ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubens, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubens, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, H. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:689-696
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Hematologic evaluation of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits prepared with a novel block copolymer

Fraser D. Rubens, FRCSCa, Rosalind S. Labow, PhDa, Gilbert R. Lavallée, RNa, Maura I. Watson, CPCa, James A. Robblee, FRCPCb, Marc E. Voorhees, PhDa, Howard J. Nathan, FRCPCb

a Cardiac Surgery University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
b Cardiac Anaesthesia, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Accepted for publication August 21, 1998.

Address reprint requests to Dr Rubens, Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin St, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4W7 Canada
e-mail: frubens{at}heartinst.on.ca


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. To decrease the complications associated with cardiopulmonary bypass, novel biomaterials have been introduced that may be less thrombogenic than standard synthetic surfaces.

Methods. Thirty-four patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to bypass using either a control circuit or a circuit prepared "tip-to-tip" with a triblock-copolymer (polycaprolactone-polydimethylsiloxane-polycaprolactone).

Results. There was a progressive increase in thrombin generation in the control group during bypass, which was not seen in the test group. The test surface decreased the release of tissue plasminogen activator and plasmin-{alpha}2-antiplasmin complex formation (p < 0.005). There was also an increased platelet count and a decreased platelet activation in the test group, as detected by GMP-140 expression and ß-thromboglobulin release (p = 0.017). There was also significantly more debris that accumulated on the arterial filter in the control group, as confirmed by scanning electron microscopy.

Conclusions. This clinical trial has demonstrated a significant difference in the hematologic effects of the test circuits, with evidence of platelet preservation, decreased fibrinolysis, and decreased thrombin generation. A larger trial would be necessary to establish the clinical relevance of these differences.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Current techniques in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) require systemic heparinization to inhibit surface activation of the coagulation system and blood cellular elements. Despite the prolongation of in vitro coagulation by heparin, there is still evidence of subclinical thrombosis during bypass [1]. To limit these changes, attempts have been made to chemically modify the biomaterial used to construct the bypass circuit to improve its blood compatibility. A new treatment has been developed in which a polysiloxane-containing copolymer has been added to the base polymer resin [2] to modify the surface. Preliminary studies with this surface have demonstrated that blood protein and cellular interactions are decreased [3]. These changes have resulted in platelet preservation in animal models of CPB [2].

This clinical trial was designed to compare the hematologic biocompatibility of bypass circuits prepared with this block copolymer with that of standard circuits. Laboratory evaluation included platelet function and number, as well as thrombin generation and fibrinolysis. Blood loss and transfusion requirements in the two groups were also assessed.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Thirty-six patients scheduled for elective primary coronary artery bypass grafting necessitating CPB were recruited for this study. The institutional human research ethics committee approved the study protocol in November 1995, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. The patients were excluded if they had major systemic illnesses (eg, poorly controlled diabetes, renal failure), preoperative platelet or coagulation abnormalities, or anticipated hematocrit during CPB of < 21%, or if they were taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications. All patients were requested to stop their aspirin 7 days before their operation.

The patients were randomly assigned to operation with either the test circuit (SMARxT) or a standard circuit (COBE CML DUO, COBE Cardiovascular Inc, Arvada, CO). The perfusionist performed the assignment immediately preoperatively, by opening a sealed, numbered envelope before set-up of the extracorporeal circuit. The randomization was accomplished using a random number table (CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 17 ed, The Chemical Rubber Co, Cleveland, OH, 1969, pp 625–9). The cannulae and tubing used in these two circuits were identical in appearance, therefore all members of the surgical and anesthesia teams, excluding the perfusionist, were blinded to the treatment assignment.

Anesthetic management
All cardiac medications, excluding aspirin, were continued up to the day of operation. The premedication included 0.1 mg/kg orally of diazepam 2 hours preoperatively and 0.1 mg/kg intramuscular morphine 1 hour preoperatively. The anesthetic induction included midazolam (0.04 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.5 µg/kg), and ketamine (1.5 mg/kg). Rocuronium (1 mg/kg) was used to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Anesthetic was maintained with midazolam 0.5 µg · kg-1 · min-1, sufentanil 0.5 µg · kg-1 · hr-1, rocuronium 10 µg · kg-1 · min-1, and isoflurane as required to maintain hemodynamic stability. No antifibrinolytics were given to the patients.

Heparin management
Before bypass all patients were anticoagulated with porcine heparin (Organon Teknika, Toronto, Ont, Canada) to achieve a kaolin-driven activated clotting time >480 seconds. Initial dosing was prescribed by a heparin dose-response with Hepcon instrumentation (Hemotec, Medtronic Inc, Parker, CO). Heparin (4,500 U) was also added to the 1.5-L pump prime to establish a 3.0 U/mL concentration. Upon initiation of bypass, the heparin serum concentration was monitored every 20 minutes by way of the Hepcon automated protamine assay and subsequent doses of heparin were administered as needed to sustain a heparin level of 3.0 U/mL [1]. After the termination of CPB, heparin reversal was accomplished with a 1:1 protamine-to-heparin ratio (milligram per milligram) dose of protamine sulfate (Fujisawa Canada, Inc, Markham, Ont, Canada) based on the final heparin serum concentration assayed. A low-dose heparin assay was performed to ensure zero residual heparin after reversal. Blood samples were drawn every 2 hours during the initial 8 hours in the recovery room for heparin levels. In only two instances (one control, one test group) was there any evidence of heparin rebound (heparin >0.2 IU/mL) and additional protamine was administered.

Conduct of bypass
In the control group, CPB was conducted using a roller pump, a flat sheet polypropylene 1.3 m2 membrane oxygenator (COBE Cardiovascular Inc). The remainder of the circuit included a 43-µm arterial filter (COBE Sentry with PrimeGard, COBE Cardiovascular Inc), a closed venous reservoir bag, circuit tubing, an ascending aortic cannula, and a two-stage single venous cannula return. The base resin for all of these components was polyvinylchloride. In the test group, the base resin for all of the surfaces was identical to the control group, although all were prepared during manufacture with the test biomaterial (SMARxT, COBE Cardiovascular Inc). Bypass flows were maintained at 2.4 to 3.2 L · m-2 · min-1. If necessary, volume was given at the perfusionist’s discretion to maintain flows. No restrictions were placed prospectively on the use of either crystalloid (Ringer’s lactate) or colloid (pentastarch) solutions. The body temperature was reduced to a systemic temperature of 32°C during the period of cardiac anoxia. Cardiac arrest was achieved using topical pericardial saline irrigation as well as antegrade cold crystalloid cardioplegia through the aortic root and the bypass grafts at 20-minute intervals. All CPB solutions were filtered by a 40-µm transfusion filter (SQ40S Pall Biomedical Products Co, East Hills, NY). At the completion of the procedure, the patient was rewarmed to a nasopharyngeal temperature of 37°C and then weaned from CPB after mechanical ventilation had been restarted.

Management of mediastinal shed blood
To exclude the effects of the activation of shed blood from the mediastinum, a cardiotomy suction system was not used in these patients. Cardiac venting was accomplished through the aortic root by gravity drainage directly into the venous CPB line. All scavenged blood from the mediastinum, collected intraoperatively and up to 4 hours postoperatively, was processed by filtration (30 µm), and centrifugation and washing (BRAT, COBE Cardiovascular Inc) before reinfusion. After 4 hours, all subsequent blood was discarded unless clinical situations (eg, excessive bleeding/no operating room available for taking the patient back) warranted otherwise.

Perioperative and postoperative management
Red blood cells (allogeneic or autologous) were administered to maintain a hematocrit of 21 during bypass and 24 postoperatively, in the absence of hemodynamic instability. Strict guidelines were used in both groups for the administration of platelets, cryoprecipitate, and fresh frozen plasma after bypass. Immediately upon arrival to the intensive care unit, all patients were treated with an acetylsalicylic acid suppository (650 mg). Oral administration of enteric-coated acetylsalicylic acid (325 mg) was commenced the following day. All patients were started on subcutaneous heparin (5,000 U every 12 hours) on the first postoperative day.

Collection of blood specimens
Blood specimens were obtained from the side-port of the right internal jugular vein sheath after removal of six dead space volumes of blood. The sampling was carried out at the time points indicated in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Sample Points for Blood Specimens

 
Hematologic variables
Blood samples were taken into tubes with citrate (3.8%) on ice, then centrifuged to produce platelet-poor plasma. Fibrinopeptide A was measured with radioimmunoassay (American Diagnostica, Montreal, PQ, Canada). Prothrombin fragment (F1.2) and thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) were quantified with the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique (Behring Diagnostics, Montreal, PQ). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was also used for the measurement of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) (American Diagnostica) and plasmin-{alpha}2-antiplasmin complex (Dade Behring Canada Inc, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Platelet ß-thromboglobulin was assessed with radioimmunoassay (Wellmark Diagnostics, Guelph, ON, Canada). Fibrinogen was assessed with a fibrometer with a standard clotting assay [4] (Blood Coagulation Analyser, Fibrometer Lab Equipment, Markham, ON, Canada) and D-dimer was measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Murex Diagnostics, Guelph, ON). Routine hematology variables were then determined including red blood cell mass, white blood cell count, and platelet count (Serono, model 9000, Baker Diagnostic, Allentown, PA).

For the preparation of whole blood for flow cytometry, blood was slowly aspirated into collection syringes from the side port of the introducer of the jugular vein cordis sheath (ArrowFlex, Arrow International Inc, Reading, PA) after discarding the initial 10 mL. All of the blood samples were immediately transferred to Diatube-H vacutainer tubes (Becton Dickenson, Braintree, MA) from the collection syringes. The cap to the vacutainer tube was removed before adding the blood to the anticoagulant to prevent blood activation from the vacuum.

Preparation of platelets
Aliquots of whole blood (5 µL), which had been taken in Diatube-H tubes, were added to several Eppendorff tubes containing Tyrode’s albumin (TA, Tyrode’s buffer with 3.5 g/L bovine serum albumin) and glycyl-L-prolyl-L-arginyl-L-proline (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) (2.5 µL of 1.25 mmol/L). The glycyl-L-prolyl-L-arginyl-L-proline was added to inhibit fibrin polymerization. All samples were then incubated for 30 minutes (37°C) before addition of the antibodies as described below. The optimal concentrations of the added antibodies used in these experiments were determined in previous experiments with blood from normal controls in which the platelets were maximally stimulated with thrombin as described below. The minimum amount of antibody required to detect activation was determined, and in subsequent experiments, the antibody concentration was doubled.

Addition of antibodies
Activated glycoproteins IIb/IIIa
Undiluted fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated mouse immunoglobulin (Ig) M (2.5 µL; Caltag Laboratories, San Francisco, CA) was added to the negative control sample and 5 µL of FITC-conjugated PAC-1 (Dr. Sanford Shattil, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) was added to the test samples. The samples were then incubated at 22°C for 30 minutes and read immediately in the flow cytometer.

Platelet thrombospondin
Undiluted rat IgG2a (5G11; 10 µL) directed against human thrombospondin (Caltag Laboratories) was added to the test samples. No antibody was added at this point to the negative control sample. All samples were incubated for 30 minutes (22°C) after which they were washed twice with 500 µL of plain Tyrode’s solution, and resuspended in TA (50 µL). After this, 10 µL of undiluted FITC-conjugated anti-rat IgG2a mouse IgG1 (Caltag Laboratories) was added to each sample. The samples were incubated at 22°C for another 30 minutes in the dark then washed twice with 500 µL of plain Tyrode’s solution. They were then resuspended in 50 µL of TA and read on the flow cytometer.

CD62P(GMP-140)
Unlike the above activation assays, GMP-140 was measured on fixed platelets as described by Kuhne and colleagues [5] as follows. Samples of whole blood were mixed with equal volumes of 1% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes (22°C). Samples of 5 µL were then added to 25 µL of FACsFlow buffer (Becton Dickenson, Braintree, MA) in an Eppendorff tube. In the test samples, 2.5 µL of undiluted FITC-conjugated CD 62P (BioCan Scientific, Mississauga, ON, Canada) was added, whereas in the negative control samples, 2.5 µL of undiluted FITC-conjugated rabbit IgG (BioCan Scientific) was added. The tubes were incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes, and then read immediately on the flow cytometer.

Glycoprotein Ib
Unfixed whole blood (5 µL) was added to 50 µL of TA, followed by 2.5 µL of undiluted FITC-conjugated CD42 (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) or 6D1, an antibody to a different epitope of the glycoprotein Ib receptor (Dr. Barry Coller, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY). In the negative control samples, 2.5 µL of undiluted FITC-conjugated rabbit IgG was added. The tubes were incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes, and then read immediately on the flow cytometer.

Monocyte-tissue factor
To 50 µL of unfixed whole blood, 10 µL of phycoerythrin-labeled CD14 (Becton Dickenson, Braintree, MA) as well as 10 µL of mouse FITC-labeled anti-human tissue factor (American Diagnostica) was added. In the negative control tube, 10 µL of phycoerythrin-labeled CD14 as well as 10 µL of mouse polyclonal FITC-labeled IgG (Becton Dickenson) were added. All tubes were incubated on ice for 30 minutes in the dark, then fixed with 250 µL of a solution containing formaldehyde (9.25%) and methanol (3.25%) for 60 seconds. At the end of the incubation, 4 mL of TA was added and the mixture was incubated at 22°C for 30 minutes in the dark. The mixture was then washed with TA, centrifuged, and the final pellet was resuspended in 400 µL of TA before the reading of the flow cytometer.

Measurement of platelet and leukocyte markers by flow cytometry and data analysis
The samples were read on a FacScan Analyzer (Becton Dickenson) with an argon laser, reading 50,000 events. The primary gate was selected using a dot plot of forward and side scatter. The background fluorescence was usually less than 2% for all of the experiments.

Morphologic analysis
Arterial filters from test and control circuits were fixed by filling the filters with 2% glutaraldehyde in saline solution. The filters were drained and dried with filtered compressed air. Samples were harvested after cutting the filters apart with a band saw. The samples were dehydrated for 20 minutes in a graded ethanol and hexamethyldisilazane (Ted Pella, Inc, Redding, CA) series (90% ethanol in reverse osmosis distilled water, 95% ethanol in reverse osmosis distilled water, pure ethanol, and 50% ethanol/50% hexamethyldisilazane solutions, and finally pure hexamethyldisilazane). After dehydration, samples were sputter-coated with 200 of gold particles and examined on JEOL JSM-6400 scanning electron microscopy (Rocky Mountain Laboratories, Golden, CO) at 10 KV accelerating voltage.

Data analysis and statistics
Sample size was based on detecting a minimally clinically important difference of 25% between the control and test groups in the level of TAT at 40 and 60 minutes on CPB. Seventeen patients per group were sufficient to detect this difference with {alpha} = 0.05 and ß = 0.20. Continuous variables were analyzed using t tests and categorical variables were analyzed using a {chi}2 test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Repeated measures were analyzed using repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA). If the ANOVA was significant (p < 0.05), then t tests were done at individual time points using the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Clinical results
Thirty-six adult patients scheduled for cardiac procedures requiring CPB were enrolled in this study during a 12-month interval. There were no differences in demographic or operative variables between the two cohorts (Table 2 ). There were two exclusions from the study (both in the control group) due to technical surgical problems, not related to the bypass circuit.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Preoperative and Intraoperative Patient Profiles and Risk Characteristics

 
Among the remaining 34 patients, there was complete follow-up throughout the study. There was no difference in total heparin doses, blood loss, or transfusion requirements between the two groups (results not shown).

Laboratory results
Platelet number and activation
There was no significant difference in the expression of glycoprotein Ib detected on the platelet surface by either of the antibodies 6D1 or CD42 (results not shown). In both groups, there was an expected decrease in the platelet count after going on CPB, associated with hemodilution. However, the platelet count was better preserved in the test group, both during and after bypass (p < 0.05 sample points 5, 6, 8, 9; Fig 1A ).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Platelet in vitro testing in control and test groups. (A) Platelet count; (B) ß-thromboglobulin (ßTG) release; (C) expression of the platelet activation marker GMP-140 as detected by flow cytometry. Sample points as described in Table 1. Values are mean ± standard error of the mean. *represents significance with p < 0.05. (Pre-Hep, Post-Hep = before and after heparin administration.)

 
The levels of ß-thromboglobulin (a product that is released from the platelet {alpha}-granule after activation) were significantly decreased in the test group during bypass and for 1 hour after administration of the protamine (ANOVA p = 0.017; Fig 1B). To confirm these changes in the platelets, a variety of markers of activation were measured by flow cytometry. GMP-140 or P-selectin was significantly decreased during bypass (ANOVA p = 0.0132; Fig 1C). Neither platelet thrombospondin nor activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa demonstrated significant differences (results not shown).

Thrombin generation
The generation of thrombin was assessed using measurements of both TAT (Fig 2A ) and F1.2 (Fig 2B). With both markers, there was a progressive increase in the generation of thrombin during the later stages of CPB in the control group, not seen in the test group. During CPB, only TAT showed an overall difference (ANOVA; TAT, p = 0.011; F1.2, p = 0.158). However, both markers have the same pattern of change. Monocyte tissue factor, which is a known source for thrombin generation, showed a progressive increase in expression in the control group with longer periods on CPB, but these changes were not significant as a result of a large amount of variability (Fig 2C). There was no difference in the generation of fibrinopeptide A during and after CPB (results not shown).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Markers of thrombin generation and tissue factor expression in control and test groups. (A) Measurement of thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT); (B) measurement of prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2); (C) measurement of leukocyte tissue factor by flow cytometry. Sample points as described in Table 1. Values are mean ± standard error of the mean. *represents significance with p < 0.05. (Pre-Hep, Post-Hep = before and after heparin administration; pp = post protamine.)

 
Fibrinolysis
Whereas the levels of tPA (Fig 3A ) and plasmin-{alpha}2-antiplasmin (Fig 3B) increased quickly after the initiation of CPB in the control group, this increase was not seen in the test group. D-Dimer did not show a significant difference between the test and control groups. Similarly, there was no difference in the levels of fibrinogen in the two groups (results not shown).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Markers of fibrinolysis in control and test groups. (A) Measurement of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) release; (B) measurement of plasmin {alpha}2 antiplasmin (PAP) complex. Sample points as described in Table 1. Values are mean ± standard error of the mean. *represents significance with p < 0.05. (Pre-Hep, Post-Hep = before and after heparin administration.)

 
Scanning electron microscopy
A consistent increase in cellular debris was demonstrated on the mesh of the arterial filter and the casing from the control circuits as compared to those collected from the test circuits (Fig 4 ). This debris appeared to consist of red cells and proteinaceous material.



View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Scanning electron microscopy of the arterial filter in the control and test groups. Specimens prepared as described in methods. (A) Arterial filter mesh netting from control case. Magnification x250 before 27.1% reduction. (B) Arterial filter mesh netting from test case. Magnification x250 before 27.1% reduction. (C) Arterial filter casing from control case. Magnification x500 before 27.1% reduction. (D) Arterial filter casing from test case. Magnification x500 before 27.1% reduction.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The thrust of modern innovation in CPB has involved modification of the blood-contacting surfaces to minimize the deleterious effects on blood proteins and cells. To this end, a new generation of biomaterials has been developed into which a surface-modifying additive has been incorporated into the polymer used to prepare the CPB circuit (SMARxT, COBE Cardiovascular Inc) [6]. The additive is a triblock-copolymer with polar and nonpolar polymer chains of the general formula polycaprolactone-polydimethylsiloxane-polycaprolactone [6, 7]. The surface-modifying additive (SMA) migrates during the manufacturing process to the surface of the base polymer yielding a stable microdomainlike configuration. Electron spectroscopy has demonstrated that the surface of blended polymers is highly saturated with SMA [3]. Although the mechanism of action by which SMA (and other surfaces with balanced polar and nonpolar characteristics) decreases blood protein and cellular activation is not known, it is hypothesized that the alternating hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions of the microdomain surface leads to uniform adhesion of fibrinogen, such that all of the sites for potential platelet interaction with surface-bound fibrinogen are occupied [8]. Alternative polymers with different microdomain structure have also shown promise in vitro and clinically for CPB [9].

In this trial, significant changes were found in the effect of this surface on a variety of aspects related to coagulation, fibrinolysis, platelet function, and number. Although there was a decrease in the platelet count with initiation of CPB and hemodilution, the platelet count continued to decrease in the control group and this change was not seen in the test group. This difference persisted into the postoperative period. There was also evidence for decreased platelet activation with CPB in the test group as demonstrated by decreased expression of the platelet surface marker GMP-140 and decreased release of ß-thromboglobulin.

Jessen and colleagues [2] have previously demonstrated in a porcine model of CPB that the mechanism of preservation of the platelet count by the SMA relates to decreased platelet deposition on the oxygenator. Neutrophil deposition was also decreased in the test group. Gu and colleagues [10] found similar platelet preservation in a clinical trial in which patients were randomized to standard circuits or SMA circuits. Platelet activation, as measured by ß-thromboglobulin release, was decreased in the test group during CPB. There was also significantly decreased deposition of platelets on the arterial and venous tubing of the circuit, as measured by labeled monoclonal antibody to the platelet glycoprotein IIIa. The platelet preservation and the decreased expression of GMP-140 in the present trial may be related to decreased platelet–neutrophil aggregate formation and the level of heparinization may be insufficient to prevent this in the control group [11, 12].

Thrombin generation did occur with CPB in the control group but not in the test group in this study, despite carefully controlled heparin levels (3 U/mL on CPB) [13]. The role of tissue factor from the pericardial well as a source for thrombin generation was excluded by the washing of all shed blood. Therefore, the mechanism for thrombin generation may be related to contact activation of the blood related to the circuit. In vitro experiments with human blood have demonstrated that SMA blended polymers delay contact activation and reduce coagulation activity, as measured by TAT generation [3]. Another potential mechanism for thrombin generation may be related to the expression of tissue factor on circulating monocytes as there was a trend to an increase in its expression in the control group toward later stages of CPB in a pattern similar to the generation of thrombin.

It has been advocated that heparin-coated circuits could be used with lower levels of heparin during CPB [14]. However, some investigators have failed to confirm a decrease in thrombin generation with this approach [15, 16]. There are also some reports that this approach may be dangerous as thrombosis has been described on CPB [17]. The SMA-modified surface shows particular promise that it may fulfill this need safely, potentially with lower heparin levels (activated clotting time > 280 seconds). Decreased heparin administration has many advantages. Heparin itself has been clearly demonstrated to be a potent activator of platelets, and it may contribute to platelet dysfunction after operation [18]. Heparin has also been demonstrated to be a major stimulant of fibrinolysis [19]. In a carefully controlled trial, Aldea and colleagues [20] demonstrated that the use of a lower activated clotting time, combined with a heparin-coated surface, markedly decreases shed blood postoperatively, and this was associated with significantly decreased transfusion requirements.

tPA release during CPB has been demonstrated in previous trials [21] and this release can be inhibited by the administration of aprotinin [22], possibly secondary to direct inhibition of heparin-mediated release of tPA [22]. The inhibition of tPA antigen release during and after CPB in the test group in this trial was not anticipated as antifibrinolytics were not used. This suggests that heparin is not the culprit for tPA release and that the block copolymer prevents the release from the blood of an alternative product that would otherwise stimulate endothelial cell release of tPA. The potential known agonists for tPA release include histamine, bradykinin, adrenaline, endothelin-1 or –3, prostacyclin and its stable biotransformed metabolite 6-keto-prostaglandin E1, and thrombin [2326]. Because thrombin generation only appears to be occurring during the later stages of CPB, this latter agonist is unlikely to be causative in this trial.

There were parallel decreases in plasmin-{alpha}2-antiplasmin in the test group that were likely related to the increased tPA, but the difference in D-dimer was not significant. Furthermore, although this was a small trial, the overall blood loss in the two groups was not statistically different. This suggests that in this trial, the induced fibrinolysis that may result from tPA release in the control group, is likely controlled by inhibitory mechanisms. These may include not only plasmin complexing with {alpha}-2 antiplasmin, but also direct inhibition of tPA by plasminogen activator inhibitors [22]. However, these regulatory mechanisms may be overwhelmed in cardiac operations that require longer CPB or in cases in which the intraoperative blood loss is much greater, such as reoperations, resulting in increased bleeding and transfusion requirements in these patients. Further trials should be completed to evaluate the role of this CPB circuit in these patient groups.

In summary, this trial has demonstrated a significant difference in the hematologic effect of circuits prepared with SMAs, with evidence of platelet preservation, decreased tPA release, and decreased thrombin generation on CPB. These changes were not associated with differences in postoperative blood loss or transfusion requirements; however, a larger clinical trial would be necessary to definitively demonstrate this. Further work should be done to evaluate the clinical relevance of these changes. Circuits prepared with this surface should also be evaluated for their potential application and safety for CPB with low levels of systemic heparin, as this approach may be a mechanism to decrease the need for homologous blood products in patients undergoing cardiac operation.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We thank Girija Waghray and Angela Macdonald for their technical assistance, Denise Wozny for her assistance with the statistical evaluation of the data, and Ren Ren Johnson for her assistance with the SEM sample preparation. This study was supported from a grant from COBE Cardiovascular, Arvada, Colorado.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Boisclair M.D., Lane D.A., Philippou H., et al. Mechanisms of thrombin generation during surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood 1993;82:3350-3357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Jessen M, Li J, Harris F, et al. Platelet and neutrophil distributions in pump-oxygenator circuits III. Influence of "Carmeda" heparin treatment [Abstract]. ASAIO J 1996; 25:21.
  3. Tsai C.-C., Deppisch R.M., Forrestal L.J., et al. Surface modifying additives for improved device-blood compatibility. ASAIO J 1994;40:M619-M824.[Medline]
  4. Clauss A. Rapid physiologic coagulation method in determination of fibrinogen. Acta Haem 1957;17:237-245.
  5. Kuhne T., Hornstein A., Semple J., Chang W., Blanchette V., Freedman J. Flow cytometric evaluation of platelet activation in blood collected into EDTA vs. Diatube-H, a sodium citrate solution supplemented with theophylline, adenosine, and dipyridamole. Am J Hematol 1995;50:40-45.[Medline]
  6. Ward RS, Riffle JS. Polysiloxane-polylactone block copolymers. (4663413). 1987. U.S. Patent.
  7. Lovinger A.J., Han B.J., Padden F.J., Mirau P.A. Morphology and properties of polycaprolactone-poly(dimethyl siloxane)-polycaprolactone triblock copolymers. J Polymer Sci 1993;31:115-123.
  8. Okano T., Aoyagi T., Kataoka K., et al. Hydrophilic-hydrophobic microdomain surfaces having an ability to suppress platelet aggregation and their in vitro anti-thrombogenicity. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:919-927.[Medline]
  9. Kawahito K., Tasai K., Murata S., et al. Evaluation of the antithrombogenicity of a new microdomain structured copolymer. Artif Org 1995;19:857-863.[Medline]
  10. Gu YJ, Boonstra PW, Rijnsburger AA, et al. Surface modifying additive (SMA) improves blood compatibility of extracorporeal circuit during clinical cardiopulmonary bypass [Abstract]. Int J Artif Organs 1996;19:62.
  11. Dore M., Burns A.R., Hughes B.J., Entman M.L., Smith C.W. Chemoattractant-induced changes in surface expression and redistribution of a functional ligand for P-selectin on neutrophils. Blood 1996;87:2029-2037.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Maugeri N., Evangelista V., Celardo A., et al. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte-platelet interaction: role of P-selectin in thromboxane B2 and leukotriene C4 cooperative synthesis. Thromb Haemostas 1994;72:450-456.[Medline]
  13. Knudsen L., Hasenkam J.M., Kure H.H., et al. Monitoring thrombin generation with prothrombin fragment 1.2 assay during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Thromb Res 1996;84:45-54.[Medline]
  14. Aldea G.S., Doursounian M., O’Gara P., et al. Heparin-bonded circuits with a reduced anticoagulation protocol in primary CABG: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:410-418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Gorman R.C., Ziats N.P., Rao A.K., et al. Surface-bound heparin fails to reduce thrombin formation during clinical cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:1-12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Muehrcke D.D., McCarthy P.M., Kottke-Marchant K., et al. Biocompatibility of heparin-coated extracorporeal bypass circuits: a randomized, masked clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:472-483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Cheung A.T., Levin S.K., Weiss S.J., Acker M.A., Stenach N. Intracardiac thrombus: a risk of incomplete anticoagulation for cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:541-542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kappa J.R., Fisher C.A., Addonizio V.P., Jr Heparin-induced platelet activation: the role of thromboxane A2 synthesis and the extent of platelet granule release in two patients. J Vasc Surg 1989;9:574-579.[Medline]
  19. Khuri S., Valeri C.R., Loscalzo J., et al. Heparin causes platelet dysfunction and induces fibrinolysis before cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1008-1014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Aldea G.S., O’Gara P., Shapira O.M., et al. Effect of anticoagulation protocol on outcome in patients undergoing CABG with heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:425-433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Stibbe J., Kluft C., Brommer E.J.P., Gomes M., De Jong D.S., Nauta J. Enhanced fibrinolytic activity during cardiopulmonary bypass in open-heart surgery in man is caused by extrinsic (tissue-type) plasminogen activator. Eur J Clin Invest 1984;14:375-382.[Medline]
  22. Ray M.J., Marsh N.A. Aprotinin reduces blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass by direct inhibition of plasmin. Thromb Haemostas 1997;78:1021-1026.[Medline]
  23. Kitaguchi H., Hijikata A., Hirata M. Effect of thrombin on plasminogen activator release from isolated perfused dog leg. Thromb Res 1979;16:407-415.[Medline]
  24. Smith D., Gilbert M., Owen W.G. Tissue plasminogen activator release in vivo in response to vasoactive agents. Blood 1985;66:835-841.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Pruis J., Emeis J.J. Endothelin-1 and -3 induce the release of tissue-type plasminogen activator and Von Willebrand factor from endothelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol 1990;187:105-112.[Medline]
  26. Korbut R., Byrska-Danek A., Gryglewski R.J. Fibrinolytic activity of 6-keto-prostaglandin E1. Thromb Haemostas 1983;50:893.[Medline]

Related Articles

L. Henry Edmunds, Jr
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999 67: 696-697. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Shukri F. Khuri
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999 67: 697-698. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. W. Hammon
Extracorporeal Circulation: The Response of Humoral and Cellular Elements of Blood to Extracorporeal Circulation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 370 - 389.
[Full Text]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
F. D. Rubens and H. Nathan
Lessons learned on the path to a healthier brain: dispelling the myths and challenging the hypotheses
Perfusion, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 153 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
K. J Lilly, J. M Balaguer, P. A Pirundini, M. A Smith, G. Connelly, L. J. Campbell, P. C Philie, M. McAdams, W. Riley, R. Dekkers, et al.
Early results of a comprehensive operative and perfusion strategy to attenuate the incidence of adverse neurological outcomes in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients
Perfusion, November 1, 2006; 21(6): 311 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. M. Kirshbom, B. E. Miller, K. Spitzer, K. A. Easley, C. E. Spainhour, B. E. Kogon, and K. R. Kanter
Failure of surface-modified bypass circuits to improve platelet function during pediatric cardiac surgery.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2006; 132(3): 675 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. G. Shann, D. S. Likosky, J. M. Murkin, R. A. Baker, Y. R. Baribeau, G. R. DeFoe, T. A. Dickinson, T. J. Gardner, H. P. Grocott, G. T. O'Connor, et al.
An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: A focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and the inflammatory response.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2006; 132(2): 283 - 290.e3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Jaggers and J. H. Lawson
Coagulopathy and Inflammation in Neonatal Heart Surgery: Mechanisms and Strategies
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): S2360 - S2366.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
S. Allen, W. T McBride, I. S Young, S. W MacGowan, T. J McMurray, S. Prabhu, S P. Penugonda, and M. A Armstrong
A clinical, renal and immunological assessment of Surface Modifying Additive Treated (SMARTTM) cardiopulmonary bypass circuits
Perfusion, September 1, 2005; 20(5): 255 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. D. Rubens, H. Nathan, R. Labow, K. S. Williams, D. Wozny, J. Karsh, M. Ruel, and T. Mesana
Effects of Methylprednisolone and a Biocompatible Copolymer Circuit on Blood Activation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 655 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
F D Rubens and T Mesana
The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: a therapeutic overview
Perfusion, January 1, 2004; 19(1_suppl): S5 - S12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
P. Menasche and L. H. Edmunds Jr.
Extracorporeal Circulation: The Inflammatory Response
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 349 - 360.
[Full Text]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
V. Vijay and K. McCusker
Recent advances in biocompatible surface-modifying additives for cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, January 1, 2003; 18(1_suppl): 41 - 45.
[PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
F. D. Rubens and T. Mesana
Surface Modified Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits: Modifying the Inflammatory Response
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2002; 6(4): 301 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-O. Defraigne, J. Pincemail, G. Dekoster, R. Larbuisson, M. Dujardin, F. Blaffart, J.-L. David, and R. Limet
SMA circuits reduce platelet consumption and platelet factor release during cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 70(6): 2075 - 2081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. D. Rubens, M. Sabloff, P. S. Wells, and M. Bourke
Use of recombinant-hirudin in pulmonary thromboendarterectomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 69(6): 1942 - 1943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubens, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubens, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, H. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS