|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1540-1544
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
b Angiogenesis Research Center, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
c Department of Radiology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Sellke, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, East Campus, Dana 905, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215
e-mail: (fsellke{at}bidmc.harvard.edu)
Presented at the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Jan 2628, 1998.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. Eight patients were enrolled. Patients were candidates if they had at least one graftable obstructed coronary artery and at least one major arterial distribution not amenable to revascularization, a serum creatinine level less than 3 mg/dL, ejection fraction greater than 0.20, and estimated operative mortality of less than 25%. During conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, 10 heparin-alginate devices, each containing either 1 µg or 10 µg of basic fibroblast growth factor, were implanted in the epicardial fat in multiple regions of the unrevascularizable territory and also in the distal distribution of a grafted or patent artery.
Results. There was no mortality and no evidence of renal, hematologic, or hepatic toxicity during follow-up. Three months after the operation, all patients remain free of angina. Seven patients were examined with stress perfusion scans. Three patients had clear enhancement of perfusion to the unrevascularized myocardium, 1 patient had a new fixed defect, and 3 had minimal overall change but had evidence of new small, fixed perfusion defects. Seven patients had improved or similar myocardial contractile function (ejection fraction at 3-month follow-up = 0.53 ± 0.22 versus 0.47 ± 0.14 preoperatively). One patient suffered a perioperative myocardial infarction in the area of basic fibroblast growth factor administration.
Conclusions. This preliminary study demonstrates the safety and technical feasibility of therapeutic angiogenesis with basic fibroblast growth factor delivered by heparin-alginate slow-release devices. Further studies examining the safety, clinical efficacy, and long-term results are ongoing.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation of bFGF-containing heparin-alginate beads
Basic fibroblast growth factor (human recombinant, 155 amino acids) was obtained from Scios, Inc, Mountain View, CA. Calcium alginate microcapsules served as a stable platform for bFGF, enhanced retention of activity and storage time, and served as a means for the controlled release of bFGF to the vessels in vivo. As previously described [10], heparin-sepharose beads (Pharmacia LKB, Piscataway, NJ) were sterilized under ultraviolet light for 30 minutes and then mixed with filter-sterilized sodium alginate (1.2%, weight/volume; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The mixed slurry was dropped through a needle into a beaker containing a hardened solution of CaCl2 (1.5% weight/volume). Microcapsules were formed instantaneously. Uniformly crosslinked capsule envelopes were obtained by incubating the capsules in the CaCl2 solution for 5 minutes under gentle mixing, and then for 10 minutes without mixing. The microcapsules were washed three times with sterile water and stored in 0.9% NaCl/1 mmol/L CaCl2 at 4°C. Each capsule in its hydrated state contained 0.05 mg heparin-sepharose, 0.18 mg of alginate, and 11 mg of water. Basic fibroblast growth factor (1 or 10 µg/microcapsule) was incorporated within the microcapsule after calcium alginate matrix formation and hardening by incubation in 0.9% CaCl2/1 mmol/L CaCl2/0.05% gelatin with bFGF for 16 hours under gentle agitation at 4°C. Beads were sterilized with gamma radiation for 15 minutes and stored in sterile saline solution at 4°C before use. The release of bFGF from heparin-alginate beads is under first-order kinetics, at a rate of approximately 30 or 300 ng/day, and complete after 3 to 4 weeks [11].
Surgical procedure and implantation of bFGF-containing beads
Patients were prepared and draped in the usual sterile manner and given perioperative cefazolin. A sternotomy was performed and patients were heparinized and cannulated in preparation for cardiopulmonary bypass. After activated clotting time was determined to be greater than 500 seconds, total cardiopulmonary bypass was instituted, ventilation was discontinued, and patients were systemically cooled to 28° to 30°C. After the aorta was clamped, 0.8 to 1.0 L of cold blood cardioplegic solution was infused into the aortic root with a mean pressure of 50 to 70 mm Hg. Infusion of 200 to 500 mL was repeated at 10- to 20-minute intervals. Cold saline solution was used to provide topical hypothermia. Distal coronary anastomoses were performed first. Systemic rewarming was initiated before the final distal anastomosis. After all distal anastomoses were completed, ten heparin-alginate beads each containing either 1 or 10 µg of bFGF (10 µg or 100 µg of total bFGF, respectively) were implanted into the epicardial fat or subepicardium in the nongraftable myocardial region in pockets through 2- to 3-mm stab incisions. One to four beads were placed in each pocket both in the ischemic territory and in the border territory of a grafted or patent coronary artery (Fig 1). The epicardial stab incisions were closed with 5-0 polypropylene suture. Proximal anastomoses were then performed while the aorta was still clamped. After rewarming was complete, the aorta was unclamped and ventilation was resumed. Patients were separated from cardiopulmonary bypass, decannulated, and closed routinely. Two to six heparin-alginate beads from each batch were cultured aerobically and anaerobically to ensure sterility.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hemodynamic and physiologic data
There were no significant acute effects on blood pressure or heart rate (mean arterial pressure was 91 ± 13 mm Hg at baseline and 93 ± 8 mm Hg 4 days postoperatively) (Table 1). Pharmacokinetic evaluation did not reveal any significant increase in serum levels of bFGF above baseline (17.4 ± 3.4 pg/mL at baseline versus 16.0 ± 1.8 pg/mL at 96 hours) (see Table 1). There were no acute or long-term (3 months) effects on serum creatinine level, hematologic profile, liver function tests, or urinalysis. All patients remained free of angina at 3 month follow-up. There were no deaths or subsequent need for revascularization.
|
Perfusion scanning
One patient refused postoperative myocardial perfusion scanning. Resting thallium and exercise sestamibi technetium scans performed on 7 patients 3 months after the operation demonstrated markedly enhanced perfusion to the nonbypassed myocardium in 3 patients (2 receiving 10 µg of bFGF and 1 receiving 100 µg). In 3 patients, minimal overall change was observed in the region of interest. However, small fixed perfusion defects were detected in the bFGF-treated myocardial territory. One patient in whom bFGF beads were applied to the right coronary artery distribution suffered a perioperative inferior myocardial infarction and had a new fixed perfusion defect. This patients global ejection fraction decreased from a preoperative value of 0.35 to 0.28 3 months after the operation. Seven patients had improved or similar contractile function and ejection fraction compared with that before the operation and remained free of angina (global ejection fraction, 0.47 ± 0.14 versus 0.53 ± 0.22, preoperative versus 3 months postoperative, respectively) (Fig 2).
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The relative benefits and risks and problems of using angiogenic growth factor protein as opposed to the DNA encoding the growth factors deserve mention. Growth factor protein administration does not require the incorporation of DNA into the nucleus of recipient tissue and thus has the benefit of simplicity and predictability of dose. Presently, the cost of large-scale production of high-grade protein may be greater than that of a relatively small amount of DNA. However, with the widespread use of bFGF and other angiogenic proteins for clinical use, the cost of production will decrease. The potential problems associated with all forms of therapeutic angiogenesis need to be considered. Angiogenic growth factors may increase the growth or expression of dormant or suppressed malignancies. Furthermore, type 1 diabetic patients may be at risk for the development of retinal neovascularity and renal insufficiency. Viral vectors used in gene transfer have created few clinical problems thus far. However, foreign DNA taken up by a virus could conceivably be transformed into a virulent pathogen. The optimal method to induce angiogenesis needs to be investigated, and the best growth factor or combination of growth factors will be examined. Basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor have been found to be synergistic in vivo [17]. Also, the optimal route of administration, method of delivery, and toxicity will likely be resolved in the future.
Presently, patients with inoperable coronary artery disease or who are incompletely revascularized have a poor long-term prognosis. Transmyocardial laser revascularization may be of some benefit, but its efficacy is still being debated and the outlook for its widespread use appears doubtful at present. Therapeutic angiogenesis using bFGF or other angiogenic growth factors has been found to be feasible and safe. However, the efficacy of bFGF-induced angiogenesis in providing clinically significant treatment for severe coronary artery disease will be the subject of future investigation.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have now administered vascular endothelial growth factor to 3 patients, using an adenovirus as the transfection vector. All 3 have done well. Our study was designed very similar to yours. Our question now as we begin to analyze results, and as you have alluded to, is the importance of a watershed effect based on collaterals from bypass vessels. My first question is, do you have any data regarding the baseline occurrence of collateralization in standard coronary bypass patients, and are you going to be looking at that in any way? Second, would not angiography be useful in terms of defining the collaterals, and do you have any intentions of including angiography in your studies?
DR SELLKE: To answer your first question, everyone with coronary disease has a degree of collateralization. Some patients have an occluded left anterior descending artery and have very little functional detriment. However, we tend to operate on patients with anginal symptoms. Therefore, in most cases, collateralization is not complete. The way to answer your question is to add a control arm in which the heparin alginate slow-release devices are administered without concurrent administration of basic fibroblast growth factor. We have now initiated a phase II clinical trial with the addition of this control arm, so hopefully we will know the answer to your question soon.
Angiography will pick up collateral vessels of a certain size, those greater than several hundred micrometers in diameter. However, many of these collaterals are similar to what you see in the porcine model. They are of small caliber and do not show up very well on angiography. However, they do have physiologic importance. Angiography therefore may have some utility in detecting new collateral vessel formation; however, magnetic resonance imaging and perhaps other perfusion studies may be a better gold standard.
DR BRUCE W. LYTLE (Cleveland, OH): I have one question. In your abstract you state that all patients examined demonstrated enhanced perfusion to the unrevascularized myocardium and improved or similar myocardial contractile function by magnetic resonance imaging and a near-normal stress test. Let me make certain that I understand this. When you showed your thallium scans you said that 3 patients got better and the rest of them did not.
DR SELLKE: Right.
DR LYTLE: Now, are you saying, then, that by magnetic resonance imaging all of them looked good in terms of increased perfusion?
DR SELLKE: When we initially looked at the scans, it appeared like there was clear enhancement. But, again, you have to compare the ungrafted area with the normally perfused or grafted territory. So it is difficult to know the absolute change just on a thallium or a sestamibi scan. What I am presenting here is the more conservative estimate, whereas in the initial review, it appeared as if there was significant enhancement in all patients.
DR LYTLE: The reason for the discrepancy is that you went back over your scans and you changed your mind, is that right?
DR SELLKE: Exactly. What we present now is very conservative. There is probably efficacy, but I did not want to say that without knowing for sure.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Boodhwani, P. Voisine, M. Ruel, N. R. Sodha, J. Feng, S.-H. Xu, C. Bianchi, and F. W. Sellke Comparison of vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor-2 in a swine model of endothelial dysfunction Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 645 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lu, X. Xu, M. Zhang, R. Cao, E. Brakenhielm, C. Li, H. Lin, G. Yao, H. Sun, L. Qi, et al. Combinatorial protein therapy of angiogenic and arteriogenic factors remarkably improves collaterogenesis and cardiac function in pigs PNAS, July 17, 2007; 104(29): 12140 - 12145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Stamatovic, R. F. Keep, M. Mostarica-Stojkovic, and A. V. Andjelkovic CCL2 Regulates Angiogenesis via Activation of Ets-1 Transcription Factor J. Immunol., August 15, 2006; 177(4): 2651 - 2661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. U. Lee, J. J. Wykrzykowska, and R. J. Laham Angiogenesis: Bench to Bedside, Have We Learned Anything? Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2006; 34(1): 3 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sirivella, I. Gielchinsky, and V. Parsonnet Results of Coronary Artery Endarterectomy and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1738 - 1744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tsutsumi and D. W. Losordo Double Face of VEGF Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9): 1248 - 1250. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tiruvoipati, M. Loubani, M. Lencioni, S. Ghosh, P. W. Jones, and R. L. Patel Coronary Endarterectomy: Impact on Morbidity and Mortality When Combined With Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 1999 - 2003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J Teng, K. Lachapelle, and R. C. Chiu Reappraisal of Recent Clinical Trials of Angiogenic Therapy in Myocardial Ischemia Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2005; 13(1): 90 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Byrne, A. N. Karavas, T. Gudbjartson, M. Leacche, J. D. Rawn, G. S. Couper, R. J. Rizzo, L. H. Cohn, and S. F. Aranki Left anterior descending coronary endarterectomy: Early and late results in 196 consecutive patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 78(3): 867 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Losordo and S. Dimmeler Therapeutic Angiogenesis and Vasculogenesis for Ischemic Disease: Part I: Angiogenic Cytokines Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2487 - 2491. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.H. Tayebjee, G.Y.H. Lip, and R.J. MacFadyen Collateralization and the response to obstruction of epicardial coronary arteries QJM, May 1, 2004; 97(5): 259 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-S. Jiang, W. Srisakuldee, F. Soulet, G. Bouche, and E. Kardami Non-angiogenic FGF-2 protects the ischemic heart from injury, in the presence or absence of reperfusion Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2004; 62(1): 154 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sakakibara, K. Tambara, G. Sakaguchi, F. Lu, M. Yamamoto, K. Nishimura, Y. Tabata, and M. Komeda Toward surgical angiogenesis using slow-released basic fibroblast growth factor Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 24(1): 105 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Hughes, M. J. Post, M. Simons, and B. H. Annex Translational Physiology: Porcine models of human coronary artery disease: implications for preclinical trials of therapeutic angiogenesis J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2003; 94(5): 1689 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nishida, T.-S. Li, K. Hirata, M. Yano, M. Matsuzaki, and K. Hamano Improvement of cardiac function by bone marrow cell implantation in a rat hypoperfusion heart model Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 768 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Zakine, E. Martinod, P. Fornes, M. Sapoval, D. Barritault, A. F. Carpentier, and J. C. Chachques Growth factors improve latissimus dorsi muscle vascularization and trophicity after cardiomyoplasty Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 549 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W. Sellke and M. Ruel Vascular growth factors and angiogenesis in cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): S685 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ruel, R. A. Kelly, and F. W. Sellke Therapeutic Angiogenesis, Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization, and Cell Therapy Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 715 - 750. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Detillieux, F. Sheikh, E. Kardami, and P. A. Cattini Biological activities of fibroblast growth factor-2 in the adult myocardium Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2003; 57(1): 8 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ruel, R. J. Laham, J. A. Parker, M. J. Post, J. A. Ware, M. Simons, and F. W. Sellke Long-term effects of surgical angiogenic therapy with fibroblast growth factor 2 protein J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2002; 124(1): 28 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Hughes, S. S. Biswas, B. Yin, D. V. Baklanov, B. H. Annex, R. E. Coleman, T. R. DeGrado, C. K. Landolfo, K. P. Landolfo, and J. E. Lowe A comparison of mechanical and laser transmyocardial revascularization for induction of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in chronically ischemic myocardium J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2002; 39(7): 1220 - 1228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hamano, T.-S. Li, T. Kobayashi, K. Hirata, M. Yano, M. Kohno, and M. Matsuzaki Therapeutic angiogenesis induced by local autologous bone marrow cell implantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 73(4): 1210 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Freedman and J. M. Isner Therapeutic Angiogenesis for Coronary Artery Disease Ann Intern Med, January 1, 2002; 136(1): 54 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Seiler, T. Pohl, K. Wustmann, D. Hutter, P.-A. Nicolet, S. Windecker, F. R. Eberli, and B. Meier Promotion of Collateral Growth by Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Circulation, October 23, 2001; 104(17): 2012 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Azrin Angiogenesis, protein and gene delivery Br. Med. Bull., October 1, 2001; 59(1): 211 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Tabibiazar and S.G Rockson Angiogenesis and the ischaemic heart Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2001; 22(11): 903 - 918. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.M. Siafakas, M. Jordan, H. Wagner, E.C. Breen, H. Benoit, and P.D. Wagner Diaphragmatic angiogenic growth factor mRNA responses to increased ventilation caused by hypoxia and hypercapnia Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 681 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Epstein, S. Fuchs, Y. F. Zhou, R. Baffour, and R. Kornowski Therapeutic interventions for enhancing collateral development by administration of growth factors: basic principles, early results and potential hazards Cardiovasc Res, February 16, 2001; 49(3): 532 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Kiesz, P. Buszman, J. L. Martin, E. Deutsch, M. M. Rozek, E. Gaszewska, M. Rewicki, P. Seweryniak, M. Kosmider, and M. Tendera Local Delivery of Enoxaparin to Decrease Restenosis After Stenting: Results of Initial Multicenter Trial : Polish-American Local Lovenox NIR Assessment Study (The POLONIA Study) Circulation, January 2, 2001; 103(1): 26 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Pantely and J. M. Porter Therapeutic angiogenesis: time for the next phase J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1245 - 1247. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Miraliakbari, N. A. Francalancia, R. M. Lust, J. A. Gerardo, P. C. Ng, Y. S. Sun, and W. R. Chitwood Jr Differences in myocardial and peripheral VEGF and KDR levels after acute ischemia Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 69(6): 1750 - 1754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kawasuji, H. Nagamine, M. Ikeda, N. Sakakibara, H. Takemura, S. Fujii, and Y. Watanabe Therapeutic angiogenesis with intramyocardial administration of basic fibroblast growth factor Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2000; 69(4): 1155 - 1161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Kerbel Tumor angiogenesis: past, present and the near future Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2000; 21(3): 505 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Stefanec Endothelial Apoptosis: Could It Have a Role in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Disease? Chest, March 1, 2000; 117(3): 841 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fujita Heparin and angiogenic therapy Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2000; 21(4): 270 - 274. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Laham, F. W. Sellke, E. R. Edelman, J. D. Pearlman, J. A. Ware, D. L. Brown, J. P. Gold, and M. Simons Local Perivascular Delivery of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Patients Undergoing Coronary Bypass Surgery : Results of a Phase I Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Circulation, November 2, 1999; 100(18): 1865 - 1871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Sundt III, C. J. Camillo, E. N. Mendeloff, H. B. Barner, and W. A. Gay Jr Reappraisal of coronary endarterectomy for the treatment of diffuse coronary artery disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 68(4): 1272 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Symes, D. W. Losordo, P. R. Vale, K. G. Lathi, D. D. Esakof, M. Mayskiy, and J. M. Isner Gene therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor for inoperable coronary artery disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 68(3): 830 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R Kersten, P. S Pagel, W. M Chilian, and D. C Warltier Multifactorial basis for coronary collateralization: a complex adaptive response to ischemia Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 1999; 43(1): 44 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D Henry Science, medicine, and the future: Therapeutic angiogenesis BMJ, June 5, 1999; 318(7197): 1536 - 1539. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Metais, J. Li, J. Li, M. Simons, and F. W. Sellke Effects of coronary artery disease on expression and microvascular response to VEGF Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 1998; 275(4): H1411 - H1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |