ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mogens Bugge
Eva Berglin
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiklund, L.
Right arrow Articles by Berglin, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiklund, L.
Right arrow Articles by Berglin, E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:79-83
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original articles: Cardiovascular

Early outcome and graft patency in mammary artery grafting of left anterior descending artery with sternotomy or anterior minithoracotomy

Lars Wiklund, MDa, Mats Johansson, MDa, Mogens Bugge, MDa, L.O. Göran Rådberg, MDa, Gunnar Brandup-Wognsen, MDa, Eva Berglin, MDa

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

Address reprint requests to Dr Wiklund, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
e-mail: lars.wiklund{at}medfak.gu.se


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. The main objective of this study was to retrospectively compare early outcome and graft patency in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with the internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery via an anterior minithoracotomy or median sternotomy and without the use of extracorporeal circulation.

Methods. One hundred thirty consecutive patients were studied. Median sternotomy was performed in 77 patients and anterior minithoracotomy in 53 patients.

Results. There were no differences in early clinical data or persistent postoperative pain between the groups. Early graft patency was 88% in the thoracotomy group and 96% in the sternotomy group (p = 0.3). Five of 7 patients who presented with a significant stenosis at the first coronary angiography had a normal angiogram at the reangiography. None of the patients with nonsignificant stenosis at the early coronary angiography had any clinical signs of ischemia or chest pain.

Conclusions. In our experience, anterior minithoracotomy and median sternotomy are different and distinguishable regarding early outcome and early graft patency. Most of the stenoses visualized at the early coronary angiography had vanished at a later coronary angiography, which makes the interpretation of the angiogram hazardous as a tool for the decision for redo procedure in the early postoperative period.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The use of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) for bypass of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is the standard procedure for coronary artery disease involving the LAD [1]. Traditionally, these operations have been performed using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardiac arrest. CPB offers safe and effective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in an immobile and bloodless operating field, but it also carries documented adverse effects. It activates the complement cascade system and other inflammatory mediators [2, 3], and there is a risk of embolization when the ascending aorta is cannulated and cross-clamped [4, 5].

Recently, new technology has been developed for safe coronary surgery on a beating heart [6, 7]. This technique has been applied via a small anterior thoracotomy [811] or a median sternotomy [6, 7]. A common opinion is that a minithoracotomy is technically more demanding than is sternotomy, which can jeopardize the safe takedown of ITA and the anastomosing procedure [1214]. It has been discussed whether a small anterior thoracotomy causes less morbidity than sternotomy. It has been claimed that besides a better cosmetic result and a shorter hospital stay to reduce costs, an anterior minithoracotomy would cause less pain than median sternotomy [15, 16]. The aim of this report is to present our retrospective experience with the off-pump CABG procedure via either anterior minithoracotomy or median sternotomy in patients with single LAD disease regarding clinical outcome, early graft patency, and wound-related problems.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Patients
Between April 1996 and October 1998, 130 patients underwent CABG at our institution on a beating heart and without the use of extracorporeal circulation for isolated LAD stenosis. All surgery was elective and the left ITA was used in all cases. An anterior minithoracotomy (n = 53) was chosen when the necessity for extracorporeal circulation was judged to be minimal, and median sternotomy (n = 77) in the remaining patients. The approach was not randomized but chosen on surgical grounds. The preoperative characteristics are listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Some Demographic Data on Patients Operated With Anterior Minithoracotomy or Median Sternotomy

 
Surgical procedure
Anesthesia was induced with thiopental (2 to 5 mg/kg), fentanyl (20 to 30 µg/kg), and pancuronium (0.1 mg/kg) and sustained with nitrous oxide (0% to 70%). Care was taken to keep normothermia during surgery by elevated room temperature, warming blankets (Warm-Touch; Mallinckrodt Medical, St. Louis, MO), and a head warmer (IM Medico; Svenska AB, Stockholm, Sweden) in order to facilitate early extubation. An anterior minithoracotomy was performed with a skin incision (approximately 8 to 12 cm) at the level of the fourth or fifth interspace. Equipment for mechanical stabilization of the operating field and rib-lifters were developed with the help of various commercially available retractors, mainly the Denver-Well’s or Bugge’s retractors. Heparin was administered at a dose of 100 to 150 U/kg. Pledgeted 2-0 sutures were placed proximally, and, if necessary, distally to the intended anastomotic site to achieve occlusion and a bloodless field. Preconditioning (ie, occlusion before incision in the coronary artery) was performed for 5 minutes and then interrupted for 3 minutes before the actual anastomosing. Transesophageal echocardiography was used to monitor changes in wall motion.

Postoperative angiography
A selective coronary angiography of ITA and LAD was performed in the first 50 consecutive patients (out of the total 130 patients) during the first postoperative period (1 to 5 days), including 24 patients from the thoracotomy group and 26 from the sternotomy group. Angiography was performed before and after administration of intracoronary nitroglycerin to relieve spasm. All the anastomoses were reviewed and classified as described by FitzGibbon and associates [17]. However, we further divided grade B into two subgroups as described: grade A, excellent graft with unimpaired run-off; grade B1, stenosis reducing caliber of anastomosis, and LAD or ITA to less than 50% of the grafted coronary artery; grade B2, stenosis reducing caliber of anastomosis, and LAD or ITA to more than 50% of the grafted coronary artery; and grade O, occlusion.

Postoperative follow-up of patients with stenosis in their early postoperative coronary angiogram
All patients (n = 9) with a stenosis grade B1 were examined with an exercise test (12-lead electrocardiogram [ECG] on an exercise bicycle) measuring the appearance of chest pain according to the New York Heart Association. All patients (n = 8) with a stenosis grade B2 were examined with an additional coronary angiography at times that varied between 3 and 18 months postoperatively.

Postoperative follow-up of wound problems
The first 74 patients (out of the total 130 patients) who underwent CABG with ITA to LAD with either anterior minithoracotomy (25 patients) or median sternotomy (49 patients) were presented with a questionnaire that included questions regarding postoperative wound problems such as infection and pain. The severity of pain was estimated using a scale where 0 was no pain and 10 was the worst pain imaginable.

Statistical methods
Clinical data are reported as mean ± SEM. Patency rates and the frequency of postoperative chest pain between groups was compared with the {chi}2 test and the Fisher’s exact probability test. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to compare a variety of demographic and clinical factors between groups.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
There was no early (30-day) mortality. In 2 patients, the anterior minithoracotomy had to be followed by a median sternotomy due to technical difficulties. No patient was switched from the intended off-pump technique to CPB. Fifty-seven percent of all patients (n = 130) were extubated in the operating room and there was no statistical significance between groups. After 3 hours, 96% of the patients were extubated. The mean intensive care time for the thoracotomy group was 7 hours (0 to 3 days) and for median sternotomy patients was 4 hours (0 to 2 days), but it should be noted that 60% of the patients did not require any time in the intensive care unit. The mean hospital time was 7.1 days (2 to 25 days) in the thoracotomy group and 6.8 days in the sternotomy group (4 to 29 days).

Early graft patency
According to the first postoperative coronary angiogram, patency was 88% in the thoracotomy group and 96% in the sternotomy group (Table 2). The postoperative coronary angiogram showed occlusion of ITA in 3 patients in the thoracotomy group and in 1 patient in the sternotomy group. Two of these patients were regrafted using CPB, 1 with a vein graft and 1 with a reimplantation of the ITA. In 1 patient, who had had three previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures performed in the LAD, the vessel was found to be too heavily calcified for further grafting. The only patient in the sternotomy group who had graft occlusion was an old man who was judged to be beyond further attempts for surgery.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Postoperative Graft Stenosis/Occlusion in the Two Groups (First Postoperative Angiography)

 
Postoperative follow-up of patients with stenosis grade B1
None of the 9 patients with stenosis grade B1 had any chest pain at the time of follow-up. Out of those 9, 7 patients had no signs of ischemia on the exercise test. One patient had signs of ischemia in inferior leads but had no chest pain, and 1 patient had heaving but no chest pain, and no exercise test had been done.

Postoperative follow-up of patients with stenosis grade B2
Of a total of 8 patients, 1 patient with a stenosis grade B2 due to a kink on ITA was regrafted with a vein using CPB (Table 3). Five out of the remaining 7 patients (71%) showed no sign of stenosis in a repeat angiography. One patient with remaining stenosis underwent successful PTCA and 1 patient has no chest pain and is doing well in spite of a persisting stenosis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. The Development of Significant Stenoses From the First to the Second Postoperative Coronary Angiography

 
Complications
No thromboembolic events occurred. One patient in each group was reoperated upon for bleeding. Two patients (5.7%) who underwent anterior minithoracotomy developed a transmural infarction (new Q-wave on ECG), whereas none did in the sternotomy group; both had occluded grafts. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 21.5% of the patients with no differences between the two groups.

Postoperative wound-related problems
Ninety-two percent answered the questionnaire at a mean follow-up time of 10 months postoperatively (3 to 22 months), with no difference between patients that had undergone anterior minithoracotomy (n = 24) or median sternotomy (n = 41). Superficial wound infection requiring antibiotic treatment occurred in 8% of the cases in both groups. No mediastinitis occurred, but 1 patient who had undergone anterior minithoracotomy developed a deep wound infection. Thirty-two percent in the thoracotomy group reported postoperative pain compared with 23% in the sternotomy group at the time of follow-up (p = 0.4). The patients described the severity of pain at a mean of 3 (in a scale from 0 to 10) in both groups. In both groups, more than 75% were back to full activity at the time of investigation.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Despite no statistically significant difference in graft patency (probably because of the limited number of cases) after anterior minithoracotomy and sternotomy, respectively, we believe that anterior minithoracotomy is a technically more demanding procedure than median sternotomy for LAD grafting. A thoracotomy involves harvesting of the ITA through a limited incision with the need for special equipment such as rib-lifters, etc. In the case of unfavorable reactions such as malignant arrhythmias or a blood pressure drop, there is limited access for CPB. All three graft occlusions in the thoracotomy group occurred at the beginning (among the first 7 cases) of our program, probably reflecting the "learning curve." These failures resulted in the development of a transmural infarction. Even though only the first half of the patients who underwent anterior minithoracotomy were examined with postoperative coronary angiography, we have no reason to suspect graft failure in the other half as no transmural infarctions occurred. At the beginning of the program, we were lacking the necessary equipment for a good exposure during the harvesting of ITA. As new equipment developed, this procedure became safer [18].

Interpretation of the coronary angiogram early after CABG is difficult. After the patient in whom a reoperation was performed because of a significant stenosis on the postoperative coronary angiogram, we became suspicious of the relevance of the angiographic findings. Even though there was a significant stenosis, there was a quick run-off of the injected contrast, indicating an acceptable surgical result. Furthermore, no patient with a significant stenosis had any clinical symptoms. After the experience with the reoperated patient, the subsequent 3 patients with significant stenoses were followed with a coronary angiogram 3 months later. Two of these patients now had a normal angiogram, confirming the clinical suspicion that the early postoperative coronary angiogram is difficult to interpret.

In our experience, most of the significant stenoses both in the ITA and in LAD turned out to be transient because they were not apparent at the late postoperative coronary angiography. Recently, this has also been described by Diegeler and associates and Mack and associates [19, 20]. It was also notable that none of the patients with nonsignificant stenosis at the early postoperative coronary angiography had signs of coronary ischemia at the time of follow-up. The stenoses, whether they were graded B1 or B2, were located at different levels, that is the ITA graft, the anastomotic site, or LAD (Table 3). One explanation for the ITA graft stenosis could be transient edema caused by the clamp used on the pedicle. In some cases, there was a stenosis distally of the anastomotic site, on the LAD, which could be due to hematoma caused by the occlusion sutures. Another explanation could be that some early stenoses seen in small vessels in cases performed off-pump are caused by platelet agglutination and therefore would not be seen in patients operated upon using cardiopulmonary bypass with its well-known effects on platelet function and other elements of the clotting cascade [21, 22]. With this thought in mind, we now try, if possible, to avoid the distal occlusion suture. It seems to be difficult to draw conclusions from angiographic findings in the early postoperative period. This is an important observation, as a significant stenosis at the early coronary angiography may result in an unnecessary reoperation. As a consequence, it may be a better alternative to measure the coronary blood flow intraoperatively with a transit Doppler flow meter or to have a coronary angiogram done on the operating table before any stenosis due to edema occurs, which, however, requires special equipment [23, 24]. If this equipment were not available, a more suitable time for coronary angiography would be well after the first postoperative period and after the healing process, for example, 6 months postoperatively if the patients have no signs of ischemia.

We believe that it is important to have strict selection criteria for choosing minithoracotomy so that the number of cases converted to sternotomy is limited. It should be kept in mind that it still remains to be proven that anterior minithoracotomy is superior in any respect to median sternotomy for grafting ITA to LAD. The questionnaire dealing with pain from the wound could not support the hypothesis that patients who underwent anterior minithoracotomy suffered less postoperative pain. Even though we did not resect cartilage in any case, the trauma to the costal cartilage may induce more intense pain than does median sternotomy [25]. It is known from the vast experience in coronary artery bypass grafting with median sternotomy that the pain from the wound is relatively limited. Patients with unclear LAD anatomy or an intramyocardial course of LAD are unsuitable for anterior minithoracotomy because these patients are more likely to need CPB.

One of the disappointing findings was that the length of hospital stay was similar to that of conventional CABG patients on CPB in our institution (unpublished data). This is in contrast to other authors, who have shown a significantly reduced hospital stay [611, 15]. Our findings can be explained by the fact that all patients were treated according to the same protocol in the ward as for conventional CABG patients on CPB. Furthermore, certain postoperative complications such as atrial fibrillation were not eliminated, albeit fewer. Whether or not there were any differences between patients who underwent thoracotomy or median sternotomy concerning the time that the patients were back to their ordinary activity is unknown to us.

A major limitation with this study is that it is not controlled and randomized. All patients were selected for anterior minithoracotomy or sternotomy, based on technical and medical reasons discussed above. The most important question is whether the long-term patency is comparable after thoracotomy and sternotomy. The only way to answer that is to do a randomized, prospective, controlled study, but as the patients suitable for minithoracotomy at each center are limited, the study has to be a multicenter trial.

In conclusion, this report shows that different and distinguishable early graft patency and clinical outcomes are seen with median sternotomy and minithoracotomy, respectively. There were more patients from the minithoracotomy group, where the angiogram showed significant stenosis early postoperatively. In addition, minithoracotomy causes more pain from the wound compared with sternotomy. The fact that most of the significant stenosis visualized at the early coronary angiogram could not be seen at the secondary angiogram makes the interpretation in the early postoperative period difficult. This may support other methods, such as intraoperative Doppler flow measurements, for determination of a satisfying surgical result, followed by an angiography after a time period of approximately 3 to 6 months to confirm patency.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Boylan M.J., Lytle B.W., Loop F.D., et al. Surgical treatment of isolated left anterior descending coronary stenosis. Comparison of left internal mammary artery and venous autograph at 18 to 20 years of follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:657-662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kirklin J.K., Westaby S., Blackstone E.H., Kirklin J.W., Chenoweth D.E., Pacifico A.D. Complement and the damaging effect of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:845-857.[Abstract]
  3. Butler J., Rocker G.M., Westaby S. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:552-559.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. McKhann G.M., Goldsborough M.A., Borowicz L.M., Jr, et al. Predictors of stroke risk in coronary artery bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:516-521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sotaniemi K.A. Long-term neurologic outcome after cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1336-1339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Buffolo E., Andrade J.C., Branco J.N., Aguiar L.F., Ribeiro E.E., Jatene A.D. Myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. Seven-year experience in 593 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1990;4:504-508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Benetti F.J., Naselli G., Wood M., Geffner L. Direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 700 patients. Chest 1991;100:312-316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Benetti F.J., Ballester C., Sani G., Doonstra P., Grandjean J. Video assisted coronary bypass surgery. J Card Surg 1995;10:620-625.[Medline]
  9. Robinson M.C., Gross D.R., Zeman W., Stedje-Larsen E. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. J Card Surg 1995;10:529-536.[Medline]
  10. Calafiore A.M., Di Giammarco G., Teodori G., et al. Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1658-1665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Subramanian V.A., McCabe J.C., Geller C.M. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1648-1655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Bonchek L.I., Ullyot D.J. Minimally invasive coronary bypass. Circulation 1998;98:495-497.[Free Full Text]
  13. Westaby S., Benetti F.J. Less invasive coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:924-931.[Free Full Text]
  14. Lytle B.W. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:554-555.
  15. King R.C., Reece T.B., Hurst J.L., et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting decreases hospital stay and cost. Ann Surg 1997;225:805-811.[Medline]
  16. Heres E.K., Marquez J., Malkowski M.J., Magovern J.A., Gravlee G.P. Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998;12:385-389.[Medline]
  17. FitzGibbon G.M., Kafka H.P., Leach A.J., Keon W.J., Hopper G.D., Burton J.R. Coronary bypass graft fate and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:616-626.[Abstract]
  18. Diegeler A., Falk V., Matin M., et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusion 1998;13:237-242.[Free Full Text]
  19. Diegeler A., Matin M., Kayser S., et al. Angiographic results after minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting using the minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting (MIDCAB) approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:680-684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Mack M.J., Magovern J.A., Acuff T.A., et al. Results of graft patency by immediate angiography in minimally invasive coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:383-390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Mammen E., Koets M., Washington B., et al. Hemostasis changes during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Semin Thromb Hemost 1985;11:281-292.[Medline]
  22. Kestin A.S., Valeri C.R., Khuri S.F., et al. The platelet function defect of cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood 1993;82:107-117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Diethrich E.B., Kinard S.A., Scappatura E., Mitsuoka H., Moiel D. Intraoperative coronary angiography. Am J Surg 1972;124:815-818.[Medline]
  24. Aliabadi D., Pica M.C., McCullough P., et al. Rapid bedside coronary angiography with a portable fluoroscopic imaging system. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;41:449-455.[Medline]
  25. Gray J.R., Fromme G.A., Nauss L.A., Wang J.K., Ilstrup D.M. Intrathecal morphine for post-thoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg 1986;65:873-876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Accepted for publication December 20, 1999.


Related Article

Invited commentary
Patrick M. McCarthy
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000 70: 83. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
H. Niinami, H. Ogasawara, Y. Suda, and Y. Takeuchi
Single-Vessel Revascularization With Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass: Minithoracotomy or Ministernotomy?
Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 47 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. K. Hol, P. S. Lingaas, R. Lundblad, K. A. Rein, K. Vatne, H.-J. Smith, S. Nitter-Hauge, and E. Fosse
Intraoperative angiography leads to graft revision in coronary artery bypass surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 502 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
U. Klima, V. Falk, M. Maringka, S. Bargenda, S. Badack, A. Moritz, F. Mohr, A. Haverich, and G. Wimmer-Greinecker
Magnetic vascular coupling for distal anastomosis in coronary artery bypass grafting: A multicenter trial
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2003; 126(5): 1568 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. K. Wolf, E. L. Alderman, M. P. Caskey, A. R. Raczkowski, M. K. Dullum, D. C. Lundell, A. C. Hill, N. Wang, and M. A. Daniel
Clinical and six-month angiographic evaluation of coronary arterial graft interrupted anastomoses by use of a self-closing clip device: a multicenter prospective clinical trial
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2003; 126(1): 168 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Niinami, Y. Takeuchi, S. Ichikawa, and Y. Suda
Partial median sternotomy as a minimal access for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: feasibility of the lower-end sternal splitting approach
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): S1041 - S1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mogens Bugge
Eva Berglin
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiklund, L.
Right arrow Articles by Berglin, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiklund, L.
Right arrow Articles by Berglin, E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS