|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1183-1185
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Cardiac Surgical Research Center and Section of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
Accepted for publication April 14, 1997.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although greater saphenous vein harvesting is customarily performed through an extended medial lower extremity incision, alternative approaches have previously been reported [4, 5]. Here we describe a method to allow vein dissection under endoscopic assistance.
| Technique |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The 5-mm lens is placed in the subcutaneous dissector, the light source is connected, and the camera is calibrated to white. We prefer to first dissect the thigh portion of the vein. The subcutaneous retractor is inserted in the incision and the vein is identified on the television monitor. The dissector is advanced along the proximal course of the saphenous vein and a subcutaneous tunnel is subsequently fashioned. A slight upward pressure is exerted on the dissector during advancement. Acceptable technique will be viewed on the television monitor as the vein "passes" under the lens, analogous to the appearance of the road as one is driving along the highway. If this passage of the vein is not noted, the vein is being stretched as the dissector is advanced, potentially damaging the conduit.
Side-branches of the saphenous vein are identified as the dissector is advanced. Of particular note, the vein will roll from one side of the television screen to the other during dissection. This occurs at points of fixation; either an anterior or an anterolateral branch has been encountered. We find it useful to ligate and divide these anterior branches as they are encountered to prevent inadvertent avulsion. The ligation of these branches is slightly different than that of lateral branches. As the cone of the dissector approaches the anteriorly oriented branches, there is a tendency of the equipment to pull the branch over the cone. Therefore, counterintuitively, one must pull the dissector away from the branch, applying upward pressure on the dissector handle. In this manner, the anterior branch "hangs" within the endoscopic field, allowing ligation and division.
After the dissector has been advanced to the saphenofemoral junction, it is withdrawn and replaced with the subcutaneous retractor. Our customary practice is to advance the retractor to the limits of the groin and then insert the vein stripper. Gentle circumferential dissection with the stripper will identify lateral branches. These are clipped endoscopically (Fig 2
). An endoscopic scissors is passed and the branch is transected so the clip is retained in the body; the saphenous portion of the branch will venospasm and no bleeding will be noted (see Fig 2
).
|
In the initial learning curve of this technique, we would recommend a 1- to 2-cm groin counterincision, aided with transillumination by the subcutaneous retractor, to ligate the proximal vein under direct vision. Alternatively, one can endoscopically ligate the vein with either clips or an Endo-loop (Ethicon). Certainly, with advancement of instrumentation, a counterincision can be avoided in the majority of patients. We have not needed a counterincision in the calf for vein ligation.
Once the vein has been removed, the vein is cannulated and the branches ligated with 3-0 silk sutures as Plasmalyte is injected. Although this represents an additional step in comparison with the traditional open technique of harvesting, we have found it to require no greater time commitment than the skin closure would require in an extended median incision. Our initial experience has rapidly progressed to a consistent total harvest time of 45 minutes.
The leg is wrapped with Kerlex until completion of the bypass procedure. After reversal of heparin anticoagulation, the small leg incision(s) is closed in layers with absorbable suture and the leg is tightly wrapped with supportive ACE bandages. The leg wrap is left in place for 24 hours and removed once the patient has begun ambulation.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because the reported incidence of serious adverse reactions to saphenous vein harvesting is roughly 1% to 5%, especially in patients with numerous comorbidities, our early experience only begins to define the complication rate with this procedure. Intuitively, fewer or smaller incisions in patients would appear to reduce many of the current complications. We have noted only mild ecchymosis in patients on preoperative anticoagulation, but the painless nature of this condition has been well accepted by the patients. In conclusion, although the widespread application of minimally invasive techniques to cardiac surgery requires skeptical optimism, the minimal pain associated with endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting will likely prompt patient request in the near future.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Athanasiou, O. Aziz, S. Al-Ruzzeh, P. Philippidis, C. Jones, S. Purkayastha, R. Casula, and B. Glenville Are wound healing disturbances and length of hospital stay reduced with minimally invasive vein harvest? A meta-analysis Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, November 1, 2004; 26(5): 1015 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Black, R. N. Karen Campbell, K. M. Channon, C. Ratnatunga, and R. Pillai Minimally invasive vein harvesting significantly reduces pain and wound morbidity Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, September 1, 2002; 22(3): 381 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kiaii, B. C. Moon, D. Massel, Y. Langlois, T. W. Austin, A. Willoughby, C. Guiraudon, C. R. Howard, and L. R. Guo A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2002; 123(2): 204 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Dusterhoft, M. Bauer, S. Buz, B. Schaumann, and R. Hetzer Wound-healing disturbances after vein harvesting for CABG: a randomized trial to compare the minimally invasive direct vision and traditional approaches Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2038 - 2043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Black, T. J. Guzik, N. E. J. West, K. Campbell, R. Pillai, C. Ratnatunga, and K. M. Channon Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: effects on endothelial and smooth muscle function Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71(5): 1503 - 1507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J.R. Dalrymple-Hay, A. Alzetani, R. Costa, and S. K. Ohri Endoscopic vein harvesting with the aid of carbon dioxide insufflation Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 739 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Fabricius, A. Oser, A. Diegeler, T. Rauch, and F. W. Mohr Endothelial function of human vena saphena magna prepared with different minimally invasive harvesting techniques Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, October 1, 2000; 18(4): 400 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Fabricius, A. Diegeler, N. Doll, H. Weidenbach, and F. W. Mohr Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting techniques: morphology and postoperative outcome Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 473 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Griffith, K. B. Allen, B. F. Waller, D. A. Heimansohn, R. J. Robison, J. J. Schier, and C. J. Shaar Endoscopic and traditional saphenous vein harvest: a histologic comparison Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 520 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Carpino, K. R. Khabbaz, R. M. Bojar, H. Rastegar, K. G. Warner, R. E. Murphy, and D. D. Payne CLINICAL BENEFITS OF ENDOSCOPIC VEIN HARVESTING IN PATIENTS WITH RISK FACTORS FOR SAPHENECTOMY WOUND INFECTIONS UNDERGOING CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2000; 119(1): 69 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. Newman and W. G. Lammle Minimally invasive vein harvest: new techniques with old tools Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1999; 67(2): 571 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Tran, H. S. Paterson, W. Meldrum-Hanna, and R. B. Chard Tunnelling versus open harvest technique in obtaining venous conduits for coronary bypass surgery Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, December 1, 1998; 14(6): 602 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Cable, J. A. Dearani, E. A. Pfeifer, R. C. Daly, and H. V. Schaff Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: endothelial integrity and early clinical results Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1998; 66(1): 139 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Folliguet, E. Le Bret, A. Moneta, S. Musumeci, and F. Laborde Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting versus 'open' technique. A prospective study Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, June 1, 1998; 13(6): 662 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |