ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Erik W.L. Jansen
Cornelius Borst
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nierich, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Knape, J. T.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nierich, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Knape, J. T.A.

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:466-472
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original articles: cardiovascular

Heart displacement during off-pump CABG: how well is it tolerated?

Arno P. Nierich, MDa, Jan Diephuis, MDa, Erik W.L. Jansen, MD, PhDb, Cornelius Borst, MD, PhDb, Johannes T.A. Knape, MD, PhDa

a Department of Anesthesiology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
b Heart–Lung Institute Utrecht, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Address reprint requests to Dr Nierich, Department of Anesthesiology, Room E03.511, Utrecht University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
e-mail: a.nierich{at}anest.azu.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. Heart displacement during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is necessary to expose the anastomosic sites. We analyzed the hemodynamic changes in relation to the grafted arteries.

Methods. The relationship between surgical exposure and hemodynamic management was assessed in 150 consecutive patients undergoing off-pump CABG utilizing the Octopus Tissue Stabilization System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN).

Results. Surgical exposure by anterolateral thoracotomy showed no significant hemodynamic changes. Through sternotomy, stroke volume was significantly reduced by dislocation at all target sites: by 6% at the left anterior descending artery (LAD), 25% at the diagonal branch artery (D), 14% at the right coronary artery (RCA), and 21% at the obtuse marginal artery (OM). The application of head-down positioning (LAD, 56%; D, 74%; RCA, 90%; OM, 96%) increased not only surgical exposure but also preload, producing correction of ventricular filling pressures and output. In a minority of cases, dopamine (3 to 5 µg · kg-1 · min-1) was added to maintain baseline hemodynamic values (LAD, 5%; D, 15%; RCA, 7%; OM, 28%).

Conclusions. Revascularization during anterolateral thoracotomy was uneventful. The sternotomy approach with heart displacement induced right heart compression. Mainly fluid redistribution was sufficient to correct cardiac output. Once stabilized, systemic circulation remained unchanged during revascularization.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) techniques using new stabilizers avoid a number of the adverse effects associated with on-pump CABG, but off-pump coronary surgery creates new challenges for the anesthesiologist. Issues that differ from conventional CABG include restriction of motion of the heart, regional interruption of native coronary blood supply during anastomosis suturing, differences in work load of the right and left ventricle, maintenance of normothermia, and lack of hemodilution. In addition, the choice of surgical access may influence pump function of the heart.

By using suction to take hold of a relatively small epicardial area, the Octopus Tissue Stabilization System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) facilitates coronary surgery—specifically, microsurgery—on the beating heart without substantial interference with pump function. This suction fixation method helps to expose all sides of the heart and may be used through any access point [1].

Initial clinical experience shows that in a selected patient group, off-pump CABG is a good alternative to conventional bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass in terms of graft patency [2], anesthesiologic management [35], cost [6], and clinical outcome [1]. The aim of this study was to further assess in 150 consecutive patients the hemodynamic consequences of cardiac dislocation and stabilization in relation to the location of the anastomosis and to gain insight in the mechanisms of the cardiovascular changes.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
We studied hemodynamic information from 150 consecutive patients who underwent off-pump CABG using the Octopus Tissue Stabilization System. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively recorded.

Surgical access
The surgical procedure has been described recently [1]. In brief, surgical access in most patients was either by anterolateral thoracotomy (ALT group) or by medial sternotomy (STERN group).

In the ALT group, the heart was not rotated to reach the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and only slightly rotated into the patient’s surgical incision wound to reach the diagonal branch artery (D).

In the STERN group, by contrast, the LAD was reached by placing two moisturized gauze pads (10 x 10 cm) between the pericardium and the left ventricle. This maneuver elevated and rotated the left ventricle toward the midsternal incision area, bringing the LAD into view. For grafting the diagonal coronary artery, the heart was retracted more to the midline by moving and rotating the tissue stabilizer to the right. The right coronary artery (RCA) was reached by placing the Octopus suction pods parallel to the RCA, elevating the right ventricle approximately 3 cm upward to gain better access and a better surgical view. The posterior wall was reached by placing the Octopus pods parallel to the obtuse marginal branch artery (OM), rotating the heart cranial and to the right. In this situation, the apex of the heart was lifted out of the thoracic cavity.

Anesthetic management and monitoring
Anesthetic management has recently been described in detail [3]. In brief, patients were treated up to the day of intervention with long-acting ß– blockers, calcium antagonists and nitrates. Perioperative monitoring consisted of a five-lead ECG with ST-segment trend analysis, capillary pulse oximetry, end tidal CO2 determination, invasive arterial blood pressure measurement, and right heart pressure measured by pulmonary artery catheter (Baxter Healthcare, Irvine, CA). Recorded variables were cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), and heart rate (HR). Cardiac output was determined by the thermodilution technique, using rapid injection of 10 ml of cold isotonic glucose. Stroke volume was calculated as CO/HR. Transesophageal echocardiography was used in most patients in order to record the physiologic consequences of cardiac displacement. During surgical preparation of the arterial conduits, a continuous infusion of a calcium blocker was started (nicardipine, 0.4 to 0.6 mg/h, or diltiazem, 6 to 8 mg/h). After mobilization of the internal mammary arteries but before the installation of the Octopus system, 1.5 mg/kg of heparin was given to the patient to produce an activated clotting time of more than 250 seconds. If regional ischemia occurred during clamping of the native coronary artery that was to be grafted, surgical preconditioning was performed (5 minutes occlusion, 5 minutes reperfusion, occlusion, and surgery).

Conditions to initiate fluid redistribution by the Trendelenburg maneuver were hemodynamic instability (MAP < 60 mm Hg; cardiac index < 2l · min-1 · m-2 or a mixed venous oxygen saturation of less than 60%), surgical improvement of exposure of the target area, or both.

If increase of preload did not restore hemodynamic values above the described limits, dopamine (3 to 5 µ g · kg-1 · min-1) was started to restore arterial pressure and cardiac output.

Hemodynamic data
Hemodynamic data were obtained before the incision was made, 3 minutes before positioning of the Octopus tentacles, 1 minute after placement of the stabilizer, directly at the start of the anastomosis, 3 minutes after beginning of grafting, and 1 minute after opening of the anastomosis before the release of the stabilizer. Event-related hemodynamic variables were stored by an IBM-compatible data acquisition system.

Statistical analysis
Hemodynamic data are presented as mean plus or minus the standard deviation. Only data completely registered for all events were analyzed by group mean comparison for repeated measurement differences compared with baseline and for differences compared with the previous value. Frequency of positioning interventions and dopamine therapy were compared by {chi}2 test. Statistical calculations were made with SPSS 7.5 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL), and p values less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Patient characteristics
Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The operative approach in two thirds of the patients (n = 96) was sternotomy. Surgical access and grafted arteries are listed in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Characteristics

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Type of Incision and Grafted Artery

 
Hemodynamic data
The results are described by operative grafting sites in the ALT and STERN groups. Supportive anesthesiologic measures including fluid redistribution by Trendelenburg positioning and inotropic support, such as administration of low doses of dopamine (3 to 5 µg · kg-1 · min-1), are depicted for each anastomotic site in Figures 1 and 2 .



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Incidence of employing Trendelenburg maneuver during anterolateral thoracotomy and sternotomy. (ALT = anterolateral thoracotomy; D = diagonal; LAD = left anterior descending artery; OM = obtuse marginal artery; RCA = right coronary artery; STERN = sternotomy.) ap < 0.001 compared with STERN group.

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Anesthesiologic measurements based on use of dopamine (3 to 5 µg · kg-1 · min-1) during anterolateral thoracotomy and sternotomy. (ALT = anterolateral thoracotomy; D = diagonal branch; LAD = left anterior descending artery; OM = obtuse marginal artery; RCA = right coronary artery; STERN = sternotomy.) ap < 0.05 compared with STERN group.

 
ALT group
In the LAD target-site group, HR increased from 65 to 69 beats/min and SV decreased from 75 to 70 ml at the moment of stabilization. Heart rate and SV remained further unchanged during subsequent operational events. Preincision values for lead II ST-segment elevation (0.15 ± 0.1 mm), MAP (72 ± 10 mm Hg), right atrial pressure (10 ± 3 mm Hg), mPAP (17 ± 3 mm Hg), CO (4.9 ± 1.2) and SvO2 (78% ± 4%) did not change significantly during placement of the stabilizer or during the surgical procedure on the LAD.

In the D target-site group, preincision hemodynamic values were same as those in the LAD group. However, several values decreased significantly after fixation by the Octopus system: MAP fell from 71 to 66 mm Hg, CO from 4.9 to 4.4 L/min, and SV from 74 to 62 mL. During the events that followed, the postfixation values remained unchanged. Preincision lead II ST-segment elevation, right atrial pressure, mPAP, and SvO2 values did not change significantly during placement of the stabilizer or during operation on the diagonal branch.

STERN group
Baseline hemodynamics and hemodynamic changes during and after application of the Octopus stabilizer are summarized in Table 3. In the LAD target site group, the average lead II ST segment increased significantly from –0.16 mm before incision to 0.05 mm at the beginning of the anastomosis phase. From preincision to fixation with Octopus, HR increased from 65 to 71 beats/min, MAP decreased from 71 to 68 mm Hg, and SV decreased from 69 to 65 mL.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Hemodynamic Parameters During Octopus Surgery by Way of Sternotomy

 
In the D target-site group, hemodynamics showed the same alterations as in the LAD group, although there were two significant decreases in prefixation values compared with those obtained after fixation by the Octopus: CO fell from 4.2 to 3.8 L/min and SV from 59 to 52 mL.

In the RCA target-site group, HR increased from 67 to 75 beats/min, MAP decreased from 72 to 66 mm Hg, and SV decreased from 76 to 65 mL from preincision to fixation. Lead II ST-segment values increased significantly from a preincision value of –0.12 to 0.09 mm at the beginning of the anastomosis phase.

In the OM target-site group, the average lead II ST segment did not change significantly during the operation. Hemodynamic changes were as follows: an overall increase of HR from 69 to 74 beats/min and decreases of MAP (65 to 61 mm Hg), CO (4.7 to 4.0 L/min), SV (70 to 55 mL), and SvO2 (78% to 73%).

Figure 3 illustrates a situation of acute hemodynamic deterioration during surgical dislocation in order to position the Octopus stabilizer on the posterior wall.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Acute hemodynamic alterations during tilting of the heart in order to reach the posterior wall. Note the decrease of ECG voltage, MAP, wedging of the pulmonary artery catheter, and the decrease of ET-CO2 but increase of CVP during the phase of placement of the stabilizer by the surgeon. After placement, these values normalized. (ABP = arterial blood pressure; CVP = central venous pressure; ET-CO2 = end tidal carbon dioxide; PAP = pulmonary artery pressure; RVP = right ventricular pressure.)

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
General considerations
The Octopus stabilization method is described in the experimental and clinical setting with regard to feasibility [7] and early clinical outcome [1]; our findings in respect to both feasibility and early outcome are encouraging.

Feasibility studies in the pig have shown that even with extreme displacement of the healthy pig heart, the circulation is not severely compromised, provided that subjects are placed in the Trendelenburg position [8]. Rotation and dislocation of the heart even with the apex out of the thoracic cavity did not obstruct coronary circulation [9]. Tilting the heart induces a reduction in CO that is primarily caused by impaired diastolic expansion of the right ventricle [810]. Treatment consists of elevation of right ventricular preload. Elevation of coronary perfusion pressure alone without an increase of right ventricular preload could not restore CO [10]. Experimental studies in the pig, however, do not per se reflect clinical situations produced by differences in anatomy and myocardial pathology in human patients and anesthetic corrections made to normalize circulatory homeostasis.

Therefore, it is important to analyze in detail perioperative effects on cardiac performance and global circulation in order to expand the use of the Octopus stabilization method without compromising the safety of the surgical procedure. Complicated hemodynamic management would make off-pump CABG with the Octopus less attractive.

The overall hemodynamic data show no clinically important deterioration in hemodynamic function of global circulation and no overall ischemic impairment of cardiac function during Octopus surgery. Ischemia was also not significant during the anastomosis phase. We observed no major decrease in contractility as reflected in unstable hemodynamics. Conversion due to hemodynamic instability or the use of a shunt was necessary in only two patients during interruption of RCA flow. Monitoring of ST-segment values in the dislocated heart is not reliable due to the loss of contact between the heart and the pericardium, which results in a decrease of ECG amplitude. Ischemia resulting in hemodynamic instability has recently been described elsewhere [11].

The act of displacing the heart, more than displacement itself, caused hemodynamic alterations, depending on the location of the target vessel. However, hemodynamic registrations were all obtained in the anesthesiologically stabilized situation after manipulation of the heart. These alterations are discussed by type of incision and by target native coronary artery site, together with their physiologic background. Baseline values differ among the different patient groups.

ALT group
Grafting the LAD using anterolateral thoracotomy produced few hemodynamic changes. This is the least compromising situation for the heart during off-pump grafting, because there is no dislocation by the stabilizer and the heart remains in its natural cavity, the pericardium.

In cases in which additional grafting of the diagonal branch was necessary, the surgeon first performed side-to-side anastomosis. To retract the diagonal artery in the surgical field, the heart was rotated towards the anterolateral incision by manipulation of the stabilizer. This meant slight compression of the left ventricle, which was reflected in a decrease of SV and CO compared with values occurring before fixation. Right atrial pressure did not change. Treatment was normally not necessary since hemodynamics remained well within acceptable levels. After finishing anastomosis of the diagonal and left internal mammary artery, suction was released and the heart rotated back to the left side to allow end to side grafting of the LAD.

STERN group
Sternotomy is the most practical incision for multiple grafting because it provides access to all sides of the heart. It allows easy harvesting of intrathoracic arterial grafts, and conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass, if needed, is simple. Hemodynamic values in patients undergoing sternotomy are different from those in the patients undergoing a limited-access procedure due to the location of the coronary arteries in relation to the incision area. In the STERN group, strategy during surgery was always to graft first the anterior wall or the right coronary artery because accessing these areas did not necessitate excessive tilting of the heart, in contrast with the posterior wall. The decision as to which vessel to graft first depended on the rate of occlusion within the native vessel. A fully occluded artery was grafted first to allow collateral perfusion to the next operated coronary artery during occlusion.

To reach the anterior wall (LAD, D) the surgeon placed two to three moistened gauze pads measuring 10 x 10 cm behind the left ventricle to elevate and to rotate the left ventricle into the midline. However, this caused compression of the right heart, which was squeezed between the thick, bulky left ventricle and the right pericardium. That resulted in a drop in right ventricular output, which was reflected in a decrease of mPAP, MAP, and CO. Treatment consisted of elevation of right heart filling by fluid loading or fluid redistribution through the Trendelenburg maneuver. Exposure of the diagonal artery area caused additional compression, suction, and rotation of the left ventricle to the right with additional right heart compression. This resulted in a significant reduction of SV and an increase by 15% in incidence of inotropic support (Fig 2). After finishing both anterior wall anastomoses, the moistened gauze pads were removed before continuation to the right or posterior wall.

To allow a good surgical view of the RCA and its distal branches, the operating table was placed in the head-down position and both suction arms were moved ventrally in order to elevate the target area 3 to 5 cm. This resulted in a tremendous increase in surgical view, but it also caused some obstruction of the tricuspid orifice. Transesophageal echocardiography as well as monitoring of right atrial pressure were helpful in identifying the limit of elevation in order to prevent tricuspid valve blockage or insufficiency.

The most challenging site to graft on the beating heart is the posterior wall. In order to view this invisible area from the sternotomy approach, the heart must be tilted out of the pericardial cradle. In the first phase of rotating and elevating the heart in order to inspect the OM vessels, compression of the heart and premature ventricular beats caused hemodynamic deterioration. Figure 3 illustrates the acute phase before the stabilized position of the heart. The mechanism is the same as in the anterior area but more pronounced. The right ventricle is squeezed between the pericardium and the muscular left ventricle, and a situation of an acute low cardiac output syndrome is created, different from that of the clinical syndrome: filling pressures did not increase but left ventricular filling pressures decreased. This was reflected in decreased mPAP, MAP, CO, and SvO2. Monitoring by TEE during this period showed a bulging of the intraatrial septum to the left side, no dilatation of the left ventricle, and a crumpled small aspect of the right ventricle (Fig 4). Ischemia monitoring was not of value, since the amplitude decreased by the loss of contact between the heart and pericardium. At the same time both stabilizer arms were placed parallel to the OM. In cases in which suction was installed, the hand of the surgeon did not compress the heart anymore and in most patients hemodynamics came back to normal values. This unstable period persisted in most instances for fewer than 30 seconds. Compared with LAD and RCA grafting, coronary circulation was only impaired in the OM area, since the other areas had already been bypassed. This means that flow over these grafts must be normalized after tilting by increasing the coronary perfusion pressure by an {alpha}-constrictor or low doses of an inotropic drug. Normalization of MAP will restore residual myocardial blood flow, as well as flow through the grafts on the anterior and inferior wall, and this situation of acute low cardiac output syndrome will disappear. It is very important to avoid overshooting with inotropic drugs, especially ß-adrenergic drugs. This may compromise local cardiac wall stabilization, the accuracy of the anastomosis, and cardiac performance because of increased oxygen demand. Our hemodynamic measurements were all made in the stabilized period, and hemodynamic values were normalized before grafting, without important efforts to increase contractility. There was a decrease of SV and of MAP, but within physiologic limits.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Four-chamber TEE view of the heart during placement of the stabilizer on posterior wall. (IAS = intraatrial septum; LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle; RA = right atrium; RV= right ventricle.)

 
It can be concluded that although there are hemodynamic alterations in the different locations of grafting, multiple off-pump CABG is well tolerated in selected groups of patients. Since correction and normalization of normal circulation is done before grafting, the quality of the anastomosis should not be compromised by a rush due to unstable hemodynamics. During placement of the stabilizer, especially on the tilted heart, it is crucial to correct hemodynamics properly without overshooting. The mechanism is mostly the same: a temporary decrease of right ventricular output and, as a result, a decrease of left ventricular output. If this unstable situation persist too long without proper correction, circulation will not normalize and grafting will be impossible. The main message about this short period is that communication between the surgeon and anesthesiologist is crucial in guiding the stabilization and correcting the circulation.

A limitation of this study is that these data were collected from a patient group that did not have severely impaired left ventricles. However, the present data show that off-pump multiple vessel grafting is quite feasible and suggest that this technique may be well controlled and applicable to a substantial proportion of the coronary artery surgery patients.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Hans van der Brugge, BSc, for the development and implementation of the data registration software and Egidius van Aarnhem, MD; Monique de Baar, Marcel Bruens, and Diederik van Dijk, MD, for their help with data acquisition perioperatively and postoperatively.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Jansen E.W.L., Borst C., Lahpor J.R., et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass using the octopus method. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:60-67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mack M., Damiano R., Matheny R., Reichenspurner H., Carpentier A. Inertia of success. A response to minimally invasive coronary bypass. Circulation 1999;99:1404-1406.[Free Full Text]
  3. Nierich A.P., Diephuis J., Jansen E.W.L., et al. Embracing the heart. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999;13:123-129.[Medline]
  4. Schaff H.V. New surgical techniques. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997;11:6-9.[Medline]
  5. Gayes J.M., Emery R.W. The MIDCAB experience. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997;11:625-628.[Medline]
  6. King R.C., Reece T.B., Hurst J.L., et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting decreases hospital stay and cost. Ann Surg 1997;225:805-809.[Medline]
  7. Jansen E.W.L., Grundeman P.F., Mansvelt B.H., Heijmen R.H., Borst C. Experimental off-pump grafting of a circumflex branch via sternotomy using a suction device. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:S93-S96.
  8. Gründeman P.F., Borst C., Van Herwaarden J.A., Mansvelt Beck H.J., Jansen E.W.L. Hemodynamic changes during displace-ment of the beating heart by the Utrecht Octopus method. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:S88-S92.
  9. Gründeman P.F., Borst C., Van Herwaarden J.A., Verlaan C.W.J., Jansen E.W.L. Vertical displacement of the beating heart by the Octopus tissue stabilizer. Influence on coronary flow. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1348-1352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gründeman P.F., Borst C., Verlaan C.W., Meijburg H., Mouës C.M., Jansen E.W.L. Exposure of circumflex branches in the tilted, beating porcine heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:316-323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Van Aarnhem E.H.L., Nierich A.P., Jansen E.W.L. When and how to shunt the coronary circulation in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:S2-S6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Accepted for publication March 7, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. K. Shim, Y. S. Choi, D. H. Chun, S. W. Hong, D. H. Kim, and Y. L. Kwak
Relationship between echocardiographic index of ventricular filling pressure and intraoperative haemodynamic changes during off-pump coronary bypass surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2009; 102(3): 316 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. M. Dewey and M. J. Mack
Myocardial Revascularization without Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 633 - 654.
[Full Text]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
H. Ustunsoy, H. Kazaz, M. A Celkan, C. Kayiran, R. Hayta, and E. Bayar
Deep Pericardial Suture vs Apical Suction for Off-Pump Bypass Grafting
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2007; 15(2): 123 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. O. Jensen, P. Hughes, L. S. Rasmussen, P. U. Pedersen, and D. A. Steinbruchel
Cognitive Outcomes in Elderly High-Risk Patients After Off-Pump Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Trial
Circulation, June 20, 2006; 113(24): 2790 - 2795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Omae, Y. Kakihana, A. Mastunaga, I. Tsuneyoshi, K. Kawasaki, Y. Kanmura, and R. Sakata
Hemodynamic Changes During Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Anastomosis in Patients with Coexisting Mitral Regurgitation: Improvement with Milrinone
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 2 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. P. Alston
Pumphead--or not! Does avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass surgery result in less brain damage?
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 699 - 701.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. C. Diephuis, K. G. M. Moons, A. N. Nierich, M. Bruens, D. van Dijk, and C. J. Kalkman
Jugular bulb desaturation during coronary artery surgery: a comparison of off-pump and on-pump procedures
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 715 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Modine, C. Decoene, S. Al-Ruzzeh, T. Athanasiou, P. Poivre, A. Pol, and G. Fayad
Dobutamine improves thoracic aortic blood flow during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 289 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W.-I. Chang, K.-B. Kim, J. H. Kim, B. M. Ham, and Y. L. Kim
Hemodynamic Changes During Posterior Vessel Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: Comparison Between Deep Pericardial Sutures and Vacuum-Assisted Apical Suction Device
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 78(6): 2057 - 2062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
S. G Raja, Z. Haider, and H. Zaman
Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Analysis of 5-Year Experience
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2004; 12(4): 306 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
E. A Black, S. Ghosh, K. Sin, T. Spyt, and R. Pillai
Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2004; 12(4): 379 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
Y.L. Kwak, Y.J. Oh, S.H. Kim, H.K. Shin, J.Y. Kim, and Y.W. Hong
Efficacy of pre-emptive milrinone in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: comparison between patients with a low and normal pre-graft cardiac index
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 26(4): 687 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Lo, R. Fijnheer, D. Castigliego, C. Borst, C. J. Kalkman, and A. P. Nierich
Activation of Hemostasis After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With or Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2004; 99(3): 634 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
Y.L. Kwak, Y.J. Oh, S.M. Jung, K.J. Yoo, J.H. Lee, and Y.W. Hong
Change in right ventricular function during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 572 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
P.-G. Chassot, P. van der Linden, M. Zaugg, X. M. Mueller, and D. R. Spahn
Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: physiology and anaesthetic management{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2004; 92(3): 400 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Decoene, T. Modine, S. Al-Ruzzeh, T. Athanasiou, D. Fawzi, R. Azzaoui, A. Pol, and G. Fayad
Analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 25(1): 26 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. Hughes, J.M. Hasenkam, I.K. Severinsen, and D.A. Steinbruchel
Right heart assist for beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 24(5): 762 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J.-H. Kim, B. M. Ham, Y. L. Kim, J.-H. Bahk, H.-G. Ryu, Y.-S. Jeon, and K.-B. Kim
Prophylactic milrinone during OPCAB of posterior vessels: implication in angina patients taking {beta}-blockers
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 24(5): 770 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. C. Hart
Maintaining hemodynamic stability and myocardial performance during off-pump coronary bypass surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): S740 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. M. Dewey and M. J. Mack
Myocardial Revascularization Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 609 - 625.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Louagie, J. Jamart, S. Broka, E. Collard, V. Scavee, and M. Gonzalez
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a case-matched comparison of hemodynamic outcome
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 22(4): 552 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. Torracca, J. J. Schreuder, A. Quarti, G. Ismeno, V. Franze, and O. Alfieri
Acute effects of beating heart coronary surgery on left ventricular performance
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): S1348 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
X. M. Mueller, P.-G. Chassot, J. Zhou, K. M. Eisa, C. Chappuis, H. T. Tevaearai, and L. K. von Segesser
Hemodynamics optimization during off-pump coronary artery bypass: the 'no compression' technique
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 22(2): 249 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. A. Vassiliades Jr, J. L. Nielsen, and J. L. Lonquist
Hemodynamic collapse during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 73(6): 1874 - 1879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
N.A. Scott, J.L. Knight, B.P. Bidstrup, H. Wolfenden, R.N. Linacre, and G.J. Maddern
Systematic review of beating heart surgery with the Octopus(R) Tissue Stabilizer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 804 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Yeatman, M. Caputo, P. Narayan, A. Kumar Ghosh, R. Ascione, I. Ryder, and G. D. Angelini
Intracoronary shunts reduce transient intraoperative myocardial dysfunction during off-pump coronary operations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1411 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. Van Dijk, E. W. L. Jansen, R. Hijman, A. P. Nierich, J. C. Diephuis, K. G. M. Moons, J. R. Lahpor, C. Borst, A. M. A. Keizer, H. M. Nathoe, et al.
Cognitive Outcome After Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Trial
JAMA, March 20, 2002; 287(11): 1405 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. M. Calafiore, M. Di Mauro, M. Contini, G. Di Giammarco, M. Pano, G. Vitolla, A. Bivona, R. Carella, and S. D'Alessandro
Myocardial revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in multivessel disease: impact of the strategy on early outcome
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 456 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D.L. Ngaage
Tolerance of haemodynamic changes during beating heart coronary surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 20(1): 214 - 215.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Erik W.L. Jansen
Cornelius Borst
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nierich, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Knape, J. T.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nierich, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Knape, J. T.A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS