|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1156-1158
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Divisions of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
Accepted for publication April 24, 1997.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 51-year-old man was referred to this institution for cardiac transplant evaluation 3 days after acute inferior wall myocardial infarction and hypotension necessitating placement of an intraaortic balloon pump. The patient's medical and surgical history included coronary artery disease with coronary artery bypass grafting 11 years earlier and ICD implantation (CPI Ventak model 1550 pulse generator, CPI model L67 large left ventricular patch electrode, and CPI model A67 small right ventricular patch electrode; CPI [currently Guidant, Inc], St. Paul, MN; and two Cordis model 325-452 rate-sensing electrodes; Cordis, Miami, FL) via left anterolateral thoracotomy 5 years earlier, with ICD replacement 2 years earlier (Medtronic Model 7217; Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN).
Physical examination on admission showed a sedated, intubated man, with a femoral intraaortic balloon pump set at a counterpulsation rate of 1:1. His systolic blood pressure was 100 mm Hg, the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 14 mm Hg, and the cardiac index was 2.2 L min-1 m-2. He had atrial flutter with 4:1 block, a murmur of mitral regurgitation, and a third heart sound. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable with the exception of a well-healed sternotomy and thoracotomy scars and an ICD generator positioned in the left upper abdominal quadrant. Medications included dobutamine, heparin, nitroglycerin, and lidocaine infusions.
Cardiac catheterization, undertaken 1 day before transfer, showed a patent internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending artery, occlusion of all saphenous vein grafts, an 80% ostial left main coronary artery stenosis, and diffusely diseased native arteries unsuitable for regrafting. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.15. Intravenous administration of amiodarone was initiated for multiple sustained episodes of ventricular tachycardia that were terminated by ICD shocks.
The patient's pre-VAD hospital course was marked by bacteremia, bilateral lower lobe pneumonia, intraaortic balloon pump and ventilator dependence, and recurrent episodes of slow ventricular tachycardia (100 to 110 beats/min). Seventeen days after his myocardial infarction, a left VAD (HeartMate IP left VAD; Thermo Cardiosystems Inc, Woburn, MA) was implanted.
Immediately before left VAD insertion, the ICD was deactivated. The ICD defibrillation electrodes had been placed on the pleural aspect of the pericardium overlying the midportions of the left and right ventricles, and the sensing electrodes had been positioned between the ICD patch electrodes so that they lay over the left ventricle. The ICD patch and sensing electrodes were displaced during the procedure when the epicardium was dissected away from the pericardium. The pericardium with its attached defibrillation and sensing electrodes was repositioned over the ventricles after the VAD was in place (Fig 1
).
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This patient had two documented ICD discharges that converted sustained ventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm. Left VAD pumping function was not altered by the ICD shocks. Furthermore, the VAD did not cause electrical artifacts in the sensing circuits of the ICD, there were no inappropriate ICD discharges, and the bradycardia pacing function of the ICD (VVI mode pacing at 60 beats/min) performed properly. After 54 days of circulatory support, the patient successfully received a transplant and the ICD was removed.
Additional observations are required to confirm the ability of other VAD designs to coexist with various ICD configurations, particularly newer ones that use transvenous pacing, sensing, and defibrillation electrodes. Implantable cardioverter/defibrillators can provide a useful function in patients with VADs, particularly in those patients who are supported in an outpatient setting. Placement of an ICD should be considered for patients supported by a VAD who experience sustained ventricular arrhythmias despite pharmacologic and ablative therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We thank Victor L. Poirier, President and CEO of Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc, for his helpful comments on this article.
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Bakhtiary, P. Therapidis, M. Scherer, O. Dzemali, A. Moritz, and P. Kleine Electromagnetic interaction between an axial left ventricular assist device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1380 - 1381. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Duru, R Candinas, M Lachat, M Rahn, G Noll, T.F Luscher, and M Turina Electrical and mechanical support in advanced heart failure. Rationale and feasibility of a combined management strategy Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2002; 23(13): 1005 - 1010. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Swartz, G. A. Lowdermilk, and L. R. McBride REFRACTORY VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA AS AN INDICATION FOR VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE SUPPORT J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1999; 118(6): 1119 - 1120. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Kulick, R. M. Bolman III, C. T. Salerno, A. J. Bank, and S. J. Park Management of recurrent ventricular tachycardia with ventricular assist device placement Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1998; 66(2): 571 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |