|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1194-1196
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Address reprints requests to Dr Landreneau, Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Allegheny University Hospitals, Allegheny General, 02 Level South Tower, 320 East North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212
e-mail: rlandren{at}pgh.auhs.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. A retrospective review of 134 cases of PDT with concurrent bronchoscopy was performed between April 1997 and July 1999 and compared with a review of 124 cases of open tracheostomy. Tracheal lacerations were primarily repaired and augmented with intercostal muscle pedicle buttress.
Results. Three cases of an extensive posterior-lateral longitudinal tracheal laceration that required operative repair were reported in the PDT group. None were reported in the open tracheostomy group. The 3 patients were managed with an adult high-frequency oscillating ventilator or pressure control ventilation during the postoperative period to limit barotrauma, and all healed without evidence of tracheal leak or stenosis.
Conclusions. The increasing popularity of PDT, particularly among nonsurgical disciplines, may generate an increasing number of complications requiring operative attention. Thoracic surgeons need to be cognizant of the pitfalls of PDT technique and be prepared to manage these difficult clinical scenarios.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All PDT procedures were performed at the intensive care unit beside or at the minor procedures room in the intensive care unit. The insertion of the percutaneous dilational tracheostomy was performed by the trauma surgery intensivists following the technique described by Ciaglia [1]. All PDT insertions were performed with concurrent fiberoptic bronchoscopic guidance by a pulmonologist. The open tracheostomies were performed in the standard fashion described by Jackson [2] by the general surgery and cardiothoracic surgeons in the operating room. Tracheostomies performed as part of an otolaryngology operation were not included.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The surgical repair was approached through a full right posterior-lateral thoracotomy in the fourth interspace. Preservation and full mobilization of the fourth intercostal muscle pedicle was routinely performed. High-frequency jet ventilation was not required in any of the cases, although the necessary tubing was made ready and available. The tracheal-bronchial defect was easily identified, and primary reapproximation was performed with a 3-0 absorbable monofilament suture ( PDS, Ethicon, Cincinnati, OH), after which the suture line was buttressed with the intercostal muscle pedicle flap. The chest was drained and closed in standard fashion.
Unfortunately, none of these patients could be extubated because of their antecedent respiratory failure. Bronchoscopic evaluation of the tracheal-bronchial repair was thus performed intraoperatively. Blood and airway secretions were removed in order to ensure proper placement of the endotracheal tube, defined as balloon placement in the immediate subglottic region. To prevent any proximal or distal movement or migration of the endotracheal tube, it was secured to an upper canine tooth with dental wire.
Pressure control ventilation was utilized in 1 patient, and a prototype adult high frequency oscillating ventilator was used for the 2 others to maintain the peak airway pressure below 35 cm H2O in order to minimize barotrauma to the suture line. Postoperative fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed to promote pulmonary hygiene in all patients. The tracheal-bronchial repairs were found to be intact, with no bronchoscopic evidence of suture line dehiscence, prolonged airleak, or pneumomediastinum. All 3 patients successfully made the transition back to conventional volume-controlled ventilation 7 to 10 days post operatively, and subsequently underwent uneventful open tracheostomy 2 weeks following repair of the tracheal laceration. Two of the 3 patients are alive but in a permanent vegetative state, while the third patient succumbed to pneumonia several weeks following the operation.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although extensive posterior tracheal lacerations have been mentioned as a potential complication in several reviews of PDT [35], the mechanism of injury has not been detailed, except in Trottiers recent publication [6]. In a clinical and laboratory study, Trottier identified the increased risk for posterior tracheal perforation when the plastic dilator guide is not maintained securely and the dilator is thus advanced beyond the guide at a right angle to the posterior tracheal wall. Trottier also found that perforation did not occur when the guide was carefully maintained in proper position. This pattern of an extensive longitudinal laceration of the posterior membranous trachea, essentially separating it from the more rigid cartilaginous airway, was consistent in our 3 patients and has been noted by others as well (personal communication with D. Sugarbaker). Strict adherence to maintaining control of the guide wire and the plastic dilator guide and advancing the dilators without undue force is therefore essential to minimize the risk of the dilator advancing over the guide catheter and causing posterior longitudinal laceration of the trachea [6].
Despite taking the appropriate precautions, the complication of a posterior longitudinal tracheal laceration may still occur, however. Prompt recognition of this problem is paramount before the ability to ventilate the patient is lost. The strategy for repair begins with a generous posterior-lateral thoracotomy to provide optimal exposure of the posterior mediastinum while preserving the intercostal muscle pedicle. Provisions should be made for jet ventilation through the operative field in case the ability to ventilate by way of the oral endotracheal tube is lost. The repair should include the use of a long-lasting, absorbable monofilament suture and the use of available pleura, pericardial fat, and the intercostal muscle pedicle to buttress the repair line. The patient should be extubated, if at all possible, to minimize barotrauma to the suture line. Pulmonary hygiene must be maintained, in most cases by fiberoptic bronchoscopy, to avoid the blind insertion of the tracheal suction tube in the immediate postoperative period. When patients cannot be extubated because of their underlying respiratory failure, secure fixation of the oral endotracheal tube must then be performed to avoid distal migration of the balloon to the suture line or proximal migration leading to accidental extubation. Pressure control ventilation was successful in limiting peak airway pressures to below 35 cm H2O for 1 of our patients, and a prototype adult high frequency oscillating ventilator was used to successfully ventilate 2 others, including one who had an aspiration pneumonia complicated by the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Conventional volume-controlled ventilation may produce excessive peak airway pressures, which are detrimental to maintaining the integrity of the suture line and should be avoided in the initial perioperative period. Creative manipulation of the mechanical ventilator maybe necessary to minimize the peak and mean airway pressures to minimize the barotrauma to the tracheal repair.
The technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy is attractive and has been adopted by many physicians who care for critically ill patients who require a long-term airway. The routine use of videobronchoscopic guidance and proper insertion techniques should be followed to minimize complications. Although thoracic surgeons are unlikely to be performing any significant numbers of percutaneous tracheostomies, we have to be cognizant of the developing pitfalls of this approach The thoracic surgeon should also be aware of the unique anatomic nature of this injury and the necessary strategies for successful repair.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J E Heffner Management of the chronically ventilated patient with a tracheostomy Chronic Respiratory Disease, July 1, 2005; 2(3): 151 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Bacchetta, L. N. Girardi, E. J. Southard, C. A. Mack, W. Ko, A. J. Tortolani, K. H. Krieger, O. W. Isom, and L. Y. Lee Comparison of Open Versus Bedside Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Cardiothoracic Surgical Patient: Outcomes and Financial Analysis Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 1879 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Beiderlinden, M. Adamzik, and J. Peters Conservative Treatment of Tracheal Injuries Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 210 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Fikkers, J. A. van Veen, J. G. Kooloos, P. Pickkers, F. J. A. van den Hoogen, B. Hillen, and J. G. van der Hoeven Emphysema and Pneumothorax After Percutaneous Tracheostomy: Case Reports and an Anatomic Study Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5): 1805 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Polderman, J. J. Spijkstra, R. de Bree, H. M.T. Christiaans, H. P.M.M. Gelissen, J. P.J. Wester, and A. R.J. Girbes Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the ICU: Optimal Organization, Low Complication Rates, and Description of a New Complication Chest, May 1, 2003; 123(5): 1595 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Westphal, D. Maeser, G. Scheifler, V. Lischke, and C. Byhahn PercuTwist: A New Single-Dilator Technique for Percutaneous Tracheostomy Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2003; 96(1): 229 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |