|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:542-548
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Departments of Department of Cardiology, Childrens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
b Department of Cardiac Surgery, Childrens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
c Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
d Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Jonas, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Childrens Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. Retrospective chart review was used for 84 patients operated on between 1990 and 1995 (mean age 26 ± 28 days, mean weight 3.3 ± 0.8 kg) undergoing homograft conduit repair in the first 3 months of life. Cases were divided into simple and complex, eg, absent pulmonary valve syndrome or associated interrupted arch. Mean homograft size was 9.0 ± 2 mm.
Results. Early mortality was 4.7% (simple) and 30% (complex). Mean hospital stay was 18 days. Mean follow-up was 34 months. Thirty-seven (47%) patients underwent conduit replacement. Median time to reoperation was 3.1 years. Mean size of replacement homograft was 17 ± 2 mm. There were no deaths at reoperation. Mean hospital stay at conduit change was 6.3 days. Probability of survival at 5 years is 75%.
Conclusions. Biventricular repair employing a conduit can be performed safely in noncomplex anomalies in the first 3 months of life. Time interval until repeat surgery is relatively short but equal or greater than that with most palliative procedures.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no operative deaths. Patients were ventilated for 1.2 ± 0.5 days and on inotropic support 0.8 ± 0.6 days. The average length of stay in the ICU was 2.9 ± 2.5 days (median 2 days), and total hospital days were 6.3 ± 4.
Two patients had wound infections, 1 of them had a similar complication at the initial surgery, 1 patient had a retained pulmonary artery line that had to be surgically removed, and 1 patient had paradoxical motion of the right diaphragm.
Second reintervention
Three patients had undergone dilatation and stent placement after their reoperation. Four patients had a reoperation for pathology unrelated to management of their conduit.
Univariate analysis
Univariate analysis of risk factors (Table 8) revealed that patients with an initial small homograft (class 1) were most likely to suffer early graft failure (p = 0.02) and reoperation (p = 0.01), but survival was unaffected. Simple cases have better survival than complex (p = 0.02). Age, weight, pathology, type (aortic vs pulmonary), length of homograft, and the different tissue banks providing homografts were not significant statistically.
|
|
|
Of the 55 patients available for detailed clinical long-term follow-up, 44 are asymptomatic (80%), 8 have mild shortness of breath (SOB), fatigability, sweating upon exercise, or cyanosis, and 3 have more severe symptoms. Thirteen families (24%) report some form of neurological problem with their child (Table 9).
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Until tissue engineering provides us with a better alternative, we prefer the use of homografts over synthetic conduits. Homograft has better hemostatic properties [2, 3] when compared with a bioprosthesis. It also provides technical ease at the time of surgery and is preferred in the neonatal period when the pulmonary vascular resistance is high and the presence of a valve is important. With a median time of 3.1 years before reoperation and acceptable freedom from graft failure and reoperation intervals, we consider the homograft to be a satisfactory conduit.
Previous reports have compared the fate of homograft conduits to bioprostheses. In a large series from Toronto, Razzouk and associates [4] compared four types of valved implants for ventricle-to-pulmonary artery connection. They concluded that Dacron conduits containing a porcine valve had significantly better durability than cryopreserved homografts. Their series is quite different from our report: the mean age was 9.1 years and the average homograft diameter 23 mm. Smaller homografts for infants were not studied.
Lacour-Gayet and associates [5] studied three different valved conduits for truncus arteriosus repair in neonates. They used Dacron-valved conduits ranging from 12 to 14 mm. The operative mortality was 16% for the entire cohort. Cases were not divided between simple and complex but were divided between anatomic and nonanatomic pulmonary valve (PV) replacement. The hospital mortality was lower in the anatomic PV replacement (7%), including placement of a homograft valved conduit, compared with 43% in the nonanatomic repair. Freedom from reoperation at 7 years was 77% for Dacron conduit and 43% for homograft. They prefer the use of Dacron-valved conduit when small cryopreserved homografts are not available.
Reddy and associates [2] have compared Dacron conduits containing porcine valves and cryopreserved homograft conduits for repair of truncus arteriosus. In a cohort of patients, actuarial freedom from conduit-related reintervention at 5 years was statistically better with homografts compared with xenograft-valved conduits. Conduit-related deaths occurred in 5.7% in the group with xenograft valved-related conduits, compared with 0% in the homograft group. This difference did not reach statistical significance and xenograft-valved conduits tended to be used early in the series compared with homografts, which were used routinely from 1992.
The only risk factor associated with decreased freedom from graft failure in our series was the use of small homografts. Reddy and associates [2] have also demonstrated that conduit size is a significant predictor of early conduit-related reintervention. In contrast to Heinemann and associates [6] from our institution, during a different time frame and with a smaller series, we could not establish a statistically significant difference between the use of pulmonary and aortic cryopreserved homografts for graft failure and reoperation.
As reported by others [2], the most frequent causes of conduit failure leading to replacement were calcification of the homograft, patient-conduit mismatch resulting from patient growth, and sternal compression of the homograft.
The role of interventional catheterization has been reported previously from our institution. Powell and associates [7] have shown the utility of angioplasty in the prolongation of conduit life. We have confirmed this finding by showing improvement in the hemodynamics across homograft conduits after stent implantation in 12 patients. However, it appears that repeat stent implantation and redilation is met with less significant improvement, reflecting the rapid growth of children over this period relative to the fixed conduit size.
The Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium [8] has described 100% mortality for infants under 6 months of age undergoing RV-to-PA connection procedures. However, we and others [9, 10] have demonstrated the feasibility of conduit repair with low mortality in noncomplex cases. ICU and hospital stay are comparable with other neonatal procedures.
Long-term follow-up has been reported after truncus arteriosus repair in infancy [11]. Our intermediate follow-up at 5 years has demonstrated a 75% survival rate for all patients. Simple cases have 80% survival at 5 years. Complex-associated anomalies were the only significant risk factors by univariate analysis. Eighty percent of the patients are asymptomatic on follow-up. They all will require continued surveillance of their homograft valved conduit. Speech delay seemed to be the most frequent impairment in the 13 neurological problems observed by parents, but this was not the aim of this study and a complete neurological assessment was not performed. The importance of genetic factors such as microdeletion of chromosome 22 was not defined, though this is likely to have been common in these patients, many of whom had conotruncal anomalies.
The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature and single institution bias. The cohort studied was 84 consecutive neonates with various pathologies, who required homograft-valved conduits. Although the pathology was not a statistically significant factor for intermediate results on univariate analysis, it may show some correlation with time for late survival and reoperation.
Biventricular repair employing a homograft-valved conduit can be performed with low mortality with noncomplex anomalies. The postoperative course is acceptable for both complex and noncomplex anomalies. Reoperation can be performed safely in both complex and noncomplex cases. Smaller homografts have earlier graft failure and reoperation. Most patients are asymptomatic at follow-up. We believe that these data support our contention that neonatal repair, even when a conduit is necessary, is preferred over palliative alternatives.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. D. Derby, J. Kolcz, S. Gidding, and C. Pizarro Outcomes following non-valved autologous reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract in neonates and infants Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 726 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-H. Kim, S. K. Min, C. H. Choi, J. R. Lee, Y. J. Kim, E.-J. Bae, and C. I. Noh Follow-Up of Shelhigh Porcine Pulmonic Valve Conduits Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 2047 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Askovich, J. A. Hawkins, C. T. Sower, L. L. Minich, L. Y. Tani, G. Stoddard, and M. D. Puchalski Right Ventricle to Pulmonary Artery Conduit Longevity: Is it Related to Allograft Size? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 907 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Karamlou, E. H. Blackstone, J. A. Hawkins, M. L. Jacobs, K. R. Kanter, J. W. Brown, C. Mavroudis, C. A. Caldarone, W. G. Williams, B. W. McCrindle, et al. Can pulmonary conduit dysfunction and failure be reduced in infants and children less than age 2 years at initial implantation? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2006; 132(4): 829 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Brown, M. Ruzmetov, M. D. Rodefeld, P. Vijay, and R. K. Darragh Valved bovine jugular vein conduits for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in children: an attractive alternative to pulmonary homograft. Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 909 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L.S. Morales, B. E. Braud, K. S. Gunter, K. E. Carberry, K. A. Arrington, J. S. Heinle, E. D. McKenzie, and C. D. Fraser Jr Encouraging results for the Contegra conduit in the problematic right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery connection. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2006; 132(3): 665 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. McMullan, G. Oppido, N. Alphonso, A. D. Cochrane, Y. d. d'Acoz, and C. P. Brizard Evaluation of downsized homograft conduits for right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery reconstruction J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 66 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Khambadkone, L. Coats, A. Taylor, Y. Boudjemline, G. Derrick, V. Tsang, J. Cooper, V. Muthurangu, S. R. Hegde, R. S. Razavi, et al. Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation in Humans: Results in 59 Consecutive Patients Circulation, August 23, 2005; 112(8): 1189 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Brown, M. Ruzmetov, M. D. Rodefeld, P. Vijay, and M. W. Turrentine Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction With an Allograft Conduit in Non-Ross Patients: Risk Factors for Allograft Dysfunction and Failure Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 655 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Selamet Tierney, W. M. Gersony, K. Altmann, D. E. Solowiejczyk, L. M. Bevilacqua, C. Khan, E. Krongrad, R. S. Mosca, J. M. Quaegebeur, and H. D. Apfel Pulmonary position cryopreserved homografts: Durability in pediatric Ross and non-Ross patients J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 282 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W.H. Sutherland, T. E. Perry, Y. Yu, M. C. Sherwood, E. Rabkin, Y. Masuda, G. A. Garcia, D. L. McLellan, G. C. Engelmayr Jr, M. S. Sacks, et al. From Stem Cells to Viable Autologous Semilunar Heart Valve Circulation, May 31, 2005; 111(21): 2783 - 2791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Karamlou, R. M. Ungerleider, B. Alsoufi, G. Burch, M. Silberbach, M. Reller, and I. Shen Oversizing pulmonary homograft conduits does not significantly decrease allograft failure in children Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 27(4): 548 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ishizaka, R. G. Ohye, C. S. Goldberg, S. R. Ramsburg, T. Suzuki, E. J. Devaney, and E. L. Bove Premature failure of small-sized Shelhigh No-React porcine pulmonic valve conduit model NR-4000 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 715 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Aupecle, A. Serraf, E. Belli, S. Mohammadi, F. Lacour-Gayet, P. Fornes, and C. Planche Intermediate follow-up of a composite stentless porcine valved conduit of bovine pericardium in the pulmonary circulation Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2002; 74(1): 127 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Koirala, S. L. Merklinger, G. S. Van Arsdell, B. W. McCrindle, M. A. Borger, C. A. Caldarone, J. G. Coles, and W. G. Williams Extending the usable size range of homografts in the pulmonary circulation: outcome of bicuspid homografts Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 866 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sinzobahamvya, J. Wetter, H. C. Blaschczok, M.-Y. Cho, A. M. Brecher, and A. E. Urban The fate of small-diameter homografts in the pulmonary position Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2070 - 2076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |