|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1660-1665
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
b Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
c Orthopedic Research Laboratory, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Accepted for publication January 30, 1998.
Address reprint requests to Dr Buchman, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, F7859 Mott Hospital, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-8063
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. The sterna from human cadavers were used in this two-phased study. Phase I compared wires to four-hole titanium straight plates. Phase II compared wires to four-hole titanium custom H plates. The sterna were tested biomechanically using all fixation methods.
Results. Phase I showed no statistically significant difference in the stiffness or lateral displacement between the wired and straight plated sterna. Phase II showed a statistically significant greater stiffness (p < 0.05) and less lateral displacement (p < 0.05) in the custom plated sterna over the wired sterna.
Conclusions. Our results showed that custom titanium H plates were superior to wire fixation. Furthermore, our results established the importance of plate configuration in sternal fixation. Our study may have beneficial clinical implications, as decreased motion at the sternotomy site could mean less postoperative pain, a decreased incidence of infection, and accelerated bone healing.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Similar to the practice of cardiothoracic surgeons, who currently use wires to close sternal osteotomies, historically, craniomaxillofacial and orthopedic surgeons have also used wires for bone fixation. Morbidity and complications associated with wire fixation in the craniofacial and axial skeleton were similar to those found by cardiothoracic surgeons in sternotomy closures. These complications included infection, separation, instability, motion, nonunion, and delayed healing. To reduce these complications, researchers developed rigid fixation techniques that were able to decrease motion at the osteotomy or fracture site, lower postoperative pain, and improve the rate of primary bone healing. Indeed, since the introduction of rigid fixation techniques with titanium plates and screws, the bone healing complication rates have been significantly reduced in craniomaxillofacial and orthopedic surgery [710]. These specialties have been able to reduce hospitalization days and have seen their patients benefit from an earlier return to normal functioning [8, 11]. In fact, the overwhelming benefits of rigid fixation has led to the near-complete replacement of wire fixation in orthopedic, craniomaxillofacial, otolaryngologic, oral, and most recently in neurologic surgery.
Extending the technological advances of rigid plate fixation to sternal osteotomy closure seems to be the next logical step for the use of rigid fixation and a reasonable method to potentially reduce sternal closure complications. Sternal plates have been used anecdotally in secondary sternal reconstruction [12, 13]. Our belief is that the sound principles of rigid fixation, used in craniomaxillofacial, orthopedic, and other surgical specialties, can be applied to cardiothoracic operations with potentially equal success. To realize these improvements, modifications and adaptations of the currently used plating systems will be required to take full advantage of the benefits of rigid fixation techniques. Our hypothesis is that rigid sternal fixation with titanium plates will display greater stiffness, less lateral motion, and have fewer failures than sterna fixed with stainless steel cerclage wires. Our specific aim is to develop a rigid sternal plate with the appropriate design refinements, which will be able to withstand biomechanical forces that simulate physiologic conditions. To test directly our hypothesis, a rigorous biomechanical analysis will be performed, which compares our rigid sternal plate fixation system to conventional stainless steel wire fixation in human cadaver sterna. Our hope is that rigid fixation of the sterna will allow cardiothoracic surgeons to achieve faster primary bone healing, lower postoperative pain, and an earlier return to normal functioning, thereby reducing the risks of sternal complications.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis used in this study was a univariate paired t test. Stiffness was calculated as the average slope of the stress/strain curve measured as a numeric value/100 mm ± standard deviation. Lateral displacement was measured in millimeters ± standard deviation as the maximum lateral displacement during an entire compression cycle. Failures were determined by the criteria set forth in the methods section. Three sterna sustained rib fractures that were unrelated to the integrity of the sternal fixation. These sterna were removed from the study and were not counted as failures toward either group. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant in this study.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rigid fixation techniques are currently widely used in the fields of craniomaxillofacial and orthopedic surgery. The advantages of rigid fixation techniques over wire fixation techniques in these specialties include accelerated primary bone healing, lower incidence of wound infection and dehiscence, and an earlier return to normal function [711]. The success of rigid fixation in fracture repair and osteotomy stabilization led us to believe that rigid fixation technology could be extended to the fixation of median sternotomies. Our failure to demonstrate an improvement of the standard titanium straight plates over wire fixation techniques in phase I of our study, however, convinced us that achieving rigid fixation of the sterna was more difficult than suspected initially. In fact, we believe that our inability to achieve rigid fixation in phase I precluded us from attaining the maximum benefits from plate and screw fixation.
The plates used in phase I were linear and did not optimize rigid fixation techniques. Rigid bony fixation not only depends on the use of rigid plates and screws, but is also influenced by the bone under the plates into which the screws are being placed. To achieve rigid fixation, the holes must be properly drilled with adequate irrigation, the appropriately sized screws must be used, and the screws must be placed into the thickest and densest possible bone. A careful inspection of our failed plated sterna demonstrated that the screws in phase I were not being placed into the best possible bone. Poorly placed titanium screws into the sternal bone edges caused small bone fractures to develop in the areas closest to the midline sternotomy. These bony fractures caused the screws to lose their purchase, which led to complete plate failure. The plate fixation failures convinced us of the need for a plate design modification, which placed the screw holes further away from the bone edges. By redesigning the rigid titanium plates, we were able to take advantage of the unique characteristics of the sternal osteotomy site. The H plate configuration placed the screw holes in an inferior and superior position instead of a side-to-side position, which achieved our goal of rigid fixation by placing the screw holes further away from the sternal edge. The H configuration significantly reduced bone breakage and prevented plate fixation failures. In phase II of our study, the screws were definitely secured into better bone stock and clinically seemed to have greater bone purchase. After phase II of our study, the expected results were realized and the plated sterna had a statistically significant greater sternal stiffness, less sternal motion, and fewer failures than the wired sterna. The success of phase II confirmed our belief that rigid titanium plate fixation was important for sternal stability and that rigid fixation could only be achieved through proper plate design.
Rigid fixation improves sternal stability over wire fixation and it may also be a safer sternal closure method. Cerclage wiring can potentially disrupt the sternal blood supply during their placement either around or through the sternum. The blood vessels at risk for compression or damage include the internal mammary arteries, perforating branches of the internal mammary arteries, and the posterior intercostal arteries. Disruption of these blood vessels can have the serious consequences of sternal ischemia, delayed wound healing, and an increased sternal complication rate [16, 17]. Rigid plate fixation, however, does not circumferentially compress the sternum and, therefore, affords a lower risk of damaging the local sternal blood supply. By reducing the risk of damaging the sternal blood supply, we believe that rigid fixation may lower the risk of sternal complications.
Rigid titanium plate fixation of the sterna carries a higher operative cost than wire fixation. The cost of six sternal wires is approximately $40, whereas the cost of three titanium plates and 12 titanium screws is approximately $500. The overall expense of thoracic procedures, however, which includes the hospital, surgical, and patient recovery costs, can potentially be reduced in patients receiving rigid fixation. The overall cost savings attributed to rigid plate fixation has already been demonstrated clinically in craniomaxillofacial operations [11]. The higher cost of rigid plate fixation may also be merited if significant patient benefit can be shown. Our study demonstrated decreased motion across the osteotomy site. If decreased motion could be reproduced clinically, as it has been shown clinically for maxillofacial fracture repair, potentially this could translate into lower postoperative pain. A decrease in the patients postoperative pain, may allow him or her to breathe more deeply, thereby reducing pulmonary complications and postoperative recovery time. Rigid fixation may also speed primary bone healing and lower the risks of bone healing complications. The higher initial costs often associated with rigid plates and screws, therefore, may be offset by fewer hospitalization days, an improved quality of life, and an earlier return to normal function.
Our custom rigid titanium plates were designed with the potential need for emergency chest reentry in mind. Clinicians may believe that removal of rigid titanium plates would be more difficult than removing wires during such emergencies. We, however, were able to readily cut through both the standard and custom titanium plates (approximately 1.5 mm thick) using standard wire cutters that are in emergency carts on cardiothoracic wards. Furthermore, we used twice as many wires as we used plates, which lengthened the wire fixation reentry time. Although wire cutters can be used to cut through plates, the use of a screwdriver is the preferred method of plate removal. If plates and screw fixation becomes more commonplace, then screwdrivers would also become standard equipment on cardiac "crash" carts, eliminating this problem.
During the placement of sternal plates, there may be a concern with potentially passing a drill beyond the sternum and damaging important underlying structures. Over-drilling can be avoided in three ways. First, the sternal thickness could be measured and a prepackaged, guarded drill bit could be used. Second, a malleable retractor could be passed beneath the sternum to protect the underlying structures. Finally, KLS-Martin, L.P. has developed screws for facial fracture repair that can be placed without predrilling a hole. Adaptation of these self-drilling screws to sternal closures would eliminate completely the hazards of drilling screw holes.
Excessive plate projection has been of concern to craniomaxillofacial surgeons who worry about palpating or visualizing rigid fixation plates through the skin. These concerns have forced plate manufacturing companies to create thinner and stronger plates. The rigid titanium plates used in our study are approximately 1.5 mm thick and were originally made to repair mandibular fractures. These plates are approximately the same thickness as sternal wires and their twisted ends. In addition, the rigid plates were smooth and flat, and the wire ends were irregular and sharp.
In our study we found a greater stiffness and a lower lateral displacement in sterna fixed with rigid custom titanium H plates when compared with sterna fixed with stainless steel cerclage wires. In addition, there were fewer failures in sterna fixed with our custom plates than in sterna fixed with cerclage wires. Our results support our belief that plate configuration is of critical importance and that the fixation screws must be placed into solid bone to achieve true rigid fixation. We have proven our hypothesis by showing statistically significant reduced motion at the median sternotomy site in sterna fixed with titanium custom H plates compared with sterna fixed by stainless steel cerclage wires. Our results may have beneficial clinical implications, as greater stiffness and decreased motion at the sternotomy site could mean less postoperative pain, a decreased incidence of wound infection and sternal dehiscence, faster primary bone healing, and an earlier return to normal functioning. These benefits have been shown clinically in both the craniomaxillofacial and orthopedic literature. Our future plans are to use rigid plate fixation in animal studies to test these biomechanical properties in vivo and to determine the benefits of rigid fixation on primary bone healing. If rigid fixation in animal studies proves to be beneficial, limited trials in humans will be attempted. This study has enhanced our knowledge of the biomechanics of rigid sternal fixation. In addition, this study has led to the development of a rigid sternal plating system that is biomechanically superior to wire fixation. It is our hope that use of such a system will enable cardiothoracic surgeons to enjoy the same benefits of rigid fixation that is already being enjoyed by craniomaxillofacial, orthopedic surgeons, and other surgical specialists.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Voss, R. Bauernschmitt, A. Will, M. Krane, R. Kross, G. Brockmann, P. Libera, and R. Lange Sternal reconstruction with titanium plates in complicated sternal dehiscence. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 34(1): 139 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Losanoff, M. D. Basson, S. A. Gruber, H. Huff, and F.-h. Hsieh Single Wire Versus Double Wire Loops for Median Sternotomy Closure: Experimental Biomechanical Study Using a Human Cadaveric Model Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1288 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pai, N. J. Gunja, E. L. Dupak, N. L. McMahon, T. P. Roth, J. F. Lalikos, R. M. Dunn, N. Francalancia, G. D. Pins, and K. L. Billiar In Vitro Comparison of Wire and Plate Fixation for Midline Sternotomies Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 962 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bruhin, U. A. Stock, J.-P. Drucker, T. Azhari, J. Wippermann, J. M. Albes, D. Hintze, S. Eckardt, C. Konke, and T. Wahlers Numerical Simulation Techniques to Study the Structural Response of the Human Chest Following Median Sternotomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 623 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. McGregor, M. Payne, D. R. Trumble, K. M. Farkas, and J. A. Magovern Improvement of sternal closure stability with reinforced steel wires Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1631 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Casha and M. Gauci Mechanical comparison of three sternotomy closure techniques using a polyurethane foam sternal model Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(6): 2009 - 2010. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. K. Dasika, D. R. Trumble, and J. A. Magovern Lower sternal reinforcement improves the stability of sternal closure Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 75(5): 1618 - 1621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Losanoff, B. W. Richman, and J. W. Jones Disruption and infection of median sternotomy: a comprehensive review Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 831 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Cohen and L. V. Griffin A biomechanical comparison of three sternotomy closure techniques Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 563 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. McGregor, D. R. Trumble, and J. A. Magovern MECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF MIDLINE STERNOTOMY WOUND CLOSURE J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1999; 117(6): 1144 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |