ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Naresh Trehan
Yugal Mishra
Yatin Mehta
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trehan, N.
Right arrow Articles by Jangid, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trehan, N.
Right arrow Articles by Jangid, D. R.

Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1113-1118
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Supplement

Transmyocardial laser as an adjunct to minimally invasive CABG for complete myocardial revascularization

Naresh Trehan, MDa, Yugal Mishra, PhDa, Yatin Mehta, MDa, Dhan Raj Jangid, MDa

a Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India

Address reprint requests to Dr Mishra, Escorts Heart Institute and Research Center, Okhla Rd, New Delhi, 110 025, India
e-mail: (ehirc{at}giasdlOl.vsnl.net.in)

Presented at "Facts and Myths of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: Current Trends in Thoracic Surgery IV," New Orleans, LA, Jan 24, 1998.

Abstract

Background. To achieve complete myocardial revascularization in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease and patients at high risk if they undergo cardiopulmonary bypass such as severe systemic disease or diffuse arteriosclerosis of the aorta, we have adopted the technique of combining direct coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass with transmyocardial laser revascularization.

Methods. From April 1995 to September 1997 this technique was used in 77 patients. Ages ranged from 37 to 85 years with a mean of 56 ± 17 years. Diffuse coronary artery lesions were present in 46 patients, 10 had severely deranged renal function, 7 had diffuse carotid artery lesions, and 7 had aortic arch atheromas. Liver dysfunction was present in 4 patients and severe obstructive airway disease in 3. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.45 ± 0.05. Midsternotomy approach was used in 65 patients and anterior minithoracotomy in 12. Direct coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass was done to the left anterior descending coronary artery or right coronary artery or both. Transmyocardial laser revascularization using a 1,000-W CO2 laser machine was performed on the areas supplied by ungraftable coronary arteries or even in graftable distal targets in the posterolateral or inferior wall in patients who were at high risk if they underwent cardiopulmonary bypass.

Results. The mean number of vessels bypassed was 1.12. One patient died of intractable ventricular arrhythmia in the early postoperative phase. Mean follow-up was 16.6 months. At 12 months 89% of the patients were angina free. Metabolic stress test demonstrated an average increase in exercise tolerance from 5.2 at baseline to 9.7 minutes at 12 months. Myocardial thallium scanning done at 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals postoperatively revealed that myocardial perfusion in grafted segments had an exponential trend of improvement, and perfusion in transmyocardial laser revascularization segments showed a linear trend in the same period with a total gain of 28.4%.

Conclusions. Transmyocardial laser revascularization is an excellent adjunct to minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting to achieve complete myocardial revascularization in patients with graftable vessels in the anterior wall and ungraftable vessels in the posterior and inferior wall. This achieves complete myocardial revascularization without compromising safety in patients who are at high risk if they undergo cardiopulmonary bypass. Minimal morbidity and mortality in the present series revealed that this procedure is safe, and postoperative follow-up of these patients showed significant functional improvement as well as an improvement in myocardial perfusion scan.

Although current methods of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are remarkably safe, there is evidence that various damaging effects of CPB do occur [1]. In the majority of patients the adverse effects of CPB are minor and reversible; however, patients with significant functional impairment of various organ systems may not tolerate the added deleterious effects of CPB, which may be irreversible and even fatal [2].

The first operation for coronary artery disease in which the internal mammary artery (IMA) was anastomosed on a beating heart to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was done by Kolessov [3]. Subsequently the technique was developed and improved mainly by Benetti and associates [4] and Buffolo and colleagues [5]. In an attempt to further reduce the invasiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and retain the benefit of mammary artery grafting, the minianterior mediastinal approach [6], partial sternotomy approach, a minilateral thoracotomy [7], and minithoracotomy [8, 9] approach have recently been described. There has also been some apprehension that in the overenthusiasm to perform CABG off-pump, there may be, in some patients, an incomplete revascularization [10]. This holds true especially for patients who have multivessel disease but are at high risk if they undergo cardiopulmonary bypass because of severe systemic disease, aortic arteriosclerosis, advanced age, or other conditions [11].

Mirhoseini and Cayton [12] first proposed using a laser to create transmyocardial channels to provide direct perfusion of the myocardium with ventricular blood. Initially they performed transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR) clinically as an adjunct to CABG, using an 80-W CO2 laser on a cardioplegia-arrested heart. In 1991 Mirhoseini and Cayton [12] began clinical studies of TMLR with a high-powered CO2 laser (1,000 W) that could transect the entire thickness of the myocardium without interfering with the electrical activity of the heart. The emergence of TMLR as a therapeutic modality has added another dimension to coronary revascularization. Although the long-term efficacy of TMLR for myocardial revascularization has yet to be proved, early clinical evidence [13] along with radionuclide studies [14] does suggest that TMLR improves myocardial perfusion and ameliorates anginal symptoms. Thus even patients with triple-vessel disease, who are unsuitable for cardiopulmonary bypass, can be offered complete myocardial revascularization after bypassing the LAD or right coronary artery (RCA) on a beating heart without CPB, and simultaneously performing TMLR to the posterolateral surface of the heart in the territory of the left circumflex (LCX) or posterior descending coronary artery.

This study has been undertaken to evaluate the suitability of the procedure in patients who have symptomatic coronary artery disease and are at a high risk if they undergo CPB, and to evaluate the adequacy of myocardial revascularization by TMLR combined with CABG in patients who have graftable vessels in the posterior or inferior wall.

Material and methods

Between April 1995 and September 1997, 77 patients had undergone TMLR combined with CABG without CPB. During the same time frame 254 patients had undergone TMLR combined with CABG on CPB. Patients’ ages ranged from 37 to 81 years (mean, 56.17 years). Twelve patients were older than 70 years. There were 49 men and 28 women. Forty-one patients (53.2%) suffered previous myocardial infarction (Table 1). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction of the group was 0.45 (range, 0.18 to 0.60). Eighteen patients had unstable angina. Preoperatively 41 patients (53.2%) were in the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class 3 angina whereas 10 patients (12.9%) were in class 4 (Table 2). Four patients required intraaortic balloon pump support for unstable angina preoperatively. Two patients had undergone prior CABG. On coronary angiography, 25 patients (32.5%) had double-vessel disease and 52 patients (67.21%) triple-vessel disease. In 4 patients, in addition to TMLR combined with CABG on the beating heart without CPB, carotid endarterectomy was also performed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative Patient Characteristics

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Preoperative Clinical Profile

 
Our indications for this procedure of TMLR combined with CABG on the beating heart can be divided into two broad groups of patients. Group 1 consists of patients who have suitable coronary anatomy, where the LCX or RCA are diffusely diseased and ungraftable, together with graftable distal targets to the LAD or RCA. Here the myocardial territory supplied by the LCX or RCA is revascularized by TMLR and grafts are done to the LAD or RCA. Group 2 consists of patients who are at a high risk if they undergo CPB because of arteriosclerosis of the aorta, severe systemic disease, advanced age, or redo operation (Table 3). In this group vessels supplying the posterolateral and inferior walls, which may be graftable or ungraftable, need to be revascularized by TMLR, because these patients cannot be put on CPB for CABG to the LCX and posterior descending coronary artery.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Indications for TMLR + CABG Without CPB

 
Baseline myocardial perfusion (at rest and at peak stress) and viability status were documented by thallium 201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (using 3mC of 201Tl procured from Amersham International Plc, Buckinghamshire, UK). A single photon emission computed tomography study was performed using a Siemens (Erlangen, Germany) Diacam gamma camera. Redistribution study was performed in a similar manner 4 hours after 201Tl injection. For analysis, the images were reconstructed as tomographic slices using a Butterworth filter (at a Nyquist cutoff frequency of 0.45 and an order of 5). Transfer slices were reoriented to long (vertical and horizontal) and short axes. A three-dimensional polar plot was generated from the reoriented slices. Multiplane orthogonal reoriented slices as well as polar plot representation of myocardial radioactive uptake were studied to judge myocardial ischemia, scarring, and hibernation. Perfusion indices were measured by a color-coded scale put beside the polar plot. Also baseline resting left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed by multigated acquisition radionuclide ventriculography. Regional wall motion and left ventricular ejection fraction were also assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography. Exercise tolerance of patients was evaluated by the standard treadmill test. Relevant parameters were timed on treadmill (minutes), and a computer estimated the average metabolic equivalent (METs) of the maximal rate of O2 consumption (measured in milliliters of O2 per kilogram per minute, and equal to 3.5 METs). Clinical performance status of the patients was graded according to the Karnofsky score.

Patients with bleeding diathesis, intractable arrhythmias, and coronary artery disease with left ventricular aneurysm were considered to have absolute contraindications for the procedures.

Surgical technique
The target areas for TMLR and CABG were planned on the basis of the coronary angiography and stress thallium scan. During the operation all patients were monitored with direct arterial and pulmonary artery catheters. After endotracheal intubation a multiplane phased-array dual-frequency (3.7/5 MHz) transesophageal echocardiography transducer was inserted. A baseline transesophageal echocardiography study was performed to evaluate the regional and global left ventricular function and the cardiac valves.

In 65 patients a midsternotomy approach was used whereas a left anterior thoracotomy was done in 12 patients. The pericardium was opened and the vessels examined to confirm the angiographic assessment of their size and diffuse nature of disease. The appropriate conduits were harvested before TMLR. A 1,000-W CO2 heart laser machine (PLC System) was made ready and laser channels were created 1 cm apart in the target areas. On average it was desirable to make 10 to 12 channels in the lateral wall. The laser energy delivered was 35 to 45 J. Bleeding from the TMLR site was stopped most of the time by applying external digital pressure. Occasionally epicardial stitching was required to stop the bleeding. We use heparin in a dose of 1.5 mg/kg body weight before dividing the arterial conduits for grafting. The distal anastomoses to the LAD and RCA were constructed with 8-0 polypropylene sutures. The target vessel was occluded with a 3-0 polypropylene sling and silicone elastomer bolster proximal to the proposed site of arteriotomy.

In patients who underwent anterior thoracotomy, a Cardiothoracic Systems (Cupertino, CA) mammary retractor and stabilizer were used for the procedure.

Analysis of myocardial injury was done by serial electrocardiograms and estimation of creatine kinase MB and troponin T levels in the postoperative period.

Follow-up
The patients were examined 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation. They were assessed for angina class, activity level, medications, and hospitalizations since the procedure. All patients had to undergo a thallium perfusion scintigraphic study and an exercise tolerance test.

The scintography results were based on counting the number of segments with fixed ischemia and the number of segments with reversible ischemia as viewed on the polar plots. The follow-up studies were compared with the baseline scans and the change in the number of involved segments was calculated.

Results

In this series of 77 patients the average number of grafts was 1.12. Internal mammary artery was used in 74 patients (95.1%). Vein graft to the LAD was used in 3 patients who had severe obstructive airway disease. Seventy-two patients received a single graft to the LAD, and 5 patients received an additional graft to the RCA as well (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Territory Revascularized (n = 77)

 
Inotropic agents were required in 20.4% of patients and were gradually tapered off in the next 6 to 18 hours in the recovery room. Only 5 patients required blood transfusion.

Postoperatively 5 patients (6.4%) showed elevation of creatine kinase-MB levels, whereas 3 patients (3.8%) had increased troponin T levels. At this time there were no associated electrocardiographic changes, and no segmental wall motion abnormalities were detected on transesophageal echocardiography. Two patients underwent reexploration for postoperative bleeding from TMLR holes (Table 5). One patient died of intractable arrhythmia on the second postoperative day. The mean duration of hospital stay was 6 days. All patients were angina free when they left the hospital. The mean follow-up has been 16.6 months. Sixteen patients have completed 12 months of follow-up. At 12 months 89% of the patients were angina free. Metabolic stress tests demonstrated an average increase in exercise tolerance from 5.2 minutes at baseline to 9.7 minutes at 12 months. Similarly the metabolic equivalents increased from 4.7 at baseline to 9.4 at 12 months (Table 6). The average Karnofsky score of 44% also increased to 86% at 12 months.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Complications and Early Mortality (n = 77)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Average Treadmill Performance

 
Myocardial perfusion (at rest and peak stress) and viability status were documented by 201Tll myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Recovery of the perfusion indices in CABG segments showed an exponential trend over the 12 months after the operation, with a total gain of 33%. However, the segments with TMLR showed a linear trend of improvement with a total gain of 25%. The total reduction in perfusion defect size was 48% in TMLR segments versus 56% in CABG segments. There was also a significant decline in antianginal medication.

Figure 1 shows the angiogram of a 68-year-old man with a critically occluded LAD and diffusely diseased LCX and RCA who had angina at rest. He received a LIMA graft to the LAD and TMLR to the LCX and posterior descending coronary artery territory. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the sixth postoperative day. Figure 2 shows his perfusion scan preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. At 1 year, the patient had marked improvement in symptomatic status and was in CCS class 1 angina.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. (A) Coronary angiogram showing a critically occluded left anterior descending coronary artery and diffuse disease in the left circumflex artery system. (B) Coronary angiogram showing diffuse disease in right coronary artery system.

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Thallium 201 myocardial perfusion status of the same patient whose angiogram is shown in Figure 1 preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

 
Figure 3 shows the postoperative angiogram of an LIMA to LAD anastomosis 12 months after the operation. The patient had a critically diseased LAD with a diffusely diseased LCX and normal RCA. The LIMA to LAD anastomosis and TMLR to LCX territory was done through a left anterior minithoracotomy and the patient was discharged from the hospital on the fifth postoperative day.



View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Patent left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending coronary artery anastomosis in a coronary angiogram.

 
Comment

Performing CABG without CPB is a technical solution to be considered in every patient in whom CPB is likely to be associated with increased morbidity. However, there is always a possibility of incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel disease. To overcome this limitation of CABG without CPB in multivessel disease in patients who are at high risk if they undergo CPB, TMLR can be used as an adjunct to achieve complete myocardial revascularization. Early results from many centers indicate that TMLR provides substantial benefit to patients. Cooley and associates [15] evaluated 21 patients and found that TMLR improved the clinical status and produced objective benefits. They noted that relief from angina occurred immediately. The mean resting left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 0.48 ± 0.10 before the operation to 0.50 ± 0.08. The resting mean subendocardial to subepicardial perfusion ratio also increased by 20% ± 9% during the subsequent 12 months. Horvath and coworkers [13] treated 20 patients with transmyocardial laser. The angina class improved markedly in all patients available for follow-up. They were all in angina class 0, 1, or 2 postoperatively compared with 14 patients in class 4 and 6 in class 2 preoperatively. Their report was based on the use of TMLR as the sole therapy.

In the absence of irrefutable evidence of long-term efficacy of TMLR, CABG still remains the gold standard for surgical myocardial revascularization. Thus if there is even one graftable vessel in a patient, the other being diffusely diseased, it should be used for the bypass graft procedure. Incomplete revascularization may not affect early mortality, but failure to effectively bypass severe arterial narrowing profoundly affects late cardiac events [16, 17]. In one report in which 500 surgical patients were followed up for 10 to 12 years, the presence of disease in ungraftable arteries was the most significant predictor of late cardiac events, including cardiac-related deaths, recurrence of angina, and myocardial infarction [18].

We have combined TMLR with CABG to provide complete myocardial revascularization in patients who had graftable vessels in the anterior wall and ungraftable vessels in the posterior and inferior wall. In these patients CABG without CPB was done to the LAD or RCA and TMLR was done to the posterolateral or inferior wall depending on the quality of distal targets. We have also combined TMLR with CABG to provide complete myocardial revascularization in territories that could be revascularized by grafts, as well as in territories where revascularization by conventional grafting was not feasible, without using extracorporeal circulation. Through a median sternotomy it is easy to approach and perform an anastomosis on the LAD, diagonal branch, and RCA but not on the LCX and posterior descending coronary artery. Hence, TMLR performed on the LCX territory is the most logical option.

Technically the anastomosis performed on a beating heart is more difficult and demands greater surgical skill [1, 5]. But among the advantages of performing CABG without CPB are the safety of the procedure, almost total nonuse of blood products, and a dramatic reduction in the cost and hospital stay [5]. Patients with preoperative renal failure are at increased risk for acute renal shutdown after CABG because of decreased renal perfusion, absence of pulsatile flow, excessive hemolysis, and platelet–fibrin microemboli [19]. Our experience of CABG without CPB shows a temporary increase in blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels in patients with preoperative abnormal renal function. But before hospital discharge their blood urea nitrogen and creatinine returned to baseline levels and none of them needed dialysis.

Coronary artery bypass grafting without CPB should address some of the problematic issues of aortic atheroma and calcified aorta [20]. In the current series, 7 patients had aortic atheroma in the arch. All of these patients tolerated the operation well without any neurologic problems. We achieved this with our current practice of making every effort to avoid manipulation of the aorta and prefer using arterial conduits in these patients.

Coronary anastomosis requires a meticulous technique. It appears to be much more difficult to perform a perfect distal anastomosis with a beating heart. Doppler flow examination of the LIMA to LAD anastomosis was done in 12 patients who had grafting done through an anterior minithoracotomy, and all of them showed excellent flow dynamics. In the early part of our study we subjected most of our minithoracotomy patients to a postoperative check angiogram to evaluate the LIMA to LAD anastomosis. All of the 12 patients in this series had excellent flow across the LIMA to LAD anastomosis (Fig 3). This observation supports the view that a good quality IMA anastomosis can be achieved even on a beating heart.

In summary, it is evident from our series that TMLR is an excellent adjunct to minimally invasive CABG to achieve complete myocardial revascularization in patients with graftable vessels in the anterior wall and ungraftable diffusely diseased vessels in the posterior and inferior wall. Performing TMLR and CABG without CPB is the appropriate procedure to achieve complete myocardial revascularization without compromising the safety in patients who are at high risk if they undergo CPB. Minimal morbidity and mortality in this study revealed that the procedure is safe. Postoperative follow-up showed significant functional improvement with improvement in the myocardial perfusion on thallium scan.

References

  1. Pfister A.J., Zaki M.S., Garcia J.M., et al. Coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:1085-1092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Moshkowitz Y., Lucky A., Mohr R. Coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass: analysis of short term and mid term out come in 220 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:979-987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kolessov V.I. Mammary artery–coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1967;54:535-544.[Medline]
  4. Benetti F.J., Naselli G., Wood M., Geffner L. Direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 700 patients. Chest 1991;100:312-316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Buffolo E., Silva de Andrade J.C., Rodrigues Branco J.N., et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:63-66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Robinson M.C., Gross D.R., Zeman W., et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a new method using anterior mediastinotomy. J Card Surg 1995;10:529-536.[Medline]
  7. Lytle B.W. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:554-555.[Medline]
  8. Calafiore A.M., Di Giammarco G., Teodori G., et al. Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1658-1665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Mishra Y.K., Mehta Y., Juneja R., Kasliwal R.R., Mittal S., Trehan N. Mammary coronary artery anastomosis without cardiopulmonary bypass through a minithoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:S114-S118.[Medline]
  10. Corso P.G. Cardiopulmonary bypass and coronary artery bypass graft. Are the risks necessary?. Chest 1991;100:298-299.[Free Full Text]
  11. Trehan N., Mishra M., Bapna R., et al. Transmyocardial laser revascularisation combined with coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;12:276-284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Mirhoseini M., Cayton M.M. Revascularization of the heart by laser. J Microvasc Surg 1981;2:253-260.
  13. Horvath K.A., Mannting F., Cumming N., Shernan S.K., Cohn L.H. Transmyocardial laser revascularization operative techniques and clinical results at two years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:1047-1053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Trehan N., Mishra M., Kohli V.M., et al. Transmyocardial laser revascularisation as an adjunct to CABG. Indian Heart J 1996;48:381-388.[Medline]
  15. Cooley D.A., Frazier O.H., Kadipasaoglu K.A., et al. Transmyocardial laser revascularization. Clinical experience with twelve month follow up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:791-799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Jones E.L., Craver J.M., Guyton R.A., et al. Importance of complete revascularization in performance of the coronary bypass operation. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:7-12.[Medline]
  17. Lawrie G.M., Morris G.C., Jr, Silvers A., et al. The influence of residual disease after coronary bypass on the 5-year survival rate of 1274 men with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1982;66:717-723.[Free Full Text]
  18. Schaff H.V., Gersh B.J., Pluth J.R., et al. Survival and functional status after coronary artery bypass grafting: results 10 to 12 years after surgery in 500 patients. Circulation 1983;68(Suppl 2):200-204.
  19. Abel R.M., Buckley N.J., Austen W.G., et al. Etiology, incidence and prognosis of renal failure following cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976;71:323-333.[Abstract]
  20. Bar-El Y., Goor D.A. Clamping of the atherosclerotic ascending aorta during coronary artery bypass operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:469-474.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
S. W Sutton, M. A Duncan, V. A Chase, B. L Hamman, and E. H Cheung
Perfusion-assisted beating heart support with a miniature extracorporeal circuit and leukocyte filtration: a 58-year-old patient with severe COPD
Perfusion, December 1, 2004; 19(6): 369 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
M. Ruel, R. A. Kelly, and F. W. Sellke
Therapeutic Angiogenesis, Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization, and Cell Therapy
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 715 - 750.
[Full Text]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
K. Minami
Surgical Treatments for Endstage Heart Failure Due to Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2001; 9(3): 159 - 166.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. R. Bridges
Myocardial laser revascularization: the controversy and the data
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 655 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. T. Beranek
Emerging new concepts of myocardial laser revascularization
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 1999; 118(5): 977 - 977.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
T. M. McLoitghlin JR
Complications of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, July 1, 1999; 3(2): 136 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Naresh Trehan
Yugal Mishra
Yatin Mehta
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trehan, N.
Right arrow Articles by Jangid, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trehan, N.
Right arrow Articles by Jangid, D. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS