ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mikhail Vaynblat
Zvi Zisbrod
Joseph N. Cunningham, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaynblat, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaynblat, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, J. N., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:81-85
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Cardiac Binding in Experimental Heart Failure

Mikhail Vaynblat, MD, Mario Chiavarelli, MD, PhD, Himansu R. Shah, MD, Geeta Ramdev, MD, Michelle Aron, RDCS, Zvi Zisbrod, MD, Joseph N. Cunningham, Jr, MD

Divisions of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiology, State University of New York-Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York

Accepted for publication January 10, 1997.


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. Cardiomyoplasty is a potential therapy for heart failure. Its benefits are attributed to systolic augmentation (dynamic cardiomyoplasty) and prevention of cardiac dilatation (static cardiomyoplasty). To evaluate the static component, we used an artificial membrane for cardiac binding in a canine model of heart failure.

Methods. Intracoronary doxorubicin was administered weekly for 4 weeks to induce heart failure in 10 dogs, each of which was assigned to one of two treatment groups: (1) no treatment, or (2) cardiac binding. Hemodynamic data were obtained at operation and at 7 weeks after operation. Echocardiography was performed weekly.

Results. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and diameter, and right ventricular end-diastolic diameter increased in group 1 (from 9.6 ± 6.1 to 19.6 ± 2.3 mm Hg, p = 0.009; from 3.9 ± 0.4 to 5 ± 0.3 cm, p = 0.0013; and from 1.6 ± 0.2 to 1.9 ± 0.3 cm, p = 0.0036, respectively). Ejection fraction fell in group 1 from 0.60 ± 0.10 to 0.40 ± 0.04 (p = 0.0009) and in group 2 from 0.56 ± 0.02 to 0.40 ± 0.04 (p = 0.0001), but the difference between groups was not significant.

Conclusion. Cardiac binding reduces the ventricular dilatation associated with heart failure without exacerbating left ventricular dysfunction.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
See also page 85.

Dynamic cardiomyoplasty is not an established treatment modality for chronic heart failure despite its clinical introduction almost a decade ago [1]. Various studies have been performed to investigate its mechanisms of action [24]. Its beneficial effects have been attributed to two mechanisms: (1) systolic augmentation from the stimulated muscle wrap (dynamic component), and (2) limitation of progressive cardiac dilatation (static component). Improvement in patient functional status and survival have been reported [5, 6]. However, objective evidence of enhanced ventricular performance has not been produced consistently.

The constraining or girdling effect of the muscle wrap has received attention recently. Few studies have shown that cardiomyoplasty increases contractility while unloading the ventricle through a reduction of end-diastolic volume [7, 8]. This mechanism may be a major benefit after cardiomyoplasty. The muscle wrap is not stimulated in currently used transformation protocols for at least 2 weeks after cardiomyoplasty (the "vascular delay" period). Several weeks then are necessary to train the muscle and obtain the full advantage of an effective transformation. During this period, further deterioration may occur as a consequence of the additional burden provided by the thick, heavy latissimus dorsi muscle that is wrapped around the heart and is not contributing any significant contractile work.

We used a canine model of chronic heart failure caused by multidose intracoronary infusions of doxorubicin to test the potential benefit of wrapping the heart with a thin synthetic membrane in the hope of attenuating cardiac dilatation and preserving ventricular function [9].


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Ten adult male mongrel dogs weighing 20 to 34 kg (mean, 27.4 ± 3.5 kg) were randomly assigned to two groups: untreated heart failure (group 1), or heart failure treated by cardiac binding (group 2) with a Gore-Tex surgical membrane (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, 0.1 mm; W.L. Gore & Associates Inc, Flagstaff, AZ). All animals received humane care in accordance with the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals," National Institutes of Health publication 86-23, revised 1985. The animals were premedicated with acepromazine maleate (Aveco Co, Inc, Fort Dodge Laboratories, Inc, Fort Dodge, IA) and were anesthetized with an intravenous injection of 15 mg/kg of sodium thiopental (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL). Anesthesia was maintained after endotracheal intubation with oxygen and halothane (0.5% to 1%).

The animals were positioned in the supine position and a bilateral anterior thoracotomy was made through the fifth intercostal space (a "clamshell" incision). A percutaneous vascular access port (model GPV; Access Technologies, Skokie, IL) was positioned in the subcutaneous tissue in the posterior aspect of the incision. The pericardium was opened and the heart was suspended in a cradle. After the coronary vasculature was examined, the first or second diagonal branch was identified and mobilized. A 4F catheter was introduced into it retrogradely until the tip was in the left main coronary artery. The catheter immediately was flushed with 1 mL of heparin (1,000 U/mL) and then secured to the epicardium with several sutures. The incision was closed and postoperative pain was controlled with intramuscular butorphanol tartrate (0.4 mg/kg; Aveco Co, Inc, Fort Dodge Laboratories, Inc).

In group 2 animals, cardiac wrapping was performed after placement of the intracoronary catheter. A surgical membrane was shaped and sized according to the animal's heart. The heart was lifted gently and the membrane was wrapped around both ventricles and atria up to the pericardial reflection. The cephalad edges of the membrane were anchored to the pericardium to prevent slippage. The wrap was made tight enough to follow the contour of the heart without altering hemodynamic parameters, and the anterior edges were sutured with interrupted 3-0 silk sutures.

All animals received weekly infusions of doxorubicin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) for 4 weeks. Doxorubicin (10 mg) was diluted in 60 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution and infused (0.25 mg/kg) through the catheter at a rate of 1 mL/min. After each infusion and every other day, the catheter was flushed with 1 mL of heparin (1,000 U/mL). Doxorubicin administration was started 1 week after operation.


    Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Right and left cardiac catheterization was carried out before operation (baseline) and repeated at 7 weeks of follow-up. A Swan-Ganz catheter (Arrow International, Inc, Reading, PA) was inserted into the external jugular vein, and the right atrial, right ventricular, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were measured. Cardiac output was measured in triplicate using the thermodilution method (model 9520A; American Edwards Laboratories, Irvine, CA). Left ventricular pressure was obtained by insertion of a pigtail catheter (Cordis Corporation, Miami, FL) into a femoral or carotid artery. After instrumentation, arterial and mixed venous blood gas levels were obtained. Hemodynamic and oximetric parameters were calculated using standard formulas for cardiac and stroke volume indices, oxygen delivery and consumption, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance indices, left and right ventricular stroke work indices, and left ventricular minute work index.


    Echocardiography
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Two-dimensional echocardiographic studies were performed using a 1500 echocardiographic system (Hewlett-Packard, Andover, MA) with a 2.5-MHz transducer. All animals were anesthetized with intravenous sodium thiopental (10 mg/kg) and placed in the right lateral decubitus position. Long- and short-axis views were obtained at the apex, left sternal border, and subcostal margin. Three sets of repeated measurements were made in each echocardiographic view at baseline and then weekly for 7 weeks in both groups of animals. The mean value of the three repeated measurements then was used to describe the quantitative data for each dog at each of the seven data points. All images were analyzed by the same echocardiographer. The calculated parameters included left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and length, endocardial area and volume, right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic length, endocardial area and volume, and ejection fraction.


    Statistical Analysis
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Data were expressed as means plus or minus standard deviations, and were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance with multiple comparisons (Scheffé's procedure). A p value of 0.05 or less was considered to represent statistical significance.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Hemodynamic Parameters
No significant differences were observed in indices of systolic function (Table 1Go). Cardiac index fell from 4.2 ± 1.8 to 3.2 ± 1 L•min-1•m-2 in group 1 and from 4.7 ± 1.4 to 3.1 ± 0.6 L•min-1•m-2 in group 2; stroke volume index decreased from 43.6 ± 11.9 to 29.7 ± 11.9 mL•beat•m-2 in group 1 and from 45.22 ± 15.3 to 24.8 ± 6.6 mL•beat•m-2 in group 2; left ventricular stroke work index declined from 62.7 ± 16.1 to 40.9 ± 9 g•m/m2 in group 1 and from 63.2 ± 29.8 to 30 ± 12.1 g•m/m2 in group 2. Heart rate and mean systemic arterial pressure did not change significantly in either group. Left ventricular peak systolic pressure and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance indices increased comparably in both groups, but these changes did not reach statistical significance. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased significantly in group 1 (from 9.6 ± 6.1 to 19.6 ± 2.3 mm Hg; p = 0.009), but not in group 2 (Fig 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. . Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Parameters With and Without Cardiac Bindinga
 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . Experimental data from all animals comparing mean change in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in the control and cardiac binding groups at baseline (white bars) and at 7 weeks (black bars). Bars indicate standard deviation. The asterisk indicates p = 0.009 from baseline.

 

    Echocardiographic Parameters
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
A significant left ventricular dilatation was observed in the untreated group (Fig 2Go; see Table 1Go): left ventricular end-diastolic diameter increased from 3.9 ± 0.4 to 5.0 ± 0.3 cm (p = 0.0013). The change obtained in the cardiac binding group was not significant (from 3.9 ± 0.3 to 4.1 ± 0.4 cm). Similar results were achieved for right ventricular end-diastolic diameter; it increased significantly in group 1 (from 1.6 ± 0.2 to 1.9 ± 0.3 cm; p = 0.0036), but not in group 2 (from 1.6 ± 0.3 to 1.6 ± 0.3 cm; Fig 3Go). Left ventricular end-systolic volume increased by 83% in group 1 (from 20.9 ± 7.1 to 38.3 ± 6 mL) and by 43% in group 2 (from 23.5 ± 4.6 to 33.7 ± 5.9 mL), but the differences were not significant. The ejection fraction fell by 33% in group 1 (from 0.60 ± 0.10 to 0.40 ± 0.04; p = 0.0009) and by 29% in group 2 (from 0.56 ± 0.02 to 0.40 ± 0.04; p = 0.0001), but the difference between groups was not significant (Fig 4Go).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. . Time course of left ventricular dilatation with (squares) and without (circles) cardiac binding. Bars indicate standard deviation. The asterisk indicates p = 0.0013 from baseline.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. . Time course of right ventricular dilatation with (squares) and without (circles) cardiac binding. Bars indicate standard deviation. The asterisk indicates p = 0.0036 from baseline.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. . Time course of ejection fraction with (squares) and without (circles) cardiac binding. Bars indicate standard deviation.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Cardiomyoplasty is a method of providing biomechanical assistance to the failing myocardium [10, 11]. The improvement in ventricular performance with muscle stimulation, however, is controversial. Prevention of left ventricular dilatation is a potential benefit of cardiomyoplasty because it results in decreased wall stress and consequent improvement of myocardial oxygen balance. Cardiac dilatation and remodeling are important compensatory mechanisms of heart failure. Initially, they allow the diseased heart to achieve appropriate systolic pressures and flows at an increased diastolic pressure. However, progressive dilatation eventually becomes detrimental when the myocardial reserve is reduced.

Cardiomyoplasty improved left ventricular diastolic function in several studies. Increased contractility (end-systolic elastance) and decreased end-diastolic volume without an increase in cardiac output, ejection fraction, or stroke volume were described [7]. Jondeau and colleagues [12] could not document, by hemodynamic evaluation or exercise stress test variables, a benefit from muscle stimulation 6 months after cardiomyoplasty, and they suggested that prevention of cardiac dilatation is the main effect of the procedure. Stimulation of the wrap provided no objective benefit, and passive constraint by the wrap was considered to be the most important mechanism of cardiomyoplasty [8]. Preservation of cardiac function and reduced enlargement of the left ventricle after unstimulated muscle wrap were obtained in a model of chronic heart failure [13].

Progressive muscle damage and fibrosis after cardiomyoplasty was documented [14]. Structural muscle damage resulted from the combined effects of chronic electrical stimulation, muscle ischemia, and loss of resting tension [11].

A negative effect of muscle wrapping could appear in the early postoperative period. Application of the unstimulated muscle wrap to the failing heart decreased the ejection fraction from 0.34 to 0.18 in dogs [4]. The unstimulated muscle wrap significantly decreased cardiac output [3, 15]. These findings could account for the prohibitively high early morbidity and mortality after cardiomyoplasty in patients with New York Heart Association class IV disease [7, 11].

The idea of using an artificial cardiac constraint or girdle is appealing. This could avoid some of the negative aspects of cardiomyoplasty, such as the burden and inertia of the muscle, the fibrosis of the muscle flap, and the prolonged operative procedure in patients with heart failure. Cardiac binding, as designed in our study, does not appear to alter the progression of systolic deterioration in the course of heart failure. All the systolic function parameters were comparable in the untreated heart failure group and the cardiac binding group. The analysis of diastolic function showed significantly increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure associated with significant dilatation of both ventricles in the control group. Cardiac binding prevented biventricular dilatation and significantly attenuated the increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.

An obvious limitation of our study is the performance of cardiac binding before the development of heart failure. Further studies will define its role in established heart failure. Another limitation of our study is the use of echocardiography and hemodynamic evaluation to study changes in systolic and diastolic function, as is commonly done in clinical practice.

Our study did not demonstrate an improvement in cardiac function as evaluated by clinical hemodynamic measurements. Interestingly, cardiac binding did not appear to have deleterious effects on cardiac performance, which could be expected in an animal model of rapidly progressive heart failure. If further studies are unable to demonstrate a significant advantage of an appropriate muscle stimulation, and the efficacy of cardiomyoplasty is attributed largely to the "girdling effect," then a skeletal muscle wrap may not be necessary because an equivalent result could be achieved by wrapping the heart with an artificial membrane.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
This study was supported by The Foundation for Surgical Education and Investigation, Inc, State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn, and The Maimonides Research and Development Foundation.

We thank the Adria Laboratories of Columbus, OH, for graciously providing our laboratory with doxorubicin, and W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc of Flagstaff, AZ, for providing our laboratory with a generous supply of surgical membrane.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Address reprint requests to Dr Chiavarelli, State University of New York-Health Science Center at Brooklyn, 450 Clarkson Ave, Box 40, Brooklyn, NY 11203.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Cardiac Hemodynamics
 Echocardiography
 Statistical Analysis
 Results
 Echocardiographic Parameters
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Carpentier A, Chachques JC. Myocardial substitution with a stimulated skeletal muscle: first successful clinical case. Lancet 1985;8440:1267.
  2. Chagas AC, Moreira LF, da Luz PL, et al. Stimulated preconditioned skeletal muscle cardiomyoplasty: an effective means of cardiac assist. Circulation 1989;80:202–8.
  3. Magovern JA, Furnary AP, Christlieb IY, Kao RL, Magovern GJ. Bilateral latissimus dorsi cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;52:1259–65.[Abstract]
  4. Cheng W, Michele JJ, Spinale FG, Sink JD, Santamore WP. Effects of cardiomyoplasty on biventricular function in a canine chronic heart failure model. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:893–901.[Abstract]
  5. Grandjean PA, Austin L, Chan S, Terstra B, Bourges IM. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: clinical follow-up results. J Cardiac Surg 1991;6:80–8.[Medline]
  6. Moreira LF, Seferian PJ, Bocchi EA, et al. Survival improvement in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1991;84:296–302.
  7. Cho PW, Levin HR, Curtis WE, et al. Pressure-volume analysis of changes in cardiac function in chronic cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:38–45.[Abstract]
  8. Kass DA, Baughman KL, Pak PH, et al. Reverse remodeling from cardiomyoplasty in human heart failure. External constraint versus active assist. Circulation 1995;91:2314–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Magovern JA, Christlieb IY, Badylak SF, Lantz GC, Kao RL. A model of left ventricular dysfunction caused by intracoronary Adriamycin. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:861–3.[Abstract]
  10. Lee KF, Wechsler AS. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty. In: Karp RB, Laks H, Wechsler AS, eds. Advances in cardiac surgery, vol 4. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993:207–36.
  11. El Oakley RM, Jarvis JC. Cardiomyoplasty. A critical review of experimental and clinical results. Circulation 1994;90:2085–90.[Free Full Text]
  12. Jondeau G, Dorent R, Bors V, et al. Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: effect of discontinuing latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance and exercise capacity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:129–34.[Abstract]
  13. Capouya ER, Gerber RS, Drinkwater DC, et al. Girdling effect of nonstimulated cardiomyoplasty on left ventricular function. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:867–71.[Abstract]
  14. Lucas CM, Van der Veen FH, Cheriex EC, et al. Long-term follow-up (12 to 35 weeks) after dynamic cardiomyoplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:758–67.[Abstract]
  15. Cheng W, David BS, Avila RA, et al. Cardiomyoplasty: unstimulated latissimus dorsi muscle wrap reduces cardiac output. Surg Forum 1992;43:228–31.

Related Article

Invited Commentary
Ignacio Y. Christlieb
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997 64: 85. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
S. Christiansen and R. Autschbach
Doxorubicin in experimental and clinical heart failure.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 30(4): 611 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
V. Chekanov, A. Dumcius, and P. Karakozov
Adaptive Cardiac Binding: A New Method for Treatment of Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2005; 13(4): 351 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Feindt, U. Boeken, J.D. Schipke, J. Litmathe, N. Zimmermann, and E. Gams
Ventricular constraint in dilated cardiomyopathy: A new, compliant textile mesh exerts prophylactic and therapeutic properties
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1107 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
P. Feindt, U. Boeken, J. Litmathe, and E. Gams
Ventricular containment in the prophylaxis of experimental dilated cardiomyopathy
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2003; 2(4): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
H. N. Sabbah, V. G. Sharov, R. C. Gupta, S. Mishra, S. Rastogi, A. I. Undrovinas, P. A. Chaudhry, A. Todor, T. Mishima, E. J. Tanhehco, et al.
Reversal of Chronic Molecular and Cellular Abnormalities Due to Heart Failure by Passive Mechanical Ventricular Containment
Circ. Res., November 28, 2003; 93(11): 1095 - 1101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
M. Vaynblat, H. R. Shah, D. Bhaskaran, G. Ramdev, W. J. Davis III, J. N. Cunningham Jr., and M. Chiavarelli
Simultaneous angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition moderates ventricular dysfunction caused by doxorubicin
Eur J Heart Fail, October 1, 2002; 4(5): 583 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. F. Konertz, J. E. Shapland, H. Hotz, S. Dushe, J. P. Braun, K. Stantke, and F. X. Kleber
Passive Containment and Reverse Remodeling by a Novel Textile Cardiac Support Device
Circulation, September 18, 2001; 104 (2009): I-270 - I-275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
Y. Ootaki, M. Okada, T. Tsukube, and Y. Okita
The Effect of Cardiomyoplasty on Left Atrial Function in Experimental Canine Models
Chest, May 1, 2001; 119(5): 1526 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. A. Chaudhry, T. Mishima, V. G. Sharov, J. Hawkins, C. Alferness, G. Paone, and H. N. Sabbah
Passive epicardial containment prevents ventricular remodeling in heart failure
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2000; 70(4): 1275 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. R. Shah, M. Vaynblat, L. Salciccioli, P. Impellizzeri, J. N. Cunningham Jr, and M. Chiavarelli
Composite cardiac binding in experimental heart failure
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 429 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. Goldstein
Passive ventricular restaint
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 1999; 44(3): 468 - 469.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J.M Power, J Raman, A Dornom, S.J Farish, L.M Burrell, A.M Tonkin, B Buxton, and C.A Alferness
Passive ventricular constraint amends the course of heart failure: a study in an ovine model of dilated cardiomyopathy
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 1999; 44(3): 549 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. H. Oh, V. Badhwar, B. D. Mott, C. M. Li, and R. C.-J. Chiu
The effects of prosthetic cardiac binding and adynamic cardiomyoplasty in a model of dilated cardiomyopathy
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1998; 116(1): 148 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mikhail Vaynblat
Zvi Zisbrod
Joseph N. Cunningham, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaynblat, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaynblat, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, J. N., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS