HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Bruno Reichart Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lamm, P. Articles by Reichart, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lamm, P. Articles by Reichart, B.

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1833-1835
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original articles: Cardiovascular

The harmonic scalpel: optimizing the quality of mammary artery bypass grafts

^a Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
^b Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
^c Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany

Address reprint requests to Dr Lamm, Department of Cardiac Surgery Universität München am Augustinum, Wolkerweg 16, 81375 München, Germany
e-mail: lamm{at}lrz.uni-muenchen.de

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 
Background. The damage done to the endothelium during the preparation of a graft used in an aortocoronary procedure is a risk factor for early graft failure. We compared the effect on the endothelium of the mammary arteries when the harvest was done either by the harmonic scalpel (HS) or the high-frequency electrocauter (HF).

Methods. Twenty-four mammary arteries were harvested and divided into two groups depending on the use of the HS or the HF. The endothelial damage was analyzed with a scanning electron microscope. The groups were compared in regard to the size of the internal mammary artery (IMA) pedicle.

Results. The endothelial damage of the IMAs taken down with the HS was significantly less than when taken down with the HF if the IMA pedicle size was less than 0.5 cm.

Conclusions. The HS has a positive effect on the endothelial preservation, especially when the preparation is done closely to the IMA. The HS is profitable in minimally invasive procedures, particularly when it is difficult to keep a wide enough distance from the IMA.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 
The internal mammary artery (IMA) is the graft of choice in an aortocoronary bypass operation [1, 2]. The use of this graft is the single most important factor in improved survival and freedom from angina [3]. Its long-term patency is significantly superior to that of vein grafts [3, 4]. The success of an aortocoronary bypass operation in general is to a large degree dependent on the structural integrity of the grafts used. The damage done to the endothelium during the preparation and storage of the grafts is presently considered to be of prime importance for early graft failure [5]. With the increasing frequency of minimally invasive aortocoronary bypass procedures associated with a smaller and more complicated access to the mammary arteries [6], this consideration has to be applied to the mammary harvest as well. So far, the left LIMA has already been taken down by use of the harmonic scalpel in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass procedures [7]. It has also been used for the harvest of the radial arteries [8] and in laparoscopic surgery [9]. The reported results are altogether promising.

The aim of our study was to evaluate the extent of the damage done to the endothelium when the mammary artery is taken down with the harmonic scalpel as compared with the standard technique by using the high-frequency electrocauter.

	Material and methods

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 
Dissection instruments
The harmonic scalpel used (Ultrasonic; Ethicon, Hamburg, Germany) consists of a generator, a hand piece with a connecting cable, a blade system (we used the 5-mm blade), and a foot pedal. The blade vibrates longitudinally with a frequency of 55,000 Hz. Different from the high-frequency cauter, there is no conduction of electricity. The effect (the denaturation of proteins) is done completely mechanically. The depth of penetration of the scalpel is regulated by the pressure applied to the scalpel.

For the control group, a conventional high-frequency electrocauter was used (Force 40; Valleylab, Boulder, CO).

Patients
Twenty-four consecutive patients with a proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis whose IMA was harvested during an aortocoronary procedure were randomly split into two groups: group 1 (12 patients), the IMA was harvested using the harmonic scalpel; group 2 (12 patients), the IMA was harvested using the high-frequency electrocauter.

With the patients’ written informed consent, the IMAs were taken down well over their distal bifurcation. A distal tissue sample for scanning electron microscopic (SEM) evaluation of the endothelium was taken from each graft. Additionally, a second tissue sample from 7 patients of group 1 and 10 patients of group 2 was collected. Those samples were used to compare the effects on the endothelium when either the harmonic scalpel or the high-frequency cauter was used closely to the vessel for about 1 second. Care was taken that there was no direct contact between the IMA and the instruments. All samples were evaluated by SEM by three independent examiners.

Score system
The score system for the description of the endothelial damage [10] was: 1, completely confluent endothelium; 2, partially confluent endothelium; 3, loosely netted endothelium; 4, islands of endothelium; 5, no endothelium. All grafts were macroscopically examined for visible carbonization damages.

Statistical analysis
Results are presented as the mean ± the standard deviation. The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze differences between groups. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 
If a distance of more than 0.5 cm between the IMA and the edges of the IMA pedicle was kept, we could not detect significant morphological differences in the two groups (Figs 1, 2). All samples showed a completely confluent endothelium. When the distance of the pedicle to the IMA was less than 0.5 cm, we found carbonization damages on the outer layer of the IMA on all grafts of group 2; there was no damage in group 1. The endothelial morphology of group 1 was hardly altered, whereas group 2 showed considerable endothelial cell losses (Table 1).

View larger version (141K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 1. Completely confluent endothelium after IMA harvest using the harmonic scalpel, with a tissue pedicle of at least 0.5 cm to the IMA.

View larger version (143K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 2. Completely confluent endothelium after IMA harvest using the high-frequency electrocauter, with a tissue pedicle of at least 0.5 cm to the IMA.

View larger version (143K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 3. Beginning detachment of the endothelial cells with no pedicle (IMA harvest with harmonic scalpel).

View larger version (136K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 4. Total loss of endothelial cells with no pedicle (IMA harvest with high-frequency electrocauter).

	Comment

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

In conclusion, the harmonic scalpel helps to optimize the quality of IMA bypass grafts by reducing the damage done to the endothelium.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 

1. Loop F.D., Lytle B.W., Cosgrove D.M., et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1-6.[Abstract]
2. Lytle B.W., Loop F.D., Cosgrove D.M., Ratliff N.B., Easley K., Taylor P.C. Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;89:248-258.[Abstract]
3. Acinapura J.A., Rose D.M., Jacobowitz I.J., et al. Internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:186-191.[Abstract]
4. Cameron A., Davis K.B., Green G., Schaff H.V. Coronary bypass surgery with internal thoracic artery grafts. N Engl J Med 1996;334:216-219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Verrier E.D., Boyle E.M., Jr Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:915-922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Calafiori A.M., Di Giammarco G., Teodori G., et al. Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1658-1665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Ohtsuka T., Wolf R.K., Hiratzka L.F., Wurnig P., Flege J.B. Thoracoscopic internal mammary artery harvest for MICABG using the harmonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:107-109.
8. Posaciolu H., Atay Y., Çetinda B., Saribülbül O., Buket S., Hamulu A. Easy harvesting of radial artery with ultrasonically activated scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:984-985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Laycock W.S., Trus T.L., Hunter J.G. New technology for the division of short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 1996;19:71-73.
10. Fischlein T., Schütz A., Uhlig A., et al. Integrity and viability of homograft valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:425-430.[Abstract]
11. Waleczek H., Recknagel S., Hegelmaier C., Wolk G. Temperature range in bipolar high frequency coagulation of the appendiceal stump. Chirurg 1993;64:1036-1039.[Medline]
12. Keeley S.B. The skeletonized internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:324-325.[Abstract]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Pektok, M. Cikirikcioglu, C. Engin, G. Daglioz, Z. Ozcan, and H. Posacioglu Does harvesting of an internal thoracic artery with an ultrasonic scalpel have an effect on sternal perfusion? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 442 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Luciani, A. Anselmi, M. Gaudino, G. Nasso, F. Glieca, L. Martinelli, F. Santarelli, M. Perisano, and G. Possati Harmonic Scalpel Reduces Bleeding and Postoperative Complications in Redo Cardiac Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 934 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. P. Lima Canadas, A. C. Canas, J. L. Orradre Romeo, C. I. Rubio Martinez, L. F. Lopez Almodovar, and M. Calleja Hernandez Endothelium histological integrity after skeletonized dissection of the left internal mammary artery with ultrasonic scalpel Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2005; 4(3): 160 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F.P. Casselman, M. La Meir, G. Cammu, F. Wellens, R. De Geest, I. Degrieck, F. Van Praet, Y. Vermeulen, and H. Vanermen Initial experience with an endoscopic radial artery harvesting technique J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2004; 128(3): 463 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Yoshikai, T. Ito, K. Kamohara, and J. Yunoki Endothelial integrity of ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery: morphological analysis with scanning electron microscopy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 208 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rukosujew, R. Reichelt, A. M. Fabricius, G. Drees, T. D. T. Tjan, M. Rothenburger, A. Hoffmeier, H. H. Scheld, and C. Schmid Skeletonization versus pedicle preparation of the radial artery with and without the ultrasonic scalpel Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 120 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Maruo, C. E. Hamner, A. J. Rodrigues, T. Higami, J. F. Greenleaf, and H. V. Schaff Nitric oxide and prostacyclin in ultrasonic vasodilatation of the canine internal mammary artery Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 126 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Lamm, G. Juchem, A. Schutz, and B. Reichart Is the harmonic scalpel feasible in cardiac reoperations? Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2185 - 2185. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Bruno Reichart Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lamm, P. Articles by Reichart, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lamm, P. Articles by Reichart, B.