ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Hazim J. Safi
Michael J. Reardon
George V. Letsou
John C. Baldwin
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Safi, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Safi, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, J. C.

Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:402-411
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original articles: cardiovascular

Operation for acute and chronic aortic dissection: recent outcome with regard to neurologic deficit and early death

Hazim J. Safi, MDa, Charles C. Miller, III, PhDa, Michael J. Reardon, MDa,a, Dimitrios C. Iliopoulos, MDa, George V. Letsou, MDa, Rafael Espada, MDa, John C. Baldwin, MDa

a Department of Surgery, The Methodist Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Safi, 6550 Fannin, Suite 1603, Houston, TX 77030

Presented at the Forty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Naples, FL, Nov 6–8, 1997.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. We reviewed our experience in the repair of acute and chronic aortic dissection with regard to early neurologic deficit and death.

Methods. Between February 1991 and June 1996, we performed 206 operations on 195 patients for aortic dissection. Ascending or arch repair, or a combination (type A dissection) was performed on 92 of 206 patients (45%); 44 of 92 (48%) were acute dissection and 48 of 92 (52%) were chronic. Descending or thoracoabdominal repair (type B dissection) was performed on 114 of 206 patients (55%); 22 of 114 (19%) were acute and 92 of 114 (81%) were chronic.

Results. Among type A cases, strokes occurred in 6 of 92 patients (7%) overall; 4 of 44 (9%) were acute cases and 2 of 48 (4%) were chronic (p < 0.34). Early deaths for type A were 11 of 92 (12%) overall; 9 of 44 (20%) acute and 2 of 48 (4%) chronic (p < 0.02). In type B cases, neurologic complications were 15 of 114 (13%) overall; 7 of 22 (32%) were acute cases and 8 of 92 (9%) were chronic (p < 0.004). Early deaths for type B were 12 of 114 (11%) overall; 3 of 22 (14%) acute and 9 of 92 (10%) chronic (p < 0.6). Preoperative hypotension was significant in acute type A patients, with strokes in 2 of 7 (29%) hypotensives compared with 2 of 37 (5%) normotensives (p < 0.05) and early death in 4 of 7 (57%) hypotensives versus 5 of 37 (14%) normotensives (p < 0.009).

Conclusions. Morbidity and mortality for repair of chronic dissection types A and B were acceptable. Preoperative hypotension in acute type A dissection was a major predisposing factor toward stroke (29% versus 5%, p < 0.05). Acute type B dissection had acceptable mortality (14%) but a high rate of neurologic complications (32%).


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
In the frequent catastrophic cascade of events immediately after an aortic dissection, patient survival relies on rapid diagnosis and early therapeutic intervention [1-3]. The patient is at the greatest risk in the acute phase, within 14 days of the initial dissection, when complications brought on by hemorrhage or rupture are most likely. The decision to manage surgically or medically depends on the time elapsed since onset, the dissection location, and urgency of presentation. Most often the treatment of type A, which originates in the ascending aorta, is surgical. Type B, in the descending thoracic aorta, is more often treated medically in the acute stage and surgically in the chronic stage. In this study we examined the results of our operative treatment of aortic dissection during the past 5 years, with particular attention to the differences in morbidity and mortality between acute and chronic aortic dissection patients.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Patient population
Between February 1991 and June 1996, 206 operations were performed on 195 patients by one surgeon (H.J.S.). Patient characteristics are as follows for the 92 type A patients: acute dissection, 44 (48%); stroke, 6 (7%); 30-day mortality, 11 (12%); hypotensive crisis (systolic blood pressure <60 mm Hg or moribund presentation, ie, cardiopulmonary arrest, pulseless, or in shock), 7 (8%); cerebrovascular disease (stroke, transient ischemic attack, or atheroocclusive disease of the carotid arteries), 12 (13%); heart disease (aortic valve disease, atheroocclusive disease of the coronary arteries, or cardiomyopathy), 20 (22%); previous aortic operation, 32 (35%); hypertension, 56 (61%); current smoker, 22 (24%); and for the 114 type B patients: acute dissection, 22 (19%); neurologic deficit (paraplegia or paraparesis), 15 (13%); 30-day mortality, 12 (11%); renal insufficiency, 13 (11%); heart disease, 28 (25%); previous proximal aortic operation, 28 (25%); hypertension, 91 (80%); and current smoker, 41 (28%). The selected risk factors for stroke in type A dissection and for spinal cord neurologic deficit in type B are shown in Table 1. Men comprised more than two-thirds of all patients. Patients were divided roughly in half between operation for repair of the ascending aorta (type A dissection) and repair of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta (type B dissection). A greater number of type A repairs, however, took place in the acute phase (44 of 92 or 48%) compared with type B repairs (22 of 114 or 19%) (p < 0.001). Age did not differ significantly between these two groups. Six of 92 (7%) of the type A repairs were in patients with Marfan’s syndrome, as were 7 of 114 (6%) of type B repairs. Twenty-five of 92 type A patients (27%) underwent the first stage of aortic repair with the elephant trunk technique; 1 had an acute dissection, the remainder had chronic dissections. Twelve of 24 patients had completed the second half of this two-stage repair at the time of this study. The specific operations performed for the 92 type A patients were as follows: aortic valve and ascending aorta, 9 (10%); aortic valve, ascending aorta and arch, 16 (17%); ascending aorta, 20 (22%); ascending aorta and proximal arch, 9 (10%); ascending aorta and transverse arch, 11 (12%); transverse arch, 2 (2%); elephant trunk, stage 1, 25 (27%); and for the 114 type B patients: elephant trunk, stage 2, 12 (11%); descending thoracic aorta, type A, 1 (0.8%); descending thoracic aorta, types A, B, 9 (8%); descending thoracic aorta, types A, B, C, 16 (14%); thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, type I, 29 (25%); thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, type II, 42 (37%); thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, type III, 4 (4%); and abdominal aorta, 1 (0.8%). Among acute type A patients, 7 were hypotensive, with preoperative cardiopulmonary arrest in 4 patients and blood pressure below 60 mm Hg in 3. In September 1992, we abandoned the simple cross-clamp technique in favor of the adjuncts of distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage, which was consequently used in 73 of 114 type B patients (64%). Similarly, retrograde cerebral perfusion, in addition to hypothermic circulatory arrest, was added to the surgical protocol for ascending and arch patients in February 1994 for 77 of 92 type A patients (84%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Selected Risk Factors

 
Statistical methods
Univariate categoric data were analyzed by contingency table methods. Continuous variables were divided into quartiles for contingency table analysis, and were also analyzed as continuous by univariate logistic regression. The p values were computed using {chi}2 statistics for contingency tables, and odds ratios were computed for dichotomous variables. Confidence intervals for contingency table odds ratios are test based. Multivariate analysis was conducted by multiple logistic regression. The p values for logistic regression analyses were computed by maximum-likelihood methods. All calculations were performed using SAS software version 6.12 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).

Patient selection and operative methods
Our protocol for treating acute aortic dissection depends on the patient presentation. If a patient had a moribund presentation to the emergency department he or she was sent directly to the operating room for anesthesia induction and transesophageal echocardiography to identify the site and extent of the intimal disruption. A patient who presented with acute symptoms, but was not moribund, was admitted to the surgical intensive care unit where he or she was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography and prepared for operation as soon as possible.

Acute type A dissection
After transfer to the operating room, median sternotomy was performed and the patient was placed on cardiopulmonary bypass and the systemic temperature cooled for profound hypothermia. Cannulation was femoral–femoral for cardiopulmonary bypass, and to the superior vena cava for retrograde cerebral perfusion. Myocardial protection was provided throughout the procedure by cardioplegic perfusion through the coronary sinus, keeping the myocardial temperature less than 15°C. Venting through the left superior pulmonary vein or artery prevented ventricular distention and allowed optimal decompression of the left ventricle. When the electroencephalogram was isoelectric and the nasopharyngeal temperature reached approximately 12°C, the pump was stopped, and retrograde cerebral perfusion was begun through the superior vena cava. The rate of pump flow did not exceed 500 mL/min and the pressure did not exceed 25 mm Hg. The ascending aorta was inspected for the site and extent of the tear, the involvement of the transverse arch, and assessment of intimal disruption requiring repair. The ascending aorta was opened longitudinally and then transected just proximal to the innominate artery. Provided the transverse arch was free of reentry, we sutured the intima and adventitia together with fine 4-0 and 5-0 polypropylene suture (Fig 1A ). A gelatin woven Dacron graft was sutured to the reinforced proximal aortic arch in end-to-end fashion, and reinforced from both inside and outside with 4-0 pledgeted sutures (Figs 1B, 1C). When the distal anastomosis was completed, retrograde cerebral perfusion was stopped and cardiopulmonary bypass restarted through the femoral artery to evacuate all air and debris from the brachiocephalic vessels. The graft was clamped proximal to the origin of the innominate artery. Flow to the cerebral and systemic circulation was restored and the head of the table was elevated. On rare occasions when the brachiocephalic arterial flow was not adequate, as manifested by low radial artery pressure and due to a dissecting flap, we cannulated the ascending aortic graft and delivered flow to the head in antegrade fashion. The patient was rewarmed with restoration of antegrade flow.




View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. (A) The intima and adventitia are sutured together. (B, C) Reinforcement of graft and aortic arch with pledgeted sutures. (D, E) Pledgeted reinforcement of supracoronary intima and adventitia.

 
If the aortic valve was morphologically normal and the root without dilatation, we resuspended the aortic valve with 4-0 polypropylene pledgeted sutures. The intima and adventitia of the supracoronary aorta were sutured together using 4-0 polypropylene sutures, and reinforced with 4-0 pledgeted suture, usually from inside the graft (Figs 1D, 1E). A composite valve graft was selected if the valve and root were dilated. The coronary arteries were reattached by button technique or modified Cabrol in which a 12-mm Dacron tube graft from the composite valve/graft prosthesis was attached to the left main coronary artery. The right coronary artery orifice was either attached directly to the graft or connected by a length of Dacron tube or saphenous vein (Fig 2 ). In 2 patients, the coronary orifices were involved in the dissection and the coronary arteries were ligated and reversed saphenous vein grafts were used for bypass from the composite graft to the left anterior descending, the circumflex, and the right coronary arteries. Finally, the sump was terminated, the heart filled to aspirate the heart chamber from air and debris, and the patient weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass.



View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Composite valve graft with modified Cabrol reattachment of left coronary artery.

 
For patients in whom dissection involved the transverse aortic arch, either the proximal arch or the total arch was replaced. In total arch replacements the brachiocephalic arteries were preserved as an island and reattached to the graft as previously described [4]. The elephant trunk technique [5] was used in 1 of 44 (2%) acute dissection patients in which the dissection extended into the descending thoracic aorta.

Chronic type A dissection
Chronic type A dissection was treated in the same manner as ascending/arch aortic aneurysm [4]. Graft replacement is the treatment of choice, and the main indications for operation for chronic type A dissection were aortic size or presence of symptoms. The operation was performed with or without aortic valve and root replacement as required (Figs 3A, 3B). The elephant trunk technique was used in 24 of 48 (50%) chronic dissection patients in which the dissection extended into the descending thoracic aorta.



View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Chronic type A dissection; completed valve and graft replacement using the elephant trunk technique.

 
Acute type B dissection
Operations for acute type B dissection were performed selectively, and only when complications of the dissection arose. The indications were persistent pain, aneurysmal dilatation (>=5 cm), end-organ (kidney, bowel) or limb ischemia, or evidence of retrograde dissection to the ascending aorta. Patients who did not meet these criteria were treated with aggressive medical therapy, which included immediate admission to the intensive care unit, urgent pharmacologic blood pressure control, complete intensive care unit monitoring, and immediate imaging studies. If pain was controlled and aortic expansion beyond 5 cm was not present, patients were weaned from intravenous antihypertensives and converted to oral antihypertensive therapy. Chest radiographs were obtained daily and computed tomographic scans weekly during hospitalization. Stable patients were discharged after 14 days. Patients were urged at follow-up to undergo quarterly computed tomographic scans in the first year, semiannual scans in the next 2 years, and thereafter to undergo annual scans. Any change in symptoms or aortic diameter were considered indications for surgical reevaluation.

Operative technique for acute dissection of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta was not unlike the techniques previously described for aneurysms occurring in this portion of the aorta [6]. The proximal descending thoracic aorta distal to the left subclavian was transected completely and lifted off the esophagus. Both proximal and distal intima and adventitia of the transected aorta were reinforced in the same manner as that for the ascending aorta with a 4-0 polypropylene suture. A gelatin woven Dacron graft was sewn directly to the reinforced acutely dissected proximal thoracic aorta with the posterior row reinforced using interrupted polypropylene sutures. The descending thoracic graft was cut to length and sutured to the reinforced distal aorta, rechanneling blood into the true lumen of the distal aorta. The adjuncts of cerebrospinal fluid drainage and distal aortic perfusion were used in all patients after 1992 [6].

When most of the descending and abdominal aorta required replacement (type II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm), we opened the entire thoracoabdominal aorta, excised the septum between the false and true lumen, and reattached the visceral vessels and renal arteries to the graft either directly or using a woven Dacron graft. We ligated all the intercostal and lumbar arteries because the friable tissue was likely to lead to catastrophic bleeding and a fatal outcome.

Chronic type B dissection
Chronic type B aortic dissection was treated in the same manner as descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm [6]. In patients with chronic dissection, we preferred to reimplant intercostal arteries T-9 through T-12 [7] using either a sidearm graft or a side hole to which we reattached the arteries directly (Figs 4A, 4B).



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Chronic type B dissection; completed graft replacement with intercostal artery reattachment.

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Type A dissection
The overall incidence of stroke in ascending and arch or type A dissection patients was 6 of 92 (7%). None of the patient characteristics other than pump time and hypotension, such as sex, hypertension, or smoking were significant in the development of stroke. Patients with acute type A dissection presenting as hypotensive were at significantly greater risk for stroke (Table 2 ). The incidence of stroke was 2 of 7 (29%) compared with 2 of 37 (5%) in patients with stable blood pressure more than 90 mm Hg (p < 0.05). With regard to early mortality, the overall incidence of death was 11 of 92 (12%) (Table 3 ). The more stable chronic dissection patients had 2 of 48 (4%) deaths and fared much better than those with acute dissection, of whom 9 of 44 (20%) died (p < 0.02). Of the acutely dissecting patients, 7 severely hypotensive patients had the highest death rate, with 4 of 7 deaths (57%). This rate was significantly elevated beyond that of the "stable" acute dissectors, among whom 5 of 37 (13%) died (odds ratio 8.5; p < 0.009).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Type A Aortic Dissection: Multiple Logistic Regression Model Risk Factors for Strokea

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Type A Aortic Dissection: Multiple Logistic Regression Model Risk Factors for Mortalitya

 
Type B dissection
Overall postoperative neurologic deficit (paraplegia or paraparesis) for descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic or type B dissection was 15 of 114 (13%). For patients with acute dissection, 7 of 22 (32%) had neurologic deficit compared to chronic aortic dissection and aneurysm patients with 8 of 92 (9%) (p < 0.004) (Table 4 ). There were 6 acute type B dissections with type II repairs and of these 4 patients had neurologic deficit The combined adjuncts of distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage showed a trend toward reduction of neurologic deficit in patients with aortic dissection, but this trend was not statistically significant. Overall, deaths occurred in 12 of 114 (11%). Three of 22 patients with acute dissection died, an incidence of 14%, versus 9 of 92 deaths (10%) among patients with chronic dissection (p < 0.06). By multiple logistic regression analysis, aortic rupture, but no other variable, was found to be a significant risk factor for mortality (Table 5 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Type B Aortic Dissection: Multiple Logistic Regression Model Risk Factors for Neurologic Deficita

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Type B Aortic Dissection: Multiple Logistic Regression Model Risk Factors for Mortalitya

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Acute type A aortic dissection of the proximal aorta should be treated as a surgical emergency to avoid rupture into the pericardium and subsequent cardiac tamponade. Historically, the rates of early deaths in the treatment of this grave condition have been high, beginning with the first treatments by DeBakey and colleagues [8] in 1965, with a mortality rate of 40%. Better imaging technology has led to earlier recognition of acute aortic dissection, bringing a greater number of complex patients to operation. Improvements in supportive medical care have increased patient survivability. Consequently and paradoxically, the surgical treatment of more critically ill patients raises the likelihood of a higher early mortality rate for acute aortic dissection, whereas techniques and adjuncts have increased overall chances of survival, most noticeably for the chronic dissection patient. The current day rate of 20% to 30% mortality in acute type A dissection was reached in the late 1970s, and although it has fluctuated since then, it has changed little overall [915]. In our series, early deaths in the acute type A dissection group fell within this range (9 of 44 patients or 20%). By striking comparison, early deaths occurred in only 4% of patients with chronic type A dissection. The favorable mortality rate in our population of patients who presented without hypotension upon admission supports this conviction (4 of 7 or 57% with hypotension died versus 5 of 37 or 14% with stable blood pressure; p < 0.009). Currently, neither imaging technology nor supportive medical care appears able to affect patients who present with catastrophic hypotension.

Transesophageal echocardiography is extremely useful for localizing intimal tears in the aorta. This imaging modality also simplifies management of acute aortic dissection because we are able to establish a diagnosis of type A or B dissection in acutely ill patients and immediately choose the proper mode of treatment. We believe that the pledgeted interrupted suture line, as compared with the felt sandwich technique, provides superior stabilization of the defective aortic wall and decreases problems of stenosis after the repair.

Acute type B aortic dissection of the distal aorta presents an entirely different set of problems than type A of the proximal aorta. Acute type B dissection can be stabilized medically before being treated surgically with a reasonable perioperative risk and selective treatment has met with a degree of success at some institutions [16]. Antihypertensive treatment, however, does not forego the necessity to closely monitor these patients. Hospital mortality of primary medical treatment remains relatively high and a substantial percentage of patients requires operation during initial hospitalization [17]. The main causes of death in both medical and surgical groups are rupture and abdominal malperfusion. We advocate conservative medical therapy and watchful waiting for treatment of acute type B aortic dissection as described in the methods section.

Improvements in surgical techniques over the past 10 years have helped to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing graft replacement for aortic aneurysms. Such improvements include refinements in circulatory support adjuncts such as retrograde cerebral perfusion also used for type A aortic dissection [4]. Although we did not see statistically significant multivariate effects of retrograde cerebral perfusion in this population, several confounding factors made it difficult to evaluate. In acute type A dissection, half of the strokes we observed occurred in patients with severe hypotension and much of the damage was done before the operation began, therefore the stroke rate could not be expected to respond to the generally beneficial effect of retrograde cerebral perfusion. Future studies on the role of retrograde cerebral perfusion in the acute type A aortic dissection population with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage should also be valuable aids in the prevention of spinal cord morbidity in type B aortic dissection. In this population, as with type A dissection, the relationship between acuity of the presentation and extent of the aortic injury made the effects of adjuncts difficult to summarize statistically. Patients with acute dissection are at much higher risk for developing neurologic complications and those with acute dissection of type II extent are at highest risk, but we did not have sufficient data to evaluate the usefulness of the adjuncts. As in type A dissection, further experience is required to evaluate the role of adjuncts in acute type B aortic dissection.

In conclusion, our experience indicates that acute type A aortic dissection should be treated aggressively with operation. Surgical treatment of chronic type A aortic dissection presenting as aneurysm has improved greatly in the past 10 years and can be treated in the same manner as typical ascending and arch aortic aneurysm with similar outcome. For acute type B aortic dissection, conservative medical therapy remains the definitive therapy. Surgical repair becomes the only option when medical therapy fails, but carries a high risk of neurologic deficit, particularly in dissections that involve the total descending aorta. Although mortality for type B dissection is commensurate to that for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, neurologic morbidity is by comparison disproportionately high, possibly because of inability to reattach friable intercostal arteries. Morbidity and mortality rates for chronic aortic dissection patients continue to improve, with outcomes very similar to those for aneurysm patients and attributable to the same technical advances. We emphasize the critical need for follow-up for the dissection patient by regular computed tomographic scans or transesophageal echocardiography. Whether treatment has been medical or surgical, sudden appearance of a previously undetected aneurysm or extension of the dissection is always a threat.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Anagnostopoulos C.E. Acute aortic dissections. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1975.
  2. Fann J.I., Miller D.C. Management of ascending aortic dissections. ACC Curr Jl Rev 1995;4(3):39-41.
  3. DeSanctis R.W., Doroghazi R.M., Austen W.G., Buckley M.J. Aortic dissection. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1060-1067.[Medline]
  4. Safi H.J., Letsou G.V., Iliopoulos D.C., et al. The impact of retrograde cerebral perfusion on ascending and arch aneurysm repair. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1601-1607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Safi H.J., Miller C.C., III, Iliopoulos D.C., Letsou G.V., Baldwin J.C. Staged repair of extensive aortic aneurysm: improved neurologic outcome. Ann Surg 1997;226:599-605.[Medline]
  6. Safi H.J., Bartoli S., Hess K.R., et al. Neurologic deficit in patients at high risk with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: the role of cerebral spinal fluid drainage and distal aortic perfusion. J Vasc Surg 1994;20:434-443.[Medline]
  7. Safi H.J., Miller C.C., III, Carr C., Iliopoulos D.C., Dorsay D.A., Baldwin J.C. The importance of intercostal artery reattachment during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:58-68.[Medline]
  8. DeBakey M.E., Henly W.S., Cooley D.A., Morris G.G., Jr, Crawford E.S., Beall A.C., Jr Surgical management of dissecting aneurysms of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1965;49:130-149.[Medline]
  9. Miller D.C., Mitchell R.S., Oyer P.E., Stinson E.B., Jamieson S.W., Shumway N.E. Independent determinants of operative mortality for patients with aortic dissections. Circulation 1984;70:153-164.[Free Full Text]
  10. Crawford E.S., Svensson L.G., Coselli J.S., Safi H.J., Hess K.R. Aortic dissection and dissecting aortic aneurysms. Ann Surg 1988;208:254-273.[Medline]
  11. Massimo C.G., Presenti L.F., Marranci P., et al. Extended and total aortic resection in the surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection: experience with 54 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;46:420-424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Bachet J., Brizard C., Goudot B., et al. Repeated surgery for recurrent dissection of the aorta. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1990;4:238-244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fann J.I., Glower D.D., Miller D.C., et al. Preservation of aortic valve in type A aortic dissection complicated by aortic regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:62-75.[Abstract]
  14. Heineman M., Laas J., Jurmann M., et al. Surgery extended into the aortic arch in acute type A dissection. Indications, techniques, and results. Circulation 1991;84:25-34.
  15. Fann J.I., Smith J.A., Miller D.C., et al. Surgical management of aortic dissection during a 30-year period. Circulation 1995;92(Suppl 9):13-21.
  16. Schor J.S., Yerlioglu M.E., Galla J.D., Lansman S.L., Ergin M.A., Griepp R.B. Selective management of acute type B aortic dissection: long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1339-1341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gysi J., Schaffner T., Mohacsi P., Aeschbacher B., Althaus U., Carrel T. Early and late outcome of operated and non-operated acute dissection of the descending aorta. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 1997;11:1163-1170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. C. Pujara, E. E. Roselli, A. V. Hernandez, L. M. Vargas Abello, J. M. Burke, L. G. Svensson, and R. K. Greenberg
Open repair of chronic distal aortic dissection in the endovascular era: Implications for disease management
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2012; 144(4): 866 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. S. Corvera and J. W. Fehrenbacher
Open Repair of Chronic Aortic Dissections Using Deep Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2012; 94(1): 78 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
J. G. T. Augoustides, W. Y. Szeto, N. D. Desai, A. Pochettino, A. T. Cheung, J. S. Savino, and J. E. Bavaria
Classification of acute type a dissection: focus on clinical presentation and extent
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, April 1, 2011; 39(4): 519 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VascularHome page
J. C. Vasquez, J. DeLaRosa, and J. J. Leon
Aortoesophageal fistula as a late complication of type B aortic dissection
Vascular, February 1, 2011; 19(1): 55 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Fattouch, R. Sampognaro, E. Navarra, M. Caruso, C. Pisano, G. Coppola, G. Speziale, and G. Ruvolo
Long-Term Results After Repair of Type A Acute Aortic Dissection According to False Lumen Patency
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1244 - 1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. P. Verhoye, D. C. Miller, D. Sze, M. D. Dake, and R. S. Mitchell
Complicated acute type B aortic dissection: Midterm results of emergency endovascular stent-grafting
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 424 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic AnnalsHome page
K. Matsuyama, Y. Narita, A. Usui, T. Akita, H. Oshima, and Y. Ueda
Entry Closure and Aortic Tailoring for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection
Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, June 1, 2008; 16(3): 249 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. B. Reece, G. R. Green, and I. L. Kron
Aortic Dissection
, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1195 - 1222.
[Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Gaul, W. Dietrich, I. Friedrich, J. Sirch, and F. J. Erbguth
Neurological Symptoms in Type A Aortic Dissections
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 292 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
V. Rampoldi, S. Trimarchi, K. A. Eagle, C. A. Nienaber, J. K. Oh, E. Bossone, T. Myrmel, G. M. Sangiorgi, C. De Vincentiis, J. V. Cooper, et al.
Simple Risk Models to Predict Surgical Mortality in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Score
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 83(1): 55 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
M. Ates and A. U. Gullu
Which temperature is better in acute type A aortic dissection?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2007; 31(1): 138 - 138.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
M. Ates
Which suture technique is better in acute type A aortic dissection?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, July 1, 2006; 30(1): 199 - 199.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
F. Santini
Survival and quality of life after repair of acute type A aortic dissection in patients aged 75 years and older justify intervention
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 2006; 29(3): 386 - 391.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
N. Kawaharada, K. Morishita, J. Fukada, Y. Hachiro, Y. Fujisawa, T. Saito, Y. Kurimoto, and T. Abe
Stroke in surgery of the arteriosclerotic descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: influence of cross-clamping technique of the aorta
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, April 1, 2005; 27(4): 622 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. L. Estrera, Z. Garami, C. C. Miller III, R. Sheinbaum, T. T.T. Huynh, E. E. Porat, B. S. Allen, and H. J. Safi
Cerebral monitoring with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography improves neurologic outcome during repairs of acute type A aortic dissection
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 277 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Trimarchi, C. A. Nienaber, V. Rampoldi, T. Myrmel, T. Suzuki, R. H. Mehta, E. Bossone, J. V. Cooper, D. E. Smith, L. Menicanti, et al.
Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2005; 129(1): 112 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Chiappini, M. E. Tan, W. Morshuis, H. Kelder, K. Dossche, and M. Schepens
Surgery for acute type a aortic dissection: is advanced age a contraindication?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 585 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic AnnalsHome page
Y. Kawachi, A. Nakashima, Y. Toshima, T. Kosuga, K. Imasaka, and H. Tomoeda
Stroke in Thoracic Aortic Surgery: Outcome and Risk Factors
Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, March 1, 2003; 11(1): 52 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. A. LeMaire, C. C. Miller III, L. D. Conklin, Z. C. Schmittling, and J. S. Coselli
Estimating group mortality and paraplegia rates after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 508 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
G. R. Green and I. L. Kron
Aortic Dissection
, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1095 - 1122.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
U. Herold, J. Piotrowski, D. Baumgart, H. Eggebrecht, R. Erbel, and H. Jakob
Endoluminal stent graft repair for acute and chronic type B aortic dissection and atherosclerotic aneurysm of the thoracic aorta: an interdisciplinary task
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, December 1, 2002; 22(6): 891 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. S. Bonser, C. H. Wong, D. Harrington, D. Pagano, M. Wilkes, T. Clutton-Brock, and M. Faroqui
Failure of retrograde cerebral perfusion to attenuate metabolic changes associated with hypothermic circulatory arrest
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2002; 123(5): 943 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
D. Harrington, C. H. Wong, and R. S. Bonser
Neurological Complications of Aortic Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2002; 6(1): 7 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. Ad, P. Lee, and J. L Cox
Type A aortic dissection with associated anomaly of the carotid and vertebral vessels
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2002; 123(3): 570 - 571.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Takahara, Y. Sudo, K. Mogi, M. Nakayama, and M. Sakurai
Total aortic arch grafting for acute type A dissection: analysis of residual false lumen
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 450 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. H. Mehta, T. Suzuki, P. G. Hagan, E. Bossone, D. Gilon, A. Llovet, L. C. Maroto, J. V. Cooper, D. E. Smith, W. F. Armstrong, et al.
Predicting Death in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection
Circulation, January 15, 2002; 105(2): 200 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. E. S.H. Tan, J. C. Kelder, W. J. Morshuis, and M. A.A.M. Schepens
Risk stratification in acute type A dissection: proposition for a new scoring system
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2065 - 2069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Kawahito, H. Adachi, A. Yamaguchi, and T. Ino
Preoperative risk factors for hospital mortality in acute type A aortic dissection
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2001; 71(4): 1239 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. Sinatra, G. Melina, I. Pulitani, B. Fiorani, G. Ruvolo, and B. Marino
Emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection: neurologic complications and early mortality
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2001; 71(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Kawahito, H. Adachi, A. Yamaguchi, and T. Ino
Early and late surgical outcomes of acute type a aortic dissection in patients aged 75 years and older
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2000; 70(5): 1455 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. J. Reardon, R. J. Brewer, S. A. LeMaire, J. C. Baldwin, and H. J. Safi
Surgical management of primary aortoesophageal fistula secondary to thoracic aneurysm
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 967 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Okita, O. Tagusari, K. Minatoya, M. Ando, S. Kitamura, N. Nakajima, and S. Takamoto
Is distal anastomosis only to the true channel in chronic type B aortic dissection justified?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1586 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Hazim J. Safi
Michael J. Reardon
George V. Letsou
John C. Baldwin
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Safi, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Safi, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, J. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS