ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Talia B. Spanier
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Spanier, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Spanier, T. B.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:278-286
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Collective Reviews

Aprotinin in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

Craig R. Smith, MDa, Talia B. Spanier, MDa

a Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Smith, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, Milstein Hospital Building, Room 7-435, 177 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY 10032
e-mail: crs2{at}columbia.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
Early experience with aprotinin in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) raised alarm about hazards associated with its use. Based on what little is known about possible mechanistic interactions between hypothermia, stasis, and aprotinin, there is no evidence that aprotinin becomes unusually hazardous in DHCA. Excessive mortality and complication rates have only been reported in clinical series in which the adequacy of heparinization is questionable. Benefits associated with use of aprotinin in DHCA have been inconsistently demonstrated. The only prospective, randomized series showed significant reduction in blood loss and transfusion requirements. Use of aprotinin in DHCA should be based on the same considerations applied in other cardiothoracic procedures.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
The complex mixture of procoagulant and anticoagulant forces unleashed by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) presents a challenging hemostatic paradox that complicates the management of anticoagulation. Minimizing the impact of anticoagulant forces has received the most attention, and a large number of randomized controlled clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that aprotinin reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in many commonplace cardiac surgical procedures [13]. Although the precise mechanism has not been clearly defined, interference with contact activation of the intrinsic cascade, preservation of platelet function, and inhibition of fibrinolysis have all been cited as contributing to the beneficial effects of aprotinin in this setting (Fig 1) [46].



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Aprotinin and CPB. Aprotinin interferes with the activation of coagulation during CPB at several steps, including inhibition of contact activation through blockade of kallekrein, blockade of platelet activation, and its direct antifibrinolytic effect. tPA = tissue plasminogen activator; C3a, C5a: complement fragments C3a and C5a.

 
It is logical to speculate that aprotinin would offer similar benefits in procedures requiring deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest (DHCA) in addition to CPB. After almost a decade of experience, however, use of aprotinin in procedures employing DHCA is considered routine by some surgeons while being condemned by others. Some authors [710] have speculated that certain potentially prothrombotic effects of aprotinin are uniquely expressed under the conditions of stasis and hypothermia that distinguish DHCA from CPB alone.

This review addresses this controversy, beginning with clinical or experimental evidence on mechanistic interactions between aprotinin, stasis, and hypothermia. Next, all of the published clinical experience with aprotinin and DHCA is reviewed for evidence of benefit in terms of blood loss or transfusion requirements, based exclusively on series containing a control group. Finally, the incidence of complications possibly associated with aprotinin is considered, based on two categories of clinical material: (1) series containing a control group, and (2) series without a control group. A summary of complication rates associated with major aortic procedures is provided as a reference point, particularly for comparison with aprotinin/DHCA series lacking a control group. An explicit description of the literature search strategies used is contained in the Appendix.


    Stasis and hypothermia
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
Hypothermia alone has several anticoagulant effects, most of which interfere with the coagulation pathways at the same steps as CPB (Fig 2). The simplest effect of hypothermia is kinetic, and slows coagulation reactions. Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and thrombin time display a negative exponential correlation with temperature, such that PT and APTT are prolonged 50%–60% at 29°C, independent of clotting factor levels [11]. Thrombin activation is 60% diminished at 25°C [12]. The kinetic effects are presumably the major factor responsible for prolongation in the activated clotting time (ACT) that occurs in cold blood independent of heparin concentration [13]. These effects of temperature are completely reversible with adequate rewarming, provided sufficient substrate remains, and are not affected by aprotinin.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Aprotinin and hypothermia. Aprotinin interferes with many of the procoagulant effects of hypothermia through its inhibitory effects on kallekrein and fibrinolysis and through its protective effects on platelets. tPA = tissue plasminogen activator; C3a, C5a: complement fragments C3a and C5a.

 
Hypothermia activates kallikrein, which increases circulating kinins by converting kininogen to kinin [14]. Kinins are vasoactive peptides that produce vasodilation and increase vascular permeability, leading to effects on fluid balance and blood pressure regulation. Kinins are normally degraded in a single passage through the lungs by a pulmonary converting enzyme present on the luminal surface of vascular endothelial cells. This effect is greatly diminished by the diversion of pulmonary arterial blood flow that accompanies total CPB [15]. The composite kallikrein-activating effects of CPB and hypothermia, amplified by avoidance of the normal degradation pathway, make the kallikrein-inhibiting effects of aprotinin attractive in this setting.

Similarly, CPB and hypothermia are both associated with many well-described platelet defects [1621]. Hypothermia alone produces platelet dysfunction because of temperature-dependent morphologic alterations, including changes in platelet membranes and function [22]. Boldt and associates [6] demonstrated that hypothermic (< 28°C) CPB reduces platelet function and aggregation, and that recovery of function in the later bypass period occurs more slowly than in normothermic (> 34°C) patients. Aprotinin protects platelets by preserving GP1b receptor [4, 23], which may explain why Boldt and associates [6] also found that administration of aprotinin to a matched hypothermic group decreased the deficits in function and aggregation and minimized transfusion requirements. There are no clinical data available in the setting of profound hypothermia, but there is also no reason to assume that these effects of aprotinin would become less beneficial, or detrimental, at lower temperatures.

Numerous alterations in the fibrinolytic system in CPB have been documented, including elevated fibrin(ogen) degradation products [24], decreased plasminogen [25], and increased plasma fibrinolytic activity [26], all reasons for the original use of antifibrinolytic agents in this setting. Fibrinolytic activity is also altered by hypothermia alone. Yoshihara and associates [27] describe significant elevations in plasma fibrinolytic activity in mongrel dogs cooled to < 20°C. Maximal fibrinolytic activity occurred during early rewarming and trended to baseline after rewarming. This phenomenon was thought to represent primary fibrinolysis since hypercoagulability, hypofibrinogenemia, and decrease in antithrombin III were not observed. The antifibrinolytic action of aprotinin, therefore, should be salutary against the cumulative antifibrinolytic effects of CPB and hypothermia.

Stasis is one-third of Virchow’s triad, and is a powerful prothrombotic stimulus. In CPB, blood pooling in the pericardium and blood sequestered in the venous reservoir are examples of stasis that are routine and well tolerated in fully anticoagulated patients. DHCA procedures are certainly notable for a more profound period of stasis, but results in a large number of cases performed without aprotinin suggest that this is well tolerated [2836]. The important question is whether circumstances are altered in the presence of aprotinin. There are simply no clinical or experimental data available to directly address this question. Studies are needed in which stasis and aprotinin are the only important variables, with DHCA and operative technical details as constants.

Protein C is one of the important natural anticoagulant mechanisms that might be exerting a protective effect in the setting of stasis, and one group of authors has suggested that the problems allegedly associated with the use of aprotinin in DHCA might be explained by the effect of aprotinin on Protein C [37]. Protein C is activated by thrombin through a calcium-dependent interaction with the endothelial cell receptor protein thrombomodulin (Fig 3) [38]. Activated Protein C inhibits clotting through the selective proteolytic destruction of factors Va and VIIIa, which prevents the formation of Factor Xa and thrombin. Activated Protein C induces fibrinolysis by releasing tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) from the endothelial cell surface. Elevations in plasma Protein C levels have been documented in CPB [39, 40], where it is thought to play a role in the maintenance of blood fluidity and in the induction of fibrinolysis. Activated Protein C is a serine protease; therefore, there is a theoretical concern that its anticoagulant activity might be attenuated by the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin. This action of aprotinin is presumably taking place in non-DHCA procedures without obvious detriment, and there is no evidence to suggest that the net effect is altered at lower temperatures. Although aprotinin has been shown to markedly decrease Protein C activity in vitro [39], this effect was not found when Protein C was measured in CPB patients receiving aprotinin [4043].



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Anticoagulant effects of Protein C. Protein C is one of the important natural anticoagulants that promotes fibrinolysis through activation of tPA when activated in the presence if thrombin, and inhibits clotting through its inactivation of factors Va and VIIIa. tPA = tissue plasminogen activator.

 

    Benefits
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
Table 1 summarizes blood loss and transfusion requirements from series containing a control group, either historical or randomized. Sundt and associates [44] were first to report experience with aprotinin in DHCA, and failed to find a reduction in blood loss comparing 20 aprotinin patients with 20 well-matched historical controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirements in Clinical Series Comparing Aprotinin and Controls in Deep Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest

 
In 1993, Dietrich and associates [45] conducted the first randomized prospective trial of aprotinin use involving DHCA. Sixty infants (weight < 10 kg) undergoing cardiac operations were randomized to one of three groups, with 20 infants in each group. DHCA was not used in all infants, but was used in the majority (37/60, 62%) and was independent of treatment group assignment. Thirteen DHCA infants were randomized to low-dose aprotinin, 10 to high dose, and 14 to control. Blood loss in the first 6 hours was significantly less in the high-dose group compared with low dose or control (99 ± 32 vs 160 ± 106 mL/m2 vs. 164 ± 87 mL/m2 respectively, p < 0.05). There were no differences in transfusion requirements. Unfortunately, results for DHCA infants are not separable from the whole.

Westaby and associates [37] reported results in a retrospective consecutive series of 80 patients operated between 1987 and 1992, during which time aprotinin use was introduced. Mean blood loss for 27 controls was 837 mL/24 h versus 1,929 mL/24 h in 53 aprotinin patients. A "significant" increase in blood loss was reported in DHCA patients who received aprotinin. Standard errors were calculated (± 90 mL/24 h in both groups), but tests for statistical significance were not applied.

The first positive results in adults were reported by Goldstein and associates [46], who compared 24 DHCA patients who received aprotinin with 24 matched historical controls, and found a significant (p < 0.01) reduction in requirements for postoperative homologous erythrocytes. Trends favoring the aprotinin group were seen in the number of patients not requiring any transfusion (16.7% vs 4.1%), and in the number of patients requiring <= 10 total units of exogenous blood products (45.8% vs 12.5%). Chest tube output in the first 12 hours did not differ (488 vs 495 mL).

Okita and associates [47] reported a series of 112 consecutive patients who underwent aortic surgery, 60 under DHCA, 39 of whom received aprotinin. The study began with a randomized design, but a selection bias favoring use of aprotinin in left thoracotomies entered at some unspecified point, based on the authors’ observation that "...aprotinin was effective for preventing...bleeding after lung manipulation." Blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass, blood loss in the ICU, and fresh blood transfusion requirements were significantly less in the aprotinin group (p = 0.047, p = 0.039, and p = 0.009, respectively). The aprotinin dose used was much less than what has been used in most series, consisting of 2 x 106 U in the pump prime only.

Parolari and associates [48] compared 18 DHCA patients who underwent thoracic aortic procedures between 1990 and 1994 and received aprotinin with 21 patients treated from 1987 through 1989 who did not receive aprotinin. Thirteen parameters of blood loss and transfusion requirements were highly similar in the two groups. Some caution may be appropriate before accepting conclusions based on an experience of 3.6 procedures per year during the aprotinin era.

The obvious need for a randomized prospective trial was finally met by Ehrlich and associates [49], who reported experience in 50 DHCA patients undergoing thoracic aortic operations, randomized to receive low-dose aprotinin or placebo. A highly significant reduction in blood loss and transfusion parameters was noted in the aprotinin group (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirements in 50 Patients Prospectively Randomized to Receive Aprotinin Versus Controla

 

    Complications
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
The controversy surrounding the use of aprotinin in DHCA has arisen primarily because of complications reported in the first two adult series published [37, 44]. Before reviewing in detail the complications reported in those series and others, it is worth considering what incidence of complications should be expected for the types of procedures being reported. It is even more important to consider the anticoagulation protocol used, which is directly related to the period of time during which the series was carried out.


    Complications of major aortic surgery
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
DHCA is typically employed in major aortic procedures that lie towards the complex and hazardous end of the spectrum of cardiac procedures. It is reasonable to expect this fact to be reflected in the incidence of complications, with or without aprotinin. Mortality was 13% in 2,975 patients undergoing major aortic surgery without the use of aprotinin in the 11 clinical series summarized in Table 3. The largest recent series [29] reported a 12% in-hospital mortality and a 7% incidence of cerebrovascular events in 656 patients who underwent aortic surgery with DHCA from 1979 to 1991. At the opposite end of the spectrum, Gott and associates [28] reported a 4.8% mortality in 270 patients, but results are undoubtedly skewed by a unique predominance of operations for annuloaortic ectasia in patients with Marfan’s syndrome, accounting for 69% of the series, in whom mortality was 2.5%. Only 10% of the patients in Gott’s series were subjected to DHCA, and only 23% had ascending aortic dissection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Complications of Major Aortic Procedures Recorded in 11 Series

 
The frequency with which DHCA was used in each series in Table 3 varies markedly, from zero to 100%. To see whether mortality correlated with the frequency of DHCA in each report, the 11 series were divided into three partially overlapping groups, those with < 50% DHCA, those with > 50% DHCA, and those with 100% DHCA (Table 4). There was no difference in mortality, suggesting that the clinical substrate was a more important determinant of mortality than the specific technical issues influencing the use or avoidance of DHCA.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Relationship Between Mortality and Frequency of DHCA in 11 Series of Major Aortic Procedures From

 
The incidence of renal dysfunction was not thoroughly reported in the 11 series constituting Table 3, in which proximal aortic pathology and frequent use of DHCA predominate. In Svensson and associates’ series above [29], "renal complications" had an incidence of 8.5% (56/656), and were highly associated (p = 0.0009) with death in multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio 4.10). The definition of "renal complications" was not provided. Because of the technical and anatomic factors associated with aortic operations below the diaphragm, renal dysfunction has been analyzed more carefully in series in which thoracoabdominal aneurysms predominate. Five representative reports totalling 3,049 patients are summarized in Table 5. Although few procedures were done with DHCA, results in this population provide perspective on the risk of renal dysfunction associated with major thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. The incidence of renal dysfunction requiring hemodialysis clusters in a narrow range from 5% to 14%, with lesser degrees of dysfunction ranging up to 25% [50].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Complications of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Procedures in Five Series

 

    Heparinization
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
The early reports of complications in DHCA patients included autopsy evidence of extensive small-vessel platelet-fibrin thrombi [44, 51], and appeared at a time when concern about excessive thromboembolic risk had been heightened by Cosgrove and associates’ report [3], suggesting an increased incidence of vein graft thrombosis and Q-wave infarction in aprotinin patients undergoing reop coronary bypass. These problems were reported before any widespread appreciation of the effects of aprotinin on the activated clotting time (ACT) assay used to guide the adequacy of heparinization. Using a celite activator, the ACT is elevated in the presence of aprotinin, an observation originally misinterpreted in 1990 as evidence of a "heparin-sparing" anticoagulant action of aprotinin [43]. By 1992, others began to report the same distorting effects of aprotinin on ACT [52], and a recommendation to maintain celite ACT > 750 s was published [53] in a letter to the Editor. In 1994, Smith and associates [54] pointed out that inadequate heparinzation might explain the excessive thromboembolic complications seen in series collected before an understanding of aprotinin effects on ACT. Certainly, by 1995, this possibility was well recognized [53, 56].

Whenever aprotinin is implicated as a possible cause of complications in a clinical series, the methods must be scrutinized carefully for evidence of adequate heparinization, particularly in reports appearing before 1995. A number of protocols to achieve adequate heparinization are now available. The protocol used at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center since 1994 is summarized in Table 6.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Protocol for Aprotinin Administration During DHCA at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center

 

    Clinical series with control data
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
With the cautions above in mind, DHCA series containing a control group and providing evidence regarding complications are summarized in Table 7, and discussed below. Sundt and associates [44] were appropriately alarmed to find striking differences in hospital mortality and renal dysfunction comparing 20 DHCA patients who received aprotinin with 20 historical controls. Hospital mortality occurred in 7 aprotinin patients (35%) versus 1 control (5%) (p < 0.04). Renal dysfunction, defined as >= 1.5 times the preop value, was seen in 13 aprotinin patients (65%) versus 1 control (5%) (p < 0.0001). Five aprotinin patients (25%) required dialysis, versus none of the controls (p = 0.04). The study was carried out in 1991 and 1992, before any widespread recognition of aprotinin effects on ACT (above). ACT was maintained at > 480 s using a celite activator, and the aprotinin patients received substantially less heparin than controls (mean 27,850 U vs. 40,250 U, not statistically tested for significance). Nothing approaching this level of complications has been reported before or since, and in retrospect, it seems likely that the aprotinin patients were inadequately heparinized.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Complications in Clinical Series Comparing Aprotinin With Controls in Deep Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest

 
Westaby and associates [37] reported a greater incidence of bleeding in their aprotinin group, and noted that six reoperations for bleeding were required in the aprotinin group against none in the controls. A claim is also made for a greater incidence of "thrombosis-related deaths." In fact, there were five deaths in each group. Four of five aprotinin deaths were attributed to either myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, or multiple pulmonary emboli, all of which would be consistent with thrombosis, but only one autopsy is described in an aprotinin patient. It revealed multiorgan "infarction and haemorrhage." There were two deaths in the control group possibly consistent with thrombosis, one attributed to multisystem failure and one to "LV [left ventricle] failure." It is unlikely that statistical analysis, which was not done, would have supported a claim for a significant difference. Similar to the Sundt series, the study was done before the recognition of aprotinin effects on ACT, raising a very real possibility of inadequate anticoagulation. With respect to this clinical report, it is also important to emphasize, as the authors put it, that "Surgical methods evolved during the study period." In 1989, moderate hypothermia (28°C) and distal aortic cross-clamping were abandoned in favor of DHCA with an open distal technique; gelatin-resorcin-formol glue was introduced in 1990; the heparinization protocol was altered "later" than 1989 in aprotinin patients. Conclusions drawn by isolating aprotinin as the independent variable in this series are best viewed as conjecture.

In the randomized prospective trial reported by Dietrich and associates [45], in which high-dose aprotinin was associated with reduced blood loss, little attention was paid to reporting complications. All patients survived, and "No side effects attributable to aprotinin were observed." At a later date (1995), the same authors reported a 5-year experience with DHCA and aprotinin in "about 500" children, observing "none of the harmful consequences described by Sundt and co-workers" [57].

After the three reports discussed above, there have been four clinical series reported containing control group data that were carried out under heparinization protocols likely to guarantee adequate anticoagulation, beginning with Goldstein and associates [46]. In one series [48], the authors reported a trend (p < 0.1) towards a higher rate of permanent neurologic deficits and a "complicated postoperative course" in the 18 patients who received aprotinin. Otherwise, no significant differences were seen in any of these series between the aprotinin and control groups in mortality, or with respect to neurologic, renal, or other complications. The most recent series in this group was prospective and randomized [49].


    Clinical series without control data
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
Results from five series containing DHCA patients who received aprotinin, but without control group data, are summarized in Table 8. Since aprotinin was not necessarily the primary focus of each series, DHCA/aprotinin patients cannot be accurately counted in two reports [50, 58]. The maximum possible number of aprotinin/DHCA patients in these two series is 168, although the actual number is undoubtedly less. One hundred forty patients in the other three series certainly qualify [5961]. Only two of the series [46, 60] describe the heparinization protocol used, and in both instances, the protocol takes into account the effects of aprotinin on ACT. Two of the other three series were carried out before 1995, and the third overlapped (1991 to 1996).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8. Clinical Series With Deep Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest, Aprotinin, No Control Group

 
The mortality experience ranges from 5% to 17%, which is quite comparable with what would be expected from DHCA procedures without aprotinin (Table 3). Neurologic and renal complications were inconsistently reported and somewhat more divergent, but also comparable with expectations.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
To summarize the mechanistic interactions between stasis, hypothermia, and aprotinin, the hemostatic perturbations attributable to hypothermia are anticoagulant, and are very similar to those encountered in routine CPB, where aprotinin would be expected to exert a beneficial effect by blunting coagulopathy. The role of stasis, which is the major prothrombotic stimulus associated with DHCA, is not well defined clinically or experimentally. The theoretical prothrombotic link between aprotinin and inhibition of activated Protein C is unsubstantiated. There is no evidence to support a belief that aprotinin becomes uniquely prothrombotic in DHCA.

The body of clinical experience with aprotinin and DHCA has several frustrating features. Only seven series [8, 37, 4446, 48, 49] contain any kind of control group data, and treatment groups are very small in number. Only two trials were prospective and randomized [45, 49]. One of these [45] was carried out in infants, before a time when the importance of aprotinin effects on ACT were recognized, and the analysis of results failed to separate the results for DHCA infants from the minority (38%) treated with CPB alone. A third [47] began with a randomized design but aborted the protocol in the face of what the authors felt were compelling benefits favoring aprotinin. Significant variation exists between series in the criteria used to assess efficacy, and in the attention devoted to the analysis of complications other than mortality.

Five clinical series [47, 50, 5860] contain larger numbers but have no control group data, making comparisons possible only to benchmark outcomes derived from experience with similar procedures. Among the uncontrolled series, only two provide a description of the heparinization protocol followed [47, 61]. In two series [50, 59], the data presented do not allow separation of the results for those patients who had DHCA with aprotinin from the results for the entire group.

Certain conclusions are still defensible. First and foremost, the alarming incidence of complications emerging from the first reported series [44] almost certainly resulted from inadequate heparinization. Nothing approaching the same level of complications has been seen in the other 6 controlled and 5 uncontrolled clinical series comprising the world’s literature on the subject. Importantly, excessive complications were not observed in the only prospective randomized trial that exists. From the standpoint of safety, the data support use of aprotinin in DHCA, provided that adequate heparinization is achieved by following a protocol that accounts for the effects of aprotinin on ACT.

Comparisons with similar procedures without aprotinin are useful with respect to outcomes such as mortality and complications. Where efficacy is concerned, the extreme diversity in methods used to report blood loss and transfusion requirements renders such comparisons meaningless, and makes the 5 series without control data useless. Left with the 7 controlled series summarized in Table 1, the evidence for a reduction in blood loss and transfusion requirements attributable to the use of aprotinin in DHCA is not overwhelming. Among 202 aprotinin patients and 152 controls in seven series, reduction in blood loss was observed in three series [45, 47, 49], and reduction in transfusion requirements was observed in three [46, 47, 49]. Nonetheless, it should be emphasized that the only two trials that were prospective and randomized [45, 49] both found significant reductions in blood loss. Reduction in transfusion requirements was observed in the prospective randomized trial in adults [49], but not in the trial carried out in children [45]. It could be argued that transfusion requirements in infants are less relevant, since all infants require transfusion on CPB, and differences might be more difficult to demonstrate. Conclusions from that trial are also compromised by inability to isolate results for DHCA infants.

In summary, there is no reason to believe that DHCA increases the risk associated with the use of aprotinin. Benefits in terms of blood loss and transfusion requirements have not been uniformly demonstrated, and may depend on other clinical factors not easily isolated[55].


    Acknowledgments
 
We wish to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Xzabia Caliste, for her help in the preparation of this manuscript, and Dr Alan Weinberg for his thorough analysis of statistical issues.


    Appendix
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 
A MEDLINE search was carried out from 1960 through 1998, without language restriction. The clinical literature search was designed to identify all published reports of aprotinin use in the setting of hypothermia and circulatory arrest, hypothermia alone, or circulatory arrest alone. Key words used in the clinical search were aprotinin/circulatory arrest/hypothermia/neurologic complications/mortality/cardiopulmonary bypass/cardiac surgery. Any report containing information on one or more patients who received aprotinin during operations performed under hypothermia or circulatory arrest was included in the review. The bibliographies of all publications reviewed were manually searched for evidence of relevant references that might have been missed. The subject was discussed with several colleagues at other institutions known to have interest in the problem in an attempt to locate unpublished data, to assure that no important published data was missed, or to clarify published findings included in the review.

The search for data related to mechanisms of action was designed to focus on clinical or experimental data on interactions between aprotinin and hypothermia or circulatory arrest. Key words were aprotinin/anticoagulation/hypothermia/coagulation/stasis/clotting/protein C/heparin/cardiopulmonary bypass/circulatory arrest/cardiac surgery. This search was necessarily more selective. Because data describing specific interactions were rare, publications thought to provide useful information on hypothermia alone, stasis alone, or aprotinin alone were included if they provided a basis for reasonable inference regarding possible interactions.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Stasis and hypothermia
 Benefits
 Complications
 Complications of major aortic...
 Heparinization
 Clinical series with control...
 Clinical series without control...
 Conclusions
 Appendix
 References
 

  1. Bidstrup B.P., Royston D., Sapsford R.N., Taylor K.M. Reduction in blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass with high dose aprotinin (Trasylol). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:372.
  2. Royston D., Bidstrup B.P., Taylor K.M., Sapford R.N. Effect of aprotinin on need for blood transfusion after repeat open heart surgery. Lancet 1987;2:1289-1291.[Medline]
  3. Cosgrove D.M., III, Heric B., Lyttle B.W., et al. Aprotinin therapy for re-operative myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:1031-1038.[Abstract]
  4. Wachtfogel Y.T., Kucich U., Hack C.E., et al. Aprotinin inhibits the contact, neutrophil, and platelet activation systems during simulated extracorporeal perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:1-9.[Abstract]
  5. Blauhut B., Gross C., Necek S., Doran J.E., Spath P., Lundsgaard-Hansen P. Effects of high-dose aprotinin on blood loss, platelet function, fibrinolysis, complement, and renal function after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:958-967.[Abstract]
  6. Boldt J., Knothe C., Zickmann B., Bill S., Dapper F., Hempelmann G. Platelet function in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:652-658.[Abstract]
  7. Westaby S. Coagulation disturbances in profound hypothermia. Seminars in Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg 1997;9:246-256.
  8. Okita Y., Takamoto S., Ando M., et al. Coagulation and fibrinolysis system in aortic surgery under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with aprotinin. Circulation 1997;96(Suppl II):II-376-II-381.
  9. Westaby S. Safety and efficacy of aprotinin in profoundly hypothermic circulatory arrest. J Card Surg 1997;12(Suppl):207-213.[Medline]
  10. Hornick P., Taylor K.M. Is aprotinin safe when used in the context of profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest? A literary review. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:669-673.[Medline]
  11. Reed R.L., II, Bracey A.W., Jr, Hudson J.D., Miller T.A., Fischer R.P. Hypothermia and blood coagulation. Circ Shock 1990;32:141-152.[Medline]
  12. Kurrek M.M., Reed R.L., II Effect of hypothermia on enzymatic activity of thrombin and plasmin. Surg Forum 1987;38:221-223.
  13. Kopriva C.J., Sreenivasan N., Stefansson S., Farrell D.T., Shaffer W.B., Jr, Geha A.S. Hypothermia can cause errors in activated coagulation time. Anesthesiology 1980;53(Suppl 3):85.
  14. Nagaoka H., Katori M. Inhibition of Kinin Formation by a Kallikrein inhibitor during extracorporeal circulation in open-heart surgery. Circulation 1975;52:325-332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Pang L.M., Stalcup S.A., Lipset J.S., Hayes C.J., Bowman F.O., Jr, Mellins R.B. Increased circulating bradykinin during hypothermia and cardiopulmonary bypass in children. Circulation 1979;60:1503-1507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ferroni P., Speziale G., Ruvolo G., et al. Platelet activation and cytokine production during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass—a possible correlation?. Thromb Haemost 1998;80:58-64.[Medline]
  17. Harker L.A., Malpass T.W., Branson H.E., Hessel E.A., II, Slichter S.J. Mechanism of abnormal bleeding in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood 1980;56:824-834.[Free Full Text]
  18. Rinder C.S., Bohnert J., Rinder H.M., Mitchell J., Ault K.A., Hillmann R. Platelet activation and aggregation during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 1991;75:388-393.[Medline]
  19. Komai H., Haworth S.G. Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on the circulating level of soluble GMP-140. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:478-482.[Abstract]
  20. Mazer C.D., Hornstein A., Freedman J. Platelet activation in warm and cold heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1481-1486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kestin A.S., Valeri C.R., Khuri S.F., et al. The platelet function defect of cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood 1993;82:107-117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Valeri C.R., Feingold H., Cassidy G., et al. Hypothermia-induced reversible platelet dysfunction. Ann Surg 1987;205:175-181.[Medline]
  23. Van Oeveren W., Harder M.P., Roozendaal K.J., Eijsman L., Wildevuur C.R.H. Aprotinin protects platelets against the initial effect of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:788-797.[Abstract]
  24. Holloway D.S., Summaria L., Sandesara J., Vagher J.P., Alexander J.C., Caprini J.A. Decreased platelet number and function and increased fibrinolysis contribute to postoperative bleeding in cardiopulmonary bypass patients. Thrombosis Haemostasis 1988;59:62-67.[Medline]
  25. Gans H., Lillehei C.W., Krivit W., Runyan A., MacAulay M., Gans M.A. Problems in hemostasis during open-heart surgery. I. On the release of plasminogen activator. Ann Surg 1961;154:915-924.
  26. Kucuk O., Kwaan H.C., Frederickson J., Wade L., Green D. Increased fibrinolytic activity in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass operation. Am J Hematol 1986;23:223-229.[Medline]
  27. Yoshihara H., Yamamoto T., Mihara H. Changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis occurring in dogs during hypothermia. Thrombos Res 1985;37:503-512.[Medline]
  28. Gott V.L., Gillinov A.M., Pyeritz R.E., et al. Aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:536-545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Svensson L.G., Crawford E.S., Hess K.R., et al. Deep hypothermia with circulatory arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:19-31.[Abstract]
  30. Ergin M.A., Galla J.D., Lansman S.L., Quintana C., Bodian C., Griepp R.B. Hypothermic circulatory arrest in operations on the thoracic aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:788-799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Laas J., Jurmann M.J., Heinemann M., Borst H.G. Advances in aortic arch surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:227-232.[Abstract]
  32. Crawford E.S., Kirklin J.W., Naftel D.C., Svensson L.G., Coselli J.S., Safi H.J. Surgery for acute dissection of ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:46-59.[Abstract]
  33. Galloway A.C., Colvin S.B., LaMendola C.L., et al. Ten-year operative experience with 165 aneurysms of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Circulation 1980;80(Suppl I):I-249-I-256.
  34. Lytle B.W., Mahfood S.S., Cosgrove D.M., Loop F.D. Replacement of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:651-658.[Abstract]
  35. Fann J.I., Sarris G.E., Mitchell R.S., et al. Treatment of patients with aortic dissection presenting with peripheral vascular complications. Ann Surg 1990;212:705-713.[Medline]
  36. Crawford E.S., Svensson L.G., Coselli J.S., Safi H.J., Hess K.R. Surgical treatment of aneurysm and/or dissection of the ascending aorta, transverse aortic arch, and ascending aorta and transverse aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;98:659-674.[Abstract]
  37. Westaby S., Forni A., Dunning J., et al. Aprotinin and bleeding in profoundly hypothermic perfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:82-86.[Abstract]
  38. Esmon C.T. The roles of protein C and thrombomodulin in the regulation of blood coagulation. J Biological Chem 1989;264:4743-4746.[Free Full Text]
  39. Knobl P.N., Zilla P., Rasol R., Muller M., Vukovich T.C. The protein C system in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;94:600-605.[Abstract]
  40. Stibbe J., Kluft C., Brommer E.J.P., Gomes M., deJone D., Nauta J. Enhanced fibrinolytic activity during cardiopulmonary bypass in open-heart surgery in man is caused by extrinsic (tissue-type) plasminogen activator. Eur J Clin Invest 1984;14:375-382.[Medline]
  41. Boldt J., Schindler E., Welters I., Wittstock M., Stertmann W.A., Hempelmann G. The effect of the anticoagulation regimen on endothelial-related coagulation in cardiac surgery patients. Anaesthesia 1995;50:954-960.[Medline]
  42. Van Oeveren W., van Oeveren B., Wildevuur R.H. Anticoagulation policy during use of aprotinin in cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:210-211.[Medline]
  43. DeSmet A.A., Joen M.C.N., van Oeveren W., et al. Increased anti-coagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass by aprotinin. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:520-527.[Abstract]
  44. Sundt T.M., II, Kouchoukos N.T., Saffitz J.E., Murphy S.F., Wareing T.H., Stahl D.J. Renal dysfunction and intravascular coagulation with aprotinin and hypothermic circulatory arrest. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:1418-1424.[Abstract]
  45. Dietrich W., Mossinger H., Spannagl M., et al. Hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass with different aprotinin dosages in pediatric patients having cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:712-720.[Abstract]
  46. Goldstein D.J., DeRosa C.M., Mongero L.B., et al. Safety and efficacy of aprotinin under conditions of deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1615-1622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Okita Y., Takamoto S., Ando M., Morota T., Yamaki F., Kawashima Y. Is use of aprotinin safe with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in aortic surgery? Investigations on blood coagulation. Circulation 1996;94(Suppl II):177-181.
  48. Parolari A., Antona C., Alamanni F., et al. Aprotinin and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:149-156.[Abstract]
  49. Ehrlich M., Grabenwoger M., Cartes-Zumelzu F., et al. Operations on the thoracic aorta and hypothermic circulatory arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:220-225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Godet G., Fleron M.H., Vicaut E., et al. Risk factors for acute postoperative renal failure in thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Annesth Analg 1997;85:1227-1232.[Abstract]
  51. Saffitz J.E., Stahl D.J., Sundt T.M., Wareing T.H., Kouchoukos N.T. Disseminated intravascular coagulation after administration of aprotinin in combination with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:1080-1082.[Medline]
  52. Wang J.S., Lin C.Y., Hung W.T., Thisted R.A., Karp R.B. In vitro effects of aprotinin on activated clotting time measured with different activators. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:1135-1140.[Abstract]
  53. Hunt B.J., Segal H.C., Yacoub M. Guidelines for monitoring heparin by the activated clotting time when aprotinin is used during cardiopulmonary bypass [letter]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:211-212.[Medline]
  54. Smith C.R., Mongero L.B., DeRosa C.M., et al. Safety of aprotinin in profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest [letter]. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:603-609.
  55. Dietrich W., Dilthey G., Spannagl M., et al. Influence of high-dose aprotinin on anticoagulation, heparin requirement, and celite and kaolin-activated clotting time in heparin-pretreated patients undergoing open-heart surgery. Anesthesiology 1995;83:679-689.[Medline]
  56. Dietrich W., Jochum M. Effect of celite and kaolin on activated clotting time in the presence of aprotinin. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:177-178.[Free Full Text]
  57. Dietrich W., Mossinger H. The use if aprotinin in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. In: Pifarre R., ed. Blood Conservation with Aprotinin. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus, 1995:275-286.
  58. Kipfer B., Striffeler H., Gersbach P., et al. Surgery for acute ascending aortic dissection. Euro J Cardiothoracic Surg 1995;9:248-252.
  59. Rooney S.J., Pagano D., Bognolo G., Wong C., Bonser R.S. Aprotinin in aortic surgery requiring profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest. Euro J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:373-378.[Abstract]
  60. Regragui I.A., Bryan A.J., Izzat M.B., Wisheart J.D., Hutter J.A., Angelini G.D. Aprotinin use with hypothermic circulatory arrest for aortic valve and thoracic aortic surgery. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:674-677.[Medline]
  61. Moreno-Cabral C.E., Miller D.C., Mitchell R.S., Stinson E.B., Oyer P.E., Jamieson S.W. Degenerative and atherosclerotic aneurysms of the thoracic aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;88:1020-1032.[Abstract]
  62. Schepens M.A., Defauw J.J., Hamerlijinck R.P., Vermeulen F.E. Risk assessment of acute renal failure after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Ann Surg 1994;219:400-407.[Medline]
  63. Svensson L.G., Crawford E.S., Hess K.R., Cosselli J.S., Safi H.J. Experience with 1509 patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic operations. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:357-370.[Medline]
  64. Crawford E.S., Crawford J.L., Safi H.J., et al. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:389-404.[Medline]
  65. Coselli J.S. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Cardiovasc Surg 1994;9:638-647.
  66. Raudkivi P.J., Williams J.D., Monro J.L., Ross J.K. Surgical treatment of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;98:675-682.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Murugesan, S. K. Banakal, R. Garg, S. Keshavamurthy, and K. Muralidhar
The Efficacy of Aprotinin in Arterial Switch Operations in Infants
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 783 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
D. Spielvogel, M. N. Mathur, and R. B. Griepp
Aneurysms of the Aortic Arch
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1251 - 1276.
[Full Text]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
E. B. Mossad, S. Machado, and J. Apostolakis
Bleeding following deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest in children.
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2007; 11(1): 34 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Sedrakyan, A. Wu, G. Sedrakyan, M. Diener-West, M. Tranquilli, and J. Elefteriades
Aprotinin use in thoracic aortic surgery: Safety and outcomes
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2006; 132(4): 909 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Kang, A. J. B. Clarke, I. A. Nicholson, and R. B. Chard
Circulatory arrest for repair of postcoarctation site aneurysm
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2029 - 2033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
D. Spielvogel, M. N. Mathur, and R. B. Griepp
Aneurysms of the Aortic Arch
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1149 - 1168.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. M. Pearl, D. P. Nelson, S. M. Schwartz, and P. B. Manning
First-stage palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome in the twenty-first century
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 331 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Talia B. Spanier
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Spanier, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Spanier, T. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS