|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:880-881
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
As Originally Published in 1992:
Updated in 1997 by Mikio Ohmi, MD, Kazuhiro Yamaya, MD, Yoshimi Shoji, MD, and Koichi Tabayashi, MD
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
Although numerous techniques for permanent pacemaker implantation in the pediatric population have been reported in many centers, few reports have been published on permanent pacemaker implantation for premature infants with congenital heart block. We reported a technique of permanent pacemaker implantation in 2 premature infants less than 2,000 g of body weight [1]. Since then we have employed the same technique in 1 additional patient and performed generator exchange for battery exhaustion in 1 patient 4 years 6 months after the primary pacemaker implantation. All 3 patients have been observed at our outpatient clinic and are doing well.
Generator placement for small infants is difficult because of discrepancies in size between the patients and the pacemaker hardware. Subcutaneous implantation is common for adults and larger children because of the simplicity of implanting and replacing the generator; however, the scanty subcutaneous fat, thin skin, and exposed position of the generator stretching the skin over the generator invite skin necrosis and infection in small infants. Retroperitoneal, intrapelvic, and intrapleural generator placements provide the possibility of generator migration and interference with major organs contained therein and result in technical problems when the generator requires exchange. Subrectal [2, 3] and preperitoneal placement [4] or preperitoneal placement with suspension by the anterior rectus fascia [5] might be acceptable for infants and children; however, the subrectal space in the rectal sheath is too small and the peritoneum is too thin and fragile to create a relatively large generator pocket for premature infants.
Our technique of intraperitoneal generator placement using a Gore-Tex surgical membrane (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ) pocket fixed to the abdominal wall in the peritoneal cavity provides maximal space to implant the generator and reliable fixation to prevent generator migration (Fig 1A
). In our second patient, the generator could be exchanged easily without opening of the free peritoneal cavity because the generator was in the pocket and attached to the peritoneum. At that time a new generator pocket was created in the intermuscular space between the internal and external oblique muscles (Fig 1B
).
|
Footnotes
Address reprint requests to Dr Ohmi, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, 980-77, Japan.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |