|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1135-1139
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Main Line Cardiothoracic Surgeons, Lankenau Hospital, Jefferson Health System, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Sutter, Lankenau Hospital, Main Line Cardiothoracic Surgeons, Medical Science Building, Suite 280, 100 Lancaster Ave, Wynnewood, PA 19066
e-mail: mlcts2220{at}aol.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. We identified 70 patients who were on long-term dialysis and had CABG during that time period. Patients were evaluated by chart review and telephone survey. Forty-nine patients (70%) had unstable angina and 37 patients (52%) had triple vessel disease. Patient risk factors included 60 patients with hypertension (85%), 40 patients with diabetes mellitus (57%), 35 patients who had congestive heart failure (50%), 35 patients who had a previous myocardial infarction (50%), and 31 smokers (44%). Operative procedures included 49 patients who had CABG only and 21 patients who had concomitant CABG with valve replacement or repair. During the postoperative period, complications developed in 50% of patients.
Results. Review of these complications showed that 25% of patients required prolonged mechanical ventilation, and 10% of patients had septicemia. Operative mortality was high, with 10 patient deaths (14.3%) within 30 days of the procedure. Six (60%) of these deaths occurred in patients who had CABG and valve repair or replacement. Long-term follow up at 50.3 months showed no improvement in survival in patients who had CABG compared with the known mortality rate of 22% per year in dialysis patients regardless of comorbid conditions. Quality of life subjectively improved in only 41% of patients in follow-up telephone survey.
Conclusions. Patients requiring long-term dialysis with coexistent severe cardiac disease should be thoroughly evaluated preoperatively. One must weigh the high morbidity and mortality risk against the limited long-term resolution of angina and ultimate survival.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The first CABG performed in a patient with chronic renal failure was in 1974 by Menzoin and associates [5]. Since then many case reports and retrospective reviews in small groups of patients have been published regarding the benefit and feasibility of CABG in this patient population. Some groups have shown improved survival and improved quality of life [69]. Other studies have shown the opposite [1012]. And yet other studies have shown an improved quality of life but no improvement in survival [1315]. Because most publications are in groups of 30 patients or fewer, one can make observations but no steadfast conclusions. Therefore CABG in the dialysis patient remains a debated issue.
We reviewed our experience in 70 patients who are on long-term dialysis and had cardiac surgery. We studied subgroups that are at higher risk to determine whether CABG is efficacious in this patient population in terms of quality of life and patient survival.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Telephone survey was conducted by two people. The patient or the closest living relative was interviewed. All were asked a standardized set of questions in an objective format. Telephone interview focused on questions regarding the patients quality of life with regards to their living situation (independent versus assisted), their overall health status since the operation, frequency of hospitalizations, and cardiac symptoms since CABG (Table 1).
|
2 analysis, Fischer exact test, Wilcoxon analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and a multivariable model. A series of univariable Cox proportional hazards models was used to identify significant predictors of survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were computed to compare patient groups and account for variable follow-up times. From August 1989 to October 1997, 7,200 patients had cardiac procedures at the Lankenau Hospital. Seventy patients were identified who fit inclusion criteria. There were 44 men and 26 women. Mean age was 62.5 years with a range of 37 to 83 years. At the time of CABG, 58 patients were on hemodialysis, and 12 patients were on peritoneal dialysis. All patients were followed by renal consultants throughout their hospitalization. Most patients had renal failure secondary to diabetes or hypertension.
A high number of risk factors were noted in the population. Forty-nine patients (70%) had unstable angina, 40 patients (57%) had diabetes mellitus, 35 patients (50%) had congestive heart failure (CHF), and 35 patients (50%) had preoperative myocardial infarction (Table 2).
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hospital death, defined as occurring within 30 days of operation, was high at 14.3% (10 patients). Five patients died of cardiac causes, 3 died of sepsis, and 2 patients died secondary to multisystem organ failure (Table 3). A higher mortality rate was also noted in the older patients, with seven of the 10 deaths (70%) occurring in patients older than 65 years.
|
Long-term follow-up
Mean follow-up time was 50.3 months in the total patient population. Only 6 patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 64 patients, 37 are currently deceased. There were 27 late deaths. Twenty-seven patients are currently alive. Mean survival after CABG was 40 months. Mean time to death after CABG was 29 months (Fig 1). In the CABG and valve operation subgroup, mean survival was only 20.7 months. Mean time to death after CABG with valve replacement or repair was 15 months.
|
|
Statistical analysis was done to identify the subgroup of patients who had worse outcomes after CABG. Risk factors that were considered included age, cardiomegaly, CHF, diabetes, and hypertension. In a univariable and multivariable model, the only risk factors that were noted to be statistically significant were CHF (p
0.01) and cardiomegaly (p
0.02) (Table 5). In Figure 1, the expected survival of dialysis patients after CABG is shown. Fifty percent of patients were dead at 38 months follow-up. Patients with cardiomegaly have a risk of mortality that is increased threefold compared with the other patients who had CABG (Fig 2). In patients with CHF, the relative risk was 3.75 (Fig 3). In Figures 2 and 3, it is evident that the patients with these risk factors are likely to die sooner after their CABG. Although the perioperative mortality rate was higher in patients older than 65 years, this was not an independent risk factor for long-term survival.
|
|
|
Most patients said that their living situation remained the same after the cardiac procedure. Sixty-five percent said their cardiac symptoms improved postoperatively, but only 41% said that their overall health status improved. This translates to 59% of patients feeling the same or worse after their procedure (Table 1).
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the short term, these patients generally fared poorly. The perioperative mortality rate was 14.3% in this study, and these patients had many complications and prolonged hospital stays. In the subgroup that had concomitant valvular and cardiac revascularization, the perioperative mortality rate was 30%. In the nondialysis population at this institution, the perioperative mortality rate is 2% with hospital stays of 7 days or fewer. With the tremendous increase in morbidity, it is difficult to operate on these patients. The obvious next question is, what would happen to these patients in this time period if they were not revascularized. Unfortunately, the answer to this question is not known and it is difficult to obtain. Such a prospective randomized study cannot be done.
At long-term follow-up, the mortality rate in this population was similar to that of the general dialysis population. The expected mortality rate for any dialysis patient is 22% per year [1]. In patients who had CABG at this institution, the mortality rate also was 22% per year. If one assumes that these patients would have died sooner without surgical intervention, then perhaps the patients outcomes were improved by revascularization. Some of the interesting findings in this review include the subgroups identified as being at higher risk of death after CABG. Patients with cardiomegaly and CHF had a mortality risk increased three to four times that of the remainder of the patients in this group. Also, patients with concomitant valve operations had a decreased survival compared with the CABG only patients.
In the follow-up telephone survey, we found that 33% of patients thought that their health status deteriorated after the cardiac operation, and 15% of patients thought that their health status did not change. Although the questions are general and subjective, they were asked objectively, and patients responded honestly. When asked more specifically, 65% of patients stated that the symptom that led to their cardiac procedure improved. However, 35% felt their cardiac symptoms did not improve.
Should cardiac surgeons continue to perform CABG in this group of patients? This is a difficult question to answer because at least 40% of patients do feel better in the long term. However, the risk of death is high in dialysis-dependent patients who have CABG. The patient should be aware of this. If one assumes that these patients were so ill before their CABG and certainly would have not survived much longer, then CABG in this patient population may be justified. Operating on these patients could improve the final outcome. Again, without a prospective randomized study, this question cannot be answered.
The patients who later have kidney transplant benefit greatly from their CABG. These patients comprise a different population. The conditions and performance status that must be met to qualify for transplantation are rigorous [16]. Most would not be able to have a transplant without a cardiac operation. Only 3 patients who had transplants in this series had their cardiac procedure as a result of findings during the preoperative transplant examination. The other 5 patients were placed on the list only after having their CABG. These transplant patients may be a slightly different patient population, as all have done well in our experience and had no major complications in the perioperative period. Such patients should have CABG if needed.
For dialysis-dependent patients not in line for transplant but with medically uncontrollable cardiac disease, the question becomes more difficult. There has been no prospective randomized study to compare how patients with the same disease and no CABG fare. One case- controlled study in a small group of patients found that the mortality rate is much higher in the dialysis patient compared with a nondialysis patient with the same cardiac profile [11]. That study would be more interesting if the control group was also dialysis dependent but did not have CABG. In our experience, survival is the same regardless of whether a patient on long-term dialysis has CABG. Additionally, patients with CHF and cardiomegaly have a greater risk of dying than even the average dialysis patient who has CABG. Based on these data, one cannot refuse to perform CABG in this patient population. However, the surgeon should inform the patient that less than half of patients feel better after operation and that the risk of complications and perioperative mortality is higher than that for the nondialysis-dependent patient. Surgeons may want to avoid operating on patients with cardiomegaly, CHF, or those who also need valvular repair or replacement.
In a dialysis-dependent patients with medically uncontrollable cardiac disease, surgeons should be aware of the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with CABG in this population. Only patients who cannot continue their current lifestyle secondary to their cardiac disease should have CABG. These patients should know that their cardiac symptoms improve 60% of the time but that less than half of these patients will report improved health status overall. Additionally, CABG will not improve the patients long-term survival, and patients with CHF, cardiomegaly, or valve operations will have a worse outcome with an increased risk of death.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Horai, T. Fukui, M. Tabata, and S. Takanashi Early and mid-term results of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end stage renal disease: surgical outcomes after achievement of complete revascularization Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2008; 7(2): 218 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Simon, R. Luciani, F. Capuano, A. Miceli, A. Roscitano, E. Tonelli, and R. Sinatra Mild and moderate renal dysfunction: impact on short-term outcome Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 286 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ledoux, M. Monchi, J.-P. Chapelle, and P. Damas Cystatin C blood level as a risk factor for death after heart surgery Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2007; 28(15): 1848 - 1853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Beckermann, J. Van Camp, S. Li, S. K. Wahl, A. Collins, and C. A. Herzog On-pump versus off-pump coronary surgery outcomes in patients requiring dialysis: Perspectives from a single center and the United States experience J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1261 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Hillis, B. L. Croal, K. G. Buchan, H. El-Shafei, G. Gibson, R. R. Jeffrey, C. G.M. Millar, G. J. Prescott, and B. H. Cuthbertson Renal Function and Outcome From Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Impact on Mortality After a 2.3-Year Follow-Up Circulation, February 28, 2006; 113(8): 1056 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nakasuji, S. Nishi, K. Nakasuji, N. Hamaoka, K. Ikeshita, and A. Asada Duration of Dialysis Is a Significant Predictor of Prolonged Postoperative Mechanical Ventilation in Dialysis-Dependent Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 2 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tabata, S. Takanashi, T. Fukui, T. Horai, T. Uchimuro, K. Kitabayashi, and Y. Hosoda Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Renal Dysfunction Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 78(6): 2044 - 2049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Antunes, D. Prieto, J. F. de Oliveira, and M. J. Antunes Renal dysfunction after myocardial revascularization Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 597 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wong, G. Thompson, K. Buth, J. Sullivan, and I. Ali Angiographic coronary diffuseness and outcomes in dialysis patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 24(3): 388 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Durmaz, T. Yagdi, T. Calkavur, R. Mahmudov, A. Z. Apaydin, H. Posacioglu, Y. Atay, and C. Engin Prophylactic dialysis in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 859 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Penta de Peppo, P. Nardi, R. De Paulis, A. Pellegrino, S. Forlani, A. Scafuri, and L. Chiariello Cardiac surgery in moderate to end-stage renal failure: analysis of risk factors Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 74(2): 378 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Prifti, M. Bonacchi, M. Leacche, G. Frati, G. Giunti, P. Proietti, A. M. Cricco, G. Brancaccio, B. Furci, A. Baboci, et al. Myocardial Revascularization in Chronic Renal Failure: 10-year Experience Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2001; 9(3): 176 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hirose, A. Amano, A. Takahashi, and N. Nagano Coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with non-dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction (serum creatinine {>=}2.0 mg/dl) Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 20(3): 565 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |