ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert A. Guyton
Jakob Vinten-Johansen
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thourani, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Vinten-Johansen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thourani, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Vinten-Johansen, J.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1732-1737
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Adenosine A3 pretreatment before cardioplegic arrest attenuates postischemic cardiac dysfunction

Vinod H. Thourani, MDa, Russell S. Ronson, MDa, James E. Jordan, BSa, Robert A. Guyton, MDa, Jakob Vinten-Johansen, PhDa

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carlyle Fraser Heart Center-Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Accepted for publication January 4, 1999.

Address reprint requests to Dr Vinten-Johansen, Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Crawford Long Hospital, 550 Peachtree NE, Atlanta, GA 30365-2225
e-mail: jvinten{at}emory.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. The cardioprotective effects of the adenosine A3 receptor in a cardioplegia model have not been described. We tested the hypothesis that infusion of the A3 receptor agonist, Cl-IB-MECA (100 nM), as a pretreatment (PTx) and/or as a cardioplegic (CP) additive reduces postischemic myocardial injury.

Methods. Isolated perfused rat hearts underwent 30 minutes of normothermic ischemia, 60 minutes of intermittent hypothermic cardioplegia (10°C), followed by 2 hours of reperfusion. Hearts were divided into four groups: (1) no pretreatment (PTx) and unsupplemented cardioplegia (CP) (control), (2) Cl-IB-MECA PTx and unsupplemented CP (A3-PTx), (3) no PTx and Cl-IB-MECA CP (A3-CP), or (4) Cl-IB-MECA PTx and Cl-IB-MECA CP (A3-[PTx+CP]).

Results. Coronary flow was not increased after A3 pretreatment when compared to baseline values. After 2 hours of reperfusion, left ventricular developed pressure in control and A3-CP groups was depressed to 43% ± 3% and 47% ± 2% of baseline; while A3-PTx and A3-[PTx+CP] significantly increased left ventricular developed pressure (65% ± 3% and 61% ± 5%) from baseline relative to control and A3-CP. Effluent creatine kinase activity was significantly decreased by A3-PTx (1520 ± 32 IU/L), A3-[PTx+CP] (1481 ± 41 IU/L) from control (1734 ± 54 IU/L) and A3-CP (1750 ± 43 IU/L). Myocardial edema (% tissue water) was significantly less in A3-PTx (78 ± 0.6%) and A3-[PTx+CP] (76% ± 2%) compared with control (85% ± 0.4%) and A3-CP (83% ± 2%).

Conclusions. Adenosine A3 receptor stimulation as a pretreatment attenuates postischemic cardiodynamic dysfunction and creatine kinase release but has no cardioprotection as an adjunct to cold cardioplegia.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Within the past decade, it has been shown that adenosine has the potential to exert beneficial effects during all three windows of cardioprotection: pretreatment (or chemical preconditioning) [1], obligate surgical ischemia [24], and reperfusion [5, 6]. The pretreatment and cardioplegic windows of opportunity are convenient settings for the administration of cardioprotective drugs during surgical myocardial revascularization. A brief pretreatment of adenosine has been shown to reduce infarct size in isolated perfused heart models [7], in in vivo animal models [8], and in humans [9]. Additionally, it has been shown that adenosine, when used alone [1, 4] or in combination with hyperkalemic, hypothermic crystalloid [3, 4] or blood [2], cardioplegia, improves postischemic contractile function. The benefits of adenosine to postischemic myocardium are demonstrable, but its untoward effects produced by activation of adenosine A1 (bradycardia, negative inotropy) and A2a (vasodilation and hypotension) receptors have impeded its routine clinical use in cardiac operations.

The recently described adenosine A3 receptor subtype potentially avoids the complications of hypotension and bradycardia. In a rat testis cDNA library, the adenosine A3 receptor was initially described in 1991 by Meyerhof and associates [10] and then by Zhou and colleagues [11] in 1992. In animal models of nonsurgical myocardial ischemia and reperfusion, the activation of the adenosine A3 receptor was cardioprotective [1214]. In addition, the stimulation of the adenosine A3 receptor has been shown to mimic or induce myocardial preconditioning [1517]. However, the cardioprotective effects of adenosine A3 receptor activation as a pretreatment before cardioplegic arrest or as an adjunct to hypothermic hyperkalemic crystalloid cardioplegic solution has not been investigated.

Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that stimulation of the adenosine A3 receptor with the highly selective A3 receptor agonist, 2-chloro-N6-(3-iodobenzyl) adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide (Cl-IB-MECA, 100 nM), would reduce postischemic dysfunction and morphologic injury in a neutrophil-free isolated perfused rat heart model when administered as a pretreatment or as an additive to crystalloid cardioplegia.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Experimental preparation
The animals in the investigation were handled in full accordance with the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996), and the protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Emory University. Sprague-Dawley rats weighing approximately 200 to 250 g were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg) intraperitoneally and heparinized intravenously with 1,000 U sodium heparin. After adequate heparinization, the heart was excised then mounted on a Langendorff perfusion apparatus (Radnoti Glass Technology Inc, Monrovia, CA), and retrograde aortic perfusion was initiated in a nonrecirculating fashion using modified Krebs-Henseleit (K-H) buffer containing 4.7 mmol/L KCl, 1.2 mmol/L KH2PO4, 1.2 mmol/L MgSO4, 118 mmol/L NaCl, 2.04 mmol/L CaCl2, 0.05 mmol/L ethylenediamene tetraacetic acid tetrasodium salt, 25 mmol/L NaHCO3, and 11 mmol/L dextrose. The perfusate was pH balanced to 7.4 after full aeration and filtered through a 5-µm magna nylon membrane (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). The perfusate temperature was maintained at 37°C using a circulating water-bath heater (Precision Scientific, Chicago, IL) and was continuously oxygenated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. The heart was suspended in a water-jacketed chamber to maintain the temperature at 37°C.

During a 25-minute stabilization period, a latex fluid-filled balloon on the end of a PE-100 catheter was inserted into the left ventricle across the mitral annulus. The balloon was inflated to achieve an end-diastolic pressure between 7 and 10 mm Hg and no further alterations in balloon volume were made. Additionally, two electrodes were placed on the right ventricle, the sinoatrial node was crushed, and the heart was paced at 250 beats per minute using a Grass S9 Stimulator (Grass Medical Instruments, Kings Park, NY).

The left ventricular balloon pressure and the perfusion pressure were monitored with fluid-filled pressure transducers (TRN050 blood pressure transducer) and connected to a TRN005 base instrument amplifier (Kent Scientific Corporation, Litchfield, CT). Coronary perfusion pressure was maintained between 70 and 80 mm Hg. Coronary flow was continuously measured with an in-line ultrasonic flow probe and ultrasonic blood flow meter (Model T101; Transonic Systems Inc, Ithaca, NY). The pressure and flow signals were sampled at 250 Hz by a personal computer using an analog-to-digital converter (Data Translation, Marlboro, MA). The data were captured, stored, and analyzed using SPECTRUM cardiovascular acquisition and analysis software (Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC).

Experimental design
Animals were randomly assigned to four groups (6 in each group): (group 1 [control]) no pretreatment (PTx) and unsupplemented cardioplegia, (CP), (group 2) Cl-IB-MECA (100 nM) PTx and unsupplemented CP (A3-PTx), (group 3) no PTx and Cl-IB-MECA (100 nM) CP (A3-CP), and (group 4) Cl-IB-MECA PTx and Cl-IB-MECA CP (A3-[PTx+CP]). Cl-IB-MECA was administered for 12 minutes before ischemia via a syringe infusion pump (Harvard Apparatus, South Natick, MA) in a side-port located just proximal to the aortic cannulation site. After stabilization and drug administration, all hearts underwent 30 minutes of normothermic (37°C) global ischemia by discontinuing electrical pacing and ceasing all buffer perfusion to the heart to sensitize the myocardium to injury. Multidose hypothermic (10°C) cardioplegia (Plegisol) was administered for 3 minutes at 50 mm Hg every 20 minutes for 1 hour of cardioplegic arrest followed by 2 hours of reperfusion. The final dose of cardioplegia was delivered at 27°C. Reperfusion was initiated by restoring buffer perfusion to the heart; pacing was resumed 5 minutes after initiation of reperfusion. Cardiodynamic measurements were obtained before and after drug administration, and at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes during reperfusion. Coronary effluent was collected before and after drug administration, and 1, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes during reperfusion to measure creatine kinase activity. At the end of 2 hours of reperfusion, all hearts were weighed and myocardial water content was determined by weighing hearts before (wet weight) and after 48 hours (dry weight) of heat desiccation. The myocardial water content was calculated by (wet weight minus dry weight) divided by the wet weight times 100%.

Creatine kinase determination
Creatine kinase (Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO) activity was calculated spectrophotometrically from the effluent collected at the aforementioned time points. The sum of the individual creatine kinase values for each time point is represented as the cumulative creatine kinase activity and is expressed as Units/L.

Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance or repeated measures two-way analysis of variance for analysis of group, time, and group-time interactions. Tukey’s posthoc method was used to determine pairwise differences among groups. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean.

Preparation and dosage of drugs
The selective A3 agonist, 2-chloro-N6-(3-iodobenzyl) adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide (Cl-IB-MECA) was reconstituted in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) to achieve a final perfusate concentration of 100 nM. At this concentration of Cl-IB-MECA, Thourani and colleagues [14] have shown cardioprotective effects without concomitant vasodilatory consequences. The perfusate concentration of DMSO was 0.01 nM. Before the addition of sodium bicarbonate (10 mL of an 8.4% solution), the concentration of electrolytes (per liter of Plegisol [Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL]) was sodium 110 mEq, chloride 160 mEq, potassium 16 mEq, calcium 2.4 mEq, and magnesium 32 mEq.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Left ventricular developed pressure
After 2 hours of reperfusion, control hearts had a 43% ± 3% recovery in left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) from baseline values (Fig 1). In the A3 cardioplegia group (no A3 agonist pretreatment), LVDP at the end of 2 hours of reperfusion was comparably depressed (47% ± 2%). In contrast, LVDP was significantly greater with Cl-IB-MECA in the pretreatment groups A3-PTx (65% ± 3%) and A3-[PTx+CP] (61% ± 5%).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Left ventricular developed pressure (mm Hg) as determined from a fixed-volume, fluid-filled balloon within the left ventricle. (A3 = adenosine A3 receptor agonist Cl-IB-MECA; base = before administration of Cl-IB-MECA; CP = cardioplegia; postdrug = 12 minutes after pretreatment in with K-H buffer or Cl-IB-MECA; r15m, r30m, r60m, r90m, r120m = minutes of reperfusion; PTx = pretreatment.) All values are mean ± standard error of the mean. *p < 0.05 A3-PTx and A3-[PTx+CP] versus control and A3-CP.

 
Peak positive dP/dt
The changes in developed pressure were accompanied by similar changes in peak positive dP/dt (dP/dtmax, Fig 2). After 2 hours of reperfusion, control hearts recovered to only 39% ± 2% of baseline dP/dtmax values. Similarly, hearts in the A3-CP group had a 43% ± 3% recovery in dP/dtmax from baseline values. However, in hearts pretreated with Cl-IB-MECA (A3-PTx and A3-[PTx+CP]), recovery of dP/dtmax from baseline values was significantly greater (60% ± 5% and 64% ± 4%, respectively).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Peak positive dP/dt (dP/dtmax). Abbreviations are as in Figure 1. All values are mean ± standard error of the mean. *p < 0.05 A3-PTx and A3-[PTx+CP] versus control and A3-CP.

 
Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure
After 2 hours of reperfusion, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in control hearts was increased by 617% ± 62% from baseline values (Fig 3). Hearts in the A3-CP group had a statistically comparable increase in LVEDP (601% ± 63%). In sharp contrast, increases in LVEDP after 2 hours of reperfusion were significantly less in both groups pretreated with Cl-IB-MECA: A3-PTx (299% ± 53% and A3-[PTx+CP] 310% ± 26%).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (mm Hg). Abbreviations are as in Figure 1. All values are mean ± standard error of the mean. *p < 0.05 A3-PTx and A3-[PTx+CP] versus control and A3-CP.

 
Coronary perfusate flow
Pretreatment with Cl-IB-MECA did not produce significant coronary vasodilation (1% to 5% increase in flow from baseline values, Table 1 and Fig 4). After 2 hours of reperfusion, coronary perfusate flow (% baseline) was decreased in control hearts to 52% ± 4% of baseline and in hearts with A3-supplemented cardioplegia alone (47% ± 3%). In contrast, postreperfusion coronary flow as compared with the control group was statistically greater after pretreatment with Cl-IB-MECA (A3-PTx (64% ± 4% and A3-[PTx+CP] 66% ± 4%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Coronary Perfusate Flow (ml/min)a

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Coronary perfusate flow (percentage of baseline) as determined by an in-line ultrasonic flow probe within the perfusate tubing of the Langendorff apparatus. Abbreviations are as in Figure 1. All values are mean ± standard error of the mean. *p < 0.05 A3-PTx and A3-[PTx+CP] versus control and A3-CP. #p < 0.05 A3-PTx versus control and A3-CP. +p < 0.05 A3-[PTx+CP] versus A3-CP. {wedge}p < 0.05 control versus A3-CP. @p < 0.05 A3-PTx and A3-[PTx+CP] versus A3-CP.

 
Cumulative effluent creatine kinase
In control hearts, cumulative creatine kinase activity averaged 1734 ± 54 U/L (Fig 5). The administration of Cl-IB-MECA-supplemented cardioplegia alone did not reduce CK activity compared with control hearts. In contrast, Cl-IB-MECA pretreatment alone significantly decreased cumulative effluent activity by 12% relative to the control group. The administration of Cl-IB-MECA as both a pretreatment agent and as a cardioplegic adjunct (group 4) was associated with a similar decrease in activity (15%) relative to control hearts.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Cumulative effluent creatine kinase activity values from perfusate samples taken during reperfusion. Abbreviations are as in Figure 1. All values are mean ± standard error of the mean. *p < 0.05 A3-PTx and A3-[PTx+CP] versus control and A3-CP.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. Myocardial water content as determined by percentage of heart water weight from left ventricular myocardium sampled at the end of the experiment. Abbreviations are as in Figure 1. All values are mean ± standard error of the mean. *p < 0.05 A3-PTx and A3-[PTx+CP] versus control and A3-CP.

 
Myocardial water content
After 2 hours of reperfusion, control hearts had the greatest myocardial edema, with a ratio of 85% ± 0.4% (Fig 6). Rat hearts treated with A3-CP had no significant reduction in myocardial edema (83% ± 2%) compared with control hearts. However, in both groups of hearts pretreated with Cl-IB-MECA (A3-PTx and A3-[PTx+CP]), myocardial edema was significantly reduced compared with control hearts (78% ± 0.6% and 76% ± 2%, respectively).


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The endogenous autacoid, adenosine, as well as exogenous adenosine analogues might offer therapeutic opportunities to reduce postsurgical ischemia and reperfusion injury in a subset of high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass operations. The ability of adenosine to attenuate myocardial injury during ischemia and reperfusion makes it a good candidate as a protective agent during the multiple episodes of ischemia and reperfusion that occur during cardiac surgical procedures. Despite the well-described cardioprotective benefits of adenosine, the undesirable effects of the activation of adenosine A1 (bradycardia, negative inotropy) and A2 (vasodilation, hypotension) receptor subtypes have precluded the routine use of these agents during surgical myocardial revascularization.

Although the adenosine A3 receptor shares sequence similarity with the adenosine A1 and A2 receptor subtypes, it has specific pharmacologic characteristics not typical of adenosine A1 or A2 receptors [18]. The adenosine A3 receptor agonist, Cl-IB-MECA, displays a K1 value of 0.33 nM and is highly selective for A3 versus A1 and A2a receptors by 2500- and 1400-fold, respectively [18]. The adenosine A3 receptor has been isolated from several animal species and humans [18]. Although Cl-IB-MECA has been reported to have a vasodilator effect mediated by histamine release from mast cells [19], Cl-IB-MECA did not cause any significant coronary vasodilation at the concentration used in the present study and a previous study by Thourani and colleagues [14]. We found that the adenosine A3 agonist, Cl-IB-MECA, when administered as a pretreatment independent of inclusion in crystalloid cardioplegia attenuated postischemic systolic and diastolic dysfunction and reduced creatine kinase release. In contrast, Cl-IB-MECA–supplemented hypothermic cardioplegia alone did not further enhance cardioprotection in this model. Therefore, when Cl-IB-MECA cardioplegia was used in conjunction with Cl-IB-MECA pretreatment, the cardioprotective effects afforded by adenosine A3 receptor activation were not further enhanced. The present study found that selective stimulation of the adenosine A3 receptor before 30 minutes of normothermic global myocardial ischemia and during 60 minutes of hypothermic cardioplegic arrest attenuates postischemic dysfunction without vasodilator effects.

The cardioprotective effects of the adenosine A3 receptor have been studied in a limited number of models of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion [12, 13]. Furthermore, studies found that the activation of the adenosine A3 receptor mimics or induces myocardial preconditioning [1517]. In the current study, we did not mimic chemical preconditioning, which incorporates a drug washout period. Instead, the adenosine A3 analogue was infused before normothermic global ischemia without a washout interval, thereby allowing tissue levels of Cl-IB-MECA to be achieved at the time of global ischemia. In the current study, the presence of Cl-IB-MECA during ischemia attenuated postischemic systolic and diastolic function.

Recently we [14] showed that pretreatment with Cl-IB-MECA for 12 minutes (without a washout period) before 30 minutes of normothermic global ischemia in rat hearts reduced postischemic myocardial systolic and diastolic dysfunction and attenuated morphologic injury. However, studies evaluating the cardioprotective effects of adenosine A3 receptor activation in a surgical model of cardioplegic arrest have not been reported. In the present study, we pretreated rat hearts with Cl-IB-MECA for 12 minutes before 30 minutes of normothermic global ischemia (to sensitize the myocardium) followed by 60 minutes of hypothermic cardioplegic arrest. Similar to our previous results [14], we found that pretreatment with adenosine A3 agonists before normothermic global ischemia significantly reduced postischemic myocardial systolic and diastolic dysfunction. It is possible that adenosine A3 analogues as a pretreatment to ischemia exert pharmacologic actions in a normothermic environment, whereas less effect is exerted during profound hypothermia. Accordingly, the activation of adenosine A3 receptors before myocardial ischemia was cardioprotective in the present cardioplegia model. The lack of protection in hearts that received adenosine A3 agonist during cardioplegic arrest alone (A3 cardioplegia group) might be caused by the inhibition or downregulation of agonist-receptor interactions during hypothermia or by the development of ischemic injury before cardioplegia was delivered. It is possible that adenosine A3 agonist supplementation with an initial warm cardioplegic infusion could provide cardioprotection by decreasing the effects of hypothermia on agonist-receptor and postreceptor interactions.

The mechanisms associated with the cardioprotection afforded by Cl-IB-MECA activation of the adenosine A3 receptor have not been clearly defined. However, the structural similarity between the adenosine A1 receptor and the A3 receptor could indicate similarity in function. The activation of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels (KATP) is involved in the cardioprotective effects of adenosine A1-receptor activation in ischemic-reperfused myocardium [20]. Accordingly, activation of the adenosine A3 receptor might mediate cardioprotection by activation of KATP channels. In an isolated rat heart model, Thourani and colleagues [21] demonstrated that glybenclamide, a KATP channel blocker, partially reversed the cardioprotective effects of Cl-IB-MECA. That finding suggests that the cardioprotection afforded by the activation of the adenosine A3 receptor, like the adenosine A1 receptor, could be mediated by opening of KATP channels.

Another possible mechanism of action of the adenosine A3 receptor is the inhibition of neutrophil function and neutrophil-mediated injury to the endothelium and myocardium. Studies by Jordan and associates [22] have shown that Cl-IB-MECA inhibits neutrophil adherence to coronary artery endothelium in a dose-dependent manner. Although the present study did not investigate putative antineutrophil effects, it would be interesting to study the cardioprotective effects of A3 receptor agonist in an in vivo model in which antineutrophil and neutrophil-independent mechanisms might be exerted.

The limitations in our study are inherent to the crystalloid perfused Langendorff model. The effects of the activation of the adenosine A3 receptor on individual cell types (eg, neutrophils) can not be assessed because our perfusate lacked formed elements. Inflammatory mediators, ie, complement fragments and cytokines, were also absent and so the effects of A3 receptor activation on soluble mediators can not be assessed. Consequently, the cardioprotective effects afforded by activation of the adenosine A3 receptor might be different in a blood-based cardioplegia delivery modality. However, it was our intent in this initial study to investigate cardioprotective mechanisms independent of blood, neutrophils, or inflammatory mediators.

In conclusion, we found that pretreatment with a specific adenosine A3 receptor agonist improved postcardioplegia contractile recovery without the vasodilator effects common to native adenosine and nonspecific adenosine agonists. However, the addition of Cl-IB-MECA to the cardioplegia solution did not further enhance the pretreatment effects. The administration of adenosine A3 agonists before aortic cross-clamp without a washout period might be a useful pretreatment strategy for high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Funded in part by the Thoracic Surgery Research Foundation Fellowship to Vinod H. Thourani, MD.

We thank Ms Gail Nechtman for assistance in preparation of the manuscript and Dr V. Bakthavachalam for the generous gift of Cl-IB-MECA. Cl-IB-MECA was synthesized by Research Biochemicals Inc (Natick, MA) as part of the Chemical Synthesis Program of the National Institute of Mental Health. We are grateful for the support of the research effort by the Thoracic Surgery Research Foundation and thank the Carlyle Fraser Heart Center of Crawford W. Long Hospital-Emory University School of Medicine for their continued long-standing contributions to cardiac surgical research endeavors.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Thornton J.D., Liu G.S., Olsson R.A., Downey J.M. Intravenous pretreatment with A1-selective adenosine analogues protects the heart against infarction. Circulation 1992;85:659-665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hudspeth D.A., Nakanishi K., Vinten-Johansen J., et al. Adenosine in blood cardioplegia prevents postischemic dysfunction in ischemically injured hearts. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:1637-1644.[Abstract]
  3. De Jong J.W., van der Meer P., van Loon H., Owen P., Opie L.H. Adenosine as adjunct to potassium cardioplegia: effect on function, energy metabolism, and electrophysiology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:445-454.[Abstract]
  4. Schubert T., Vetter H., Owen P., Reichart B., Opie L.H. Adenosine cardioplegia: adenosine versus potassium cardioplegia: effects on cardiac arrest and postischemic recovery in the isolated rat heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;98:1057-1065.[Abstract]
  5. Jordan J.E., Zhao Z.-Q., Sato H., Taft S., Vinten-Johansen J. Adenosine A2 receptor activation attenuates reperfusion injury by inhibiting neutrophil accumulation, superoxide generation and coronary endothelial adherence. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;280:301-309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Thourani V.H., Ronson R.S., VanWylen D.G., et al. Myocardial protection with adenosine given at reperfusion is superior to adenosine-enhanced cardioplegia. Circulation 1998;98(Suppl):I3217.
  7. Woolfson R.G., Patel V.C., Yellon D.M. Pre-conditioning with adenosine leads to concentration-dependent infarct size reduction in the isolated rabbit heart. Cardiovasc Res 1996;31:148-151.[Medline]
  8. Toombs C.F., McGee D.S., Johnston W.E., Vinten-Johansen J. Myocardial protective effects of adenosine. Infarct size reduction with pretreatment and continued receptor stimulation during ischemia. Circulation 1992;86:986-994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lee H.T., LaFaro R.J., Reed G.E. Pretreatment of human myocardium with adenosine during open heart surgery. J Cardiac Surg 1995;10:665-676.[Medline]
  10. Meyerhof W., Muller-Brechlin R., Richter D. Molecular cloning of a novel putative G-protein coupled receptor expressed during rat spermiogenesis. FEBS Lett 1991;284:155-160.[Medline]
  11. Zhou Q.-Y., Li C., Olah M.E., Johnson R.A., Stiles G.L., Civelli O. Molecular cloning and characterization of an adenosine receptor: the A3 adenosine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:7432-7436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Auchampach J.A., Rizvi A., Qiu Y., et al. Selective activation of A3 adenosine receptors with N6-(3-iodobenzyl) adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide protects against myocardial stunning and infarction without hemodynamic changes in conscious rabbits. Circ Res 1997;80:800-809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Stambaugh K., Jacobson K.A., Jiang J.L., Liang B.T. A novel cardioprotective function of adenosine A1 and A3 receptors during prolonged simulated ischemia. Am J Physiol 1997;273:H501-H505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Thourani V.H., Nakamura M., Zhao Z.Q., et al. Specific adenosine A3 receptor stimulation attenuates global ischemic-reperfusion injury in a neutrophil-free model. Circulation 1997;96(8):I743.
  15. Armstrong S., Ganote C.E. Adenosine receptor specificity in preconditioning of isolated rabbit cardiomyocytes: evidence of A3 receptor involvement. Cardiovasc Res 1994;28:1049-1056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Liu G.S., Richards S.C., Olsson R.A., Mullane K., Walsh R.S., Downey J.M. Evidence that the adenosine A3 receptor may mediate the protection afforded by preconditioning in the isolated rabbit heart. Cardiovasc Res 1994;28:1057-1061.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Tracey W.R., Magee W., Masamune H., et al. Selective adenosine A3 receptor stimulation reduces ischemic myocardial injury in the rabbit heart. Cardiovas Res 1997;33:410-415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jacobson K.A. Adenosine A3 receptors: novel ligands and paradoxical effects. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1998;19:184-191.[Medline]
  19. Van Schaick E.A., Jacobson K.A., Kim H.O., Ijzerman A.P., Danhof M. Hemodynamic effects and histamine release elicited by the selective adenosine A3 receptor agonist 2-Cl-IB-MECA in conscious rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1996;308:311-314.[Medline]
  20. Yao Z., Mizumura T., Mei D.A., Gross G.J. KATP channels and memory of ischemic preconditioning in dogs: synergism between adenosine and KATP channels. Am J Physiol 1997;272:H334-H342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Thourani VH, Nakamura M, Ronson RS, et al. Adenosine A3 receptor stimulation attenuates postischemic dysfunction after ischemia and reperfusion through KATP channels. Am J Physiol 1999; in press.
  22. Jordan J.E., Thourani V.H., Auchampach J.A., Vinten-Johansen J. A3 adenosine receptor activation reduces PMN-endothelial cell interaction without effect on free radicals and degranulation. Circulation 1998;98:I3500.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. A. Rothermel and J. A. Hill
Adenosine A3 Receptor and Cardioprotection: Enticing, Enigmatic, Elusive
Circulation, October 21, 2008; 118(17): 1691 - 1693.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
Z.-D. Ge, J. N. Peart, L. M. Kreckler, T. C. Wan, M. A. Jacobson, G. J. Gross, and J. A. Auchampach
Cl-IB-MECA [2-Chloro-N6-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide] Reduces Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Mice by Activating the A Adenosine Receptor
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2006; 319(3): 1200 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. A. Auchampach, Z.-D. Ge, T. C. Wan, J. Moore, and G. J. Gross
A3 adenosine receptor agonist IB-MECA reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in dogs
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 11, 2003; 285(2): H607 - H613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
G. J Harrison, R. J Cerniway, J. Peart, S. S Berr, K. Ashton, S. Regan, G Paul Matherne, and J. P Headrick
Effects of A3 adenosine receptor activation and gene knock-out in ischemic-reperfused mouse heart
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 147 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
K. Mubagwa and W. Flameng
Adenosine, adenosine receptors and myocardial protection: An updated overview
Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2001; 52(1): 25 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert A. Guyton
Jakob Vinten-Johansen
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thourani, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Vinten-Johansen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thourani, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Vinten-Johansen, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS