|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1194-1195
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave N, Rm S3-751, Worcester, MA 01655-0304, USA
To the Editor
I am pleased that Dr Satta and his colleagues have used a procedure nearly identical to the one I described [1]. They have used the technique for more years than have we, and it is gratifying that they too have had good results with it.
They contend that the use of a coated Dacron graft has advantages over the polytetrafluoroethylene graft we used; they may be correct. I agree that needle hole bleeding from the polytetrafluoroethylene graft can be a vexing nuisance during full heparinization. We have dealt with that problem in one of two ways. We often perform the polytetrafluoroethylene graft-to-femoral artery anastomosis after giving only 5,000 units of heparin, and give a full heparin dose before instituting cardiopulmonary bypass. We have seen no troublesome or continuing needle hole bleeding with this staged heparin administration.
When our initial heparin dose is sufficient for cardiopulmonary bypass, we manage continuing needle hole blood loss by carrying the shed blood back to the venous reservoir through an extra cardiotomy suction line lying adjacent to the femoral anastomosis, while using towel clips to close the skin over the femoral cannula and suction line, thus creating a small reservoir.
The excellent and infection-free result Satta and colleagues have achieved suggests that a Dacron graft may be preferable to a polytetrafluoroethylene graft. Their cannula-in-a-sleeve technique is ingenious, and one we will adopt when confronted with the need for emergency cannulation.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |