ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Y. John Gu
Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schreurs, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bogers, A. J.J.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schreurs, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bogers, A. J.J.C.

Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:166-171
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original articles: cardiovascular

Heparin-coated bypass circuits: effects on inflammatory response in pediatric cardiac operations

Hedi H. Schreurs, EKPa, Marianne J. Wijers, EKPa, Y. John Gu, MD, PhDb, Wim van Oeveren, PhDb, Ron T. van Domburg, MSca, Johan H. de Boer, MDa, Ad J.J.C. Bogers, MD, PhDa

a Thoraxcentre, University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
b Blood Interaction Research, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

Accepted for publication February 10, 1998.

Address reprint requests to Mrs Schreurs, Thoraxcentre, University Hospital Rotterdam, Bd 467, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. This study was designed to investigate whether clinical signs of the inflammatory response in pediatric cardiac patients are reduced by heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits and how this could be explained by differences in the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved.

Methods. In a randomized, prospective study 19 patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass either with Carmeda BioActive Surface bypass circuits (n = 9) or with identical noncoated circuits (control, n = 10). Clinical parameters were recorded during the first 48 hours after the start of operation. Blood samples for determination of terminal complement complex, soluble form of E-selectin, and beta-thromboglobulin were obtained perioperatively up to 24 hours after operation.

Results. All clinical and inflammatory mediators showed a tendency in favor of the group with heparin-coated circuits. When analyzed on a point-by-point basis there were significant differences in postoperative central body temperature, soluble E-selectin levels, and beta-thromboglobulin levels (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions. These data suggest that the use of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass offers clinical benefit and tends to reduce the release of inflammatory mediators.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Operations involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induce a complex systemic inflammatory reaction, partly caused by blood–material interaction in the CPB circuit [1, 2]. In this regard, heparin-coated CPB circuits have been studied extensively, and their improved biocompatibility has been well demonstrated. These studies, however, have been performed on adult patients [36]. Although the inflammatory response has been documented in children undergoing CPB [7, 8], literature data on the use of heparin-coated CPB circuits in these patients are scarce. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate in small children (<10 kg) whether the use of heparin-coated CPB circuits could reduce the inflammatory response after open heart operation and whether a reduction of the appearance of markers of the inflammatory response could be shown.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Patients
Nineteen patients (9 boys, 10 girls) with a body weight of less than 10 kg, undergoing elective cardiac operations for different congenital anomalies, were prospectively enrolled in this study. Informed parental consent was obtained for all patients, according to the regulations of the hospital medical ethical committee. Patients were randomized into two groups. In group I patients were assigned to cannula-to-cannula Medtronic Carmeda BioActive Surface-treated CPB circuits (Medtronic, Annaheim, CA) (CBAS, n = 9). In group II patients were assigned to identical, but noncoated circuits (control, n = 10). Demographic and surgical data are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic and Surgical Data

 
Anesthesia
Premedication consisted of 0.3 mg/kg midazolam. Induction of anesthesia was done by inhalation (halothane or sevoflurane) or intravenously (midazolam, pavulon, fentanyl). Patients were ventilated with a minute volume of 10 mL · kg-1 · min-1 on a Servo 900C (Siemens, Solna, Sweden). An arterial line was put in the right radial artery. A central venous catheter was inserted into the right internal jugular vein. A bladder catheter, a gastric catheter, and nasopharyngeal and rectal temperature probes were inserted.

Cardiopulmonary bypass
The CPB circuit consisted of a Minimax hollow fiber oxygenator, Minimax collapsable venous reservoir, Intersept cardiotomy reservoir (all Medtronic), Biomedicus BP 50 centrifugal pumphead (Medtronic Biomedicus, Eden-Prarie, CO), and a Pall LPE 1440 arterial line filter (Pall, Porthmouth, UK). The circuit was primed with red blood cells, ABO fresh frozen plasma, and Ringer’s solution (Baxter, Utrecht, The Netherlands) to achieve an intraoperative hematocrit of 0.28 L/L. The prime was completed with 3,000 IU of porcine heparin (Leo Pharmaceutical Products, Weesp, The Netherlands), 0.5 g/kg body weight mannitol, and 0.5 g/kg body weight human albumin (CLB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Before cannulation patients were heparinized with 300 IU/kg body weight. Activated clotting time was measured with a Hemotec kaolin cartridge (Medtronic Hemotec, Parker, CO) and was maintained at more than 480 seconds during the procedure. Patients were systemically cooled to a nasophyaryngeal temperature of 25°C and weaned off CPB when rectal temperature reached 34°C. Blood flow rate was maintained at 2.4 L · min-1 · m-2 at normothermia and at 1.5 to 1.8 L · min-1 · m-2 at 25°C. Blood from the operating field was aspirated by vacuum-controlled cardiotomy suction (maximum, -60 mm Hg) and collected in the cardiotomy reservoir. Cardiotomy suction was kept to a minimum. At the end of CPB heparin was neutralized with protamine chloride (Kabi Pharmacia, Woerden, The Netherlands) at a dose of 4 to 5 mg/kg body weight.

Postoperative care
Postoperative goals were normal hemodynamic parameters according to patient age. Afterload reduction and inotropic support consisted of 2 µg · kg-1 · min-1 dopamine and 1 µg · kg-1 · min-1 nitroglycerin. Basic intravenous fluid administration consisted of 2 mL · kg-1 · h-1 glucose 5%. If urine production was less than 1 mL · kg-1 · h-1, 1 mg/kg furosemide was given. Kidney function was measured by serum and creatinine levels, liver function was measured by alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and {gamma}-glutamyltransferase levels. Patient ambient temperature was kept at 36°C during the intensive care unit stay, with a Dräger radiant heater 600 W (Drägerwerk Aktiengesellschaft, Lübeck, Germany).

Postoperative inflammatory response
Postoperative central body temperature and increase of patient body weight were used as clinical parameters for the determination of the postoperative inflammatory response. To determine differences in body weight patients were weighed nude on a Sartorius QS 16 scales (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany) immediately before the operation. Patients were weighed again 24 hours after arriving at the intensive care unit in the same way as preoperatively. Central body temperature was monitored continuously by measuring rectal temperature during the first 24 hours postoperatively with a Lameris 5386249 temperature probe (Lameris, Veenendaal, the Netherlands). Fever was defined as a rectal temperature more than 38°C.

Blood collection and processing
Blood for determination of the inflammatory markers was collected in tubes containing 0.5 mol of EDTA and 2.5% polybrene. Tubes were immediately placed on ice. Samples were collected after induction of anesthesia, at 20 minutes on CPB, 5 minutes before and 5 minutes after release of the aorta cross-clamp, at termination of CPB, 20 minutes after protamine administration, and 24 hours after CPB. All samples were immediately centrifuged and plasma was stored at -40°C. Complement activation was indicated by the terminal complement complex and determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Quidel, San Diego, CA; normal value, <40 ng/mL; lower detection limit, 20 ng/mL). Platelet activation was indicated by ß-thromboglobulin (ßTG) and determined by radioimmunoassay (Amersham International, Amersham, UK; normal value, 20 to 30 ng/mL; lower detection limit, 10 ng/mL). Endothelial cell activation was indicated by the soluble form of E-selectin (sE-selectin) and determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK; normal value, 29 to 63 ng/mL; lower detection limit, 0.1 ng/mL).

Statistics
Data are expressed as mean value ± standard error of the mean. Student’s t test was performed to compare group differences. Because of repeated measurements in a limited number of patients in each group, comparisons were made by point-by-point analysis with a Mann-Whitney or Wilcoxon rank sum test. These data were completed by area under the curve analysis. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Perioperative data
There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (Table 1). Postoperatively no complications occurred and all patients survived. There were no significant differences between the groups concerning intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements, urine production, kidney or liver function, and duration of postoperative ventilatory support (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Postoperative Dataa

 
Clinical parameters of inflammatory response
Postoperative central body temperature during the first 12 hours was less elevated in patients of the CBAS group (Fig 1) (point-by-point analysis, p < 0.05; area under the curve analysis, p = 0.2). A temperature greater than 38°C, measured at 4 hours after arriving at the intensive care unit, developed in 2 patients (22%) in the CBAS group, in comparison with 7 patients (70%) of the control group (p < 0.05). At 12 hours in the intensive care unit, none of the patients (0%) in the CBAS group had a temperature greater than 38°C, in comparison with 5 patients (50%) in the control group (p < 0.01) (Fig 2). Within 24 hours central body temperature of all patients returned to normal. In 4 patients from the CBAS group (44%) there was an increase in postoperative body weight compared with preoperative body weight, whereas in the control group this was demonstrated in 6 patients (60%) (not significant). The mean increase in body weight in the control group was higher than in the CBAS group (CBAS, -30 ± 57 g versus control, +22 ± 71 g; not significant).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Postoperative central body temperature in pediatric patients perfused either with the extracorporeal circuit with Carmeda BioActive Surface (CBAS, n = 9) or without (Control, n = 10). (Point-by-point analysis, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; area under the curve analysis, not significant).

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Central body temperature at 4 hours and 12 hours in intensive care unit (ICU). Significant difference in patients with temperature above 38°C (at 4 hours CBAS 2 versus Control 7, p < 0.05; at 12 hours CBAS 0 versus Control 5, p < 0.01). (CBAS = Carmeda BioActive Surface.)

 
Terminal complement complex
Baseline levels of terminal complement complex were comparable for both groups (64 ± 19 ng/mL versus 99 ± 22 ng/mL; not significant) (Fig 3). After onset of CPB mean levels increased to 196 ± 51 ng/mL in the CBAS group versus 358 ± 74 ng/mL in the control group at the end of CPB (not significant). After protamine administration a further increase of terminal complement complex was observed in both groups. After 24 hours levels in both groups were at baseline again.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Terminal complement complex (TCC) during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in pediatric patients perfused either with the extracorporeal circuit with Carmeda BioActive Surface (CBAS, n = 9) or without (Control, n = 10). Samples taken as described in the text. (PreCPB = after induction of anesthesia; 20'CPB = 20 minutes after start of CPB; -5'X-off = 5 minutes before declamping; 5'X-off = 5 minutes after declamping; endCPB = at termination of CPB; 20'Prot = 20 minutes after starting the administration of protamine.)

 
Soluble form of E-selectin
High preoperative levels of sE-selectin were observed in both groups (CBAS, 167 ± 13 ng/mL versus control, 90 ± 9 ng/mL; not significant) (Fig 4). After the start of CPB there was a strong decline in both groups. During the entire period of CPB sE-selectin levels were lower in the CBAS group (point-by-point analysis, p < 0.05; area under the curve analysis, p = 0.6). At 24 hours levels were still well below the presumed baseline level (CBAS, 50 ± 14 ng/mL versus control, 48 ± 20 ng/mL; not significant).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Soluble form of E-selectin (sE-Selectin) during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in pediatric patients perfused either with the extracorporeal circuit with the Carmeda Bioactive Surface (CBAS, n = 9) or without (Control, n = 10). Samples taken as described in the text. (PreCPB = after induction of anesthesia; 20'CPB = 20 minutes after start of CPB; -5'X-off = 5 minutes before declamping; 5'X-off = 5 minutes after declamping; endCPB = at termination of CPB; 20'Prot = 20 minutes after starting the administration of protamine.) (Point-by-point analysis, *p < 0.05; area under the curve analysis, not significant).

 
ß-thromboglobulin
Baseline levels of ßTG were comparable for both groups (CBAS, 167 ± 31 ng/mL versus control, 201 ± 65 ng/mL, not significant). After the start of CPB mean values increased (Fig 5). In both groups the peak was reached about the time of the release of the aorta cross-clamp. The ßTG levels during CPB were lower in the CBAS group. This difference was largest at the end of CPB (CBAS, 275 ± 33 ng/mL versus control, 370 ± 28 ng/mL; point-by-point analysis, p < 0.05; area under the curve analysis, p = 0.7). At 24 hours levels were below baseline in both groups.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. ß-Thromboglobulin released from activated platelets during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in pediatric patients perfused either with the extracorporeal circuit with the Carmeda Bioactive Surface (CBAS, n = 9) or without (Control, n = 10). Samples taken as described in the text. (PreCPB = after induction of anesthesia; 20'CPB = 20 minutes after start of CPB; -5'X-off = 5 minutes before declamping; 5'X-off = 5 minutes after declamping; endCPB = at termination of CPB; 20'Prot = 20 minutes after starting the administration of protamine.) (Point-by-point analysis, *p < 0.05; area under the curve analysis, not significant).

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Several studies show improved biocompatibility of heparin-coated CPB circuits in adult patients [36]. In these patients the inflammatory response is usually mild and differences in the postoperative clinical response to the improved biocompatibility are not readily demonstrated. Young children are more susceptible to the adverse effects of CPB than adult patients [9] and the inflammatory response to CPB may have serious consequences for neonatal and pediatric patients [10, 11]. Therefore, reduced blood activation during CPB by heparin-coated circuits could be useful in the management of these higher risk patients and could result in a more beneficial clinical course. Especially because the surface area of the CPB circuit, relative to the patients’ blood volume, is much higher in children than in adults.

As in the study by Ashraf and colleagues [12], the postoperative clinical course in the present study was positively modified after CPB by the use of heparin-coated circuits. However, they found an improvement on postoperative ventilation time. In our study ventilation time was limited in both groups. Our study showed a beneficial effect on postoperative central body temperature. Development of postoperative fever is often seen in young children undergoing CPB [10]. In our study postoperative central body temperature was lower in the CBAS group. This suggests that the heparin-coated CPB circuit improves the clinical condition of pediatric patients after cardiac operations in this respect.

Cardiopulmonary bypass in children is also associated with a capillary leak, which results in an increase in total body water after CPB [13, 14]. Longer duration of bypass, lower temperature, younger age, and lower body weight have been shown to be incremental risk factors of the accumulation of water [13]. Although results of this study show reduced postoperative gain in body weight in the CBAS group, this difference did not reach a level of significance. In this regard the overall perioperative fluid management plays an essential role and influences the possible beneficial effects of heparin-coated CPB. Moreover, in our study group the number of patients was small and the duration of CPB relatively short. Further investigations in neonates of low body weight undergoing longer periods of CPB are necessary to show significant differences in this respect. In our study we found no significant differences in complement activation. Concentrations of sE-selectin, however, a marker of endothelial activation, were lower in the CBAS group. Injury to the endothelial cells is a frequent outcome of the acute inflammatory response [15, 16], which may lead to extravasation of leukocytes and leakage of fluid in the extravascular space. As observed in this study, the baseline levels of sE-selectin in plasma, a marker of endothelial activation, were rather high, more than twice as high as levels of adults [6]. Concentrations decreased after initiation of CPB, even when mathematically corrected for hemodilution (data not shown). This pattern is in agreement with other articles in which adhesion molecules in a comparable group of pediatric patients were studied [17, 18]. The reason of these high baseline levels is still not clear. It might indicate some preexisting endothelial damage before operation [17]. The sE-selectin levels during CPB were lower in the CBAS group, when analyzed by point-by-point analysis. However, the mechanism and importance of lower sE-selectin concentrations in patients perfused with CBAS circuits remains uncertain.

The relevance of ßTG levels in relation to heparin-coated CPB is still not established. It is known that impaired hemostasis after CPB is mainly attributable to platelet damage [19]. Although in this study no beneficial effect was demonstrated in postoperative blood loss, ßTG levels were lower in the CBAS group, especially at the end of CPB. In addition to contact activation, other factors such as return of cardiotomy blood, contributes to a large extent to platelet damage. Consequently, this damage can partly obscure the improved biocompatibility of a heparin-coated circuit [20]. Therefore, in some studies cardiotomy suction is compensated by a red cell washing device. In our study we used cardiotomy suction without cell washing. Platelet activation remained less in the CBAS group as identified by lower ßTG levels. This suggests that the role of suction blood in obscuring the biocompatibility of extracorporeal circuits may be less important in children. The small amount of cardiotomy suction and the large biomaterial-to-blood ratio may explain this. Again larger study groups are necessary to support these findings.

Limitations of the study
Our study concerns a biological system with relatively large standard deviations in a limited number of patients and a limited number of observations. This hampers statistical analysis. Therefore, larger randomized studies will be necessary to further elucidate the efficacy of heparin-coated CPB during pediatric open heart operation.

Conclusion
Our data suggest that the use of heparin-coated CPB offers a clinical benefit and tends to reduce the release of inflammatory mediators during CPB.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Kirklin J.K., Westaby S., Blackstone E.H., Kirklin J.W., Chenoweth D.E., Pacifico A.D. Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:845-857.[Abstract]
  2. Butler J., Rocker G.M., Westaby S. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:552-559.[Abstract]
  3. Videm V., Svennevig J.L., Fosse E., Semb G., Osterud A., Mollnes T.E. Reduced complement activation with heparin-coated oxygenator and tubings in coronary bypass operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;103:806-813.[Abstract]
  4. Gu Y.J., van Oeveren W., Akkerman C., Huyzen R.J., Boonstra P.W., Wildevuur C.R.H. Heparin-coated circuits reduce the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:917-922.[Abstract]
  5. Fosse E., Moen O., Johnson E., et al. Reduced complement and granulocyte activation with heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:472-477.[Abstract]
  6. Weerwind P.W., Maessen J.G., van Tits L.J.H., et al. Influence of Duraflo II heparin-treated extracorporeal circuits on the systemic inflammatory response in patients having coronary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1633-1641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Finn A., Norik S., Klein N., Levinsky R.J., Strobel S., Elliott M. Interleukin-8 release and neutrophil degranulation after pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:234-241.[Abstract]
  8. Seghaye M.C., Duchateau J., Grabitz R.G., et al. Complement activation during cardiopulmonary bypass in infants and children: relation to postoperative multiple organ failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:978-987.[Abstract]
  9. Larson D.F., Bowers M., Schechner H.W. Neutrophil activation during cardiopulmonary bypass in paediatric and adult patients. Perfusion 1996;11:21-27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Butler J., Pathi V.L., Paton R.D., et al. Acute phase responses to cardiopulmonary bypass in children weighing less than 10 kilograms. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:538-542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Seghaye M.C., Grabitz R.G., Duchateau J., et al. Inflammatory reaction and capillary leak syndrome related to cardiopulmonary bypass in neonates undergoing cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:687-697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ashraf S., Tian Y., Cowan D., Entress A., Martin P.G., Watterson K.G. Release of proinflammatory cytokines during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass: heparin bonded versus nonbonded oxygenators. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1790-1794.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Maehara T., Novak I., Wyse R.K.H., Elliott M.J. Perioperative monitoring of total body water by bioelectrical impedance in children undergoing open heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1991;5:258-265.[Abstract]
  14. Brans Y.W., Dweek H.S., Harris H.B., et al. Effect of open-heart surgery on the body composition of infants and young children. Pediatr Res 1981;15:1024-1028.[Medline]
  15. McMillen M.A., Huribal M., Sumpio B. Common pathway of endothelial-leukocyte interaction in shock, ischemia, and reperfusion. Am J Surg 1993;166:557-562.[Medline]
  16. Verrier E.D., Boyle E.M., Jr Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:915-922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Boldt J., Osmer C., Linke C., Dapper F., Hempelmann G. Circulating adhesion molecules in pediatric cardiac surgery. Pediatr Anesth 1995;81:1129-1135.
  18. Blume E.D., Nelson D.P., Gauvreau K., et al. Soluble adhesion molecules in infants and children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 1997;96:352-357.
  19. Harker L.A., Malpas T.W., Branson H.E., Hessel E.A., II, Slichter S.J. Mechanism of abnormal bleeding in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Acquired transient platelet dysfunction associated with alpha-granule release. Blood 1985;56:824-834.
  20. De Haan J., Boonstra P.W., Tabuchi N., van Oeveren W., Ebels T. Retransfusion of thoracic wound blood during heart surgery obscures biocompatibility of the extracorporeal circuit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:272-275.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. Mangoush, S. Purkayastha, S. Haj-Yahia, J. Kinross, M. Hayward, F. Bartolozzi, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou
Heparin-bonded circuits versus nonheparin-bonded circuits: an evaluation of their effect on clinical outcomes
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 1058 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. Jensen, S. Andreasson, A. Bengtsson, H. Berggren, R. Ekroth, L. Lindholm, and J. Ouchterlony
Influence of two different perfusion systems on inflammatory response in pediatric heart surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 919 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. R. Stephenson Jr and J. L. Myers
Pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2176 - 2177.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
H. A. Hennein
Inflammation After Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Therapy for the Postpump Syndrome
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2001; 5(3): 236 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F. De Somer, K. Francois, W. van Oeveren, J. Poelaert, D. De Wolf, T. Ebels, and G. Van Nooten
Phosphorylcholine coating of extracorporeal circuits provides natural protection against blood activation by the material surface
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2000; 18(5): 602 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. A. Grossi, K. Kallenbach, S. Chau, C. C. Derivaux, M. G. Aguinaga, B. M. Steinberg, D. Kim, S. Iyer, M. Tayyarah, M. Artman, et al.
Impact of heparin bonding on pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective randomized study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2000; 70(1): 191 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. A. Grossi, C. Derivaux, and A. LaPietra
Heparin coating of bypass systems
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2000; 70(1): 335 - 335.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
D. F Larson, D. Arzouman, L. Kleinert, V. Patula, and S. Williams
Comparison of Sarns 3M heparin bonded to Duraflo II and control circuits in a porcine model: macro- and microanalysis of thrombi accumulation in circuit arterial filters
Perfusion, January 1, 2000; 15(1): 13 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. B. Horton, W. W. Butt, R. J. Mullaly, C. A. Thuys, E. B. O’Connor, K. Byron, A. D. Cochrane, C. P. Brizard, and T. R. Karl
IL-6 and IL-8 levels after cardiopulmonary bypass are not affected by surface coating
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1751 - 1755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
H. P Wendel, A. M Scheule, F. S Eckstein, and G. Ziemer
Haemocompatibility of paediatric membrane oxygenators with heparin-coated surfaces
Perfusion, January 1, 1999; 14(1): 21 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Y. John Gu
Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schreurs, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bogers, A. J.J.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schreurs, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bogers, A. J.J.C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS