|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:27-35
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
b Division of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Boineau, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine 660 S Euclid Ave, Box 8234-3308 CSRB, St. Louis, MO 63110
Presented at the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Jan 2628, 1998.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. We examined the atrial coronary arteries and the activation sequence during sinus rhythm in normal canine hearts to design the atrial incisions according to the concept of a radial approach.
Results. The pattern of coronary artery distribution was centripetal, branching from the right coronary or left circumflex coronary artery at the right or left atrioventricular groove and spreading toward the sinus node. The endocardial mapping of the atria disclosed some important findings in designing the atrial incisions of the radial approach: the activation sequence at the left atrial septum and at the posterior left atrium between the pulmonary vein orifices. The atrial incisions were designed according to these findings.
Conclusions. The radial approach may represent a more physiologic atrial transport function.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The maze procedure is a surgical intervention to restore sinus rhythm and atrial contraction in patients with AF. The atrial incisions of the procedure block all the potential macroreentrant pathways and narrow the atrial tissue to block propagation of the microreentrant wavelets. As a result, the procedure restores sinus rhythm and some degree of atrial mechanical function. A high incidence of restoration of sinus rhythm and prevention of AF after operation has been reported in patients with and without structural heart disease [26]. Among 164 patients who underwent the maze procedure at our institution [4], AF or atrial flutter recurred in 12 (7%) postoperatively. All 12 patients were converted to sinus rhythm with medical therapy. Thus, all patients after the maze procedure are now free of AF. Atrial transport function was also studied in these patients. One hundred twenty-five patients were reevaluated approximately 6 months postoperatively specifically for atrial transport function. The evaluation revealed that 98% of patients had right atrial and 86% left atrial transport function detected by Doppler echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, or atrioventricular versus ventricular pacing at the same rate. Although the presence of atrial mechanical contraction has been demonstrated in most patients after the maze procedure, more important is whether the amount of atrial mechanical function is enough to provide sufficient atrial transport function and to eliminate the risk of systemic thromboembolism. Quantitative analysis of atrial function in patients after the maze procedure revealed that the left atrial transport function was significantly less than that in normal control subjects, whereas the right atrial function was comparable [69]. The reason for this finding is hypothesized as follows: The maze procedure electrically and thus mechanically isolates the posterior left atrium between the pulmonary vein orifices, thereby eliminating approximately 29% of the left atrium [10] from contributing to the transport function. Because of the complex and detouring incisions, the activation and contraction of neighboring atrial segments across the incisions can be discordant. Also, the total atrial activation time is prolonged; thus, atrioventricular contraction coupling can be desynchronized. Moreover, some of the maze incisions interrupt the atrial coronary arteries; therefore myocardial circulation can be impaired by the procedure.
The significance of atrial contraction to ventricular filling depends on the patients ventricular diastolic function. In ventricles with normal compliance, relatively low atrial pressure is necessary to fill the ventricle and maintain normal cardiac output. This preceeding statement is true because the early rapid filling is accomplished by the pressure gradient between the atrium and ventricle, where the diastolic pressure is normal. Most of the ventricular filling is completed during the early diastolic period, and there is little need of atrial contraction (late filling), which is why patients with AF and normal ventricular systolic and diastolic function do not exhibit the symptoms of heart failure. In patients with diastolic dysfunction, however, the ventricular filling pressure is elevated because of the impaired compliance. Even if the left atrial pressure is raised and filling time is prolonged to compensate for the ventricular filling, diastolic ventricular filling is not accomplished during the early filling period. Atrial contraction during the late filling period contributes to ventricular filling and results in maintaining cardiac output within the normal range. Therefore, atrial contraction is an important determinant of hemodynamic status in patients with diastolic dysfunction. Abnormalities of diastolic ventricular filling are seen in patients with most forms of heart disease, including hypertension [11], coronary artery disease [12], valvular heart disease [13], cardiomyopathies [14], and a variety of systemic diseases. Diastolic dysfunction can be present and can be detected before the clinical manifestations of disease. More important, aging is another important factor that affects diastolic function [15]. In young adults with normal diastolic function, 85% to 95% of ventricular filling occurs in early diastole. By age 65, however, approximately 50% of flow may occur during late diastole because of the impaired diastolic function. Therefore the majority of the patients undergoing operation for AF can have some degree of ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
We hypothesized that a procedure with atrial incisions radiating from the sinus node toward the atrioventricular annular margins, paralleling the activation sequence and paralleling the atrial coronary arteries, would provide a more physiologic atrial activationcontraction sequence and optimize the atrial contribution to ventricular filling. The concepts of the maze procedure and the radial approach are compared in Figure 1. It is hypothesized that the activation wavefront from the sinoatrial node radiates centrifugally toward the atrioventricular annular margins in normal atria and that the atrial coronary arteries, originating at the atrioventricular groove, distribute centripetally toward the sinus node. In the left panel, the atrial incisions of the maze procedure desynchronize this physiologic activation sequence and prolong the total activation time of the atria. Some of the incisions cross the atrial coronary arteries. Also, there is a large electrically isolated region encompassing the pulmonary vein orifices. In the right panel, the atrial incisions of the radial approach parallel the direction of the physiologic activation and the direction of the blood supply. There is no electrically or mechanically isolated region. These incisions may not disturb the physiologic activation sequence and may preserve blood supply to most atrial segments.
|
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Atrial activation sequence
Because it was necessary to examine the activation sequence at the atrial septum and the posterior left atrium between the pulmonary vein orifices, which the maze procedure isolates, endocardial mapping of the atria was performed. The chest was opened through a median sternotomy, and the heart was suspended in a pericardial cradle. The dog was supported by normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with vena caval and femoral artery cannulations. Two electrode molds carrying 104 and 108 unipolar electrodes each were inserted into the right and left atria through bilateral ventriculotomies across the atrioventricular annuli retrogradely. The mitral and tricuspid valve leaflets were excised to facilitate the insertion of electrode molds. The mapping system and method have been described previously [17]. The activation maps during sinus rhythm and atrial pacing were constructed.
All animals received humane care in compliance with the "Principles of Laboratory Animal Care" formulated by the National Society of Medical Research and the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" prepared by the National Academy of Science and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication No. 86-23, revised 1985). In addition, the study protocol was approved by the Washington University Animal Studies Committee.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Coronary arteries of the interatrial septum were examined in 22 animals. Four atrial arteries were distributed in the interatrial septum, as illustrated in the lower panel of Figure 3: the anterior right atrial artery, the intermediate right atrial artery, the anterior left atrial artery, and the atrioventricular node artery. The anterior right atrial artery had branches to the anterior septum in 15 animals (68%). The branches of the anterior left atrial artery were distributed in the anteromedial part of the anterior limbus of the fossa ovalis in 88% of the animals. The branches of the intermediate right atrial artery were distributed in the crista terminalis and were further distributed posterolaterally in the posterior part of the anterior limbus in all animals except one in which the artery was small, as described earlier. The lower interatrial septum was perfused by the posterior left atrial artery and the atrioventricular node artery from the LCX.
|
The site of earliest left atrial activation in the posterior septal region (indicated by an asterisk in Fig 3) was depolarized from the adjacent site in the right atrial septum 20 to 30 ms after the onset of earliest activation in the right atrium. Wavefronts spread from this earliest left septal activation site in three directions. A wavefront traversed the anterosuperior left atrium (Bachmanns bundle) and activated the left atrial appendage and surrounding atrium. Other wavefronts propagated toward the posterior left atrium above, below, and between the pulmonary vein orifices, terminating in the left lateral wall of the left atrium at 60 ms. A third component of the wavefront propagated toward the atrioventricular annulus and inferiorly toward the lateral left atrium. These three wavefronts merged at the lateral left atrium, where the latest activation occurred. The left atrial activation was completed by 70 ms, and the median left atrial activation time was 45 ms after onset of activation in the right atrium.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The atrial coronary arteries in humans have been previously examined either in cadaver hearts or angiographically in living humans [20, 21]. There are several differences in atrial coronary artery anatomy between humans and dogs. The intermediate right atrial artery is the sinus node artery in most canine hearts, whereas the sinus node is supplied by the anterior right atrial artery in approximately two thirds of humans and by the anterior left atrial artery in one third. The atrioventricular node artery arises from the distal LCX in dogs, whereas it arises from the distal RCA in humans. The intermediate right atrial artery branches to the crista terminalis and the posterior part of the anterior limbus of the fossa ovalis in dogs, but this artery is small in humans. The interatrial septum in humans is supplied by the anterior right or left atrial artery superiorly and by the atrioventricular node artery inferiorly [22].
The atrial activation during sinus rhythm has been previously demonstrated by epicardial [23] or right atrial septal maps [24]. The endocardial mapping of the atria in the present study disclosed the activation sequence at the left atrial septum as well as at the posterior left atrium between the pulmonary vein orifices, where epicardial mapping is technically difficult. There were some important findings in designing the atrial incisions of the radial approach. There are two paths between the sinus node and the interatrial septum; one rotating around the SVC clockwise and the other rotating counterclockwise. These two wavefronts merge and activate the septum at the posterior region of the anterior limbus. The left atrial activation begins at the posterosuperior septum. Early activation of the left septum could be blocked by the septal incision of the maze procedure, delaying the onset of left atrial depolarization. Another important finding was that the posterior left atrium was activated by the wavefront propagating inferiorly from the superior left atrium through the atrial tissue between the right and left upper pulmonary veins. The conduction from the earliest left septal activation site to the posterior left atrium may be faster through this pathway than through the atrial tissue between the upper and lower right pulmonary veins. This statement is true because the right pulmonary veins form a common orifice with a narrow band of atrial tissue between each vein.
Development of a surgical procedure
On the basis of the coronary artery distribution and activation sequence of the atria described in the present report, we designed the atrial incisions following the concept of the radial approach. Figure 4 illustrates the atrial incisions and the subsequent activation sequence during sinus rhythm after the radial approach and after the maze procedure. The right atrial incisions are similar between the two procedures, except for the excision of the right atrial appendage. The right atrial appendage can participate in atrial reentry as an anatomic obstacle in conjunction with or without the SVC. It also has many bridging endocardial trabeculae that could form part of a potential reentrant pathway [25]. However, the right atrial appendage has been shown to secrete atrial natriuretic peptides [2628], and reduced secretion of these peptides has been demonstrated in patients after the maze procedure [29, 30]. This reduced secretion of atrial natriuretic peptides could be one of the mechanisms for the postoperative complication of fluid retention frequently seen in patients after the maze procedure. To preserve secretion of atrial natriuretic peptides, the right atrial appendage is not excised in the radial approach but is incised to prevent reentry at the lateral right atrium. In addition, major bridging trabeculae in the right atrial appendage are divided to eliminate reentry using these structures. The right atrial appendage incision is extended down to the tricuspid valve annulus anteromedially and from the appendage tip in the opposite direction, toward the lower right atrium inferiorly, as in the maze procedure.
|
The incisions in the left atrium and interatrial septum in the radial approach are entirely different from those of the maze procedure. One incision, beginning at the anterior limbus of the fossa ovalis, extends inferoposteriorly toward the lower posterior interatrial septum and to the right posteroinferior wall of the left atrium, passing near the right and left lower pulmonary vein orifices, and continues down to the mitral valve annulus at the commissure between the middle and posteromedial scallops. The other incision, beginning at the superior left atrium between the right and left upper pulmonary veins, connects with the left atrial appendage excision line and extends anteromedially further downward to the mitral valve annulus at the anterolateral commissure. These two incisions divide the left atrium into three segments: the upper, middle, and lower left atrium. These segments are connected to each other at the septum and at the superior left atrium. Because these incisions parallel the activation sequence during sinus rhythm, a synchronous left atrial activation sequence is maintained.
The data in the present study suggest that the septal incision of the maze procedure interrupts the blood supply to the posterior septum from the anterior left atrial artery and that the incision locates the earliest activation site of the left septum. This incision may cause ischemia in certain areas of the septum and may impair the physiologic activation sequence of the septum. In the radial approach, the septal incision is placed from the posterior lower septum extending up to the anterior limbus, so that the blood supply to most areas will not be disturbed and the normal septal activation is preserved.
The posterior left atrium, which is isolated in the maze procedure, is activated from the superior left atrium between the right and left upper pulmonary veins in the radial approach. This activation sequence is the same as the sequence in normal canine atria. To prevent reentry around the right upper pulmonary vein, the narrow isthmus of atrial tissue between the upper and lower right pulmonary veins is cryoablated. Moreover, the atrial tissue between the left atrial incision and each pulmonary vein orifice is also cryoablated to prevent reentry around one or more orifices. At the superior left atrium between the right and left upper pulmonary veins, the area of the atrial myocardium can be broad and large enough to maintain reentry in this region, particularly in patients with a dilated left atrium. Therefore the upper left atrial incision, beginning at the left atrial appendage excision line, is extended over the left upper pulmonary vein and toward the right upper pulmonary vein orifice to reduce the effective atrial area and to prevent reentry at this region.
The studies on atrial coronary artery anatomy and the activation sequence during sinus rhythm described in the present report suggest that the atrial incisions of the radial approach parallel the activation sequence and atrial coronary arteries in canine atria. Moreover, the basic patterns of the atrial coronary arteries and the activation sequence are similar between dogs and humans. Therefore the radial approach should also preserve a more physiologic activation sequence and blood supply to most atrial segments in patients.
To characterize and compare the pattern of activation sequence after the two procedures, correlation between the atrial activation and the atrial incisions is illustrated in Figure 5, with reference to the preoperative activation sequence. The difference in the right atrial activation sequence is small after the radial approach or the maze procedure. However, the activation sequence in the left atrium is markedly different in the two procedures. The left atrial incisions of the radial approach barely alter the preoperative activation sequence because the incisions parallel the activation sequence. The difference between the procedures is evident in three regions: the posterior left atrium, the left lateral left atrium, and the interatrial septum. The most significant difference is that the posterior left atrium is activated physiologically in the radial approach, whereas this region is isolated and inexcitable in the maze procedure. The activation at the lateral left atrium is also different in the two procedures. In the maze procedure, this region is activated by the wavefront propagating from the superior left atrium and detouring around the left atrial appendage excision line. The path length from the sinus node to this region is longer than the preoperative path length, suggesting delayed activation in the region. In the radial approach, the activation sequence of this region is the same as the preoperative sequence. The activation at the posterior septum reaches a dead end in both procedures. However, the activation sequence is more physiologic in the radial approach than in the maze procedure, in which the activation turns around at the edge of the septal incision. These differences in the left atrial activation sequence should result in a significant difference in the left atrial transport function between the two procedures. This hypothesis is tested in a subsequent report [16].
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-year clinical experience with surgery for atrial fibrillation. Ann Surg 1996;224:267-273.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. El Oumeiri, C. Stefanidis, A. Sabry, M. Antoine, J.-M. De Smet, D. De Canniere, and J.-L. Jansens Long-term follow-up after endocardial radiofrequency modified Nitta procedure for concomitant atrial fibrillation treatment Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2007; 6(3): 319 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Bakir, F. P. Casselman, P. Brugada, P. Geelen, F. Wellens, I. Degrieck, F. Van Praet, Y. Vermeulen, R. De Geest, and H. Vanermen Current Strategies in the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Review of the Literature and Onze Lieve Vrouw Clinic's Strategy Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 83(1): 331 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bando, H. Kasegawa, Y. Okada, J. Kobayashi, A. Kada, T. Shimokawa, M. Nasu, S. Nakatani, K. Niwaya, O. Tagusari, et al. Impact of preoperative and postoperative atrial fibrillation on outcome after mitral valvuloplasty for nonischemic mitral regurgitation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2005; 129(5): 1032 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. O'Donnell, G. Agnelli, and J. I. Weitz Emerging therapies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J. Suppl., May 1, 2005; 7(suppl_C): C19 - C27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Lad Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter After Atrial Compartment Operation: Modified Atrial Incisions and Role of Amiodarone Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 389 - 389. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Schuessler Do we need a map to get through the maze? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2004; 127(3): 627 - 628. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bonanomi, D. Schwartzman, D. Francischelli, K. Hebsgaard, and M. A. Zenati A new device for beating heart bipolar radiofrequency atrial ablation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 1859 - 1866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Raman, S. Ishikawa, M. M. Storer, and J. M. Power Surgical radiofrequency ablation of both atria for atrial fibrillation: results of a multicenter trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2003; 126(5): 1357 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bando, J. Kobayashi, M. Hirata, T. Satoh, K. Niwaya, O. Tagusari, S. Nakatani, T. Yagihara, and S. Kitamura Early and late stroke after mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis: risk factor analysis of a 24-year experience J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 358 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. T Sie, W. P Beukema, A. Elvan, and A. R Ramdat Misier New strategies in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2003; 58(3): 501 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Gillinov, E. H. Blackstone, and P. M. McCarthy Atrial fibrillation: current surgical options and their assessment Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2210 - 2217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Raman, S. Ishikawa, and J. M. Power Epicardial radiofrequency ablation of both atria in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: experience in patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 74(5): 1506 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Matsumoto, G. Watanabe, M. Endo, H. Sasaki, and F. Kasashima Coexistence of sinus rhythm and segmental atrial fibrillation after maze procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2002; 74(1): 249 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W. Mohr, A. M. Fabricius, V. Falk, R. Autschbach, N. Doll, U. von Oppell, A. Diegeler, H. Kottkamp, and G. Hindricks Curative treatment of atrial fibrillation with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation: Short-term and midterm results J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2002; 123(5): 919 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Jais, R. Weerasooriya, D. C. Shah, M. Hocini, L. Macle, K.-J. Choi, C. Scavee, M. Haissaguerre, and J. Clementy Ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF): Past, present and future Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 337 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lonnerholm, P. Blomstrom, L. Nilsson, and C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist Atrial size and transport function after the Maze III procedure for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 107 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Isobe, H. Kumano, T. Ishikawa, Y. Sasaki, S. Kinugasa, K. Nagamachi, and Y. Kato A new procedure for chronic atrial fibrillation: bilateral appendage-preserving maze procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): 1473 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, R. W. Asinger, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, R. L. Frye, J. L. Halperin, G. N. Kay, W. W. Klein, S. Levy, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Circulation, October 23, 2001; 104(17): 2118 - 2150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2001; 22(20): 1852 - 1923. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, R. W. Asinger, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, R. L. Frye, J. L. Halperin, G. N. Kay, W. W. Klein, S. Levy, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1231 - 1265. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, R. W. Asinger, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, R. L. Frye, J. L. Halperin, G. N. Kay, W. W. Klein, S. Levy, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1266 - 1266. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |