ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Royse, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Raman, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Royse, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Raman, J. S.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1612-1618
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Exclusive Y graft operation for multivessel coronary revascularization

Alistair G. Royse, FRACSa, Colin F. Royse, FANZCAb, Jai S. Raman, FRACSa

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
b Department of Anesthesia, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Address reprint requests to Dr Royse, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, PO Box 2135, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
e-mail: alistair.royse{at}nwhcn.org.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. The pedicled (in-situ) left internal mammary artery grafted to the left anterior descending artery has a very high late patency and reduces late mortality following coronary artery bypass surgery. A technique is described which achieves total arterial revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary disease and which is also entirely pedicled.

Methods. Using the left internal mammary artery and radial artery joined as a composite Y graft, all coronary territories may be grafted.

Results. One in-hospital death from 464 patients (0.2%) occurred. Age (mean ± standard error) was 64.7 ± 0.5 years and number of distal anastomoses 3.4 ± 0.04. Of 1,681 patients from Royal Melbourne Hospital, 346 had this operation. Comparison found no preoperative selection bias and no postoperative differences in complications. Actuarial survival was 0.98 ± 0.01 at 36.1 ± 0.3 months.

Conclusions. Total arterial revascularization may be performed using the left internal mammary artery and radial artery as a composite Y graft. There was no increase in complications. This technique preserves the left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery graft.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Total arterial revascularization is a goal many surgeons see as a potential solution to the relatively high late failure of saphenous vein graft [1]. The availability of arterial conduit and the morbidity associated with its harvest have been limitations to total arterial revascularization. These problems can be overcome by the use of radial artery, sequential, and composite grafting techniques. The radial artery is simple to harvest at low morbidity [25]. Composite grafts [69] make more efficient use of the conduit by placing the point of inflow closer to the point of outflow.

Sequential grafting uses one conduit for more than one distal anastomosis and is therefore more efficient. Since most patients receive more than two anastomoses, sequential grafts are frequently required when using composite grafts.

Long term angiographic studies have found a very high patency of pedicled (in-situ) left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to the left anterior descending artery [10, 11]. This graft is the most important graft in reducing late mortality [12] or recurrence of angina or infarction [13] following coronary artery bypass surgery. Free internal mammary arteries anastomosed to the aorta have a lower patency [14, 15]. It is generally accepted that any conduit grafted to the left anterior descending artery retains a higher late patency, perhaps due to a greater "run off" for this vessel. It is still unclear however, whether the pedicled (in-situ) nature of this graft is of independent benefit.

This paper describes a simple technique for total arterial revascularization of multivessel coronary disease using composite pedicled arterial grafts where the LIMA to the left anterior descending artery graft is preserved.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Only patients receiving composite arterial grafts were included (n = 464). They were excluded if any aortocoronary or venous graft was used, or if only pedicled arterial (without a composite Y graft) was used. No patient was excluded on the basis of surgical urgency, high risk, reoperation, or concomitant procedure.

The operations were performed mostly at Royal Melbourne Hospital and Melbourne Private Hospitals, Melbourne, Australia. Data was collected prospectively on a custom database written by the author and colleagues. In-hospital mortality was known for all patients. Mortality within 30 days of operation following discharge from hospital was not routinely collected and this time frame for mortality is consequently not reported. A comparison of preoperative and postoperative variables pertains only to those patients operated on at the Royal Melbourne Hospital (n = 346), because this was the only institution with a complete data set. Follow-up data was from surgeon review or telephone consultation by a nurse research assistant.

Statistical analysis
Univariate analyses was performed using the Fisher’s exact test for dichotomous variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables (SPSS V8.0 SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error. The Cochrane-Armitage trend test for ordered categorical data as performed using StatXact V3.1 (Cytel Software Corporation, Cambridge, MA). Where appropriate, pwas adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing (p') according to the Ryan-Holm step-down Bonferroni procedure [16]. The 2 sided p or p' less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant. Actuarial survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method (SPSS V8.0, SPSS Inc).

Technique of exclusive Y graft
Radial artery harvest
The key is to enter the plane deep to the fascia immediately surrounding the radial artery (neurovascular fascia) [5]. The radial artery lies within loose areolar tissue only and is easily harvested (Fig 1). Topical and intraluminal papaverine 1 mg/mL; but no systemic vasodilator is used. Sharp dissection with minimal traction will reduce the incidence of spasm. We use electrocautery as the method of dissection.



View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Radial artery harvest within the neurovascular plane. Neurovascular fascia surrounding radial artery is divided. The radial artery lies within loose areolar tissue. (Reprinted from Royse AG. Redial harvest using the harmonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:894–5, with the permission of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.)

 
LIMA harvest
We use electrocautery and harvest without skeletonizing the vessel.

Y graft construction
This is performed prior to cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. The chest wall side of the vessel is opened near the third intercostal branch (equating to the point where the LIMA will pass through a hole made in the pericardium anterior to the phrenic nerve) and lies in the center of the operative field over the thymus (Fig 2). By constructing the anastomosis as one may for a distal anastomosis, a "Y" rather than a "T" is formed. The radial artery vein and the left side of the LIMA fascia are tacked together in case of inadvertent traction to prevent kinking.



View larger version (186K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Conduit position for Y graft construction. A gauze is placed over the thymus prior to cannulation. The chest wall side of the left internal mammary artery is opened distal to the third intercostal branch.

 
Positioning
The key is to pass the composite pedicle through a hole made in the pericardium anterior to the phrenic nerve so that the LIMA lies within the pleural space and so the minimum length is used. The ideal is that the Y is situated at a point where the LIMA reaches the border of the heart, where the pericardial hole is (Fig 3). Better positioning of the Y graft generally occurs if the left anterior descending artery system is grafted first. The LIMA should be used for all distal anastomoses that will lie anterior to the pericardial window when the heart is beating; and the radial artery used for those that will lie posterior to this window. Thus, very proximal diagonal and intermediate arteries are usually grafted using radial artery rather than LIMA in order to avoid kinking the LIMA. Coronary branches of 1.25 mm or more in diameter are usually grafted as required.



View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Position of Y graft and coronary arteries. The Y graft is ideally placed just beyond a hole in the pericardium, lying within the pericardial space. The left internal mammary artery is used to graft all coronary arteries anterior to this hole and the radial artery is used to graft all vessels posterior to this hole.

 
Order of grafting
Distal anastomoses closest to the Y for each conduit are grafted before anastomoses more distally placed along each conduit. Although there is no limit to the number of anastomoses that each conduit will support, in practice it is rare for more than two anastomoses to be performed using the LIMA. In general the conduit should be tacked loosely to the heart on either side of the anastomosis in order to prevent inadvertent kinking.

Method of anastomosis
Wherever possible, a parallel method should be used (where the extremities of coronary and conduit incisions match exactly as would be the case for a usual end-to-side anastomosis). Surgeons are familiar with this technique and so it is most easily performed as well as having the least potential for distorting either conduit or coronary artery (Fig 4A).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Sequential anastomosis suture technique. First needle passed through the coronary artery (1) and second needle passed through the conduit (2). Conduit incision seen on the deep surface and conduit rotated clockwise when sutures are tensioned. (A) Parallel anastomosis. (B) Rotated anastomosis. (C) Near 90 degrees anastomosis.

 
Usually vessels in the circumflex and often in the right coronary territories require some rotation, where the apex of the conduit incision is offset toward one side of the coronary incision (Fig 4B). This should be minimized as much as possible (usually approximately 30 degrees) to reduce the possibility of anastomotic distortion and to make anastomosis construction easier. Using redundant length of conduit should allow it to adopt gentle curves that will reduce the degree of rotation required. The concept of the conduit lie assumes greater significance than for aortocoronary grafts. Where insufficient length of conduit precludes the formation of redundant curves, anastomoses near 90 degrees (diamond) are required (Fig 4C).

The key to simple anastomosis construction is to place the first few sutures in the order and site displayed in Figure 4 (for a right-handed surgeon using the "forehand" technique of suturing).

Patency and removal of air
Before the most distal anastomosis is tied, the clamp on that conduit should be removed to check for adequate blood flow and to remove air from the conduit. Hemostasis for each anastomosis is then checked prior to removal of the aortic clamp.

Simple rules
Sequential anastomoses are often more technically demanding. The most difficult vessels to graft are vessels near the intermediate artery. Grossly obese patients and those with substantial rotation of their hearts to the left present increasing technical challenge. The radial artery and LIMA are usually of adequate length to graft all coronary branches in all patients, but caution is advised for patients with dilated left ventricles where the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension is 6.5 cm or more.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Four hundred sixty-four patients underwent the exclusive Y graft operation between November 1996 and June 30, 1998, except that 8 patients received operations in 1995. Age was 64.7 ± 0.5 years and 74.5% male. Diabetes were present in 23.3%, prior myocardial infarction in 41.8%, reoperation in 2.6%, and nonelective surgery (according to the definitions of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons) in 4.7%. Preoperative Canadian cardiovascular class III and IV was present in 64.9%. The number of distal anastomoses was 3.4 ± 0.04; cardiopulmonary bypass time was 85.8 ± 1.8 minutes; and aortic occlusion time was 64.2 ± 1.4 minutes. Concomitant procedures were performed in 7.4%.

Patients were included if the right internal mammary was used with this technique (n = 7) when the radial artery was found to be diseased. Patients were excluded if any aortic anastomosis or venous conduit was used. Three patients were excluded due to poor LIMA flow after vasodilation (presumed subclavian artery disease affecting inflow) and 3 where the LIMA was damaged during harvest. Three of these patients had the same Y graft technique used, excepting that the proximal LIMA was anastomosed to the ascending aorta (since the distance of the proximal LIMA segment to the pericardial reflection is approximately the same as from the ascending aorta) and were excluded. Two patients had saphenous vein graft used to lengthen the radial artery during grafting; 1 patient had damage to the radial artery during grafting and another had less than the full length of radial artery harvested and this was not realized before commencement of coronary grafting. Another had an aortocoronary saphenous vein graft when inadvertent traction on the radial artery resulted in tearing of a circumflex marginal artery and repair required division of the radial artery. All 3 of these patients were excluded from this series. One suffered a myocardial infarct in the territory of the saphenous vein graft and there were no complications in the other 2.

There was 1 in-hospital death resulting in a series mortality of 0.2%. This patient was unstable preoperatively following myocardial infarction, underwent reoperation and required postoperative intraaortic balloon pump. The patient died of renal and cardiac failure 3 days postoperatively.

There were 5 myocardial infarcts, 2 being acute evolving myocardial infarctions at the time of surgery and one being caused by severe tamponade presumably kinking the radial artery. Reoperation with regrafting was performed in 3 patients. Two of these at 3 and 11 months postoperatively were due to kinks in the conduit. Another had supplementary graft to the posterior descending artery at the time of emergency reoperation for tamponade from extrapericardial clot compressing the right ventricle. One patient had the radial artery vein inadvertently sutured to the medial (right) aspect of the LIMA pedicle and this vein lay in front of and compressed the LIMA against the heart. Reoperation cut this suture and no regrafting was required. One patient had atypical chest pains and a 50% stenosed intermediate artery not seen to fill via the graft. Angioplasty was performed but did not resolve the atypical pains in the longer term.

Two patients had deep sternal wound infection requiring debridement. Intra-aortic balloon pump was used preoperatively in 2, intraoperatively in 2, and postoperatively in 1. There were two strokes. One resulted from aortic root rupture in the postoperative period following stentless aortic valve replacement. This stroke was caused by hypotension following cardiac arrest and was not related to the coronary procedure. There were no significant hand ischemic or neurological events.

Comparison of preoperative and postoperative variables was performed for patients from Royal Melbourne Hospital only, as a complete data set was present only at this institution. From January 1, 1996 to June 30, 1998 there were 346 patients with exclusive Y graft and 1,335 patients without. No differences in preoperative variables were noted (Table 1). Comparison of postoperative data was made for patients at Royal Melbourne Hospital (Tables 2 and 3) with no differences in complications. Postoperative hemoglobin was slightly, but significantly, lower in the Y graft group and not clinically relevant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Comparison for Patients With and Without Exclusive Y Graft at Royal Melbourne Hospital

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Postoperative Comparison of Major Complications for Patients With and Without Exclusive Y Graft at Royal Melbourne Hospital (categorical data)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Postoperative Comparison for Patients With and Without Exclusive Y Graft at Royal Melbourne Hospital (numeric data)

 
Follow up of 264 patients from Royal Melbourne Hospital (74.6% complete) at 11.9 ± 0.5 months found Canadian Cardiovascular class I in 95.8% and class II in 3.8%. New York Heart Association class I was present in 88.6% and class II in 1.5%.

There were 4 late deaths during follow-up for Royal Melbourne Hospital patients and the 8 patients from 1995, resulting in actuarial survival of 0.98 ± 0.01 at 36.1 ± 0.3 months (Fig 5). One patient more than 80 years of age died at 6 months of unknown cause; 1 died of cardiac failure at 1 month; and 2 died suddenly at 6 and 18 months postoperatively. These 2 patients were otherwise well and their deaths may have been caused by arrhythmia. Both had dilated ventricles with poor function. One had undergone a research graft study 3 weeks prior with patent grafts; postmortem examination did not identify a cause of death in this patient.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Postoperative survival. Line-survival plot, cross-censored observation. Survival 0.98 ± 0.01 at 36.1 ± 0.3 months.

 
Surgeons performing this technique use it in between 40% and 95% of cases.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
This study details a technique using composite grafts that may be used to achieve total arterial and pedicled arterial revascularization in patients requiring multivessel coronary reconstruction. The LIMA to left anterior descending artery graft is preserved. The technique may be performed without increased mortality or complication (Tables 2 and 3). There was no evidence of preoperative selection bias for those receiving this technique compared to those without (Table 1).

The disadvantage of saphenous vein grafts has been late attrition due to the development of disease within the conduit [1]. It is the hope of many surgeons that arterial conduit of all types will replicate the better late patency of the pedicled LIMA to the left anterior descending artery [10, 11]. In this series, most patients had entirely normal arterial conduit harvested having already been exposed to the arterial circulation for an average of 64.7 years.

Until recently, use of bilateral internal mammary artery was infrequent despite excellent results and low mortality and morbidity [12, 1719]. The pedicled right internal mammary artery is less useful since it will not routinely reach the right coronary artery branches without tension leading to its use predominantly as a free graft, but with lower apparent patency [15]. Cautious use of bilateral internal mammary artery related primarily to the increased risk of sternal wound infection [20] and particularly with diabetics. These patients may present at a younger age and would have more to gain from longer conduit patency, but receive fewer arterial grafts. This Y graft operation avoids bilateral internal mammary artery harvest in the majority of patients.

Additional arteries have been used in an attempt to achieve total arterial revascularization or to reduce the rate of bilateral internal mammary artery harvest [2, 21]. Of these, the radial artery is the simplest and most convenient to harvest and has the lowest morbidity [2, 5]. Total arterial revascularization is therefore possible in at least half of all patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery and would be expected to lead to late benefit from reduced conduit disease seen with saphenous vein graft. Late patency will not be known for some years although midterm patency is know in some series [9, 2123]. The concept is to use arteries only, and avoid any saphenous vein graft.

Very rapid change to practice occurred at our institution [5] where the adoption of total arterial revascularization as a goal far preceded the known late patency of arterial conduit other than LIMA. The change was driven by an impression of lower in-hospital mortality as well as the reduced morbidity related to radial artery harvest. The mortality for this Y graft series is low; and the mortality for the comparison group (Table 2) is also low, the majority also receiving total arterial revascularization.

Since most patients receive three to five coronary anastomoses, many patients will receive saphenous vein graft unless more efficient reconstructive techniques were employed. First, we used sequential grafting and since the radial artery is longer than the internal mammary artery, it can be used to revascularize all of the circumflex or right coronary artery territories as an aortocoronary graft. In this way, most patients may receive total arterial revascularization by using three or four arterial grafts.

Composite grafts [7, 8], allow total arterial revascularization in most patients with reduced conduit use. This is because the length of conduit from the point of inflow to the point of outflow is reduced, thereby minimizing conduit wastage. The LIMA and left radial artery may be harvested simultaneously and the Y graft performed during arm closure. All coronary branches may be revascularized in this way.

It is unclear if the pedicled nature of these composite grafts has independent benefit with respect to late patency. Calafiore has suggested that conduits arising from the aorta may experience more turbulence and potentially endure more intimal damage than composite conduits arising from the LIMA [9].

A theoretical concern may also relate to the possible loss of all conduits if occlusion of the proximal LIMA segment occurred. Since the results of late patency of LIMA to left anterior descending artery are so good, this Y graft operation, being a modified version of this same graft, could have a similar outcome. A possible benefit of avoidance of aortic anastomoses may be by reduced cerebral embolism manifest by reduced neuropsychological dysfunction and stroke. This may result from a greater freedom to move aortic cannulation and clamping sites when aortic atheroma is detected by echocardiography and from reduced aortic manipulation during construction of proximal anastomoses [24].

The LIMA is rarely diseased and radial artery calcification is uncommon, but when it is present of sufficient severity to preclude use, the right internal mammary artery may be harvested and used in the same manner. This vessel is a little shorter, and so more care is needed to avoid excessive redundancy in the conduit lie or to skeletonize it. Since most patients may be revascularized in this way, this operative technique affords considerable flexibility. The surgeon may alter the technique and conduit lie to accommodate variances in vessel size, position, or number of grafts required.

The hypoperfusion syndrome was neither seen nor expected, because the construction of a composite graft increased the flow through the LIMA graft [Royse et al, unpublished data]. The conduit flow reserve, being the maximum potential flow deliverable via the grafts, exceeded the actual flow via the grafts following weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass by 2.3-fold.

Limitations
While in-hospital mortality and preoperative data is known for all patients in this series, detailed postoperative data stored on a custom database currently exists only for patients from Royal Melbourne Hospital. Nonetheless, these patients may act as a guide to complication rates compared to alternative techniques. Resource limitations have led to incomplete late follow up, and this is not easily addressed. Hospital mortality is multifactorial and many factors other than operative technique may influence this outcome.

This paper addresses early clinical outcome. Angiographic data is available for some patients who have participated in two research studies and also for those who have returned with symptoms. Angiography is not examining this Y graft technique specifically, but is examining radial artery patency during a 5-year period. Intermediate results and analysis of the influence of competitive flow from the native coronary circulation will be reported separately.

The influence of this technique on reducing late neuropsychological dysfunction will be reported separately.

Although Table 1 reveals no selection bias during the study period, the surgeons using this technique commenced using it in a highly selective fashion and later applied it in a nonselective fashion. This operation incorporates a number of techniques that can be more technically demanding. It is recommended that limited use of sequential grafting with aortocoronary conduit and limited reliance on the Y graft should occur until familiarity with these techniques be gained. The most difficult anastomoses with this technique involve the intermediate artery or arteries close to it. Technical difficulty also increases in patients with markedly dilated left ventricles or marked obesity. Cautious use of this technique is advised in these situations until the surgeon has gained experience with this operation.

Total arterial revascularization which is entirely pedicled may be performed using the left internal mammary artery and radial artery as a composite Y graft. There was no increase in complications. This technique preserves the LIMA to left anterior descending artery graft [25].


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr John Ludbrook (Biomedical Statistical Consulting Pty Ltd) for his statistical analysis and manuscript review and Dr Paul Soeding for manuscript review. We thank Mrs Karen Groves and Mrs Jenny Pang for data collation; and the surgical and nursing staff of the cardiothoracic surgery unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital. Grant assistance from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and the Lew Carty Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Campeau L., Enjalbert M., Lesperance J., Vaislic C., Grondin C., Bourassa M. Atherosclerosis and late closure of aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts. Circulation 1983;68:II1-II7.
  2. Acar C., Jebara V., Portoghese M., et al. Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:652-659.[Abstract]
  3. Dietl C., Benoit C. Radial artery graft for coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:102-109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Brodman R.F., Frame R., Camacho M., Hu E., Chen A., Hollinger I. Routine use of unilateral and bilateral radial arteries for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:959-963.[Abstract]
  5. Royse A., Royse C., Shah P., Williams A., Kaushik S., Tatoulis J. Radial artery harvest technique, use and functional outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:186-193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chocron S., Etievent J., Schiele F., et al. The Y graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:736-740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Tector A., Amundsen S., Schmahl T., Kress D., Peter M. Total revascularization with T grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:33-38.[Abstract]
  8. Calafiore A., Di Giammarco G., Luciani N., Maddestra N., Di Nardo E., Angelini R. Composite arterial conduits for a wider arterial myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:185-190.[Abstract]
  9. Weinschelbaum E., Gabe E., Macchia A., Smimmo R., Suarez L. Total myocardial revascularization with arterial conduits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:911-916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Barner H., Barnett M. Fifteen to 21-year angiographic assessment of internal thoracic artery as a bypass conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1526-1528.[Abstract]
  11. Zeff R., Kongtahworn C., Iannone L., et al. Internal mammary artery versus saphenous vein graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;45:533-536.[Abstract]
  12. Loop F., Lytle B., Cosgrove D., et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1-6.[Abstract]
  13. Cameron A., Kemp H.G., Jr, Green G.E. Bypass surgery with the internal mammary artery graft. Circulation 1986;74:III30-III36.
  14. Loop F., Lytle B., Cosgrove D., Golding L., Taylor P., Stewart R. Free (aorta-coronary) internal mammary artery graft. Late results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:827-831.[Abstract]
  15. Tatoulis J., Buxton B., Fuller J. Results of 1,454 free right internal thoracic artery-to-coronary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1263-1268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ludbrook J. Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1998;25:1032-1037.[Medline]
  17. Cosgrove D., Lytle B., Loop F., et al. Does bilateral internal mammary artery grafting increase surgical risk?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;95:850-856.[Abstract]
  18. Pick A., Orszulak T., Anderson B., Schaff H. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:599-605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Fiore A., Naunheim K., McBride L., et al. Fifteen-year follow-up for double internal thoracic artery grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1991;5:248-252.[Abstract]
  20. Borger M., Rao V., Weisel R., et al. Deep sternal wound infection. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1050-1056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Suma H., Wanibuchi Y., Terada Y., Fukuda S., Takayama T., Furuta S. The right gastroepiploic artery graft. Clinical and angiographic midterm results in 200 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:615-622.[Abstract]
  22. Acar C., Ramsheyi A., Pagny J.Y., et al. The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:981-989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Possati G., Gaudino M., Alessandrini F., et al. Midterm clinical and angiographic results of radial artery grafts used for myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:1015-1021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Royse C., Royse A., Blake D., Grigg L. Assessment of thoracic aortic atheroma by echocardiography. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;4:72-77.[Medline]
  25. Royse A.G. Radial harvest using the harmonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:894-895.[Free Full Text]
Accepted for publication April 5, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
E. Gongora and T. M. Sundt III
Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 599 - 632.
[Full Text]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
A. Royse and C. Royse
A standardised intraoperative ultrasound examination of the aorta and proximal coronary arteries
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 701 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
S. Na, Y. J. Oh, Y. H. Shim, Y. W. Hong, S. O. Bang, and Y. L. Kwak
Effects of milrinone on blood flow of the Y-graft composed with the radial and the internal thoracic artery in patients with coronary artery disease.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 30(2): 324 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Glineur, P. Noirhomme, J. Reisch, G. El Khoury, P. Astarci, and C. Hanet
Resistance to Flow of Arterial Y-Grafts 6 Months After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-281 - I-285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S.-W. Ryu, B.-H. Ahn, S.-J. Choo, K.-J. Na, Y.-K. Ahn, M.-H. Jeong, and S.-H. Kim
Skeletonized Gastroepiploic Artery as a Composite Graft for Total Arterial Revascularization
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): 118 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Mariani, A. D'Alfonso, and J. G. Grandjean
Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Surgery: Time to Change Our Habits?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1591 - 1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
O. Tagusari, J. Kobayashi, K. Bando, K. Niwaya, H. Nakajima, T. Nakatani, T. Yagihara, and S. Kitamura
Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Revascularization of the Total Coronary System: Clinical Outcome and Angiographic Evaluation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 78(4): 1304 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Muneretto, G. Bisleri, A. Negri, J. Manfredi, M. Metra, S. Nodari, and L. Dei Cas
Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery technique for total arterial myocardial revascularization: a prospective randomized study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 76(3): 778 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Muneretto, A. Negri, G. Bisleri, J. Manfredi, A. Terrini, M. Metra, S. Nodari, and L. D. Cas
Is total arterial myocardial revascularization with composite grafts a safe and useful procedure in the elderly?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 657 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. Muneretto, A. Negri, J. Manfredi, A. Terrini, G. Rodella, S. ElQarra, and G. Bisleri
Safety and usefulness of composite grafts for total arterial myocardial revascularization: A prospective randomized evaluation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2003; 125(4): 826 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Haase, A. Sharma, A. Fielitz, S. Uchino, J. Rocktaeschel, R. Bellomo, L. Doolan, G. Matalanis, A. Rosalion, B. F. Buxton, et al.
On-pump coronary artery surgery versus off-pump exclusive arterial coronary grafting: a matched cohort comparison
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 62 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Royse, A. Royse, P. Soeding, D. Blake, and J. Pang
Prospective randomized trial of high thoracic epidural analgesia for coronary artery bypass surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 93 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. G. Santos and N. A.G. Stolf
Reply to Hirose and Amano
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 22(6): 1036 - 1036.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. C. Ho, C. F. Royse, A. G. Royse, A. Penberthy, and R. McRae
Persistent Pain After Cardiac Surgery: An Audit of High Thoracic Epidural and Primary Opioid Analgesia Therapies
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2002; 95(4): 820 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Sakaguchi, E. Tadamura, M. Ohnaka, K. Tambara, K. Nishimura, and M. Komeda
Composite arterial Y graft has less coronary flow reserve than independent grafts
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 74(2): 493 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G.G. Santos, N.A.G. Stolf, L.F.P. Moreira, V.L.S. Haddad, R.M.C. Simoes, S.R.V. Carvalho, A.A. Salgado, and S.F. Avelar Jr.
Randomized comparative study of radial artery and right gastroepiploic artery in composite arterial graft for CABG
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 21(6): 1009 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. T. Yilmaz, E. Ozal, N. Barindik, C. Gunay, and H. Tatar
The results of radial artery Y-graft for complete arterial revascularization
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 794 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. B. Christensen, J. T. Lund, E. Kassis, and H. Kelbaek
Complete arterial coronary revascularisation using radial artery conduit for double thoracic artery inlet flow: arterial sling operation
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 21(3): 391 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. M. Calafiore, M. D. Mauro, S. D'Alessandro, G. Teodori, G. Vitolla, M. Contini, A. L. Iaco, and G. Spira
Revascularization of the lateral wall: Long-term angiographic and clinical results of radial artery versus right internal thoracic artery grafting
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2002; 123(2): 225 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Tatoulis, A. G. Royse, B. F. Buxton, J. A. Fuller, P. D. Skillington, J. C. Goldblatt, R. P. Brown, and M. A. Rowland
The radial artery in coronary surgery: a 5-year experience--clinical and angiographic results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 143 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Ochi, N. Hatori, R. Bessho, M. Fujii, Y. Saji, S. Tanaka, and H. Honma
Adequacy of flow capacity of bilateral internal thoracic artery T graft
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2008 - 2011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. Lund, J. Christensen, S. Holme, K. Fruergaard, A. Olesen, E. Kassis, and U. Abildgaard
On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass: independent risk factors and off-pump graft patency
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 20(5): 901 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. L. Iaco, G. Teodori, G. Di Giammarco, M. Di Mauro, L. Storto, V. Mazzei, G. Vitolla, B. Mostafa, and A. M. Calafiore
Radial artery for myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical and angiographic results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 464 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Royse
Reply to Alverez
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2001; 19(4): 543 - 544.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. G. Royse, C. F. Royse, K. L. Groves, and G. Yu
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2000; 70(1): 341 - 342.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. G. Royse, C. F. Royse, J. Tatoulis, L. E. Grigg, P. Shah, D. Hunt, N. Better, and S. F. Marasco
Postoperative radial artery angiography for coronary artery bypass surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 17(3): 294 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. G. Royse, C. F. Royse, K. L. Groves, and G. Yu
Blood flow in composite arterial grafts and effect of native coronary flow
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1619 - 1622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Royse, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Raman, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Royse, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Raman, J. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS