ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
James H. Oury
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oury, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, C. M.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oury, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, C. M.G.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1403-1406
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Case Reports

Expanding indications for the Ross procedure

James H. Oury, MDa, Bruce G. Hardy, MDa, Hong He Luo, MDa, Matt Maxwell, MDa, Carlos M.G. Duran, MD, PhDa

a The International Heart Institute of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Oury, The International Heart Institute of Montana, 554 West Broadway, Missoula, MT 59801


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Comment
 References
 
The pulmonary autograft procedure has been shown to provide excellent hemodynamic results in young patients with aortic pathology. However, the use of this procedure in those with more complex aortic disease has not been extensively evaluated. The purpose of this report is to present the application of the Ross procedure in a 21-year-old man with extensive acquired aortic root pathology, both subannular and supraannular, and prosthetic valve dysfunction after two previous procedures.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Comment
 References
 
The pulmonary autograft procedure has been shown to provide excellent hemodynamic results in young patients with aortic root pathology. The efficacy of this procedure has been documented in several series of patients with relatively straightforward aortic root pathology [13].

The Ross procedure has also been expanded to neonates and infants with complex aortic root pathology with excellent results in both the immediate and midterm periods [4]. However, its application in complicated acquired adult aortic root conditions has had less appreciation and evaluation.

It is the purpose of this report to present the application of the Ross procedure in a patient with extensive aortic root pathology, both subannular and supraannular extending to the transverse arch. The patient had undergone two previous aortic root procedures and presented for his third procedure at age 21.

A 21-year-old man presented with extensive aortic root pathology after two previous procedures at ages 5 and 15 years. He had originally undergone aortic valvuloplasty and supraannular patch reconstruction for congenital aortic valvular and supravalvular stenosis. At age 15 years he underwent reoperation at which time his aortic valve was replaced with a 23-mm St. Jude mechanical valve (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN). To deal with the supravalvular problem, a graft was placed "... at the level of the commissures and somewhat below the coronary ostia, which were large." Because of significant intraoperative bleeding through the graft material, the previous operative note stated that it was necessary to place a Teflon felt band over the majority of the ascending aortic Dacron graft.

The patient’s postoperative course after this second operation was uncomplicated. However, while on anticoagulant therapy he experienced a spontaneous intraspinal bleed leading to a transient paraplegia that required emergency incision and drainage to restore normal neurologic function. At that time, his warfarin was discontinued. He had remained on aspirin until the time of the present procedure.

Symptoms of exercise-induced fatigability had also developed. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated a 55-mm Hg mean resting gradient across the mechanical prosthesis and the subaortic area, with the suggestion of a subannular narrowing or membrane by echocardiography. These findings prompted surgical consultation and operation.

At operation, dense adhesions were encountered between the entire ascending aorta with the external Teflon felt wrap and surrounding structures. Standard bicaval cannulation technique was used together with femoral artery cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. Systemic hypothermia to 26°C was used, with both antegrade and retrograde blood cardioplegia for myocardial protection. An insulating pad was placed between the heart and the posterior mediastinal structures. With satisfactory exposure obtained, the aorta was cross-clamped and alternating antegrade and retrograde myocardial protection was begun. Topical iced saline and continuous monitoring of the myocardial temperature were used with the goal of maintaining myocardial temperatures below 10°C. Cold blood cardioplegia was administered every 20 minutes, antegrade or retrograde or by direct coronary cannulation.

The existing ascending aortic graft was first removed along with the anterior portion of the right pulmonary artery, which was imbedded in the Teflon felt posteriorly. The pulmonary autograft root was next harvested in the manner originally described by Ross [1]. As its length was not sufficient to reach the distal ascending aorta/transverse arch, it was necessary to extend the pulmonary autograft using a 24-mm Dacron conduit (Hemashield, Meadox Medical, Oakland, NJ), (Fig 1). The patient was cooled to 17°C and under a 17-minute period of circulatory arrest, an open distal anastomosis was constructed between the distal aorta and the Dacron graft.



View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. The completed extended Ross procedure, including Dacron graft extensions of the pulmonary autograft and homograft to reconstruct the pulmonary artery bifurcation and the right pulmonary artery.

 
Standard root replacement techniques were used to seat the pulmonary autograft. However, because of the small aortic annulus and subannular stenosis, a Konno procedure was also necessary. The intraventricular septum was incised and the pulmonary autograft with its extended segment of attached anterior right ventricular wall was placed using interrupted 4-0 Prolene sutures (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) tied over an external reinforcing strip of Teflon felt. Left and right coronary buttons were then attached to the autograft in the usual fashion with running 6-0 Prolene suture.

Reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and the right pulmonary artery was then accomplished using a pulmonary homograft (Cyrolife, Inc, Kennesaw, GA) with attached branch pulmonary arteries. The distal portion of the homograft pulmonary artery was used as a patch to reconstruct the excised anterior portion of the native right pulmonary artery. With the distal pulmonary homograft and pulmonary artery reconstruction secure, the end-to-end anastomosis between the pulmonary autograft and the distal Dacron graft was performed. The proximal pulmonary homograft was then anastomosed to the RVOT in the usual fashion.

Aortic cross-clamp time was 263 minutes. Sinus rhythm returned within 5 minutes after removal of the aortic cross-clamp. After 30 minutes of rewarming and stabilization, the patient was easily weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass. After bypass transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrated a competent pulmonary autograft from the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) to the ascending aorta with a physiologic gradient (< 5 mm Hg). Normal left ventricular function was also documented by transesophageal echocardiogram.

The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful. He was extubated within 12 hours, moved from the intensive care unit within 18 hours, and discharged on his fifth postoperative day.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Comment
 References
 
Valid concern exists regarding the use of the Ross procedure for complex aortic root pathology. The operation is complex and involves a two-valve procedure for single valve pathology. It is unarguably apparent, however, that when performed properly, it offers the ideal solution for aortic root pathology [5].

The expansion of this procedure for the neonate and infant born with complex aortic root pathology has evolved in the past decade beginning with the report of Drs Dewan and Oswalt submitted in 1994 to the Ross registry of a 1-day-old infant undergoing the Ross procedure (J. D. Oswalt and S. J. Dewan, personal communication). Hanley’s group [6] in San Francisco has reported excellent early and mid-term results in this age group, adding significantly to the surgeon’s repertoire when dealing with complex aortic root pathology by using the Ross procedure or additional LVOT widening procedures, formerly amenable only to the standard Konno procedure. With the Ross/Konno operation, they have reported complete relief of outflow tract obstruction, with excellent short- and midterm results.

When dealing with the adult patient, however, whose original pathology involved complex aortic root reconstruction in infancy or childhood, the basic components of this operation leading to a successful outcome using the Ross procedure have been less well-appreciated and applied.

Principles leading to a successful outcome in these acquired or iatrogenic forms of aortic root pathology, are summarized as follows: (1) optimum exposure and uniform meticulous myocardial protection anticipating a prolonged period of ischemic arrest; (2) placement of an architecturally perfect pulmonary homograft, which also, because of the marked distortion of the aortic root encountered in these situations, requires root replacement; and (3) accurate reconstruction of the RVOT and pulmonary artery using a pulmonary homograft. The operative sequence followed in this case emphasized these basic principles and allowed excellent exposure, good myocardial protection, and secure hemostasis of all suture lines. All the techniques used in this procedure are part of current standard cardiovascular teaching [7]. However, the sequence involved in these techniques is worth noting as it allows a methodical and unhurried approach to this complex problem and achievement of an optimal outcome.

The perioperative risks of this procedure must be weighed against other suitable alternatives including aortic homograft root replacement, unstented porcine xenograft root replacement, and composite mechanical valve conduit alternatives. In this setting, however, each of the alternatives requires a fairly similar approach in terms of myocardial protection and prolonged ischemic time owing to the complexity of the aortic root pathology encountered and the necessity of removing the entire aortic root and prosthetic valve. They also individually do not address the LVOT obstruction that was a component of the clinical presentation of this patient. As demonstrated with the Ross/Konno procedure, this last problem is easily solved by use of the pulmonary graft with attached right ventricular free wall muscle, allowing widening of the LVOT as necessary.

The long-term durability of the pulmonary autograft in the aortic position has been documented both experimentally and clinically [8, 9]. The hemodynamic performance of the pulmonary autograft is also identical to its normal counterpart and certainly superior to other mechanical or biologic alternatives [10]. The freedom from complications related to anticoagulation is also of obvious importance in this particular case as the patient had previously documented warfarin-related complications. The issue of long-term durability of the pulmonary autograft has been raised in terms of its use in young adults. Data compiled by the Ross registry document a greater than 80% 25-year survival with the pulmonary autograft in the aortic position and similar statistics for the pulmonary homograft used to reconstruct the RVOT [11].

In conclusion, the Ross procedure as performed in a patient with complex aortic valve pathology provided an optimally suited solution for this problem. The pulmonary autograft was easily adapted to this complex LVOT and aortic root pathology and provided a satisfactory clinical result. The perioperative risk of this procedure, primarily the prolonged cross-clamp time, must be weighed against the long-term performance of other alternatives.

Consideration must be tempered by the realization that an individual approach to the patient is dependent on the experience of the surgeon performing such repairs. However, in experienced hands, the Ross procedure is feasible and provides significant immediate and long-term advantages in selected patients with complex aortic root pathology.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Ross D.N. The pulmonary autograft. Sem Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;8:350-357.[Medline]
  2. Kouchoukos N.T., Davila-Roman V., Spray T.L., Murphy S.F., Perrillo J.B. Replacement of the aortic root with a pulmonary autograft in children and young adults with aortic valve disease. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1-6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Elkins R.C. Congenital aortic valve disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:269-274.[Free Full Text]
  4. Reddy V.M., Rajasinghe H.A., McElhinney D.B., et al. Extending the limits of the Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S600-S603.
  5. Elkins R.C. Pulmonary autograft—the optimal substitute for the aortic valve? [Editorial]. N Engl J Med 1994;330:59-60.[Free Full Text]
  6. Hanley F.L., Reddy V.M., Rajasinghe H.A., Teitel D.F., Haas G.S. Aortoventriculoplasty with the pulmonary autograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:158-167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Oury J.H., Maxwell M. An appraisal of the Ross procedure. Oper Tech Card Thor Surg 1996;2:289-301.
  8. Gorczynski A., Trenkner M., Anisomowicz L., et al. Biomechanics of the pulmonary autograft valve in the aortic position. Thorax 1982;37:535-539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ross D., Jackson M., Davies J. Pulmonary autograft aortic valve replacement. J Cardiol Surg 1991;6(suppl):529-533.
  10. Oury J.H., Doty D.B., Oswalt J.D., Knapp J.F., Mackey S.K., Duran C.M.G. Cardiopulmonary response to maximal exercise in young athletes following the Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S153-S154.
  11. Oury J.H., Hiro S.P., Maxwell M., et al. The Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S162-S165.
Accepted for publication March 23, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
E. Lansac, H.S. Lim, Y. Shomura, K.H. Lim, W. Goetz, N.T. Rice, C. Acar, and C.M.G. Duran
Aortic and pulmonary root: are their dynamics similar?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 268 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
James H. Oury
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oury, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, C. M.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oury, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, C. M.G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS