|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1538-1539
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-St 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
e-mail: Th.Wittwer-MD{at}t-online.de
To the Editor
Although lung transplantation is now regarded as an effective therapy in end-stage pulmonary disease, its application is limited by the severe scarcity of suitable donor organs. With the approach to extend the donor pool, adequate preservation of the donor organ is still an important issue to enhance the applicability of the procedure with the aim to reduce perioperative mortality due to organ dysfunction.
Currently, most institutions use single-flush perfusion with extracellular type preservation solutions via the pulmonary artery for lung preservation. Recent research described that the addition of the serine protease inhibitor Aprotinin to the preservation solution significantly improves postischemic lung function [1]. While the authors of those experiments used Euro-Collins and University of Wisconsin solution, others reported similar findings after administration of recombinant Kunitz protease inhibitor, which is more homologous to human Kunitz protease inhibitor as compared with Aprotinin, to low-potassium dextran solution [2].
To verify the demonstrated benefit, Aprotinin was used in an established isolated rat lung model [3, 4] to elucidate if the combination with the recently developed Celsior solution would provide similar preservation results as compared with modified Euro-Collins solution [5]. Using male inbred Sprague-Dawley rats, eight lungs each were preserved with Celsior solution with and without addition of Aprotinin in the described dose of 150 KIU/mL as suggested by Roberts and associates [1] and compared with Perfadex solution. After 4 h of ischemia, all lungs were reventilated and reperfused using a roller-pump. Oxygenation as assessed by relative oxygenation capacity (ROC = [paO2 - pvO2] x 100/pvO2) was monitored for a reperfusion period of 50 min. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance with repeated measures.
After ischemia, all reperfused lungs resumed sufficient function. However, the ROC of Celsior-preserved organs was significantly better as compared with the corresponding Perfadex preservation (Fig 1). After additional application of Aprotinin, a significant deterioration of postischemic lung performance in the Celsior group was noticed (p = 0.02), while graft function in the Perfadex+Aprotinin group was not significantly altered (p = 0.62). With use of Aprotinin, both solutions (Celsior/Perfadex) led to a comparable quality of organ preservation (p = 0.39).
|
In conclusion, the clinical application of Aprotinin in combination with other preservation solutions should be performed carefully until further data are available.
References
Related Article
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |