ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Paul J. Hendry
Roy G. Masters
Wilbert J. Keon
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mussivand, T.
Right arrow Articles by Keon, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mussivand, T.
Right arrow Articles by Keon, W. J.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:785-789
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Innovative Circulatory Support Systems

Progress with the HeartSaver ventricular assist device

Tofy Mussivand, DEnga, Paul J. Hendry, MDa, Roy G. Masters, MDa, Mike King, CEnga, Kevin S. Holmesa, Wilbert J. Keon, MDa

a Cardiovascular Devices Division, University of Ottawa Heart Institute and WorldHeart Corporation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Address reprint requests to Dr Mussivand, Cardiovascular Devices Division, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 1053 Carling Ave, Rm H560B, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1Y 4E9
e-mail: tofym{at}heartinst.on.ca

Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Circulatory Support Devices for Severe Cardiac Failure, Houston, TX, Oct 3–5, 1997.

Abstract

Background. Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been shown to be effective for short- or long-term circulatory support. Devices are either being adapted or newly designed for longer term or permanent support, with the goal to provide patients with improved quality of life. Since 1990, a program has been in place to develop a totally implantable, permanent VAD.

Methods. A multidisciplinary team is developing this VAD with specific goals in mind: (1) that it have an intrathoracic position, (2) that it be a totally implantable device without any percutaneous connections, and (3) that it be possible to communicate with the device from remote locations. These goals would allow for complete patient mobility and flexibility for follow-up.

Results. The electrohydraulically actuated VAD combines the blood pump, volume displacement chamber, energy converter, and internal electronic module into a single compact unit. The device called the HeartSaver VAD is powered by a transcutaneous energy transfer system and can be remotely monitored and controlled. Prototypes of different versions of the device have been tested in vitro and in vivo with satisfactory performance.

Conclusions. The prototypes of the HeartSaver VAD have functioned well under test conditions and fulfilled the outlined goals. Further development and testing of the design are being conducted before clinical availability.

There is little question that the incidence of end-stage heart failure is increasing in the world. Numerous therapeutic alternatives are being assessed as the limitations of traditional medications and cardiac transplant are recognized. As experience has been gained with the short-term use of currently available circulatory support devices, the duration of support has been extended quite successfully [13]. Current systems are being adapted and new technologies are being developed to allow for longer term and permanent support with circulatory support devices.

Several major issues have been identified as limitations of the current technologies. One important problem with current devices is that the location of devices in the abdomen may not be ideal as complications associated with adjacent organs and diaphragmatic defects may occur [4]. An intrathoracic location for such devices may be preferable.

Another complication associated with existing devices that require percutaneous connections is the relatively high incidence of infection, which affects 40% to 50% of recipients. Previously, it has been suggested that a totally implantable system without such percutaneous connections could have a major impact in reducing this incidence of infection [5, 6]. Finally, to increase cost effectiveness, hospital stays and visits should be minimized. To aid in this compact controllers and biotelemetry systems allowing remote control and assessment of these devices would be advantageous.

The Cardiovascular Devices Division of the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and the WorldHeart Corporation has focused on these issues with the ongoing development of the HeartSaver Ventricular Assist Device (VAD), an intrathoracically implantable VAD without percutaneous connections. This device combines total implantability with an intrathoracic position, transcutaneous power transfer, and remote communication capabilities, thus offering future recipients the potential of an enhanced quality of life.

Device description

The HeartSaver VAD has undergone several conformal changes since its inception in 1990 (Fig 1). Although it continues to be based on an electrohydraulic actuating mechanism, the change to a compact implantable unit with the blood pump, volume displacement chamber, energy converter, and internal electronic module encapsulated together has allowed the device to be shaped for an intrathoracic position.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. The evolution of the device design toward an implantable unit suitable for intrathoracic positioning.

 
Advantages of intrathoracic positioning
Selection of the intrathoracic implant site for the system (Fig 2 ) is based on several factors. First, the inflow cannula length may be shortened compared to intraabdominal devices. It is speculated that the shortened inflow cannula may improve inflow characteristics. Second, the rib cage would provide a secure anchoring site to eliminate device migration. Finally, the incision would not have to be extended into the abdomen, thereby improving patient comfort and postoperative mobility, while avoiding the necessity of perforating the diaphragm for passage of the cannula.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. HeartSaver VAD schematic showing the location of the implantable unit adjacent to the natural heart in the left hemithorax.

 
The implantable unit
To design the implantable unit for intrathoracic placement, the overall size, weight, and geometry of the unit would need to be optimized to fit within the available space in the left hemithorax. To assess the available space, a series of cadaver and intraoperative fit trials were conducted [7]. Based on these studies the overall geometric constraints of the device were determined and the unit’s configuration was adapted to meet these demands.

The implantable unit (version 5.1) has a total volume displacement of 480 mL and a weight of 680 g (Fig 3). It consists of a 70-mL blood chamber with a flexible polyurethane diaphragm within a rigid housing. The silicone-based hydraulic fluid is pumped during systole through the energy convertor that consists of a bidirectional brushless DC motor, a bladed impeller, and a bladed housing. The hydraulic fluid actuates the flexible blood chamber diaphragm that ejects the blood from the chamber. The blood chamber fills passively during diastole with the hydraulic fluid returning to the volume displacement chamber through a one-way valve. The diastolic filling may be augmented with reversal of the motor in the active filling mode. Filling and ejection of blood is monitored using Hall Effect sensors and a magnet embedded in the blood pumping diaphragm, which allows the position of the flexing diaphragm to be dynamically determined throughout the pumping cycle by the internal electronic module. Mechanical valves (Medtronic-Hall, extended side tilting disk; Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) mounted in the inflow and outflow cannulas, were used for the in vitro and in vivo testing described herein. As this device is now nearing clinical use, these mechanical valves have recently been replaced with bioprosthetic valves (Carpentier-Edwards, Baxter Healthcare Corp, Irvine, CA) to reduce anticoagulation requirements.



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. The implantable unit of the HeartSaver VAD, which combines the blood chamber, volume displacement chamber, energy converter, and internal electronic module into an anatomically compatible package.

 
To eliminate the need for percutaneous venting, a volume displacement chamber (VDC) was integrated into the implantable unit. The VDC allows for the displacement of the actuating hydraulic fluid during device diastole, and consists of an integrated hydraulic fluid chamber with a flexible diaphragm. The flexible diaphragm is in contact with the lung tissue, which is, in turn, in contact with atmospheric pressures, thus eliminating the need for a percutaneous vent. In the case of the HeartSaver VAD, the VDC also performs a secondary function, namely heat dissipation from the internal electronic module. The internal electronic module is mounted within the VDC surrounded by the actuating hydraulic fluid, which allows excess heat generation to be transferred over the entire surface area of the implanted unit. Heat transfer to the body is accomplished across the blood diaphragm into the bloodstream, across the VDC diaphragm to the lung tissue, and across the housing to the surrounding tissue. By allowing large areas of heat transfer potential, local hot spots are eliminated and operating temperatures well within physiologic limits can be obtained.

Total implantability and transcutaneous energy transfer
In addition to not requiring external venting, total implantability would only be possible if power for the device was completely internal or could be delivered transcutaneously.

To provide power to the device without percutaneous lines, a transcutaneous energy transfer (TET) system was developed [8, 9]. The TET system transfers power from an external source across intact skin and tissue to the device using electromagnetic induction. This is accomplished using a pair of wire coils, one implanted subcutaneously and one located directly over the implanted coil on the skin surface. By selecting an appropriate operating frequency and coil geometry, a coupling coefficient suitable for power transfer across intact skin and tissue can be obtained.

The TET system provides two major functions: (1) provides operating power from an external power source (battery, wall socket, etc.) to the implanted device; and (2) provides power to recharge the implanted battery, which is used as a backup power supply. The implanted battery also provides the patient with the ability to bathe, shower, swim, and partake in other activities unencumbered by any external components.

Biotelemetry
To monitor and control the device without the need for percutaneous connections, a biotelemetry system was developed [911]. This system uses infrared data communications to transfer control and monitoring information across intact skin and tissue. Electronic modules consisting of multiple infrared receivers and transmitter components are mounted in both of the energy transfer coils, establishing a continuous bidirectional communications path between the implanted device and the outside of the body. The infrared method was selected based primarily on its immunity to electrical noise, which ensures a high level of accuracy for this life-critical application.

Remote capabilities
A remote biotelemetry capability has been added to the HeartSaver VAD System, which allows the device to be controlled and monitored using public communications infrastructure (telephone lines, ATM, satellite, Internet, etc) by a healthcare provider at a remote site. This feature is expected to offer patients improved convenience and quality of life by reducing the number of visits to the hospital or clinic for routine device or patient check-ups. Basically the patient can connect the wearable external controller to a telephone line or cellular phone at his home or other location, and a healthcare provider at the hospital or clinic can have access to control and monitoring functions of the implanted device. This remote communications capability should also help to alleviate the fears that some patients have exhibited related to leaving the hospital with a complex implanted medical device. In addition, as the patient will no longer be required to return as frequently to the hospital for routine device or patient check-ups, the cost of follow-on patient care could also be reduced.

Quality of life
The HeartSaver VAD System is expected to deliver enhanced quality of life to the device recipients in both the short and long term. The intrathoracic position should reduce incision length and abdominal manipulation and thereby reduce postoperative pain and minimize associated complications. Total implantability will offer improved patient mobility and hopefully early patient discharge. Finally, the remote biotelemetry capability will allow for ease of follow-up with patients living away from hospital-based resources.

Results

In vitro testing
Testing of the individual components and the entire HeartSaver VAD System is ongoing. Various versions of the device have been tested on modified Donovan mock loops for up to 6.4 years (Fig 4). One of the early systems has now run for more than 6.4 years, which is equivalent to approximately 200 million cycles (Fig 5). Although the results from this testing may not be directly relevant to the final device configuration, they have provided valuable insight into the potential durability of the developed system, subsystems, and components.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. In vitro durability results (longest running system by version number).

 


View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. An early prototype that has now run failure free in vitro for more than 6.4 years.

 
The TET and Biotelemetry subsystems have been tested extensively both in-house and by other researchers using the patented technologies [10]. In vitro testing has demonstrated acceptable function over a range of conditions.

In vivo testing
The entire HeartSaver VAD System (version 4) including the TET and Biotelemetry subsystems was assessed in vivo during a series of 11 bovine experiments [12]. During these experiments, the animals were supported for periods up to 5 days to assess system design, implantability, and overall function.

To allow further development of the TET and Biotelemetry systems independent of the implantable unit, version 5 was tested with a percutaneous power and information cable. Testing focused on performance of inflow and outflow cannulas, device positioning in the calf model in preparation for chronic testing of the final design, and team preparation. A total of 13 experiments were performed in animals with a mean weight of 102 ± 4 kg. Duration of implantation ranged from 13.5 hours to 30 days. Modifications resulting from these tests included: (1) abandoning cardiopulmonary bypass support during cannula implantation to reduce pulmonary sequelae of cardiopulmonary bypass, (2) use of a stainless-steel wire reinforced cannula to prevent kinking and use of a Dacron coating to prevent abrasion of adjacent tissue, and, (3) changes in the control software and an improved monitoring system for blood chamber filling and ejection (Fig 6).



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. Display unit for monitoring blood chamber filling and ejection.

 
During the entire series of 25 experiments there were no infection-related complications and only 1 case of thrombosis in the blood chamber that was later determined to be caused by the breakage of a polyurethane housing component, which has since been resolved by using a cast titanium housing. There were also two cases of cannula clotting related to cannula kinking, which has been successfully resolved through cannula reinforcement and straightening.

The reason for termination of the various studies was as follows: 6 electively terminated due to achieving various goals, 3 due to insufficient inflow to the device, 3 due to pulmonary dysfunction, 3 due to bleeding/tamponade, 2 due to respiratory insufficiency, 2 due to faulty electrical connections, 2 due to housing defects resulting in hydraulic fluid loss, 1 due to thromboembolic complications (related to the anticoagulation protocol), 1 due to ventricular fibrillation during implant, 1 due to an air embolism during device implant, and 1 due a power failure in the facility. As can be seen by these results, most of the study terminations were due to the medical/surgical complications experienced during the development of a suitable implantation protocol in the animal model. Each of these issues have now been specifically addressed and satisfactorily resolved.

Comment

The HeartSaver VAD development has achieved the major design goals, resulting in a totally implantable, intrathoracic VAD. The system has undergone in vitro and in vivo evaluation, establishing the feasibility of an intrathoracically implanted VAD without percutaneous connections. Further modifications to the design of the device will be based on the results from ongoing testing. Once the design has been finalized, formal in vitro reliability testing and chronic in vivo assessment will be carried out before human clinical trials.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Industry Canada and WorldHeart Corporation.

References

  1. Frazier OH. Long-term ventricular support with the Heartmate in patients undergoing bridge-to-transplant operations. Cardiac Surgery: State of the Art Reviews 1993;7:353–62.
  2. Oz M.C., Argenziano M., Catanese K.A., et al. Bridge experience with long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices. Circulation 1997;95:1844-1852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. McCarthy P.M., Young J.B., Smedira N.G., Hobbs R.E., Vargo R.L., Starling R.C. Permanent mechanical circulatory support with an implantable left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1458-1461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Phillips W.S., Burton N.A., Macmanus Q., Lefrak E.A. Surgical complications in bridging to transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:482-486.[Abstract]
  5. Pennington D.G. Extended support with permanent systems. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:403-406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McCarthy P.M., Schmitt S.K., Vargo R.L., Gordon S., Keys T.F., Hobbs R.E. Implantable LVAD infections. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:359-365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mussivand T., Masters R.G., Hendry P.J., et al. Critical anatomic dimensions for intrathoracic circulatory assist devices. Artif Organs 1992;16:281-285.[Medline]
  8. Mussivand T., Miller J.A., Santerre P.J., et al. Transcutaneous energy transfer system performance evaluation. Artif Organs 1993;17:940-947.[Medline]
  9. Mussivand T., Hendry P.J., Masters R.G., Holmes K.S., Hum A., Keon W.J. A remotely controlled and powered artificial heart pump. Artif Organs 1996;20:1314-1319.[Medline]
  10. Mussivand T., Hum A., Diguer M., et al. A transcutaneous energy and information transfer system for implanted medical devices. ASAIO J 1995;41:M253-M258.[Medline]
  11. Mussivand T., Hum A., Holmes K.S., Keon W.J. Wireless monitoring and control for implantable rotary blood pumps. Artif Organs 1997;21:661-664.[Medline]
  12. Hendry P.J., Masters R.G., Keaney M., et al. Evolution of an electrohydraulic ventricular assist device through in vivo testing. ASAIO J 1996;42:M350-M354.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. J. Hendry, T. V. Mussivand, R. G. Masters, M. E. Bourke, G. M. Guiraudon, K. S. Holmes, K. D. Day, and W. J. Keon
The HeartSaver left ventricular assist device: an update
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S166 - S170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
A K Mahmood, J M Courtney, S Westaby, M Akdis, and H Reul
Critical review of current left ventricular assist devices
Perfusion, September 1, 2000; 15(5): 399 - 420.
[PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Paul J. Hendry
Roy G. Masters
Wilbert J. Keon
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mussivand, T.
Right arrow Articles by Keon, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mussivand, T.
Right arrow Articles by Keon, W. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS