|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1620-1623
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Surgery, Osaka Prefectural Habikino Hospital, Osaka, Japan
Address reprint requests to Dr Inoue, Department of Surgery, Osaka Prefectural Habikino Hospital Habikino 3-7-1, Habikino-city, Osaka 583-8588, Japan
e-mail: masayoshinoue{at}aol.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. To determine the N component of the TNM staging system, computed tomographic findings and the results of mediastinoscopy were compared with the pathologic examination of surgical specimens.
Results. Four cases among 37 patients (10.8%) were determined as inoperable by mediastinoscopy because of mediastinal lymph node metastasis. A thoracotomy was performed in 33 patients. Six patients (18.2%) who had been judged to have no metastasis by mediastinoscopy were found to have N2 disease after examination of the surgical specimens. In the identification of all mediastinal metastases, mediastinoscopy was 40.0% sensitive, 100% specific, and 83.8% accurate. When the superior mediastinal, paratracheal, pretracheal, tracheobronchial, and subcarinal lymph nodes were defined as approachable nodes, mediastinoscopy was 66.7% sensitive, 100% specific, and 94.6% accurate in the evaluation of these restricted nodes. Four cases among 8 patients with cN1 lesions resulted in a designation as pN2.
Conclusions. Mediastinoscopy is useful for the diagnosis of an approachable mediastinal lymph node in small cell lung cancer cases. This exploration is necessary for patients with small cell lung cancer who are diagnosed as cN1 before thoracotomy.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As to the number of lymph nodes, we sample all of the superior mediastinal, paratracheal, pretracheal, tracheobronchial, and subcarinal nodes in principle. If there is no distinct lymph node in these stations, we sample the connective or fatty tissue. The number of biopsies was 4.3 stations on average in this study.
Four cases among 37 patients (10.8%) were determined as inoperable by mediastinoscopy because of mediastinal lymph node metastasis (N2 to N3; Table 1). There was 1 from the 26 patients designated as cN0, 1 from the 8 patients designated as cN1, and 2 from the 3 patients designated as cN2. A thoracotomy was performed in 33 patients. One patient underwent an exploratory thoracotomy because of an invasion by the pulmonary ligament lymph node into the left atrium. A pulmonary resection was performed in the remaining 32 cases. There were 2 patients with pathologic stage 0, 10 with IA, 8 with IB, 3 with IIA, 2 with IIB, 4 with IIIA, and 4 with IIIB. Of these patients, 6 (18.2%) who had been judged to have no metastasis in the mediastinal lymph node by mediastinoscopy were found to have N2 disease after examination of the surgical specimens after thoracotomy (Table 1). In detail, there were 2 patients with cN0, 3 with cN1, and 1 with cN2 in whom we were unable to diagnose N2 disease before the thoracotomy. In the patient designated as cN2, induction chemotherapy was performed. The diagnosis was subsequently reduced to yN0, and there was no lymph node metastasis by prethoracotomy mediastinoscopy. However, a micrometastatic node was found in the subcarinal region by postoperative pathologic examination. Thus, in the identification of all mediastinal lymph node metastases, mediastinoscopy was 40.0% sensitive, 100% specific, and 83.8% accurate in SCLC. When the superior mediastinal, paratracheal, pretracheal, tracheobronchial, and subcarinal lymph nodes were defined as approachable nodes, mediastinoscopy was 66.7% sensitive, 100% specific, and 94.6% accurate in the evaluation of these restricted mediastinal lymph nodes. It should also be emphasized that 4 of the 8 patients designated as cN1 in this study resulted in pN2. There were two pT0 N0 M0 cases in this series. They were diagnosed as cT1 N0 M0 and cT2 N0 M0 by CT findings. Both of these patients were treated by preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative prophylactic cranial irradiation.
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, it should be noted that 4 of the 8 patients designated as cN1 and all of the 3 patients designated as cN2 resulted in pN2 diagnosis. Thus, cN1 seen on a chest CT might suggest pN2, and cN2 shows probably as pN2 disease in SCLC. We suggest that prethoracotomy mediastinoscopy should be performed for patients with SCLC designated as cN1 to determine operative indication, although it might not be necessary for patients designated as cN2 with the histologic diagnosis of SCLC. There were 2 patients diagnosed as pN2 and 1 patient diagnosed as pN3 among 26 patients designated as cN0. The pN2 patients had been diagnosed as cT1 N0 M0 and cT2 N0 M0, and the pN3 patient was diagnosed as cT2 N0 M0. We suggest that a mediastinoscopy might be necessary for the patients with cN0, especially cancer stage IB, although early treatment is desirable for SCLC. It may be an option to sequentially perform mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy on the same operating day.
There were 9 patients treated by operation without mediastinoscopy during the same period of this study. Among these, 6 patients (4 with cT1 N0 M0, 2 with cT2 N0 M0) had a histologic diagnosis of SCLC preoperatively. Induction chemotherapy was administered to 4 patients (3 with cT1 N0 M0, 1 with cT2 N0 M0) without mediastinoscopy by the judgment of attending physicians. All of these 4 patients were diagnosed as pT1 N0 M0 by surgery. In the remaining 2 patients (1 with cT1 N0 M0, 1 with cT2 N0 M0), an initial operation without mediastinoscopy was performed. The patient designated as cT1 N0 M0 underwent a curative resection (pT2 N0 M0), and the other patient designated as cT2 N0 M0 underwent an exploratory thoracotomy (pT4 N2 M0). Thus, a mediastinoscopy is recommended for the patients with cancer stage IB.
As for survival period, the patient who had undergone an exploratory thoracotomy and a patient who was inoperable because of pN2 by mediastinoscopy survived for 46 and 53 months, respectively, with a good response to chemotherapy. The prognosis was very poor in the patients with pN2 who were treated by pulmonary resection. We suggest that a pulmonary resection should be avoided if pN2 is found at thoracotomy.
In summary, mediastinoscopy is useful for the diagnosis of an approachable mediastinal lymph node in patients with SCLC, whereas an unapproachable station should be explored by other methods. Although a decision of therapy for SCLC should be made promptly because of such biologic characteristics as rapid growth and metastasis, a sufficient evaluation of a mediastinal lymph node and an accurate exclusion of N2 disease from the surgical candidates would clarify the significance of surgical treatment for SCLC.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Morikawa, Y. Demura, T. Ishizaki, S. Ameshima, I. Miyamori, M. Sasaki, T. Tsuchida, H. Kimura, Y. Fujibayashi, and H. Okazawa The Effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET/CT Combined with STIR MRI for Diagnosing Nodal Involvement in the Thorax J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 81 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Leschber, D. Sperling, W. Klemm, and J. Merk Does video-mediastinoscopy improve the results of conventional mediastinoscopy? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 33(2): 289 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hellwig, T. P. Graeter, D. Ukena, A. Groeschel, G. W. Sybrecht, H.-J. Schaefers, and C.-M. Kirsch 18F-FDG PET for Mediastinal Staging of Lung Cancer: Which SUV Threshold Makes Sense? J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1761 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Simon and A. Turrisi Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 324S - 339S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Badzio, K. Kurowski, H. Karnicka-Mlodkowska, and J. Jassem A retrospective comparative study of surgery followed by chemotherapy vs. non-surgical management in limited-disease small cell lung cancer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Spira and D. S. Ettinger Multidisciplinary Management of Lung Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., January 22, 2004; 350(4): 379 - 392. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Graeter, D. Hellwig, K. Hoffmann, D. Ukena, C.-M. Kirsch, and H.-J. Schafers Mediastinal lymph node staging in suspected lung cancer: comparison of positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and mediastinoscopy Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 231 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Simon and H. Wagner Small Cell Lung Cancer Chest, January 1, 2003; 123 (2009): 259S - 271S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Toker, S. Dilege, and G. Kalayci Combined left pneumonectomy and off-pump coronary artery bypass: principles of cancer surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 370 - 371. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |