|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:144-148
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Cardiac Transplantation Research Laboratory, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
Accepted for publication July 15, 1997.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. Heart allografts from Lewis rats were heterotopically transplanted into the infrarenal abdominal aorta of ACI recipients. The treatment groups consisted of different regimens of short-term intravenous Allotrap 07 and oral cyclosporin A. All grafts were palpated daily, with rejection defined as the cessation of palpable contractions.
Results. Cardiac allografts transplanted from Lewis to ACI rats survived indefinitely after administration of intravenous Allotrap 07 and oral cyclosporin A. Tolerance induction was donor-specific because third-party Brown-Norway, but not Lewis, grafts were rapidly rejected after implantation into ACI recipients.
Conclusions. Because donor-specific tolerance persisted long after cessation of peptide administration and did not occur when cyclosporin A was omitted from the immunosuppressive regimen, the mechanism may involve induction of clonal anergy.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One promising therapeutic strategy has been the development of synthetic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) peptides. Synthetic peptides corresponding to polymorphic regions of the alpha 1 and alpha 2 domains of certain MHC class I molecules have been shown to block lysis by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) specific for the MHC molecule from which the peptide was derived [5][6][7]. Residues 75-84 of the alpha 1 chain constitute a less polymorphic and more conserved region of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I molecule. Only ten variations have been found in more than 85 HLA-A, -B, and -C sequences determined to date [8]. Synthetic peptides corresponding to residues 75-84 of human HLA-B7 and HLA-B27 have been shown to block differentiation of CTL presursors [9]. These peptides have been marketed for research under the commercial name of Allotrap 07 and Allotrap 2702 (derived from residues 75-84 of the alpha 1 domain of human HLA-B7 and -B27, respectively). This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of Allotrap 07 (Allotrap) on rodent heart allograft survival.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Organ Transplantation
Heart allografts from Lewis rats were heterotopically transplanted into the infrarenal abdominal aorta of ACI recipients using a modification of the technique described by Ono and Lindsey [10]. All grafts were palpated daily, with rejection defined as the cessation of palpable contractions. Rejection was confirmed by palpation under anesthesia and at celiotomy.
Immunosuppressive Regimen
Cyclosporin A (Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp, Basel, Switzerland) was administered orally through a gavage tube at a dose of 10 mg · kg-1 · day-1 on days 0 to 4 according to the prescribed schedule listed below. Allotrap 07 (a gift of Sangstat Corporation, Menlo Park, CA) was dissolved in sterile normal saline solution to achieve a concentration of 40 mg/mL and given at a dose of 40 mg · kg-1 · day-1 according to the prescribed schedule listed below.
Experimental Protocol
Animals were divided into the following groups:
Statistical Analysis
Allograft survival is reported both as a mean ± standard error of the mean (days) and median (days). The data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis one-way nonparametric analysis of variance. Pairwise comparisons were performed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Statistical significance was attributed to a p value of less than 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Induction of Donor-Specific Tolerance
A second heart transplant procedure was performed on 6 animals that had retained their original grafts for more than 200 days. No further immunosuppression was administered after the second heart transplantation, and the original Lewis graft was left in place. Second-party Lewis allografts (n = 3) survived more than 100 days whereas third-party Brown-Norway allografts (n = 3) were rejected by day 12 (Table 2).
The rejection of the third-party Brown-Norway allograft did not affect the function of the original Lewis allograft.
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In addition to inhibiting NK cell functions, structures encoded by polymorphic residues within the alpha-1 helical region of the MHC class I molecule also inhibit T-cell receptor (TCR)-induced functions of T lymphocytes. The Bw6 epitope of HLA-B molecules, as well as certain structures in HLA-C molecules, inhibit TCR-mediated target cell lysis or cytokine production [17] by binding to their respective ligands on T-cells, whereas the Bw4 epitope has been shown to inhibit T lymphocyte cytotoxicity directed against targets expressing superantigens [18]. In this regard, Cuturi and associates [11] demonstrated that lymphocytes obtained from the allografts of LEW-1A rats treated with peptide 75-84 from HLA-B7 had significantly lower levels of cytotoxic activity directed to both NK targets and alloantigens. Moreover, there was a significant reduction in the number of allograft-infiltrative T-cells bearing alpha-beta TCR after treatment with the HLA-B7derived peptide [11]. Because HLA-B7 contains the Bw6 epitope, this suggests that the effects of the B7-derived peptide may have been mediated by direct interactions with CD94 receptors expressed on both NK cells and T lymphocytes.
Major histocompatibility complex class I molecules bind peptides in an allele-specific manner, with selectivity being conferred by polymorphic residues within the peptide-binding groove. Residues 77, 80, and 81 within the Bw4/Bw6 region face into the peptide-binding groove and are predicted to interact directly with bound peptides. In addition, residues 75, 79, and 83 are at the surface of the alpha-helix, and are predicted to interact directly with TCR variable region structures. Substitutions at these residues, particularly in conjunction with those at peptide-binding sites, would be expected to have profound effects on TCR recognition of the MHC+ peptide complex. At residues 75, 79, and 83, the B7-derived peptide contains arg, arg, gly, in common with the RT1a allele present in LEW.1A and ACI rats, whereas the B27-derived peptides (-02 and -05) contain arg, arg, arg, making the latter significantly more positively charged. At positions 77, 80, and 81, however, RT1a differs significantly from HLA-B7, having the same residues as HLA-B27-05, namely asp, thr, leu, which in part encode the Bw4 specificity. Because neither peptide 75-84 derived from HLA-B27-05 [11] nor peptide 75-84 derived from the RT1a molecule itself (C. Cuturi, personal communication) prolonged allograft survival in RT1a recipients, the tolerogenic effect mediated by the HLA-B7 peptide is likely to depend primarily on critical residues that interact directly with both TCR structures present in ACI recipients and CD94 receptors expressed by the alloreactive T-cells.
The role of MHC molecules in modifying alloimmune responses has been supported by both clinical and experimental observations, and this effect appears to be dependent on coadministration of CsA or other immunosuppressive agents. In human studies, multiple blood transfusions have been shown to prolong survival after renal transplantation [19]. In a rat allograft model, whole blood transfusions, as well as extracted donor antigen administration before transplantation, were able to prolong the survival of a subsequent renal transplant only when used in conjunction with CsA [20]. Moreover, Foster and colleagues [21] showed that whereas membrane-bound class I MHC molecules could induce donor-specific unresponsiveness to subsequent rat renal allografts, water-soluble class I MHC molecules could only induce tolerance when combined with subtherapeutic doses of CsA. Similarly, Goto and coworkers [22] showed that prolonged rat cardiac allograft survival could only be achieved by concurrent administration of KCl-extracted soluble donor antigen and CsA immunosuppression.
In our studies, use of the B7-derived peptide alone did not prolong allograft survival. In contrast, treatment with the same peptide in conjunction with CsA resulted in indefinite graft survival. These results are consistent with recent observations in vitro demonstrating that partial activation of TCR by peptides with alterations in TCR contact residues, and that cannot induce clonal proliferation or cytokine production, leads to profound T-cell unresponsiveness on subsequent stimulation with the original immunogenic peptide [23]. In our model, concomitant binding of the peptide to the TCR and to CD94 would send a stimulatory signal to the T-cell, whereas simultaneous treatment with CsA would prevent interleukin-2 production and clonal expansion. The outcome would be anergy to all antigens presented by self-MHC at the time of treatment, including alloantigens. The specificity of this response would be constrained to antigens present at the time, and would not include antigens presented by self-MHC after cessation of treatment. This explains the rapid rejection we observed when a third-party Brown-Norway graft was implanted into RT1a recipients containing Lewis hearts, long after cessation of the treatment protocol.
In the study by Nisco and associates [12], alloantigen-specific anergy induced by treatment with the B7-derived peptide was accompanied by a decreased frequency of allospecific CTL precursors. Zavazava and colleagues [24], however, reported that treatment with soluble HLA class I molecules could not inhibit alloreactive CTL during the first 5 days of allostimulation, a period when the CTL response is mostly polyclonal. Moreover, Parham and coworkers [25] showed that HLA-derived peptides are unable to inhibit polyclonal CTL directed against the HLA molecules from which the peptide is derived. These observations suggest that during the first 5 days of an alloimmune response, the polyclonal T-cell response may overcome the immunosuppressive effects of MHC class I-derived peptides. This may explain why a short course of Allotrap 07 after transplantation failed to induce tolerance in our study, whereas treatment until day 12 was successful. Therefore, the optimal effect of soluble MHC class I-derived peptides on tolerance to the allograft and prolonged survival is likely to require peptide administration for more than 6 to 10 days after transplantation.
In contrast to intravenous administration of the peptide, which resulted in tolerance induction in 7 of 8 ACI recipients, intraperitoneal delivery was only associated with induction of tolerance in 3 of 8 recipients. This may reflect differences in peptide kinetics when administered by intravenous and intraperitoneal routes. Intraperitoneal administration of Allotrap is likely to be associated with slower absorption and lower initial blood levels than intravenous administration, thus potentially decreasing the efficacy of the peptide during initial allograft exposure. Additionally, intraperitoneal administration may be associated with a half-life of circulating Allotrap peptide that is significantly longer than the 2 to 3 minutes after intravenous administration. More prolonged exposure to circulating Allotrap could result in loss of the tolerogenic properties of the peptide, with some T-cell clones being activated, rather than inhibited, after prolonged TCR ligation. In support of such a mechanism, Faugmann and associates [26] have shown that synthetic peptides corresponding to residues 57-80 of the RT1a molecules were immunogenic rather than tolerogenic when administered in complete Freunds adjuvant. In future studies we anticipate further evaluation of the dynamics of T-cellMHC interactions and the pharmacokinetics of the HLA-derived peptides. More interestingly, the success of human class I-derived peptide in rodent allotransplantation encourages the possibility of developing a single agent for tolerance induction in human transplantation.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kishimoto, X. Yuan, H. Auchincloss Jr., A. H. Sharpe, D. A. Mandelbrot, and M. H. Sayegh Mechanism of Action of Donor-Specific Transfusion in Inducing Tolerance: Role of Donor MHC Molecules, Donor Co-stimulatory Molecules, and Indirect Antigen Presentation J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2004; 15(9): 2423 - 2428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Ng, M. Hernandez-Fuentes, R. Baker, A. Chaudhry, and R. I. Lechler Reversibility with Interleukin-2 Suggests that T Cell Anergy Contributes to Donor-Specific Hyporesponsiveness in Renal Transplant Patients J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2002; 13(12): 2983 - 2989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. MAGEE, H. AZUMA, A. KNOFLACH, M. D. DENTON, A. CHANDRAKER, S. IYER, R. BUELOW, and M. SAYEGH In Vitro and in Vivo Immunomodulatory Effects of RDP1258, a Novel Synthetic Peptide J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 1999; 10(9): 1997 - 2005. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |