Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1466-1467
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Correspondence
Is there a need for a utility thoracotomy during VATS major lung resections?
Eduardo A. Tovar, MDa
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Jude Medical Center, 100 E Valencia Mesa Dr, Suite 301, Fullerton, CA 92835, USA
e-mail: etovarmd{at}aol.com
To the Editor
I read with interest the article by Iwasaki and associates [1] regarding their video-assisted thoracic surgical lung resection and mediastinal lymphadenectomy. In the abstract and the Material and Methods section of their article they contend that their two-window method employs two 2- 3-cm incisions. In their comment, however, they admit that one of their incisions needs to be at least 3 cm to extract the specimen from the chest cavity. They also state that in their last 80 patients rib retraction was kept to a minimum. I could not help imagining what it would be like to try to remove a pulmonary lobe without rib retraction and through an incision slightly larger than the one needed for a chest tube insertion (Fig 1). I reviewed the literature to establish what the quoted sizes for the utility thoracotomy were and I found out that among eight authors there were eight different sizes reported (2 to 3 cm [1], 3 to 4 cm [2], 5 cm [3], 4 to 6 cm [4], 6 cm [5], 6 to 7 cm [6], 7 cm [7], and 6 to 8 cm [8]).
I have long maintained that it is possible to perform a major lung resection using a thoracotomy incision similar in size to a utility or access approach needed to remove the specimen (Fig 2). I must acknowledge, however, that that would not be feasible through a 3-cm incision. By the same token, I doubt that any adult pulmonary lobe would fit through it.
Staging is just as important as resecting when dealing with cancer of the lung. As long as a utility thoracotomy remains a necessity to maintain the integrity of the specimen while removing it, video-assisted thoracic surgical major lung resection will have to compete with minithoracotomies as the minimally invasive approach of choice.
References
- Iwasaki M., Kaga K., Nishiumi N., Maitani F., Inoue H. Experience with the two-windows method for mediastinal lymph node dissection in lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:800-802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Roviaro G., Varoli F., Rebuffat C., et al. Major pulmonary resections: pneumonectomies and lobectomies. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:779-783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Guidicelli R., Thomas P., Lonjon T., et al. Video-assisted minithoracotomy versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy for performing lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:712-718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lui H.P., Chang C.H., Lin P.J., Chang J.P., Hsieh M.J. Thoracoscopic-assisted lobectomy: Preliminary experience and results. Chest 1995;107:853-855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lewis R.J., Sisler G.E., Caccavale R.J. Imaged thoracic lobectomy: should it be done?. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:80-83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- McKenna R.J. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery with mediastinal node sampling for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:879-882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Walker W.S., Carnochan F.M., Pugh G.C. Thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy: Early operative experience and preliminary clinical results. J Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:1111-1117.
- Kirby T.J., Mack M.J., Landreneau R.J., Rice T.W. Initial experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:1248-1253.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. W. Shroyer, L. P. Coombs, E. D. Peterson, M. C. Eiken, E. R. DeLong, A. Chen, T. B. Ferguson Jr, F. L. Grover, and F. H. Edwards
The society of thoracic surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
June 1, 2003;
75(6):
1856 - 1865.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|