|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:402-411
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Surgery, The Methodist Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Safi, 6550 Fannin, Suite 1603, Houston, TX 77030
Presented at the Forty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Naples, FL, Nov 68, 1997.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. Between February 1991 and June 1996, we performed 206 operations on 195 patients for aortic dissection. Ascending or arch repair, or a combination (type A dissection) was performed on 92 of 206 patients (45%); 44 of 92 (48%) were acute dissection and 48 of 92 (52%) were chronic. Descending or thoracoabdominal repair (type B dissection) was performed on 114 of 206 patients (55%); 22 of 114 (19%) were acute and 92 of 114 (81%) were chronic.
Results. Among type A cases, strokes occurred in 6 of 92 patients (7%) overall; 4 of 44 (9%) were acute cases and 2 of 48 (4%) were chronic (p < 0.34). Early deaths for type A were 11 of 92 (12%) overall; 9 of 44 (20%) acute and 2 of 48 (4%) chronic (p < 0.02). In type B cases, neurologic complications were 15 of 114 (13%) overall; 7 of 22 (32%) were acute cases and 8 of 92 (9%) were chronic (p < 0.004). Early deaths for type B were 12 of 114 (11%) overall; 3 of 22 (14%) acute and 9 of 92 (10%) chronic (p < 0.6). Preoperative hypotension was significant in acute type A patients, with strokes in 2 of 7 (29%) hypotensives compared with 2 of 37 (5%) normotensives (p < 0.05) and early death in 4 of 7 (57%) hypotensives versus 5 of 37 (14%) normotensives (p < 0.009).
Conclusions. Morbidity and mortality for repair of chronic dissection types A and B were acceptable. Preoperative hypotension in acute type A dissection was a major predisposing factor toward stroke (29% versus 5%, p < 0.05). Acute type B dissection had acceptable mortality (14%) but a high rate of neurologic complications (32%).
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
2 statistics for contingency tables, and odds ratios were computed for dichotomous variables. Confidence intervals for contingency table odds ratios are test based. Multivariate analysis was conducted by multiple logistic regression. The p values for logistic regression analyses were computed by maximum-likelihood methods. All calculations were performed using SAS software version 6.12 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).
Patient selection and operative methods
Our protocol for treating acute aortic dissection depends on the patient presentation. If a patient had a moribund presentation to the emergency department he or she was sent directly to the operating room for anesthesia induction and transesophageal echocardiography to identify the site and extent of the intimal disruption. A patient who presented with acute symptoms, but was not moribund, was admitted to the surgical intensive care unit where he or she was evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography and prepared for operation as soon as possible.
Acute type A dissection
After transfer to the operating room, median sternotomy was performed and the patient was placed on cardiopulmonary bypass and the systemic temperature cooled for profound hypothermia. Cannulation was femoralfemoral for cardiopulmonary bypass, and to the superior vena cava for retrograde cerebral perfusion. Myocardial protection was provided throughout the procedure by cardioplegic perfusion through the coronary sinus, keeping the myocardial temperature less than 15°C. Venting through the left superior pulmonary vein or artery prevented ventricular distention and allowed optimal decompression of the left ventricle. When the electroencephalogram was isoelectric and the nasopharyngeal temperature reached approximately 12°C, the pump was stopped, and retrograde cerebral perfusion was begun through the superior vena cava. The rate of pump flow did not exceed 500 mL/min and the pressure did not exceed 25 mm Hg. The ascending aorta was inspected for the site and extent of the tear, the involvement of the transverse arch, and assessment of intimal disruption requiring repair. The ascending aorta was opened longitudinally and then transected just proximal to the innominate artery. Provided the transverse arch was free of reentry, we sutured the intima and adventitia together with fine 4-0 and 5-0 polypropylene suture (Fig 1A ). A gelatin woven Dacron graft was sutured to the reinforced proximal aortic arch in end-to-end fashion, and reinforced from both inside and outside with 4-0 pledgeted sutures (Figs 1B, 1C). When the distal anastomosis was completed, retrograde cerebral perfusion was stopped and cardiopulmonary bypass restarted through the femoral artery to evacuate all air and debris from the brachiocephalic vessels. The graft was clamped proximal to the origin of the innominate artery. Flow to the cerebral and systemic circulation was restored and the head of the table was elevated. On rare occasions when the brachiocephalic arterial flow was not adequate, as manifested by low radial artery pressure and due to a dissecting flap, we cannulated the ascending aortic graft and delivered flow to the head in antegrade fashion. The patient was rewarmed with restoration of antegrade flow.
|
|
Chronic type A dissection
Chronic type A dissection was treated in the same manner as ascending/arch aortic aneurysm [4]. Graft replacement is the treatment of choice, and the main indications for operation for chronic type A dissection were aortic size or presence of symptoms. The operation was performed with or without aortic valve and root replacement as required (Figs 3A, 3B). The elephant trunk technique was used in 24 of 48 (50%) chronic dissection patients in which the dissection extended into the descending thoracic aorta.
|
5 cm), end-organ (kidney, bowel) or limb ischemia, or evidence of retrograde dissection to the ascending aorta. Patients who did not meet these criteria were treated with aggressive medical therapy, which included immediate admission to the intensive care unit, urgent pharmacologic blood pressure control, complete intensive care unit monitoring, and immediate imaging studies. If pain was controlled and aortic expansion beyond 5 cm was not present, patients were weaned from intravenous antihypertensives and converted to oral antihypertensive therapy. Chest radiographs were obtained daily and computed tomographic scans weekly during hospitalization. Stable patients were discharged after 14 days. Patients were urged at follow-up to undergo quarterly computed tomographic scans in the first year, semiannual scans in the next 2 years, and thereafter to undergo annual scans. Any change in symptoms or aortic diameter were considered indications for surgical reevaluation. Operative technique for acute dissection of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta was not unlike the techniques previously described for aneurysms occurring in this portion of the aorta [6]. The proximal descending thoracic aorta distal to the left subclavian was transected completely and lifted off the esophagus. Both proximal and distal intima and adventitia of the transected aorta were reinforced in the same manner as that for the ascending aorta with a 4-0 polypropylene suture. A gelatin woven Dacron graft was sewn directly to the reinforced acutely dissected proximal thoracic aorta with the posterior row reinforced using interrupted polypropylene sutures. The descending thoracic graft was cut to length and sutured to the reinforced distal aorta, rechanneling blood into the true lumen of the distal aorta. The adjuncts of cerebrospinal fluid drainage and distal aortic perfusion were used in all patients after 1992 [6].
When most of the descending and abdominal aorta required replacement (type II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm), we opened the entire thoracoabdominal aorta, excised the septum between the false and true lumen, and reattached the visceral vessels and renal arteries to the graft either directly or using a woven Dacron graft. We ligated all the intercostal and lumbar arteries because the friable tissue was likely to lead to catastrophic bleeding and a fatal outcome.
Chronic type B dissection
Chronic type B aortic dissection was treated in the same manner as descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm [6]. In patients with chronic dissection, we preferred to reimplant intercostal arteries T-9 through T-12 [7] using either a sidearm graft or a side hole to which we reattached the arteries directly (Figs 4A, 4B).
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transesophageal echocardiography is extremely useful for localizing intimal tears in the aorta. This imaging modality also simplifies management of acute aortic dissection because we are able to establish a diagnosis of type A or B dissection in acutely ill patients and immediately choose the proper mode of treatment. We believe that the pledgeted interrupted suture line, as compared with the felt sandwich technique, provides superior stabilization of the defective aortic wall and decreases problems of stenosis after the repair.
Acute type B aortic dissection of the distal aorta presents an entirely different set of problems than type A of the proximal aorta. Acute type B dissection can be stabilized medically before being treated surgically with a reasonable perioperative risk and selective treatment has met with a degree of success at some institutions [16]. Antihypertensive treatment, however, does not forego the necessity to closely monitor these patients. Hospital mortality of primary medical treatment remains relatively high and a substantial percentage of patients requires operation during initial hospitalization [17]. The main causes of death in both medical and surgical groups are rupture and abdominal malperfusion. We advocate conservative medical therapy and watchful waiting for treatment of acute type B aortic dissection as described in the methods section.
Improvements in surgical techniques over the past 10 years have helped to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing graft replacement for aortic aneurysms. Such improvements include refinements in circulatory support adjuncts such as retrograde cerebral perfusion also used for type A aortic dissection [4]. Although we did not see statistically significant multivariate effects of retrograde cerebral perfusion in this population, several confounding factors made it difficult to evaluate. In acute type A dissection, half of the strokes we observed occurred in patients with severe hypotension and much of the damage was done before the operation began, therefore the stroke rate could not be expected to respond to the generally beneficial effect of retrograde cerebral perfusion. Future studies on the role of retrograde cerebral perfusion in the acute type A aortic dissection population with larger sample sizes are warranted.
Distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage should also be valuable aids in the prevention of spinal cord morbidity in type B aortic dissection. In this population, as with type A dissection, the relationship between acuity of the presentation and extent of the aortic injury made the effects of adjuncts difficult to summarize statistically. Patients with acute dissection are at much higher risk for developing neurologic complications and those with acute dissection of type II extent are at highest risk, but we did not have sufficient data to evaluate the usefulness of the adjuncts. As in type A dissection, further experience is required to evaluate the role of adjuncts in acute type B aortic dissection.
In conclusion, our experience indicates that acute type A aortic dissection should be treated aggressively with operation. Surgical treatment of chronic type A aortic dissection presenting as aneurysm has improved greatly in the past 10 years and can be treated in the same manner as typical ascending and arch aortic aneurysm with similar outcome. For acute type B aortic dissection, conservative medical therapy remains the definitive therapy. Surgical repair becomes the only option when medical therapy fails, but carries a high risk of neurologic deficit, particularly in dissections that involve the total descending aorta. Although mortality for type B dissection is commensurate to that for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, neurologic morbidity is by comparison disproportionately high, possibly because of inability to reattach friable intercostal arteries. Morbidity and mortality rates for chronic aortic dissection patients continue to improve, with outcomes very similar to those for aneurysm patients and attributable to the same technical advances. We emphasize the critical need for follow-up for the dissection patient by regular computed tomographic scans or transesophageal echocardiography. Whether treatment has been medical or surgical, sudden appearance of a previously undetected aneurysm or extension of the dissection is always a threat.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Fattouch, R. Sampognaro, E. Navarra, M. Caruso, C. Pisano, G. Coppola, G. Speziale, and G. Ruvolo Long-term results after repair of type a acute aortic dissection according to false lumen patency. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1244 - 1250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Verhoye, D. C. Miller, D. Sze, M. D. Dake, and R. S. Mitchell Complicated acute type B aortic dissection: midterm results of emergency endovascular stent-grafting. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 424 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Matsuyama, Y. Narita, A. Usui, T. Akita, H. Oshima, and Y. Ueda Entry Closure and Aortic Tailoring for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2008; 16(3): 249 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Reece, G. R. Green, and I. L. Kron Aortic Dissection Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1195 - 1222. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gaul, W. Dietrich, I. Friedrich, J. Sirch, and F. J. Erbguth Neurological Symptoms in Type A Aortic Dissections Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 292 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rampoldi, S. Trimarchi, K. A. Eagle, C. A. Nienaber, J. K. Oh, E. Bossone, T. Myrmel, G. M. Sangiorgi, C. De Vincentiis, J. V. Cooper, et al. Simple Risk Models to Predict Surgical Mortality in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Score Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 83(1): 55 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ates and A. U. Gullu Which temperature is better in acute type A aortic dissection? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 138 - 138. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ates Which suture technique is better in acute type A aortic dissection? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 199 - 199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Santini, G. Montalbano, A. Messina, A. D'Onofrio, G. Casali, F. Viscardi, G. B. Luciani, and A. Mazzucco Survival and quality of life after repair of acute type A aortic dissection in patients aged 75 years and older justify intervention Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 29(3): 386 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kawaharada, K. Morishita, J. Fukada, Y. Hachiro, Y. Fujisawa, T. Saito, Y. Kurimoto, and T. Abe Stroke in surgery of the arteriosclerotic descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: influence of cross-clamping technique of the aorta Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 27(4): 622 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Estrera, Z. Garami, C. C. Miller III, R. Sheinbaum, T. T.T. Huynh, E. E. Porat, B. S. Allen, and H. J. Safi Cerebral monitoring with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography improves neurologic outcome during repairs of acute type A aortic dissection J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 277 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Trimarchi, C. A. Nienaber, V. Rampoldi, T. Myrmel, T. Suzuki, R. H. Mehta, E. Bossone, J. V. Cooper, D. E. Smith, L. Menicanti, et al. Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2005; 129(1): 112 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chiappini, M. E. Tan, W. Morshuis, H. Kelder, K. Dossche, and M. Schepens Surgery for acute type a aortic dissection: is advanced age a contraindication? Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 585 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kawachi, A. Nakashima, Y. Toshima, T. Kosuga, K. Imasaka, and H. Tomoeda Stroke in Thoracic Aortic Surgery: Outcome and Risk Factors Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2003; 11(1): 52 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. LeMaire, C. C. Miller III, L. D. Conklin, Z. C. Schmittling, and J. S. Coselli Estimating group mortality and paraplegia rates after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 508 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Green and I. L. Kron Aortic Dissection Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1095 - 1122. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
U. Herold, J. Piotrowski, D. Baumgart, H. Eggebrecht, R. Erbel, and H. Jakob Endoluminal stent graft repair for acute and chronic type B aortic dissection and atherosclerotic aneurysm of the thoracic aorta: an interdisciplinary task Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 22(6): 891 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Bonser, C. H. Wong, D. Harrington, D. Pagano, M. Wilkes, T. Clutton-Brock, and M. Faroqui Failure of retrograde cerebral perfusion to attenuate metabolic changes associated with hypothermic circulatory arrest J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2002; 123(5): 943 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Harrington, C. H. Wong, and R. S. Bonser Neurological Complications of Aortic Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2002; 6(1): 7 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ad, P. Lee, and J. L Cox Type A aortic dissection with associated anomaly of the carotid and vertebral vessels J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2002; 123(3): 570 - 571. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Takahara, Y. Sudo, K. Mogi, M. Nakayama, and M. Sakurai Total aortic arch grafting for acute type A dissection: analysis of residual false lumen Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 450 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Mehta, T. Suzuki, P. G. Hagan, E. Bossone, D. Gilon, A. Llovet, L. C. Maroto, J. V. Cooper, D. E. Smith, W. F. Armstrong, et al. Predicting Death in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Circulation, January 15, 2002; 105(2): 200 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. S.H. Tan, J. C. Kelder, W. J. Morshuis, and M. A.A.M. Schepens Risk stratification in acute type A dissection: proposition for a new scoring system Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2065 - 2069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kawahito, H. Adachi, A. Yamaguchi, and T. Ino Preoperative risk factors for hospital mortality in acute type A aortic dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2001; 71(4): 1239 - 1243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sinatra, G. Melina, I. Pulitani, B. Fiorani, G. Ruvolo, and B. Marino Emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection: neurologic complications and early mortality Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2001; 71(1): 33 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kawahito, H. Adachi, A. Yamaguchi, and T. Ino Early and late surgical outcomes of acute type a aortic dissection in patients aged 75 years and older Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2000; 70(5): 1455 - 1459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Reardon, R. J. Brewer, S. A. LeMaire, J. C. Baldwin, and H. J. Safi Surgical management of primary aortoesophageal fistula secondary to thoracic aneurysm Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 967 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Okita, O. Tagusari, K. Minatoya, M. Ando, S. Kitamura, N. Nakajima, and S. Takamoto Is distal anastomosis only to the true channel in chronic type B aortic dissection justified? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1586 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |