|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1869
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
To the Editor
We appreciate Dr Sarsams comment on our paper entitled. "Atrial Flap Anastomosis: An Alternative Technique for Orthotopic Heart Transplantation" [1]. The letter reflects the still ongoing discussion about the optimal reconstruction of the superior venous inflow tract in orthotopic heart transplantation (oHTx). Dr Sarsams bicaval technique [2] prevents a narrowing of the superior vena cava (SVC) anastomosis by connecting an atrial cuff of the recipient SVC with the donor SVC cut obliquely. In case of cava mismatch often present in patients with right heart failure before oHTx he proposes an enlargement of the donor SVC opening by an incision onto the roof of the donor right atrium (RA).
Considering this technique we are concerned about the following aspects: First, using the recipient SVC plus the atrial cuff plus a segment of the proximal donor SVC will result in a considerable length of reconstructed SVC. Was a kinking of the SVC never observed? Second, by using the donor SVC for the construction of this SVC-RA-inflow tract anastomosis, a material with the potential of shrinking is implanted. Third, Dr Sarsam is to be congratulated that he never faced a permanent sinus node dysfunction after having done an incision onto the roof of the RA, where within the terminal sulcus great interindividual variations in the sinus node area are to be expected [3]. This region should be respected as a "no touch area" and never be incised.
In our opinion the "atrial flap" technique represents the following "improvements on already existing techniques" of oHTx: The SVC-RA connection can be done quickly and easily. We never faced bleeding problems of the suture lines within the right atrial appendage. The anastomosis is atrioatrial with a minimal (or zero?) risk of narrowing. Despite of the atrial incision the geometric changes within the RA are negligible, so the risk of incompetence of the atrioventricular valves is small. Because all suture lines are guided more than 1.0 cm distant from the terminal sulcus, the risk of a sinus node dysfunction due to tension, edema, surgical trauma, or sinus artery laceration is minimal.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |