|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:25-30
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery Services, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Wilson, Cardiology Service, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA98431-5055
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. This study prospectively compared intraoperative omniplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and epiaortic ultrasound (EAU) images in 22 patients (6 women, 16 men, age 66 ± 8 years) before surgical manipulation of the ascending aorta. Atheroma lesion severity was scored: 1 = normal, 2 = nonprotruding intimal thickening (> 2 mm), 3 = atheroma less than 4 mm ± Ca++, 4 = atheroma greater than or equal to 4 mm ± Ca++, and 5 = any size mobile or ulcerated lesion ± Ca++. The ascending aorta between the aortic valve and innominate artery was divided into proximal, middle, and distal segments. A total of 66 segments were evaluated.
Results. Although the overall agreement of scores between procedures was 75.8%, significantly more lesions were identified by EAU (15) than by TEE (5) (p < 0.03). TEE failed to identify lesions in the middle and distal segments of the aorta with a score of more than 3.
Conclusions. Although atheromatous lesions were identified in the ascending aorta by both ultrasound modalities, the results suggest that intraoperative EAU may have an advantage over TEE for surgeons assessing target sites for surgical procedures involving the ascending aorta.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stroke incidence following coronary bypass also is known to increase with age. Patients between 51 and 60 years have a 1% incidence of stroke after bypass compared with 9% of those older than 80 years [9]. With the increasing age of patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures in the United States, surgeons are encountering more patients with significant arteriosclerosis of the thoracic aorta. Commonly surgeons inspect and palpate the ascending aorta before bypass procedures. However, visual inspection and palpation underestimate the prevalence and severity of aortic arteriosclerosis compared with direct ultrasonographic examination [4, 10]. Thus ultrasonic imaging of the ascending aorta may be of value in reducing perioperative stroke risk [4, 1013].
Both epiaortic ultrasonography (EAU) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) have been used to identify ascending aortic atheroma [1, 10, 1216]. It is unclear whether the clinical information provided by these modalities is comparable [1416]. More recently multiplane TEE has been used to interrogate the aorta [1720]. Although multiplane TEE is superior to biplane TEE for obtaining detailed views of the aorta [21], both approaches are limited in their ability to view distal segments of the ascending aorta, which are sites frequently instrumented by cardiac surgeons. The objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy of multiplane TEE with intraoperative EAU in identifying significant atheroma in the ascending aorta.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Epiaortic imaging was performed by the surgeon (P.G.L. or D.J.C.) immediately before invasive instrumentation of the ascending aorta for cardiopulmonary bypass. A 5.0/7.5 MHz vascular imaging probe (Hewlett-Packard) was inserted into a sterile plastic sleeve (Civco, Kalona, IA) with a small volume of sterile saline added. The saline provided an acoustic medium through which images could be obtained without the probe being placed directly on the anterior surface of the aorta. This "stand-off" technique permitted the visualization of the anterior aspect of the aorta. The epiaortic probe was then manipulated to obtain both transverse and longitudinal images along the entire ascending aorta.
The aorta was instrumented surgically at various levels depending on the patients surgical procedure and anatomy. For example, the aorta bypass cannula is commonly placed in the distal third of the ascending aorta, the antegrade cardioplegia cannula in the proximal to middle third, and the aortic cross-clamp in the middle to distal segments. The partial occluder clamp is placed on, and the proximal graft anastomoses sewn into the proximal to middle segments. For patients requiring aortic valve replacement, aortotomies are performed in the proximal one third of the ascending aorta. Surgeons were provided results of both imaging modalities before aortic instrumentation and were able to adjust surgical procedures accordingly.
Before surgical procedures were undertaken, medical records were reviewed to determine whether patients had a history of stroke. Their hospital records were also reviewed following discharge to determine the incidence of perioperative cerebral vascular events. Inpatient postoperative care included prophylactic 5000 U twice daily subcutaneous heparin doses until ambulating for all patients. They were also treated postoperatively with aspirin. Patients with dyslipidemias were treated with appropriate lipid-lowering therapy. Patients developing postoperative atrial fibrillation were given a weight-adjusted intravenous heparin bolus and an infusion acutely to achieve a partial thromboplastin time of 60 to 80 seconds, until either the atrial fibrillation resolved, or oral warfarin dosing reached therapeutic levels (
).
| Data analysis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
grade 2). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. A Bland-Altman test [23] was used to assess agreement between these two imaging modalities (mean ± 95% confidence interval). Cohens kappa was also calculated to assess agreement [24].
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
). Five patients had congestive heart failure preoperatively. Nineteen patients underwent an operation for coronary artery bypass and 3 had an aortic valve replacement. Two patients with valve replacement also had coronary artery bypass grafting. Fifteen (68%) of the patients had two or more proximal vein graft anastomoses. One patient underwent simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting.
|
grade 2) were found by EAU compared with 5 by TEE (p < 0.03). All grade 4 and 5 atheromas were identified by EAU, but none by TEE. Figure 1 illustrates a high grade atheroma found by EAU and missed with TEE. TEE identified 2 grade 2 and 3 grade 3 lesions in the proximal aorta. No middle or distal segment lesions were detected by TEE. EAU identified 4 proximal, 6 middle, and 6 distal segment lesions. Lesions identified by EAU included 9 grade 2, 3 grade 3, 4 grade 4, and 1 grade 5. In only one case was a lesion
grade 2 identified in the proximal aorta by TEE that was not found by EAU. Although the overall agreement of the lesion scores in the ascending aorta was 75.8%, Cohens kappa value was not significantly different from chance (kappa = 0.14, p = NS). The Bland-Altman test of agreement (Fig 2) also reflects the disparity between lesion scores using the two imaging modalities. These data suggest that ascending aortic lesions may be underestimated by TEE (Fig 3).
|
|
|
) and descending aorta (
) (Fig 4). It is of interest to note that of the 9 patients with lesions greater than grade 3 in the descending aorta, 3 had significant atheroma (> grade 3) in the ascending aorta. No patient with lesion scores less than 3 in the descending aorta had lesions more than grade 2 in the ascending aorta. Three grade 4 lesions were found in the transverse arch, 11 grade 4, and 4 grade 5 lesions were found in the descending aorta (Fig 5).
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In recent studies, EAU identified the presence and extent of ascending and transverse aortic atheroma more often than biplane TEE [14, 15]. However, Konstadt and coworkers [16] reported that TEE could be used to image the ascending aorta to a mean distance of 7.4 cm from the aortic annulus. They also reported that the aortic cannulation site was typically 7.2 cm (range, 5.5 to 9.2 cm) from the aortic annulus. In contrast, EAU consistently imaged the entire length of the ascending aorta from annulus to innominate artery [16]. Biplane TEE was reported to visualize the aortic cannula in 1 of 14 patients in this study. Despite these limitations, Konstadt and Reich [14] concluded that EAU was unlikely to add significantly to the TEE examination in the vast majority of cases. These investigators suggested that only when significant disease was identified by TEE would further study with EAU be warranted [14].
More recently studies of the ascending aorta have been conducted using multiplane TEE imaging probes. TEE is reported to be an useful imaging modality for identifying and following the natural history of atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta in patients who have had stroke and peripheral atheroembolic events [1720]. However, the interposition of the trachea and/or right mainstem bronchus as well as the distance of the probe from the aortic arch often prevent adequate visualization of the middle to distal segments of the ascending aorta. This is important because these regions are the target sites for cross-clamp and aortic cannulation. Our study results are consistent with others [14, 15] and suggest that TEE and EAU are not equivalent in their ability to identify severe atheroma in the ascending aorta, particularly in more distal segments.
In our study, TEE was useful in interrogating the descending aorta. Our findings suggest that the absence of significant lesions in the descending thoracic aorta by TEE may imply a low likelihood of significant ascending aorta disease. However, the finding of significant atheroma in the descending aorta is likely to warrant further interrogation of the ascending aorta by EAU. These findings are consistent with previous reports that describe a relative sparing of the thoracic aorta until late in the atherosclerotic process [27]. Further study is recommended to define the value of TEE-delineated atheroma in the descending aorta to predict significant atheroma at common surgical sites in the ascending aorta.
In contrast to earlier studies [16], our study suggests that EAU imaging of the ascending aorta for arteriosclerosis is superior to TEE. Significant (> grade 3) lesions were missed by TEE, particularly in the middle and distal segments of the ascending aorta. Although EAU imaging requires additional time before institution of bypass, it may prove useful in reducing perioperative complications.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Chaudhuri, E. Storey, G. A. Lee, M. Bailey, J. Chan, F. L. Rosenfeldt, A. Pick, J. Negri, J. Gooi, A. Zimmet, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation in open-chamber cardiac surgery: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial of neurocognitive effects J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2012; 144(3): 646 - 653.e1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. van Zaane, A. P. Nierich, G. J. Brandon Bravo Bruinsma, P. M. J. Rosseel, F. Z. Ramjankhan, E. E. C. de Waal, W. F. Buhre, and K. G. M. Moons Diagnostic accuracy of modified transoesophageal echocardiography for pre-incision assessment of aortic atherosclerosis in cardiac surgery patients Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2010; 105(2): 131 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Jungwirth and G. B. Mackensen Real-Time 3-Dimensional Echocardiography in the Operating Room Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 248 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rosenberger, S. K. Shernan, M. Loffler, P. S. Shekar, J. A. Fox, J. K. Tuli, M. Nowak, and H. K. Eltzschig The Influence of Epiaortic Ultrasonography on Intraoperative Surgical Management in 6051 Cardiac Surgical Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 548 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. van Zaane, A. P. Nierich, W. F. Buhre, G. J. Brandon Bravo Bruinsma, and K. G. M. Moons Resolving the blind spot of transoesophageal echocardiography: a new diagnostic device for visualizing the ascending aorta in cardiac surgery Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2007; 98(4): 434 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.- L. Li, D. T. Wong, W. Wei, and J. Liu A novel acoustic window for trans-oesophageal echocardiography by using a saline-filled endotracheal balloon Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2006; 97(5): 624 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bainbridge Aortic assessment for cardiac surgical procedures. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2006; 10(2): 158 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Aranki, M. Nathan, P. Shekar, G. Couper, R. Rizzo, and L. H. Cohn Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Enables Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Unclampable Aorta Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1679 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bainbridge 3-D Imaging for Aortic Plaque Assessment Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2005; 9(2): 163 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fox, K. Glas, M. Swaminathan, and S. Shernan The Impact of Intraoperative Echocardiography on Clinical Outcomes Following Adult Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 25 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Lev-Ran, R. Braunstein, R. Sharony, A. Kramer, Y. Paz, R. Mohr, and G. Uretzky No-touch aorta off-pump coronary surgery: The effect on stroke J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 307 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Raja, Z. Haider, and H. Zaman Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Analysis of 5-Year Experience Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, December 1, 2004; 12(4): 306 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Medalion, D. Meirson, E. Hauptman, L. Sasson, and A. Schachner Initial experience with the Heartstring proximal anastomotic system J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2004; 128(2): 273 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Chavanon, M. Abdennadher, and D. Blin Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using arterial grafts exclusively: aiming for an absolute "no-touch" aortic technique Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 379 - 380. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sharony, C. S. Bizekis, M. Kanchuger, A. C. Galloway, P. C. Saunders, R. Applebaum, C. F. Schwartz, G. H. Ribakove, A. T. Culliford, F. G. Baumann, et al. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reduces Mortality and Stroke in Patients With Atheromatous Aortas: A Case Control Study Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(2011): II-15 - II-20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. Hangler, G. Nagele, M. Danzmayr, L. Mueller, E. Ruttmann, G. Laufer, and J. Bonatti Modification of surgical technique for ascending aortic atherosclerosis: impact on stroke reduction in coronary artery bypass grafting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 391 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Spielvogel, M. N. Mathur, and R. B. Griepp Aneurysms of the Aortic Arch , January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1149 - 1168. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimokawa, N. Minato, N. Yamada, Y. Takeda, Y. Hisamatsu, and M. Itoh Assessment of ascending aorta using epiaortic ultrasonography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2097 - 2100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Chavanon, M. Durand, R. Hacini, H. Bouvaist, M. Noirclerc, T. Ayad, and D. Blin Coronary artery bypass grafting with left internal mammary artery and right gastroepiploic artery, with and without bypass Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 499 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. S. Meharwal and N. Trehan Aortocoronary bypass surgery and ascending aortic dissection: letter 2 Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 72(4): 1445 - 1445. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |