA stenosis greater than 80% (n = 9). In addition, preoperative cerebral angiography in these 15 patients revealed isolated ICA stenosis or occlusion in 10 patients and combined ICA and intracranial arterial stenosis in 5 patients. In the former subgroup, concomitant carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and CABG with the aid of extracorporeal circulation was performed in 7, precedent CEA followed by CABG in 1, and isolated CABG followed by CEA in 2 patients. These patients recovered without any signs of perioperative stroke. Among 5 patients with critical ICA stenosis and intracranial arterial stenosis, 1 patient who underwent concomitant CEA and CABG developed a stroke after surgery. Two patients who underwent isolated CABG with the aid of extracorporeal circulation maintaining a perfusion pressure higher than 80 mm Hg and 2 patients who underwent off-pump double CABG recovered without any neurologic sequelae.

Aortic screening and surgical modification
The relationship between plain chest CT and intraoperative ultrasonography is shown in Table 5. Among 212 patients who were diagnosed as having grade 0 calcification, 203 patients (95.8%) had normal ultrasonic findings of the ascending aorta. On the other hand, among 57 patients who were diagnosed as having grade 1 calcification, 12 patients (21.0%) had normal ultrasonic findings. All patients who had grade 2 or 3 calcification of the ascending aorta exhibited abnormal ultrasonic findings of the ascending aorta.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Comparison Between Plain Chest Computed Tomography and Intraoperative Ultrasonography

 
In group C, among 93 patients, 44 patients had routine cannulation, 29 had a change in arterial cannulation site, 15 underwent the no-touch technique, and 5 had off-pump surgery. Safe arterial access and clamping sites were definitively confirmed by intraoperative direct ultrasonography of the ascending aorta. The alternative arterial access site was the mid portion of the ascending aorta in 21, the femoral artery in 5, and the axillary artery in 3 patients. In the aortic no-touch group, arterial access was selected in either the axillary artery (n = 7), the femoral artery (n = 7), or aortic arch (n = 1). Intraoperative ultrasonography was the ultimate factor for making the final decision in regard to surgical strategy.

Mortality and morbidity
There were 3 hospital deaths (hospital mortality of 0.97%). Causes of death were arrhythmia in 1 (day 4), rupture of abdominal aneurysm in 1 (day 35), and pneumonia in 1 (day 77). There were 2 perioperative strokes (morbidity of 0.65%). One patient in group A who underwent concomitant CABG and CEA suffered a stroke owing to intraoperative low brain perfusion. This patient had a tandem lesion in the cervical and intracranial portion of the left internal carotid artery. Although a temporary shunt was employed during CEA, ischemia-reperfusion injury of the brain might have been induced by pressure drop during surgery. Because scant blood supply from the contralateral carotid artery to the distal region of the affected artery was demonstrated in preoperative cerebral angiography, a two-stage strategy should have been adopted in this patient. The other patient in group B had a small lacunar infarction in the basal ganglia on day 2. Since the cerebral angiography performed after the onset of stroke revealed an intact internal carotid artery and multiple intracranial arterial stenoses, a drop in blood pressure during the postoperative period seemed to have been responsible. The former patient was seriously disabled, but the latter patient recovered with partial disability.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Because atherosclerosis is a systemic disorder, patients with ischemic heart disease frequently have atherosclerosis of other organs. Coronary artery bypass grafting has become a popular surgical procedure for patients with severe coronary artery disease. Although it generally has positive results, CABG is sometimes associated with adverse neurologic outcomes including neuropsychic damage, transient ischemia, and stroke. Because perioperative stroke is as much disabling as lethal, it will reduce the benefits of surgical intervention and require long-term hospitalization with increased medical cost. However, the incidence of stroke after CABG has recently increased owing to extended surgical indications for high-risk or aged patients. Several parameters were detected as risk factors of stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. Gardner and associates [8] reported that age, previous cerebrovascular disease, pump time, severe perioperative hypotension, and atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta were univariate predictors of stroke following CABG. Lynn and coworkers [9] suggested that diabetes, mural thrombi, and aortic calcification were predictors of postoperative permanent neurological deficits by multivariate analysis.

The different conclusions drawn from these reports suggest that several mechanisms of stroke may be present in high-risk populations. In other words, the cause of stroke after CABG is multifactorial. Among these mechanisms, atheroembolism from the ascending aorta and cerebral hypoperfusion due to carotid occlusive disease seem to be major causes of postoperative stroke [1, 2, 7, 10]. Other mechanisms inducing stroke after CABG, such as detachment of ventricular mural thrombus, air embolism, and perioperative arrhythmia, can be prevented through careful intraoperative and postoperative management. However, prevention of atheroembolism and brain hypoperfusion during surgery depends upon preoperative and intraoperative surgical evaluation. Therefore, preoperative and intraoperative screening is important. On the other hand, because medical costs have increased markedly, it is necessary to be aware of excessive and unnecessary screening tests that increase medical cost and are time consuming.

In this study, we investigated the prevalence and risk factors of carotid and aortic atherosclerosis in order to determine what type of screening would be most efficient. Berens and colleagues [11] screened the carotid arteries of 1087 patients undergoing heart surgery by duplex scanning. In their report, ICA stenosis greater than 50% and 80% was found in 17.0% and 5.9% of patients, respectively. In our study with duplex scanning and carotid angiography, the prevalence of carotid disease greater than 50% and 80% in CABG candidates in a Japanese population were 14.3% and 7.1%, respectively. Since we established the significance of carotid stenosis by cerebral angiography, evaluation of the degree of carotid stenosis was definite. Our results suggested that the prevalence of carotid artery disease in patients scheduled for CABG was almost identical when comparing Western and Oriental populations.

The role of carotid stenosis in disturbed cerebral circulation has been controversial. Schwartz and associates [13] reported that in patients with significant, complete or bilateral carotid artery occlusion, morbidity by perioperative stroke was clearly elevated. Brener and associates [14] reported a 9.2% stroke incidence of transient ischemic attack and cerebrovascular accident in patients having coronary artery bypass grafting with 50% or greater carotid stenosis and a 20% stroke rate in patients with significant carotid stenosis contralateral to internal carotid occlusion. Based on these data, the authors insisted that preoperative carotid screening had a clinical impact on the prevention of postoperative stroke in CABG.

This study identified the risk factors for carotid stenosis in CABG candidates as AA atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis of the lower extremities, and history of stroke. In previously published data, advanced age was one of the risk factors for perioperative stroke [12, 15]. Faggiloli and coworkers [1] recommended preoperative carotid screening in patients older than 60 years of age because the prevalence of carotid artery disease was high in this group of patients. However, Salasidis and associates [6] reported that advanced age was not a risk factor for carotid disease. Our results exhibited that the prevalence of significant carotid artery disease was not low even in younger patients in their 40s. In addition, advanced age was not a risk factor for carotid artery disease in our study. Therefore, we recommend carotid screening before CABG in all candidates regardless of age.

Atheroembolism from the diseased ascending aorta has been recognized as a major problem, other than cerebral hypoperfusion, in CABG especially in elderly patients [10, 15]. Lynn and coworkers [9] reported that one of the significant risk factors for stroke was aortic calcification detected by intraoperative examination. As for the evaluation of the atherosclerotic ascending aorta, many authors described efficacy of aortic screening by plain CT of the chest or intraoperative ultrasonography [1620]. The CT is sensitive in detecting fine calcification of the ascending aorta. Information regarding the significance of aortic calcification is beneficial in planning surgery as to the choice of graft material, arterial access, and myocardial protection [16]. Preoperative diagnosis of extensive aortic calcification, the so-called porcelain aorta, is also especially important when planning surgery. On the other hand, intraoperative ultrasonic imaging is sensitive in detecting fragile, atheromatous thickening of the aorta [18, 17]. In this study we obtained intraoperative information regarding "risky" atheroma of the ascending aorta, and these findings assisted surgeons in determining a safe site for aortic cannulation and clamping.

In our investigation, advanced age was noted as a risk factor for AA atherosclerosis. Extensive calcification or significant atheromatous degeneration was rarely seen in patients under 60 years of age. Because we aggressively use arterial conduits in patients younger than 70 years of age, inflow of graft conduit may be assigned to in-situ arterial grafts when atherosclerotic change of the ascending aorta is significant. In elderly patients, we usually decide the choice of graft material and arterial access before surgery. If combined carotid and aortic disease is suggested to exist before surgery, we have adopted off-pump surgery recently. Although Wareing and colleagues [17] recommended aggressive surgical treatment of diseased ascending aorta based on intraoperative ultrasonic imaging, our strategy for diseased aorta was principally a "no-touch" method, employing induced ventricular fibrillation with or without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest or off-pump CABG [21]. We did not apply replacement of diseased ascending aorta with tube graft because extensive replacement of the aorta seemed to be necessary.

As for arterial access in patients with diseased aorta, the femoral artery was the primary choice because of easy access. Because retrograde perfusion from the femoral artery may dislodge atheromatous debris from the iliofemoral region, preoperative evaluation of peripheral vascular disease is important. When retrograde perfusion seemed to be risky, we chose the axillary artery as an alternative arterial access [22]. Because of its small size, we anastomosed artificial graft to the axillary artery when it was of small size. However, recent improvements in arterial cannulas have made it easier to access this artery. Recently, we have employed a 17F or 19F Biomedicus cannula (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) when patients were of small stature, because it had a thin wall and low resistance.

In our study, carotid stenosis and AA atherosclerosis sometimes coexisted in CABG candidates. This reflects the fact that both are based upon systemic arteriosclerosis. In such conditions, it is important to maintain adequate perfusion pressure during the perioperative period in order to prevent hypoperfusion of the brain. Current progress in the technique and device made it easy for us to apply off-pump CABG in patients with diffuse atherosclerosis. The off-pump technique could avert both embolism from the ascending aorta and cerebral hypoperfusion due to hypotension. Although information by plain chest CT is limited, we believe preoperative evaluation of the ascending aorta is of great help in making operative strategies in elderly patients.

In conclusion, preoperative carotid screening was efficient in CABG candidates. We recommend its use for all CABG candidates regardless of age. Preoperative aortic screening with CT provided us useful information related to the planning of surgery in elderly patients. However, intraoperative ultrasonographic evaluation is an essential tool in deciding arterial access, the method of cardiac protection, and the arterial clamping site.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Faggioli G.L., Curl G.R., Ricotta J.J. The role of carotid screening before coronary artery bypass. J Vasc Surg 1990;12:724-731.[Medline]
  2. Reed G.L., III, Singer D.E., Picard E.H., DeSanctis R.W. Stroke following coronary artery bypass surgery. A case-control estimate of the risk from carotid bruits. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1246-1250.[Abstract]
  3. Bluth E.I., Wetzner S.M., Stavros A.T., Aufrichtig D., Marich K.W., Baker J.D. Carotid duplex sonography. A multicenter recommendation for standardized imaging and Doppler criteria. Radiographics 1988;8:487-506.[Abstract]
  4. Jones E.L., Craver J.M., Michalik R.A., et al. Combined carotid and coronary operations. When are they necessary?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;87:7-16.[Abstract]
  5. Rao V., Christakis G.T., Weisel R.D., et al. Risk factors for stroke following coronary bypass surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 1995;10:468-474.
  6. Salasidis G.C., Latter D.A., Steinmetz O.K., Blair J., Graham A.M. Carotid artery duplex scanning in preoperative assessment for coronary revascularization: the association between peripheral vascular disease, carotid artery stenosis, and stroke. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:154-162.[Medline]
  7. Bar-El Y., Goor D.A. Clamping of the atherosclerotic aorta during coronary artery bypass operations. Its cost in strokes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:469-474.[Abstract]
  8. Gardner T.J., Horneffer P.J., Manilio T.A., et al. Stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting: a ten-year study. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;40:574-581.[Abstract]
  9. Lynn G., Stefanko K., Reed J.F., et al. Risk factors for stroke after coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:1518-1523.[Abstract]
  10. Blauth C.I., Cosgrove D.M., Webb B.W., et al. Atheroembolism from the ascending aorta. An emerging problem in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;103:1104-1112.[Abstract]
  11. Berens E.S., Kouchoukos N.T., Murphy S.F., Wareing T.H. Preoperative carotid artery screening in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:313-323.[Medline]
  12. Mickleborogh L.L., Walker P.M., Takagi Y., Ohashi M., Imanor J., Tamariz M. Risk factors for stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1250-1259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Schwartz L.B., Bridgman A.H., Kieffer R.W., et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and stroke in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:146-153.[Medline]
  14. Brener B.J., Brief D.K., Alpert J., Goldenkranz R.J., Parsonnet V. The risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis undergoing cardiac surgery: a follow-up study. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:269-279.[Medline]
  15. Gold J.P., Charlson M.E., Williams-Russo P., et al. Improvement of outcomes after coronary bypass: a randomized trial comparing intraoperative high versus low mean arterial pressure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1302-1314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Saito T., Terada Y., Suma H., et al. The calcified ascending aorta. Preoperative evaluation and intraoperative management. Nippon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1992;40:1189-1194.[Medline]
  17. Wareing T.H., Davila-Roman V.G., Daily B.B., et al. Strategy for the reduction of stroke incidence on cardiac surgical patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:1400-1408.[Abstract]
  18. Ohteki H., Ito T., Natsuaki M., Minato N., Suda H. Intraoperative ultrasonic imaging of the ascending aorta in ischemic heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:539-542.[Abstract]
  19. Marshall W.G., Jr, Barzilai B., Kouchoukos N.T., Saffitz J. Intraoperative ultrasonic imaging of the ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:339-344.[Abstract]
  20. Ura M., Sakata R., Nakayama Y., Miyamoto T., Goto T. Extracorporeal circulation before and after ultrasonographic evaluation of the ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:478-483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Suma H. Coronary artery bypass grafting with calcified ascending aorta: aortic no-touch technique. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:728-730.[Abstract]
  22. Sabik J.F., Lytle B.W., McCarthy P.M., Cosgrove D.M. Axillary artery: an alternative site of arterial cannulation for patients with extensive aortic and peripheral vascular disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:885-891.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
T. J Kiernan, V. Taqueti, G. Crevensten, B. P Yan, D. P Slovut, and M. R Jaff
Correlates of carotid stenosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting - a case control study
Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2009; 14(3): 233 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. H. Criqui, M. J. Alberts, F. G. R. Fowkes, A. T. Hirsch, P. T. O'Gara, J. W. Olin, and for Writing Group 2
Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium II: Screening for Atherosclerotic Vascular Diseases:: Should Nationwide Programs Be Instituted?
Circulation, December 16, 2008; 118(25): 2830 - 2836.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. H. Kolh, L. Comte, V. Tchana-Sato, C. Honore, A. Kerzmann, M. Mauer, and R. Limet
Concurrent coronary and carotid artery surgery: factors influencing perioperative outcome and long-term results
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 49 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Fenchel, A. M. Scheule, N. I. Stauder, U. Kramer, K. Tomaschko, T. Nagele, C. Bretschneider, H.-P. Schlemmer, C. D. Claussen, and S. Miller
Atherosclerotic Disease: Whole-Body Cardiovascular Imaging with MR System with 32 Receiver Channels and Total-Body Surface Coil Technology--Initial Clinical Results
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 280 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
V. Aboyans, P. Lacroix, J. Guilloux, F. Rolle, A. Le Guyader, M. Cautres, E. Cornu, and M. Laskar
A predictive model for screening cerebrovascular disease in patient undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2005; 4(2): 90 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. J. Durand, B. A. Perler, G. S. Roseborough, M. A. Grega, L. M. Borowicz Jr, W. A. Baumgartner, and D. D. Yuh
Mandatory versus selective preoperative carotid screening: a retrospective analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 159 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Rigatelli, P. J. Nederkoorn, W. P.T.M. Mali, L. J. Kappelle, and Y. van der Graaf
Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease in Patients Scheduled for Cardiac or Vascular Surgery: Is This a Place for Invasive Selective Carotid Angiography? * Response: Combined Testing of Cardiac and Carotid Artery Stenosis?
Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): e89 - e90.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, I.
Right arrow Articles by Seita, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, I.
Right arrow Articles by Seita, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS