ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ole Lund
Hans K. Pilegaard
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lund, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pilegaard, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lund, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pilegaard, H. K.

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1459-1465
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original articles: Cardiovascular

Standard aortic St. Jude valve at 18 years: performance profile and determinants of outcome

Ole Lund, MD, DSca, Sten Lyager Nielsen, MDa, Hanne Arildsen, MDb, Lars B. Ilkjaer, MDa, Hans K. Pilegaard, MDa

a Departments of Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital - Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus, Denmark
b Department of Cardiology, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Address reprint requests to Dr Lund, Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital in Gentofte, Niels Andersens Vej 65, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
e-mail: olund{at}thorax.dk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix
 References
 
Background. The standard St. Jude disc valve has been in use for 20 years and remains the dominant mechanical valve of today. With nearly 19 years of follow-up, the present large series could indicate the performance profile and its determinants in the very long term.

Methods. A detailed follow-up was performed to a maximum of 18.6 years in 694 patients aged 15 to 83 years who undervent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the standard St. Jude valve during 1980 to 1993. The Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent determinants of outcome in the aortic stenosis (n = 490) and regurgitation (n = 204) groups.

Results. Overall survival was 58%, 39%, and 37% at 10, 15, and 18 years, respectively. Only 12% of deaths (0.60%/patient-year) were related to the valve with a 15-year freedom of 91%. Embolism (1.18%/patient-year) and anticoagulant-related bleeding (2.24%/patient-year) were the dominant complications with 10-year/15-year freedoms of 90%/80% and 85%/72%, respectively. Only 24% of bleeding events were classified as major. Valve thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (0.04%/patient-year): 1 did not receive vitamin K antagonist treatment and International Normalized Ratio was below target level in the other. There were no mechanical failures. Endocarditis (0.42%/patient-year) and paravalvular leak (0.42%/patient-year) occurred with 15-year freedoms of 92% and 96%, respectively, with a relation between the latter (but not the former) and preoperative endocarditis in the regurgitation group. Freedom from serious complications (2.33%/patient-year) and all complications joined (4.33%/patient-year) were 72% and 54%, respectively, at 15 years with a 96% freedom from redo AVR (0.36%/patient-year). Age- and heart-related variables were independent risk factors for mortality, thromboembolism, bleeding, serious complications, and all complications joined. Small valve (19 and 21 mm) adversely affected serious and all complications in the regurgitation group.

Conclusions. With a follow-up approaching 2 decades and exhibiting a low rate of valve-related deaths, acceptable low thrombogenicity, and abscence of mechanical failure, the standard aortic St. Jude disc valve sets the standard for contemporary mechanical valves.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix
 References
 
The standard St. Jude disc valve (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN) has been in clinical use for 20 years. The valve with its remarkable design became available when two unfortunate developments had to be recognized by heart surgeons worldwide in the late 1970s: the now well-known high degeneration rate of xenograft valves, especially in younger patients, and the risk of mechanical failure of a dominant single disc valve [1]. The St. Jude valve soon surpassed any other prosthetic valve in total number of implants, and the standard valve together with its modifications remains the dominant mechanical valve of today. No newer disc valve designs have shown any clinical advantages.

The still available "pioneer valve," the Starr-Edwards silastic ball valve (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Edwards CVS Division, Irvine, CA), has passed 30 years of clinical follow-up [2]. Published aortic St. Jude valve series with a maximum follow-up of 15 years are available [3, 4]. The present large and homogenous series of 694 patients with a first-time aortic valve replacement (AVR) using the standard St. Jude disc valve with a maximum follow-up of nearly 19 years may thus indicate important outcome data at 15 years and beyond. With this in mind, we aimed to give a detailed account of the long-term performance profile of the standard St. Jude valve and to elucidate independent determinants of outcome.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix
 References
 
This analysis deals with the first 694 patients who underwent a first-time AVR with a standard St. Jude Medical bileaflet disc valve at the present center during 1980 to 1993 with follow-up performed from July 1997 through January 1999. Patients with associated coronary artery disease (CAD; n = 188) or associated aneurysm or dissection necessitating replacement of the ascending aorta (n = 22) were included. Any other cardiac disease necessitating concomitant surgical procedures and age less than 15 years served as exclusion criteria. The present St. Jude valve patients constituted 62% of patients having AVR during 1980 to 1993 (n = 1,119) at the present institution (25% during 1980 to 1983; 87% during 1990 to 1993).

There were 427 men and 267 women aged 15 to 83 years. The clinical profile is given in Table 1 and the Appendix. Left-sided heart catheterization was performed in 612 patients combined with echocardiography in 563, whereas 82 were evaluated exclusively with echocardiography. The primary indication for AVR was aortic stenosis in 481 patients, chronic aortic regurgitation in 90, combined stenosis and regurgitation in 58, active bacterial endocarditis in 55, and ascending aortic aneurysm or dissection in 10. The predominant valve lesion was aortic stenosis in 490 patients, aortic regurgitation in 145, and combined stenosis and regurgitation in 59. The patients with regurgitation or combined lesion had at least moderate (grade 3 of 4) regurgitation. Of the total of 549 patients with stenosis or combined lesion, 434 had a catheter passed into the left ventricle: the peak-to-peak gradient across the valve was at least 30 mm Hg (average, 85 mm Hg; maximum, 186 mm Hg); the remaining 115 patients had a Doppler (peak instantaneous) gradient of at least 35 mm Hg (average, 87 mm Hg). The peak-to-peak gradient was estimated (average, 83 mm Hg; range, 51 to 128 mm Hg) in these 115 patients using linear regression in 303 patients with both measurements (peak-to-peak gradient = 29 + 0.62 · Doppler gradient; r = 0.57, p < 0.001). Left ventricular failure was defined as an episode of pulmonary edema or vascular congestion [5] within a year before the operation. Secondary kidney failure was recorded when S-creatinine exceeded the upper reference level of our laboratory [5] in two successive preoperative blood samples.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Profilea

 
Operation and anticoagulant treatment
Previously described standard methods [57] involving complete extracorporeal circulation, general and topical hypothermia, and crystalloid cardioplegic cardiac arrest were used in all patients. Coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 169 patients whereas 22 had the ascending aorta replaced.

All patients except one was started on a regimen of lifelong anticoagulant treatment with vitamin K antagonists aiming at maintaining Owren’s prothrombin-proconvertin index within the 10% to 20% range. For our laboratory this translates into an International Normalized Ratio (INR) corridor of 2.5 to 5.0. During 1997 the target INR was lowered to 2.0 to 3.0 [8]. One patient received lifelong treatment with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid and dipyridamole because of a hemangioma of the colon and another was shifted to the same treatment 1 year after operation because of bleeding from colon diverticulosis.

Follow-up and valve-related complications
A detailed account of database construction, definitions of variables, and follow-up involving direct contact with all patients who were still alive, with the general practitioner of all patients, and with all hospitals where patients had been admitted throughout follow-up has been given previously [6]. All of the present 694 patients were accounted for at the end of study: 42 had died during the first 30 days after AVR (early mortality), 190 had died late, and 462 were still alive. Death certificates were available for all deaths; autopsy was performed in 25 (60%) of early deaths and 52 (27%) of late deaths. A total of 4,502 patient-years at risk were accumulated with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years and a maximum of 18.6 years.

Registration of valve-related complications followed internationally accepted guidelines [9] as previously detailed [6, 10, 11]. Embolism was recorded if a systemic vascular event could not be proved to be thrombotic or hemorrhagic. Embolic and hemorrhagic events were recorded as minor if symptoms subsided within 48 hours or as major if they did not. Valve thrombosis and paravalvular leak were recorded in the absence of infective endocarditis, and hemolysis if B-hemoglobin in a patient with serologic signs of chronic hemolysis [7, 12] could not be kept normal with iron, vitamin B12, and folic acid medication.

Statistical analysis
All analyses were computerized by means of the BMDP Dynamic version 7.0 software package [13]. Simple comparisons were done using a one-way analysis of variance or a Pearson {chi}2 test. Cumulative survival and complication freedom curves were made using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and differences between curves were tested with a log-rank test and a Gehan test. Multivariable analyses of long-term survival and valve-related complications were done using a Cox proportional hazard regression analysis employing a comprehensive formalized analysis sequence as previously described [5, 6]. The odds ratio (multiplication factor for risk increase relative to a basic risk of 1) was calculated [6] for each independent risk factor. The Cox analyses were performed on two patient groups: the 490 patients with aortic stenosis and the 204 patients with regurgitation including those with combined stenosis and regurgitation (Table 1). All variables of Table 1 and the Appendix were entered into the Cox analyses including valve size index (valve size divided by body surface area) in both test groups and peak-to-peak aortic valve gradient in the tests of the stenosis group. The long-term survival of a sex-, age-, and operative year-matched Danish background population was calculated using the annually published Danish life-tables; the relative survival for each postoperative year of the patients was calculated as the ratio between the conditional survival probability of the patients and of the matched background population [6, 14]. Survival, complication freedoms, relative survival, and linearized incidence rates are given with 95% confidence intervals [6, 15], whereas quantitative data are given with ±1 standard deviation (SD). The level of statistical significance was 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix
 References
 
Preoperative profile and operative data of the patients are given in Table 1 in relation to dominant aortic valve lesion. Data with no difference between valve lesion groups are given in the Appendix. As many as 30% of patients in the stenosis group were 70 years or older compared with only 8% in the regurgitation group (p < 0.0001). CAD was more prevalent in the stenosis group (32% versus 16%, p < 0.0001), whereas active endocarditis (2% versus 23%, p < 0.0001) and aortic media disease (1% versus 23%, p < 0.0001) dominated in the regurgitation group. A total of 261 patients (38%) had complicating diseases or surgical procedures (CAD, endocarditis, or ascending aorta replacement). Valve sizes included the entire spectrum of available standard St. Jude valves (19 to 31 mm); 189 patients (27%) had a 19 or 21 mm valve (31% in the stenosis group versus 18% in the regurgitation group, p < 0.001).

The causes of the 42 early deaths are given in Table 2: 71% were cardiogenic. Two valve-related deaths were caused by a cerebral embolus in 1 patient and a cerebral hemorrhage in another (12 and 21 days after AVR). Early mortality was 5.5% in 434 patients with isolated chronic aortic valve disease, 6.6% in 183 with associated CAD, 7.3% in 55 with active endocarditis, and 9.1% in 22 with ascending aorta replacement of which 5 also had CAD (p > 0.05). Early mortality was 5.1% in 532 patients aged 69 years or younger and 9.3% in 162 patients aged 70 years or older (p = 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Causes of Early and Late Deathsa

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Valve-Related Complicationsa

 
Long-term survival
The causes of late deaths are given in Table 2: 41% were cardiogenic, 6% were sudden and presumed cardiogenic [1, 16], and 13% were valve related (Table 3). Overall cumulative survival is summarized in Table 4 and depicted in Figure 1 together with the survival of the matched background population. Upper 95% confidence limit of relative survival was lesser than 1.0 (thus indicating excess mortality of patients relative to background population) during the 1st, 8th, and 9th postoperative years. Dominant valve lesion and the primary indication for operation did not influence long-term survival except during the 1st year (aortic stenosis better than remaining groups). Ten-year survival was 63% (57% to 69%) for 506 patients without CAD and 42% (32% to 52%) for 188 patients with CAD (p < 0.0001). The independent risk factors are given in Table 5.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Cumulative Survival and Freedoms From Valve-Related Complicationsa

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Overall cumulative survival of all 694 patients (see Table 4 for details) and of a matched Danish background population. Numbers above the abscissa indicate patients at risk.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Cumulative freedom from endocarditis, paravalvular leak, thromboembolism, and anticoagulant-related (ACR) bleeding of all 694 patients. See Tables 3 and 4 for details.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Cumulative freedom from redo aortic valve replacement (AVR), valve-related deaths, serious complications, and all complications joined of all 694 patients. See Tables 3 and 4 for details.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Independent Risk Factors for Late Mortalitya

 
Valve-related complications
The complications are given in detail in Table 3 and are depicted in Figures 2 and 3 ; long-term cumulative complication freedoms are summarized in Table 4.

Thromboembolism
There were 53 embolic events in 42 patients (Tables 3, 4; Fig 2): 75% of the events were major or fatal. The incidence rate did not change significantly over time. There were two valve thromboses: one occurred in a female patient with associated CAD 8.2 years after AVR when she was 77 years old and who did not receive vitamin K antagonist treatment (but acetylsalicylic acid and dipyridamole) because of a sigmoid hemangioma; one of the two valve leaflets was immobilized in a semiopen position, and she did not undergo redo AVR because of high age and severe universal atherosclerosis but was alive at the end of study 1.1 year after the valve thrombosed. The other valve thrombosis occurred during vitamin k antagonist treatment in a female patient 5.9 years after AVR when she was 49 years old; her INR had been below target range just before the thrombosis, and she underwent a successful redo AVR with another disc valve and was alive at the end of study 1 year later. The independent risk factors for thromboembolism are given in Table 6. Age was a strong risk factor in both test groups, whereas high peak-to-peak gradient reduced the risk of thromboembolism in the stenosis group (odds ratio < 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Independent Risk Factors for Valve-Related Complications in the Aortic Stenosis Group (n = 573) and Aortic Regurgitation Group (n = 144)a

 
Anticoagulant-related bleeding
There were 101 bleeding events in 72 patients (Tables 3, 4; Fig 2): only 24% were major or fatal. The independent risk factors are given in Table 6.

Endocarditis
Prosthetic valve endocarditis occurred in 19 patients (Table 3) with a 15-year and 18-year freedom of 92% (Table 4; Fig 2). Eight patients underwent redo AVR with 3 deaths within 1 month and none during the ensuing 2 months; the remaining 11 patients were treated conservatively with 4 deaths during the 1st month after start of antibiotics treatment and a further 2 deaths during the 2nd and 3rd months. There was no relation between preoperative native endocarditis and postoperative prosthetic endocarditis in any of the two groups (Table 6).

Paravalvular leak, hemolysis and structural failure
Paravalvular leak occurred in 19 patients (Tables 3, 4; Fig 2): 11 were diagnosed within 1 year after operation and another 4 before the 5-year date. Seven of these 19 patients also had hemolysis with chronic anemia and 1 patient had hemolysis without paravalvular leak (Table 3); his 25 mm St. Jude valve appeared normal during redo AVR 1.6 years after the primary operation. There were no risk factors for paravalvular leak in the stenosis group, whereas preoperative native endocarditis (odds ratio 5.92, p = 0.01) was an independent risk factor in the regurgitation group. There were no instances of structural or mechanical failure.

Composite complication rates and redo AVR
All complications joined gave 195 events in 140 patients (Tables 3, 4; Fig 3). The incidence rate did not change significantly over time. The independent risk factors are shown in Table 6; they included small valve size in the regurgitation group. Serious complications (Tables 3, 4; Fig 3) occurred with 10-year and 15-year freedoms of 86% and 72%, respectively. Age (odds ratio for a 10-year age increase: 1.57, p = 0.01) was the independent risk factor in the stenosis group, whereas preoperative native endocarditis (odds ratio 3.50, p < 0.01) and valve size less than or equal to 21 mm (odds ratio 3.65, p < 0.01) were the risk factors in the regurgitation group. Valve-related deaths (Tables 3, 4; Fig 3) were independently related to secondary kidney failure (odds ratio 3.87) and cardiothoracic index (odds ratio of an index increase of 0.1:2.14, p < 0.05) in the stenosis group and to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV (odds ratio 7.07, p < 0.01) and atrioventricular conduction block (odds ratio 8.83, p = 0.01) in the regurgitation group. Redo AVR (Tables 3, 4; Fig 3) was performed in 16 patients, mainly for endocarditis and paravalvular leak. The 18-year freedom was as high as 96%. The replacement valves included nine St. Jude disc valves, two other bileaflet disc valves, three Starr-Edwards silastic ball valves, and two stented xenografts. The independent risk factors (none in the stenosis group) are given in Table 6.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix
 References
 
This study has served to document the long-term pattern of performance of the standard aortic St. Jude disc valve over nearly 2 decades. The study has documented an acceptably low thrombogenicity of the valve and a good prosthesis-to-patient match drawn from a low rate of valve-related deaths. Identified patient and valve-related factors could, furthermore, influence future patient outcome.

Valve-related death is an important measure of prosthetic valve performance. Only 13% of the present late deaths were valve related, but another 6% were "sudden and unexpected" and potentially valve related. However, it has been shown that less than 10% of sudden deaths are related to the prosthetic valve or anticoagulant treatment [1, 16]. It should be stressed that the present long-term survival (with early mortality excluded) was only marginally different from the survival of a matched background population.

We have recently published the long-term results of a large series of patients with the traditional "mechanical valve of comparison," the Starr-Edwards aortic model 1260 silastic ball valve, with a clinical follow-up to 32 years [2]. The Starr-Edwards ball valve patients were comparable with the present St. Jude valve patients regarding age, but the prevalence of complicating diseases and procedures was only 22% compared with 38% in the present series and the ball valves were on average 3 mm larger than the present St. Jude valves. With these differences in mind, a comparison between the two aortic valve series reveals a higher thrombogenicity of the Starr-Edwards ball valve, comparable rates of all complications and serious complications, complete absence of mechanical failure of both valves, and a 30% higher rate of valve-related deaths associated with the ball valve.

It is well established that the St. Jude disc valve, like any other mechanical valve, is thrombogenic and that vitamin K antagonist treatment is necessary [8, 17]. However, anticoagulant treatment reduced the present rate of embolism to and even below the rate associated with the aortic allograft valve with no anticoagulation but a high rate of primary valve degeneration especially late after AVR [11]. It is important to observe that the present very infrequent cases of valve thrombosis, as in other St. Jude disc valve series [4, 18], occurred in patients who did not receive vitamin K antagonist treatment or in whom INR was below target level. The present incidence rates of valve-related complications were comparable with or lower than previously reported levels from age and target INR comparable aortic St. Jude disc valve series with maximum follow-up of at least 10 years [3, 18]. A lower rate of bleeding was found only in series in which patients were significantly younger and had a significantly lower prevalence of CAD than the present patients [4, 19]. High age and CAD were major determinants of anticoagulant-related bleeding in the present as well as in other reports [10]. As these two variables were also the main risk factors for late mortality, it cannot surprise that survival at 10 years better than the present one was found only in St. Jude disc valve series in which prevalence of CAD (9% to 18%) and patient age (54 to 57 years) were lower than in the present patients [4, 18, 19]. A newer disc valve, the CarboMedics valve, with a maximum follow-up in reported series reaching 8 years, has shown incidence rates of thromboembolism and of all complications comparable with [20] or higher than [21] the present rates but with comparable bleeding rates.

Obviously, the target INR corridor is an important determinant of the incidence rates of thromboembolism and bleeding. The current trend, to lower target INR in patients with modern aortic disc valves, stems from observations by Horstkotte and coworkers [8]. A lowering of target INR to 1.8 to 2.8 in patients with an aortic St. Jude valve reduced the overall rate of bleeding with only a modest increase in the rate of major thromboembolism (but a significant increase of minor embolism) [8]. However, some of their minor events would have been classified as major according to the present criteria, and their overall rates of both thromboembolism and bleeding of their aortic St. Jude disc valve patients were about twice the present rates. The present distribution between major and minor events further indicates that low intensity anticoagulation may backfire: 75% of our embolic events were major compared with only 24% of our bleeding episodes. Our recent lowering of target INR to 2.0 to 3.0, complying with the international trend, may thus result in a decrease of the rate of a rather benign complication at the cost of an increased rate of a "malignant" complication. In another aortic St. Jude disc valve series it was noted that INR was below 2.5 in all embolic episodes wherein INR was known [18]. Perhaps a target INR corridor of 2.5 to 3.5 would be suitable.

Another mode of action other than lowering target INR may be valid in reducing the dominant complications of mechanical valves: thromboembolism and anticoagulant-related bleeding. High age was the dominant risk factor in the present just as in numerous other studies, but also CAD played a role. High age, CAD, and systemic hypertension have been shown previously to be the decisive risk factors [6, 10, 22]. Avoidance of a mechanical valve and anticoagulant treatment in patients with these risk factors may do the trick. A xenograft or allograft valve may be indicated primarily in patients aged, eg, 70 years and older and in patients in their 60s with concomitant CAD and hypertension.

A low aortic valve gradient preoperatively was associated with a high rate of thromboembolism in our patients with aortic stenosis. It has been shown previously that a low gradient is related to a poor left ventricle and a high death rate after AVR [5, 6]. A malfunctioning left ventricle also has been related to a poor hemodynamic function of the standard St. Jude disc valve and also to a higher degree of intravascular hemolysis and presumeably of platelet activation [7]. Other factors indicating poor preoperative heart status (high cardiothoracic index, CAD, left ventricular failure, antifailure medication) were related to a high bleeding rate in the present study. The implication is straightforward and cannot be repeated too often: operation before heart status deteriorates would reduce the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding as well as the rate of both cardiogenic and valve-related deaths after AVR.

The present incidences of prosthetic endocarditis and paravalvular leak were low and comparable with the rates of other St. Jude disc valve series [3, 4, 18, 19]. The majority of the present paravalvular leaks were detected within a few years after AVR and were related to preoperative native endocarditis in our aortic regurgitation group. These factors may be related to a certain weakness of aortic annular tissue (even though the primary infection seemed to be eradicated) that underlines the importance of a meticulous suturing technique. Prosthetic endocarditis seemed to occur more at random with no relation to preoperative native endocarditis and with an 18-year freedom as high as 92%. It has been shown that the standard aortic St. Jude disc valve is less susceptible to infection than aortic allografts and xenografts [23].

The two smallest (19 and 21 mm) of the aortic St. Jude disc valves independently increased the risk of serious complications and of all complications joined in the present patients with aortic regurgitation. The latter is usually associated with a volume loaded and dilated left ventricle, and it has been shown that mismatch between valve size and end-diastolic dimension of the left ventricle significantly impairs the hemodynamic function of the standard aortic St. Jude disc valve [7]. Aortic root enlargement or use of a modified valve with a larger inner opening area [24] may be the available remedies.

With a maximum follow-up of nearly 19 years the present low rate of valve-related deaths, acceptably low thrombogenicity, and absence of mechanical failure are indicators of a sound valve design. We conclude that the standard aortic St. Jude disc valve sets the standard for contemporary mechanical valves.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank the Danish Heart Foundation and St. Jude Medical Inc for financial support.


    Appendix
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix
 References
 
Preoperative and operative data with no statistical difference between the valve lesion groups of Table 1: male gender, 62% (n = 427); secondary kidney failure, 20% (n = 142); sinus rhythm, 94% (n = 649); atrioventricular conduction block 1°–3°, 5% (n = 33); ventricular ectopic beats in more than 10% of beats in electrocardiogram, 5% (n = 35); complete right or left bundle-branch block, 12% (n = 81); previous myocardial infarct, 8% (n = 58); Bretschneider and St. Thomas crystalloid cardioplegia [6], 63% (n = 437) and 37% (n = 257), respectively.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix
 References
 

  1. Lindblom D., Björk V.O., Semb B.K.H. Mechanical failure of the Björk-Shiley valve. Incidence, clinical presentation, and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:894-907.[Abstract]
  2. Lund O., Pilegaard H.K., Ilkjaer L.B., Nielsen S.L., Arildsen H., Albrechtsen O.K. Performance profile of the Starr-Edwards aortic cloth covered valves, track valves and silastic ball valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:403-413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Debetaz L.F., Ruchat P., Hurni M., et al. St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:134-148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Baudet E.M., Puel V., McBride J.T., et al. Long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:858-870.[Abstract]
  5. Lund O. Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention. Circulation 1990;82:124-139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lund O. Valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;29(Suppl 40):1-137.
  7. Lund O., Emmertsen K., Nielsen T.T., et al. Impact of size mismatch and left ventricular function on performance of the St. Jude disc valve after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1227-1234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Horstkotte D., Schulte H.D., Bircks W., Strauer B.E. Lower intensity anticoagulation therapy results in lower complication rates with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:1136-1145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Edmunds L.H., Jr, Clark R.E., Cohn L.H., Grunkemeier G.L., Miller D.C., Weisel R.D. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:932-935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lund O., Pilegaard H.K., Magnussen K., Knudsen M.A., Nielsen T.T., Albrechtsen O.K. Long-term prosthesis-related and sudden cardiac-related complications after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:396-406.[Abstract]
  11. Lund O., Chandrasekaran V., Grocott-Mason R., et al. Primary aortic valve replacement with allografts over twenty-five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:77-91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lund O. Late chronic hemolysis after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Relation to residual hypertrophy and impaired left ventricular function. Angiology 1990;41:836-847.
  13. Dixon WJ, ed. BMDP statistical software manual, version 7.0, vol 1 and 2. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992:1–1500.
  14. Lee E.T. Statistical methods for survival data analysis. Belmont: Lifetime Learning Publications, 1980:96-100.
  15. Grunkemeier G.L., Thomas D.R., Starr A. Statistical considerations in the analysis and reporting of time-related events. Application to analysis of prosthesis-related thromboembolism and pacemaker failure. Am J Cardiol 1977;39:257-258.[Medline]
  16. Rooney S.J., de la Santa P.M., Lewis P.A., Butchart E.G. Sudden death in a large prosthetic valve series based on a single prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:5-9.[Medline]
  17. Cannegieter S.C., Rosendaal F.R., Briet E. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses. Circulation 1994;89:635-641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ibrahim M., O’Keane H., Cleland J., Gladstone D., Sarsam D., Patterson C. The St. Jude prosthesis. A thirteen-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:221-230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Smith J.A., Westlake G.W., Mullerworth M.H., Skillington P.D., Tatoulis J. Excellent long-term results of cardiac valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Circulation 1993;88:49-54.
  20. Copeland J.G. An international experience with the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:56-62.[Medline]
  21. Craver J. CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15(Suppl 1):3-11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lund O., Magnussen K., Knudsen M., Pilegaard H., Nielsen T.T., Albrechtsen O.K. The potential for normal long term survival and morbidity rates after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5:258-267.[Medline]
  23. Agnihotri A.K., McGiffin D.C., Galbraith A.J., O’Brien M.F. The prevalence of infective endocarditis after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1708-1724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Fisher J. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of six size 19 mm bileaflet heart valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:692-696.[Abstract]
Accepted for publication November 26, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. W. Emery, A. M. Emery, A. Knutsen, and G. V. Raikar
Aortic Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Cardiac Valve Prosthesis
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 841 - 856.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. L. Svennevig, M. Abdelnoor, and S. Nitter-Hauge
Twenty-Five Year Experience With the Medtronic-Hall Valve Prosthesis in the Aortic Position: A Follow-Up Cohort Study of 816 Consecutive Patients
Circulation, October 16, 2007; 116(16): 1795 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
J.-P. Verhoye, I. Abouliatim, B. Lelong, A. Ingels, X. Roques, J. Pierre Villemot, T. Langanay, and A. Leguerrier
Edwards Mira bileaflet prosthesis in aortic position: midterm results of a prospective multi-centre study
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2007; 6(4): 458 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Baykut, L. Grize, C. Schindler, A. S. Keil, F. Bernet, and H.-R. Zerkowski
Eleven-year single-center experience with the ATS Open Pivot Bileaflet heart valve.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 847 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
O. Lund and M. Bland
Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 20 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. Bakhtiary, M. Schiemann, O. Dzemali, T. Wittlinger, M. Doss, H. Ackermann, A. Moritz, and P. Kleine
Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2006; 131(4): 883 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Josa, M. Castella, C. Pare, J. L. Bedini, R. Cartana, C. A. Mestres, J. L. Pomar, and J. Mulet
Hemolysis in Mechanical Bileaflet Prostheses: Experience With the Bicarbon Valve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1291 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. W. Emery, C. C. Krogh, K. V. Arom, A. M. Emery, K. Benyo-Albrecht, L. D. Joyce, and D. M. Nicoloff
The St. Jude Medical Cardiac Valve Prosthesis: A 25-Year Experience With Single Valve Replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 776 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J P A Puvimanasinghe, J J M Takkenberg, M B Edwards, M J C Eijkemans, E W Steyerberg, L A van Herwerden, K M Taylor, G L Grunkemeier, J D F Habbema, and A J J C Bogers
Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation
Heart, October 1, 2004; 90(10): 1172 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
O. Lund
Invited commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 83 - 84.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. S. Ikonomidis, J. M. Kratz, A. J. Crumbley III, M. R. Stroud, S. M. Bradley, R. M. Sade, and F. A. Crawford Jr
Twenty-year experience with the St Jude Medical mechanical valve prosthesis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 2022 - 2031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. H. Rahimtoola
Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 19, 2003; 41(6): 893 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. L. Grunkemeier and Y. Wu
"Our complication rates are lower than theirs": Statistical critique of heart valve comparisons
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2003; 125(2): 290 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. R. Clarke
Presidential address: Value, viability, and valves
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2002; 124(1): 1 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Gelsomino, G. Morocutti, P. Da Col, R. Frassani, R. Carella, G. Minen, and U. Livi
Preliminary experience with the St. Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valve in the aortic position: early in vivo hemodynamic results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 73(6): 1830 - 1836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
J.J.M. Takkenberg, J.P.A. Puvimanasinghe, L.A. van Herwerden, E.W. Steyerberg, M.J.C. Eijkemans, J.D.F Habbema, and A.J.J.C. Bogers
Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical bileaflet prostheses: impact on outcome of varying thromboembolic and bleeding hazards
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2001; 3(suppl_Q): Q27 - Q32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ole Lund
Hans K. Pilegaard
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lund, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pilegaard, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lund, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pilegaard, H. K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS