ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Kazuhiro Yanagihara
Hiromi Wada
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, F.
Right arrow Articles by Wada, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, F.
Right arrow Articles by Wada, H.

Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1745-1750
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original articles: general thoracic

Lewis Y antigen expression and postoperative survival in non–small cell lung cancer

Fumihiro Tanaka, MDa, Ryo Miyahara, MDa, Yohsuke Ohtake, MDa, Kazuhiro Yanagihara, MDa, Tatsuo Fukuse, MDa, Shigeki Hitomi, MDa, Hiromi Wada, MDa

a Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chest Disease Research Institute, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan

Address reprint requests to Dr Wada, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chest Disease Research Institute, Kyoto University, Shogoinn-kawahara-cho 53, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606, Japan
e-mail: (wada{at}chest.kyoto-u.ac.jp)

Presented at the Poster session of the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Jan 26–28, 1998.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. In contrast to other Lewis blood group-related antigens, Lewis Y antigen (LeY) has not been fully investigated in non–small cell lung cancer.

Methods. To assess the significance of LeY expression, 236 patients with completely resected pathologic stage 1-3a were reviewed with immunohistochemical analysis.

Results. LeY expression was positive in 179 patients (75.8%). In poorly differentiated cancer, percentage of LeY-positive patients was lower than in moderately to well-differentiated cancer (67.2% versus 81.2%, p = 0.028). Five-year survival rate of LeY-positive patients was 78.2%, significantly higher than that of LeY-negative patients (59.7%, p = 0.001). Combined with p53 status, differences in survival proved to be marked; 5-year survival rate of patients with positive LeY expression and without aberrant p53 expression, was as high as 83.3%, whereas that of patients with negative LeY expression and with aberrant p53 expression was only 38.4% (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that LeY expression was a significant independent factor to predict better survival.

Conclusions. LeY expression is a significant prognostic factor related to grade of cancer differentiation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
A variety of changes in cell surface carbohydrates occur closely related to malignant transformation. ABH (O) and Lewis blood group-related antigens, which play major roles in alloantigenic systems in human tissues, are carbohydrates carried by two types of backbone structures, type 1 chain containing [Galß1 -> 3GlcNAc] and type 2 chain containing [Galß1 -> 4GlcNAc] [1]. Among them, Lewis A antigen having type 1 chain structure and Lewis X antigen having type 2 chain structure have been well studied as cancer-related carbohydrate antigens [25].

On the other hand, the biological significance of Lewis Y antigen (LeY, Fuc{alpha}1 -> 2Galß1 -> 4[Fuc{alpha}1 -> 3]GlcNAc) having type 2 chain structure, has not been fully investigated yet. Only LeY expression in process of malignant transformation of colorectal tissue has been demonstrated in some reports [1, 59]. There have been only a few clinical reports on LeY expression in colorectal cancer [9], hepatocellular cancer [10], breast cancer [11], and lung cancer [12, 13]; the clinical significance as a cancer-related marker has not been established. In the present study, therefore, significance of LeY expression in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was analyzed.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
A total of 237 consecutive patients with pathologic stage 1–3a NSCLC who underwent complete tumor resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection without chemotherapy nor radiation therapy before operation at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chest Disease Research Institute, Kyoto University between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1990, were reviewed. Complete tumor resection was defined when no microscopic cancers were identified either in the resection margins of the tumor or in the highest mediastinal lymph nodes [14]. Pathologic stage was determined histopathologically in accordance with tumor-node-metastasis classification revised in 1986 [15], and pathologic stage of patients treated before 1986 was reevaluated according to the same criteria. Histological type was determined in accordance with the classification by the World Health Organization. One case was excluded from the study due to operation-related death, a total of 236 patients were evaluated in this study. In all patients, the in-patient medical records, chest x-ray films, whole-body computed tomography (CT) films, bone and gallium scanning data, records of surgery were evaluated without knowledge of the p53 status with immunohistochemical examination. Postoperative follow-up surveillance study was conducted by the use of outpatient records and telephone or letter inquiries. The day of the thoracotomy was regarded as the starting day for counting the postoperative survival days.

Clinical characteristics of the patients
There were 170 men and 66 women (Table 1). Mean age at thoracotomy was 62.4 ± 9.74 years (mean ± standard deviation, range 17 to 83 years). Performance status (PS) was 0 or 1 for most patients. With respect to the histologic type, adenocarcinoma was most frequent (130 patients, 55.1%) and squamous cell carcinoma (85 patients, 36.0%), was the next most frequent. As for the postoperative p-stage, the number of stage 1 patients was the highest (138 patients, accounting for 58.5%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients and Lewis Y Antigen Expression

 
Immunohistochemistory
Four micrometers thin tissue sections were cut from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary tumor block and used for the immunohistochemical staining. Immunohistochemical staining was performed by streptoavidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase complex method (LSAB kit; Dako Japan, Kyoto, Japan), and antihuman LeY monoclonal antibody (MoAb) BM-1/JIMRO (mouse IgM, 1 mg/mL, Japan Immunoresearch Laboratories Co Ltd, Gunma, Japan) was used as primary antibody [16]. After deparaffinization, tissue sections were treated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 20 min to remove endogenous peroxidase activity, and then, treated with normal goat serum for 10 min. The slides were incubated with antihuman LeY monoclonal antibody (the original antibody solution was diluted 1:50 to final concentration of 20 µg/mL) at room temperature for 20 min. Next, the slides were incubated with biotinylated sheep antimouse IgG antibody at room temperature for 10 minutes, and then, they were incubated with horseradish peroxidase labeled streptoavidin for 10 min. Finally, 0.06% 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) (Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO) was used as a chromogen, and the slides were counterstained by the use of hematoxylin. Negative control slides were obtained by using nonimmuned mouse serum instead of primary antibody.

Antihuman p53 MoAb (DO-7, mouse IgG2b, kappa, 250 µg/mL, (Dako) was used as primary antibody for immunostaining against p53. The slides were incubated with the diluted antibody (1:50) after microwave heating for 10 min to retrieve the antigenicity.

Stained tissue slides were evaluated by three of the authors (F.T., Y.O., and R.M.) independently without knowing their clinical data. Tumor cells were judged as positive staining only when the cytoplasm was faintly stained. A total of 1,000 tumor cells were counted for positive staining and the percentage of positive cells were determined. The degree of LeY expression was graded according to the percentage of LeY-positive-staining cells as follows: (-) if the percentage was 5% or less than 5%, (+) if the percentage was over 5% and under 10%, (2+) if the percentage was over 10% and under 25%, (3+) if the percentage was over 25% and under 50%, (4+) if the percentage was over 50% and under 75%, and (5+) if the percentage was over 75%. Aberrant expression of p53 was judged when the percentage of the positive-staining cells exceeded 5%.

Statistical methods
Counts were compared by {chi}2 test. Continuous data were compared by Student’s t test if the distribution of samples was normal or by Mann-Whitney U-test if the sample distribution was asymmetrical. Postoperative survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, while the differences in survival rates were assessed by log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors was performed by Cox regression model. The difference was considered significant if p value was less than 0.05. All statistical manipulations were performed using SPSS for Windows software system (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Expression of LeY
The number of patients for whom the grade of LeY expression was judged (-), (+), (2+), (3+), (4+), or (5+) was 57 (24.2%), 17 (7.2%), 42 (17.8%), 51 (21.6%), 31 (13.1%), and 38 (16.1%), respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 50.2% for (-) group, 79.3% for (1+) group, 80.0% for (2+) group, 74.4% for (3+) group, 76.0% for (4+) group, and 77.6% for (5+) group. The LeY expression (-) group showed significantly worse postoperative prognosis than the other (+), (2+), (3+), (4+), and (5+) groups. No significant difference in the postoperative prognosis was observed among the (+), (2+), (3+), (4+), and (5+) groups. As a consequence, the (-) patient group was determined to be the LeY expression negative and the other patients groups, (+), (2+), (3+), (4+), or (5+), were determined to be the LeY expression positive, and the assessment shown below was carried out. One hundred seventy-nine (75.8%) of 236 patients were judged to be LeY expression positive, and the other 57 patients (24.2%) LeY-expression negative.

LeY expression and clinical characteristic (table 1)
Increased positivity for LeY expression was seen in adenocarcinoma (84.6%) versus squamous cell carcinoma (70.6%, p = 0.001). LeY expression was seen correlated with cancer differentiation; LeY expression was positive in 138 (81.2%) of 170 patients with moderately to well-differentiated cancer whereas in only 39 (67.2%) of 58 patients with poorly differentiated cancer (poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma) (p = 0.028).

Ninety-nine (41.9%) patients were judged to show aberrant expression of p53. Only 68.7% of patients with aberrant p53 expression showed positive LeY expression, whereas 81.0% of those without aberrant p53 expression showed positive LeY expression (p = 0.029).

Sex, performance status, or p-stage was not correlated with LeY expression.

LeY expression and postoperative prognosis (table 2)
Five-year survival rate of LeY-positive patients was 77.9%, which was significantly higher than that of LeY-negative patients (50.2%, p = 0.001) (Fig 1). In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 5-year survival rate of LeY-positive patients was 75.1%, which was significantly higher than that of LeY-negative patients (46.4%, p = 0.028). In patients with adenocarcinoma as well, prognosis of LeY-positive patients tended to be better than that of LeY-negative patients, although showing no significant difference (p = 0.059).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Postoperative Survival of Patients With and Without Lewis Y Antigen Expression

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Survival after complete tumor resection with lymph node dissection for non–small cell lung cancer during 1985–1990 at Kyoto University. Comparison between that for Lewis Y antigen (LeYLeY) expression positive disease and that for LeY expression negative disease.

 
Analysis according to the p-stage revealed that impact of the status of LeY expression on the postoperative prognosis were most remarkable in patients with p-stage 1 disease. That is, 5-year survival rate was as high as 85.9% for LeY-positive patients, and only 49.1% for LeY-negative patients (p < 0.001) (Fig 2).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Survival after complete tumor resection with lymph node dissection for non–small cell lung cancer during 1985–1990 at Kyoto University. Comparison between that for Lewis Y antigen (LeY) expression positive disease and that for LeY expression negative disease.

 
With respect to the p53 status, aberrant expression of p53 proved to be an independent prognostic factor to predict worse postoperative prognosis. Five-year survival rates for patients with and without aberrant p53 protein expression were 60.0% and 83.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). Combined with the p53 status, impact of LeY expression on postoperative prognosis was assessed. An extremely poor prognosis was demonstrated for patients with negative LeY expression and with aberrant p53 expression (5-year survival rate: 38.7%), whereas a most favorable prognosis for patients with positive LeY expression and without aberrant p53 expression (5-year survival rate: 83.3%) (Fig 3). Analysis of p-stage 1 patients alone revealed that the impact of LeY expression combined with p53 status on postoperative prognosis was marked (Fig 4).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Comparison of postoperative survival between LeY-positive and p53 aberrant expression negative disease (A), that for LeY-positive and p53 aberrant expression positive disease (B), that for LeY-negative and p53 aberrant expression negative disease (C), and that for LeY-negative and p53 aberrant expression positive disease (D).

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Comparison of postoperative survival for p-stage 1, NSCLC between LeYpositive and p53 aberrant expression negative disease (A), that for LeY-positive and p53 aberrant expression positive disease (B), that for LeY-negative and p53 aberrant expression negative disease (C), and that for LeY-negative and p53 aberrant expression positive disease (D).

 
Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors
Multivariative analysis of prognostic factors using the Cox proportional hazard model confirmed that positive LeY expression was a significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio 0.431, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.252–0.739). Higher age (for every 10 years of age, hazard ratio 1.475, 95% CI: 1.096–1.985), advanced pathologic stage (hazard ratio 1.478, 95% CI: 1.120–2.371), and aberrant expression of p53 (hazard ratio 2.055, 95% CI: 1.220–3.462) proved to be significant prognostic factors to predict poor prognosis. Pathologic stage, gender, or histologic types were not proved to be significant prognostic factors.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
During neoplastic transformation, glycosylation may revert to an earlier development form with lung cancer cells reexpressing antigens found on immature embryonic lung cells. The tumor-associated LeY is the focus of the present study and is correlated with postoperative survival.

Several findings have been reported with respect to LeY expression in normal tissue and in cancer tissue since the 1980s, when various kinds of MoAbs against LeY were generated. As for LeY expression in lung cancer, only two results have been reported. Miyake and coworkers conducted an immunohistologic study on NSCLC using a MoAb, MIA-15-5 [12]. MIA-15-5 recognizes sugar chains having a structure of Fuc{alpha}1 -> 2Galß1 -> R (R: type 1 or type 2 chain), and react with not only LeY but also H-antigen (Fuc{alpha}1 -> 2Gal) and Lewis b antigen (Leb, Fuc{alpha}1 -> 2Galß1 -> 3[Fuc{alpha}1 -> 4]GlcNAc). Positive expression was judged when more than 5% of tumor cells were stained, and MIA-15-5-positive was seen in 91 (61.1%) of 149 patients. Postoperative prognosis of MIA-15-5-positive patients proved to be significantly worse as compared with that of MIA-15-5-negative patients, which did not agree with our findings that LeY-positive patients had a better prognosis. However, because MIA-15-5 recognizes not only LeY but also H-antigen and Leb, the disagreement with our results obtained by using MoAb, BM-1/JIMRO recognizing only LeY could be understandable.

Ogawa and coworkers also conducted a study on LeY expression in NSCLC [13]. They examined LeY expression in patients with p-stage 1 disease using BM-1/JIMRO, the same MoAb used in our study. They judged LeY expression was positive when more than 50% of tumor cells were stained, and reported that 84 (63.2%) of 133 patients were LeY positive. They also reported that postoperative prognosis of LeY-positive patients was poor as compared with that of LeY-negative patients, which was not in agreement with the result of our study which showed that the prognosis of LeY-positive patients was favorable. They used a 50% positive cell count rate as the cut-off value because the mean percentage of LeY-positive cells for all patients was 56%. They determined that patients with a positive cell count rate of 50% or higher were LeY positive and that those with a positive cell count rate of lower than 50% were LeY negative, and LeY-positive patients accounted for 63.2% of the total patients. If a cut-off value of the 50% positive cell rate were applied to our patients, LeY-positive patients would account for 29.2% of the total patients (69 of 236 patients). Thus, the LeY-positive cell count rate reported by Ogawa and coworkers appears too high in comparison with our findings. Moreover, in a study reported by Miyake and coworkers using MIA-15-5 recognizing H antigen and Leb in addition to LeY, a cut-off value of 5% was also used as in our study, and 91 (61.1%) of 149 patients exhibited positive cell count rates of over 5% [12]. Studies on hepatocellular cancer [10] and breast cancer [11], where patients showing only one positively stained cell were determined to be positive, also showed that positive patients accounted for 43.5% and for 66.9%, respectively. Therefore, the cut-off value at 50% as stated by Ogawa and coworkers might be questionable.

Our study suggests that LeY-negative patients had poor prognosis because more patients had poorly differentiated cancer. Conversely, in poorly differentiated cancer, decreased LeY antigen expression on the surface of tumor cells may result in a poor prognosis. Another reason why LeY-negative patients had poor prognosis contrary to other studies can be related to apoptosis. It has recently been reported that LeY expression is closely related to apoptosis; LeY expression is a phenotypic marker of apoptosis [16]. In the present study, the relationship between LeY expression and p53 status was also investigated. It was demonstrated that LeY expression decreased in patients with aberrant p53 expression, and aberrant p53 expression was increased in LeY-negative patients. Aberrant p53 expression detected by immunohistologic staining usually reflects abnormal accumulation of gene product caused by p53 gene mutation, and immunohistological staining is widely used as a simple and easy method to detect p53 gene mutation [17]. p53 Gene is a tumor suppression gene, which can control the cell cycle and induce apoptosis [18]. Apoptosis plays essential roles in normal development and maintenance of homeostasis, and also plays important roles in inhibition of growth of cancer cells. When mutation of p53 occurs, apoptosis can not occur easily in tumor cells, and inhibition of tumor growth becomes difficult. It has recently been reported that LeY expression is closely related to apoptosis [16]. Taking this concept into consideration, in patients showing aberrant p53 expression, apoptosis may not occur easily due to the p53 gene mutation, and as a consequence, LeY expression might decrease. Further basic studies are needed to disclose relationships between p53 disorder and LeY expression.

Aberrant p53 expression detected by immunohistological staining has been generally reported to be an independent prognostic factor to predict poor prognosis in lung cancer patients [19], as shown in the present study as well. Combined with the p53 status, the significance of LeY expression as a prognostic factor proved to be marked. If a limited population with poor prognosis after operation for lung cancer can be identified, it would be clinically useful because patients who require postoperative adjuvant therapy can be identified. From the point of view, assessment of LeY expression along with aberrant p53 expression proved to be clinically very important.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We thank Dr Nobuyuki Hamajima, Division of Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Institute, Aichi, Japan, for his helpful comment and critical reading of the statistical section of the manuscript.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Sakamoto J., Furukawa K., Cordon-Cardo C., et al. Expression of Lewisa, Lewisb, X, and Y blood group antigens in human colonic tumors and normal tissue and in human tumor-derived cell lines. Cancer Res 1986;46:1553-1561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ho J.L., Siddiki B., Kim Y.S. Association of sialyl-Lewisa and sialyl-Lewisx with MUC-1 apomucin in a pancreatic cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 1995;55:3659-3663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Itzkowitz S.H., Yuan M., Fukushi Y., et al. Lewisx- and sialyl Lewisx-related antigen expression in human malignant and nonmalignant colonic tissues. Cancer Res 1986;46:2627-2632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hoff S.D., Matsushita Y., Ota D.M., et al. Increased expression of sialyl-dimeric Lex antigen in liver metastasis of human colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res 1989;49:6883-6888.[Medline]
  5. Nakamori S., Kameyama M., Imaoka S., et al. Increased expression of sialyl Lewisx antigen correlates with poor survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma: clinicopathological immunohistochemical study. Cancer Res 1993;53:3632-3637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Abe K., Hakomori S., Ohshiba S. Differential expression of difucosyl type 2 chain (Ley) defined by monoclonal antibody AH6 in different locations of colonic epithelia, various histological types of colonic polyps and adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res 1986;46:2639-2644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Waldock A., Ellis I.O., Armitage N., et al. Differential expression of the Lewis Y antigen defined by monoclonal antibody C14/1/46 in colonic polyp. Cancer 1989;64:414-421.[Medline]
  8. Nudelman E., Levery S.B., Kaizu T., et al. Novel fucolipids of human adenocarcinoma: characterization of the major Ley antigen of human adenocarcinoma as trifucosylnonaosyl Ley glycolipid (III3FucV3FucVI2FucnLc6). J Biol Chem 1986;261:11247-11253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kim Y.S., Yuan M., Iztkowitz S.H., et al. Expression of Ley and extended Ley blood group-related antigen in human malignant, premalignant, and non-malignant colonic tissues. Cancer Res 1986;46:5985-5992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Wakabayashi M., Shiro T., Seki T., et al. Lewis Y antigen expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 1995;75:2827-2835.[Medline]
  11. Narita T., Funahashi H., Satoh Y., et al. Association of expression of blood group-related carbohydrate antigens with prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer 1993;71:3044-3053.[Medline]
  12. Miyake M., Taki T., Hitomi S., et al. Correlation of expression of H/Ley/Leb antigens with survival in patients with carcinoma of the lung. New Engl J Med 1992;327:14-18.[Abstract]
  13. Ogawa J., Sano A., Inoue H., et al. Expression of Lewis-related antigen and prognosis in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:412-415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Wada H., Tanaka F., Yanagihara K., et al. Time trends and survival after surgery for primary lung cancer during 1976–1990. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:349-355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Mountain C.F. A new international staging system for lung cancer. Chest 1986;89:225s-233s.
  16. Hiraishi K., Suzuki K., Hakomori S., et al. Ley antigen expression is correlated with apoptosis (programmed cell death). Glycobiology 1993;3:381-390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Carbone D.P., Mitsudori T., Chiba I., et al. p53 Immunostaining positivity is associated with reduced survival and imperfectly correlated with gene mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer. A preliminary report of LCSG 871. Chest 1994;106:377s-381s.
  18. Clarke A.R., Purdie C.A., Harrison D.J., et al. Thymocyte apoptosis induced by p53-dependent and independent pathways. Nature 1993;362:849-852.[Medline]
  19. Quinlan D.C., Davidson A.G., Summers C.L., et al. Accumulation of p53 protein correlates with poor prognosis in human lung cancer. Cancer Res 1992;52:4828-4831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Ishikawa, T. Nakagawa, R. Miyahara, Y. Kawano, K. Takenaka, K. Yanagihara, Y. Otake, H. Katakura, H. Wada, and F. Tanaka
Expression of MDA-7/IL-24 and Its Clinical Significance in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 11(3): 1198 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. Shoji, F. Tanaka, T. Takata, K. Yanagihara, Y. Otake, N. Hanaoka, R. Miyahara, T. Nakagawa, Y. Kawano, S. Ishikawa, et al.
Clinical Significance of p21 Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2002; 20(18): 3865 - 3871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. D. Brundage, D. Davies, and W. J. Mackillop
Prognostic Factors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer* : A Decade of Progress
Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 1037 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Yuan, C.-J. Yu, K.-T. Luh, S.-H. Kuo, Y.-C. Lee, and P.-C. Yang
Aberrant p53 Expression Correlates With Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor mRNA and Interleukin-8 mRNA and Neoangiogenesis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2002; 20(4): 900 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
E. Steels, M. Paesmans, T. Berghmans, F. Branle, F. Lemaitre, C. Mascaux, A.P. Meert, F. Vallot, J.J. Lafitte, and J.P. Sculier
Role of p53 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2001; 18(4): 705 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
M. Dettke, G. Pálfi, and H. Loibner
Activation-dependent expression of the blood group-related Lewis Y antigen on peripheral blood granulocytes
J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2000; 68(4): 511 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. Tanaka, Y. Kawano, M. Li, T. Takata, R. Miyahara, K. Yanagihara, Y. Ohtake, T. Fukuse, and H. Wada
Prognostic Significance of Apoptotic Index in Completely Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 1999; 17(9): 2728 - 2728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Kazuhiro Yanagihara
Hiromi Wada
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, F.
Right arrow Articles by Wada, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, F.
Right arrow Articles by Wada, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS