|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1745-1750
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chest Disease Research Institute, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan
Address reprint requests to Dr Wada, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chest Disease Research Institute, Kyoto University, Shogoinn-kawahara-cho 53, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606, Japan
e-mail: (wada{at}chest.kyoto-u.ac.jp)
Presented at the Poster session of the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Jan 2628, 1998.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. To assess the significance of LeY expression, 236 patients with completely resected pathologic stage 1-3a were reviewed with immunohistochemical analysis.
Results. LeY expression was positive in 179 patients (75.8%). In poorly differentiated cancer, percentage of LeY-positive patients was lower than in moderately to well-differentiated cancer (67.2% versus 81.2%, p = 0.028). Five-year survival rate of LeY-positive patients was 78.2%, significantly higher than that of LeY-negative patients (59.7%, p = 0.001). Combined with p53 status, differences in survival proved to be marked; 5-year survival rate of patients with positive LeY expression and without aberrant p53 expression, was as high as 83.3%, whereas that of patients with negative LeY expression and with aberrant p53 expression was only 38.4% (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that LeY expression was a significant independent factor to predict better survival.
Conclusions. LeY expression is a significant prognostic factor related to grade of cancer differentiation.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3GlcNAc] and type 2 chain containing [Galß1
4GlcNAc] [1]. Among them, Lewis A antigen having type 1 chain structure and Lewis X antigen having type 2 chain structure have been well studied as cancer-related carbohydrate antigens [25].
On the other hand, the biological significance of Lewis Y antigen (LeY, Fuc
1
2Galß1
4[Fuc
1
3]GlcNAc) having type 2 chain structure, has not been fully investigated yet. Only LeY expression in process of malignant transformation of colorectal tissue has been demonstrated in some reports [1, 59]. There have been only a few clinical reports on LeY expression in colorectal cancer [9], hepatocellular cancer [10], breast cancer [11], and lung cancer [12, 13]; the clinical significance as a cancer-related marker has not been established. In the present study, therefore, significance of LeY expression in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was analyzed.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical characteristics of the patients
There were 170 men and 66 women (Table 1). Mean age at thoracotomy was 62.4 ± 9.74 years (mean ± standard deviation, range 17 to 83 years). Performance status (PS) was 0 or 1 for most patients. With respect to the histologic type, adenocarcinoma was most frequent (130 patients, 55.1%) and squamous cell carcinoma (85 patients, 36.0%), was the next most frequent. As for the postoperative p-stage, the number of stage 1 patients was the highest (138 patients, accounting for 58.5%).
|
Antihuman p53 MoAb (DO-7, mouse IgG2b, kappa, 250 µg/mL, (Dako) was used as primary antibody for immunostaining against p53. The slides were incubated with the diluted antibody (1:50) after microwave heating for 10 min to retrieve the antigenicity.
Stained tissue slides were evaluated by three of the authors (F.T., Y.O., and R.M.) independently without knowing their clinical data. Tumor cells were judged as positive staining only when the cytoplasm was faintly stained. A total of 1,000 tumor cells were counted for positive staining and the percentage of positive cells were determined. The degree of LeY expression was graded according to the percentage of LeY-positive-staining cells as follows: (-) if the percentage was 5% or less than 5%, (+) if the percentage was over 5% and under 10%, (2+) if the percentage was over 10% and under 25%, (3+) if the percentage was over 25% and under 50%, (4+) if the percentage was over 50% and under 75%, and (5+) if the percentage was over 75%. Aberrant expression of p53 was judged when the percentage of the positive-staining cells exceeded 5%.
Statistical methods
Counts were compared by
2 test. Continuous data were compared by Students t test if the distribution of samples was normal or by Mann-Whitney U-test if the sample distribution was asymmetrical. Postoperative survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, while the differences in survival rates were assessed by log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors was performed by Cox regression model. The difference was considered significant if p value was less than 0.05. All statistical manipulations were performed using SPSS for Windows software system (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LeY expression and clinical characteristic (table 1)
Increased positivity for LeY expression was seen in adenocarcinoma (84.6%) versus squamous cell carcinoma (70.6%, p = 0.001). LeY expression was seen correlated with cancer differentiation; LeY expression was positive in 138 (81.2%) of 170 patients with moderately to well-differentiated cancer whereas in only 39 (67.2%) of 58 patients with poorly differentiated cancer (poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma) (p = 0.028).
Ninety-nine (41.9%) patients were judged to show aberrant expression of p53. Only 68.7% of patients with aberrant p53 expression showed positive LeY expression, whereas 81.0% of those without aberrant p53 expression showed positive LeY expression (p = 0.029).
Sex, performance status, or p-stage was not correlated with LeY expression.
LeY expression and postoperative prognosis (table 2)
Five-year survival rate of LeY-positive patients was 77.9%, which was significantly higher than that of LeY-negative patients (50.2%, p = 0.001) (Fig 1). In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 5-year survival rate of LeY-positive patients was 75.1%, which was significantly higher than that of LeY-negative patients (46.4%, p = 0.028). In patients with adenocarcinoma as well, prognosis of LeY-positive patients tended to be better than that of LeY-negative patients, although showing no significant difference (p = 0.059).
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several findings have been reported with respect to LeY expression in normal tissue and in cancer tissue since the 1980s, when various kinds of MoAbs against LeY were generated. As for LeY expression in lung cancer, only two results have been reported. Miyake and coworkers conducted an immunohistologic study on NSCLC using a MoAb, MIA-15-5 [12]. MIA-15-5 recognizes sugar chains having a structure of Fuc
1
2Galß1
R (R: type 1 or type 2 chain), and react with not only LeY but also H-antigen (Fuc
1
2Gal) and Lewis b antigen (Leb, Fuc
1
2Galß1
3[Fuc
1
4]GlcNAc). Positive expression was judged when more than 5% of tumor cells were stained, and MIA-15-5-positive was seen in 91 (61.1%) of 149 patients. Postoperative prognosis of MIA-15-5-positive patients proved to be significantly worse as compared with that of MIA-15-5-negative patients, which did not agree with our findings that LeY-positive patients had a better prognosis. However, because MIA-15-5 recognizes not only LeY but also H-antigen and Leb, the disagreement with our results obtained by using MoAb, BM-1/JIMRO recognizing only LeY could be understandable.
Ogawa and coworkers also conducted a study on LeY expression in NSCLC [13]. They examined LeY expression in patients with p-stage 1 disease using BM-1/JIMRO, the same MoAb used in our study. They judged LeY expression was positive when more than 50% of tumor cells were stained, and reported that 84 (63.2%) of 133 patients were LeY positive. They also reported that postoperative prognosis of LeY-positive patients was poor as compared with that of LeY-negative patients, which was not in agreement with the result of our study which showed that the prognosis of LeY-positive patients was favorable. They used a 50% positive cell count rate as the cut-off value because the mean percentage of LeY-positive cells for all patients was 56%. They determined that patients with a positive cell count rate of 50% or higher were LeY positive and that those with a positive cell count rate of lower than 50% were LeY negative, and LeY-positive patients accounted for 63.2% of the total patients. If a cut-off value of the 50% positive cell rate were applied to our patients, LeY-positive patients would account for 29.2% of the total patients (69 of 236 patients). Thus, the LeY-positive cell count rate reported by Ogawa and coworkers appears too high in comparison with our findings. Moreover, in a study reported by Miyake and coworkers using MIA-15-5 recognizing H antigen and Leb in addition to LeY, a cut-off value of 5% was also used as in our study, and 91 (61.1%) of 149 patients exhibited positive cell count rates of over 5% [12]. Studies on hepatocellular cancer [10] and breast cancer [11], where patients showing only one positively stained cell were determined to be positive, also showed that positive patients accounted for 43.5% and for 66.9%, respectively. Therefore, the cut-off value at 50% as stated by Ogawa and coworkers might be questionable.
Our study suggests that LeY-negative patients had poor prognosis because more patients had poorly differentiated cancer. Conversely, in poorly differentiated cancer, decreased LeY antigen expression on the surface of tumor cells may result in a poor prognosis. Another reason why LeY-negative patients had poor prognosis contrary to other studies can be related to apoptosis. It has recently been reported that LeY expression is closely related to apoptosis; LeY expression is a phenotypic marker of apoptosis [16]. In the present study, the relationship between LeY expression and p53 status was also investigated. It was demonstrated that LeY expression decreased in patients with aberrant p53 expression, and aberrant p53 expression was increased in LeY-negative patients. Aberrant p53 expression detected by immunohistologic staining usually reflects abnormal accumulation of gene product caused by p53 gene mutation, and immunohistological staining is widely used as a simple and easy method to detect p53 gene mutation [17]. p53 Gene is a tumor suppression gene, which can control the cell cycle and induce apoptosis [18]. Apoptosis plays essential roles in normal development and maintenance of homeostasis, and also plays important roles in inhibition of growth of cancer cells. When mutation of p53 occurs, apoptosis can not occur easily in tumor cells, and inhibition of tumor growth becomes difficult. It has recently been reported that LeY expression is closely related to apoptosis [16]. Taking this concept into consideration, in patients showing aberrant p53 expression, apoptosis may not occur easily due to the p53 gene mutation, and as a consequence, LeY expression might decrease. Further basic studies are needed to disclose relationships between p53 disorder and LeY expression.
Aberrant p53 expression detected by immunohistological staining has been generally reported to be an independent prognostic factor to predict poor prognosis in lung cancer patients [19], as shown in the present study as well. Combined with the p53 status, the significance of LeY expression as a prognostic factor proved to be marked. If a limited population with poor prognosis after operation for lung cancer can be identified, it would be clinically useful because patients who require postoperative adjuvant therapy can be identified. From the point of view, assessment of LeY expression along with aberrant p53 expression proved to be clinically very important.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Ishikawa, T. Nakagawa, R. Miyahara, Y. Kawano, K. Takenaka, K. Yanagihara, Y. Otake, H. Katakura, H. Wada, and F. Tanaka Expression of MDA-7/IL-24 and Its Clinical Significance in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 11(3): 1198 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shoji, F. Tanaka, T. Takata, K. Yanagihara, Y. Otake, N. Hanaoka, R. Miyahara, T. Nakagawa, Y. Kawano, S. Ishikawa, et al. Clinical Significance of p21 Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2002; 20(18): 3865 - 3871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Brundage, D. Davies, and W. J. Mackillop Prognostic Factors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer* : A Decade of Progress Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 1037 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yuan, C.-J. Yu, K.-T. Luh, S.-H. Kuo, Y.-C. Lee, and P.-C. Yang Aberrant p53 Expression Correlates With Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor mRNA and Interleukin-8 mRNA and Neoangiogenesis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2002; 20(4): 900 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Steels, M. Paesmans, T. Berghmans, F. Branle, F. Lemaitre, C. Mascaux, A.P. Meert, F. Vallot, J.J. Lafitte, and J.P. Sculier Role of p53 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2001; 18(4): 705 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dettke, G. Pálfi, and H. Loibner Activation-dependent expression of the blood group-related Lewis Y antigen on peripheral blood granulocytes J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2000; 68(4): 511 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Tanaka, Y. Kawano, M. Li, T. Takata, R. Miyahara, K. Yanagihara, Y. Ohtake, T. Fukuse, and H. Wada Prognostic Significance of Apoptotic Index in Completely Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 1999; 17(9): 2728 - 2728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |