|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:401-405
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Department of Thoracic Surgery Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, , Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
b Department of Ultrastructure Research, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
Address reprint requests to Dr Mitsudomi, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan
e-mail: mitsudom{at}leo.bekkoame.ne.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. Expression of these genes was evaluated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in 92 human lung cancers and in 32 non-neoplastic lung tissues. In 15 patients, both telomerase activity by telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay and expression were evaluated.
Results. hTERT expression was best associated with telomerase activity with a concordance of 77%. In 92 lung cancer tissues, hTERC, TEP1, and hTERT were expressed in 100%, 93%, and 89%, respectively. Whereas most adjacent non-neoplastic lung tissues expressed hTERC and TEP1 (94% and 100%, respectively), hTERT was detected in only 1 of 32 normal lungs. However, there was no relationship between hTERT expression and clinicopathologic features.
Conclusions. hTERT expression can be a surrogate for telomerase activity that may serve as a novel biomarker of lung cancer with high specificity and sensitivity.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The telomere is a specialized structure that caps eukaryotic chromosomes at each end, maintaining chromosome stability by protecting them from degradation and terminal fusion [4]. Human telomeres contain the repeat TTAGGG, which may be reiterated in tandem for up to 15 kb. Telomere length has been implicated in the control of cell life span and telomerase, the enzyme that elongates telomeric DNA, is believed to have an essential role in cell immortalization [4]. Cancer cells must attain the potential for immortality to allow progression to malignant states and hence require telomerase activity. In 1994, a highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method for detecting telomerase activity, the telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay, was developed [5]. Since then, various tumor tissues have been analyzed for telomerase activity and most are positive (> 80%) [6]. However, there is a minor subset of tumors that do not exhibit telomerase activity, which is also not usually detected in non-neoplastic untransformed cells, except for germ cells and those in some self-renewing tissues [4].
Recently, constituents of the human telomerase complex have been cloned. Human telomerase RNA component (hTERC), an RNA component that acts as a template to add telomeres to ends of chromosomes, was identified first [7]. Another component, telomerase-associated protein (TEP1), is a homologue of the p80 of ciliate Tetrahymena [8]. In 1997 a further element, human telomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT) was cloned [911]. This protein has several sequence motifs characteristic of the catalytic region of reverse transcriptase [911]. It has been shown that expression of hTERT but not of hTERC of TEP1 parallels telomerase activity as detected by the TRAP assay [9, 10, 12]. Furthermore, ectopic expression of hTERT restores telomerase activity in human cells [12, 13].
In the present study, using resected lung cancer tissues, we first assessed the relationship between telomerase activity as detected by TRAP assay and expression of hTERC, TEP1 and hTERT. Specifically, we asked the question of whether hTERT expression could be a surrogate for telomerase activity. Finally we examined 92 lung cancer tissues for expression of telomerase subunit genes by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR to search for clinical implications.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
First-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using 5 µg of total cellular RNA with M-MLV reverse transcriptase (GIBCO BRL, Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) and random hexanucleotide primers (Boehringer Mannheim-Yamanouchi, Tokyo, Japan). A 281-base-pair (bp) region of hTERT was amplified with the primer TERT/U1426 (5'-CCT CTG TGC TGG GCC TGG ACG ATA-3') and TERT/L253 (5'-ACG GCT GGA GGT CTG TCA AGG TAG-3') [12] for 32 cycles (94°C for 45 seconds, 61°C for 45 seconds, 72°C for 90 seconds). Because these primers were designed to cross intron sequences, a 5.5-kb band would be expected when the sample is contaminated with genomic DNA. Similarly, a 264-bp region of TEP1 was amplified using primers TP1.1 (5'-TCA AGC CAA ACC TGA ATC TGAG-3') and TP1.2 (5'-CC CGA GTG AAT CTT TCT ACG C-3') [9] for 28 cycles (94°C for 45 seconds, 55°C for 45 seconds, 72°C for 90 seconds). A 125-bp region of hTERC was amplified using primers F3b (5'-TCT AAC CCT AAC TGA GAA GGG CGT AG-3') and R3c (5'-GTT TGC TGT AGA ATG AAC GGT GGA AG-3') [9] for 24 cycles (same conditions as for hTERT). To confirm the integrity of cDNA, mRNA for glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was also amplified using the primers GAPDHs (5'-GTC AAC GGA TTT GGT CGT ATT-3') and GAPDH as (5'-AGT CTT CTG GGG GCA GTG AT-3') for 24 cycles (94°C for 60 seconds, 56°C for 60 seconds, 72°C for 60 seconds). PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis through 2% agarose gels and the gels were stained with ethidium bromide. Each specimen was analyzed at least twice and, in all instances, the replication confirmed the first analysis results.
Telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay
For 15 patients from whom protein extracts of tumor and non-neoplastic lung were available, we also directly assessed telomerase activity by the TRAP assay originally developed by Kim and coworkers [5] using a commercial kit (TRAPeze telomerase detection kit, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturers instructions. Briefly, frozen cell pellets were dissolved in 10 to 30 µL of 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate lysis buffer, incubated on ice for 30 minutes, and then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C. The supernatants were collected and the protein contents determined using a protein assay kit from BioRad Laboratories (Richmond, CA). Two-microliter aliquots of the cell extracts (equivalent to 6 µg protein) were added to a 48-µL reaction solution containing 10 pmol TS primer (5'-AAT CCG TCG AGC AGA GTT-3'), TRAP primer mix containing a 36-bp internal standard, 0.2 µL of [
32P] dCTP (3,000 Ci/mmol, 10 mCi/mL, Amersham, Arlington, IL) and Taq polymerase (Takara Shuzo, Ohtsu, Japan). The mixture was incubated at 30°C for 10 minutes and then heated at 90°C for 90 seconds, followed by PCR amplification (30 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds and 55°C for 30 seconds). The PCR products (25 µL) were subjected to electrophoresis on a 12.5% acrylamide denaturing gel. Six base-pair ladders were visualized by autoradiography. To confirm the specificity, heat inactivated reactions were run in parallel.
Statistical analysis
Comparisons of proportion were performed using the Fishers exact test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probability of survival as a function of time and survival differences were analyzed by the logrank test. All reported p values were two-sided, and those less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hiyama and colleagues [19] earlier reported detection of telomerase activity by TRAP in 109 of 136 (80%) lung cancer tissues and in 3 of 68 (4%) specimens of non-neoplastic adjacent tissues. Albanell and colleagues [20] similarly found 84 (85%) of 99 lung cancers without prior chemotherapy to be positive in contrast with 0 of 34 non-neoplastic lung samples. In our study, hTERT expression was evident in 82 (89%) of 92 lung cancers, whereas all but one of the non-neoplastic specimens were negative. This rate is comparable to those in previous studies for TRAP. Considering that RT-PCR is less laborious than performing TRAP assays, determination of hTERT expression may be better suited for clinical application.
We asked whether a small subset of lung cancer that did not have a detectable hTERT expression might show unique clinical characteristics. Hiyama and colleagues [19] reported that higher levels of telomerase activity were observed in metastatic tumors and Albanell and colleagues [20] noted significant positive association with stage or proliferation potential as determined by Ki 67 immunostaining. Furthermore, Taga and coworkers [21] showed recently that telomerase activity is one of the important poor prognostic factors in nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients by a multivariate analysis. However, we failed to detect any significant difference in stage of patients or overall survival between patients with and without hTERT expression. Reasons for this discrepancy may include difference of TRAP and hTERT assay, lack of statistical power due to limited number of telomerase-negative patients, relatively short follow-up period, or presence of unidentified bias of prognostic factors. Further studies are clearly warranted.
There have been efforts to apply telomerase activity as a marker for early detection of cancers. Yahata and coworkers [22] showed that telomerase activity was detected in 18 of 22 bronchial washings from patients with lung cancer, whereas cancer cells were detected by cytologic examination in only 9 of 22. Yang and coworkers [23] considered that detection of telomerase activity is useful in diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions. As mentioned earlier, hTERT expression for diagnosis of lung cancer had both high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (97%). This finding suggests that detection of hTERT in clinical samples may indeed be very useful in early detection, considering that RT-PCR is less labor intensive than TRAP assay.
In conclusion, detection of hTERT expression but not that of TEP1 or hTERC by RT-PCR is a rapid and easy approach estimating telomerase activity in human lung cancers. Although we failed to detect any association with clinical features, the high sensitivity and specificity for hTERT in lung cancers suggest that it may be an ideal target of diagnosis or therapy to ultimately improve the prognosis of this deadly disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000 70: 405-406.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. METZGER, D. VALLBOHMER, C. MULLER-TIDOW, H. HIGASHI, E. BOLLSCHWEILER, U. WARNECKE-EBERZ, J. BRABENDER, S. E. BALDUS, H. XI, W. E. BERDEL, et al. Increased Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (hTERT) mRNA Expression but not Telomerase Activity is Related to Survival in Curatively Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Anticancer Res, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 1157 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K M Fong, Y Sekido, A F Gazdar, and J D Minna Lung cancer * 9: Molecular biology of lung cancer: clinical implications Thorax, October 1, 2003; 58(10): 892 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Dikmen, M. Kara, G. Dikmen, H. Cakmak, and P. Dogan Detection of telomerase activity in bronchial lavage as an adjunct to cytological diagnosis in lung cancer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 23(2): 194 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wang, J.-C. Soria, B. L. Kemp, D. D. Liu, L. Mao, and F. R. Khuri hTERT Expression Is a Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2002; 8(9): 2883 - 2889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |