|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:751-755
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Cardiovascular Division, Institut de Recherches Servier, Suresnes; and Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
Accepted for publication October 18, 1996.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. Coronary artery bypass grafting with an internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery anastomosis was performed in a porcine model with a 30-minute period of ischemia and a subsequent 30-minute period of reperfusion, using snares on either side of the anastomotic site to achieve hemostasis of the operative field. Endothelium-dependent relaxation to serotonin was studied in conventional organ chamber experiments with rings taken from the left anterior descending artery at the proximal snare site, the anastomotic site in the segment that underwent the ischemia-reperfusion cycle, the distal snare site, and at a control segment. Responses to potassium chloride and bradykinin were also compared.
Results. There were no significant differences in endothelium-dependent relaxation values among the four sites studied.
Conclusions. These results confirm that snaring of the coronary artery for achieving hemostasis at the anastomotic site when performing coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart does not cause endothelial dysfunction.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be performed with the use of "minimally invasive" techniques both with and without bypass [1, 2]. Because most of these techniques avoid cross-clamping of the aorta and delivery of cardioplegic solutions, they are performed on the beating heart. However, manipulation of the target coronary artery vessel is necessary to achieve a clean surgical field for performance of a satisfactory anastomosis. Operative control [3] and ischemia-reperfusion [4] can lead to local coronary endothelial dysfunction. Such dysfunction may favor the occurrence of acute vasospasm, leading to hypoperfusion and the development of chronic intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis. The present experiments were designed to assess the effects of the looping snares commonly used for minimally invasive CABG on the endothelial function of target coronary arteries.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After a median sternotomy, the pedicle of the left internal mammary artery was harvested in a standard fashion. After injection of heparin (300 U/kg), the graft was prepared for anastomosis. The bradycardic agent S16257 (0.5 mg/kg), which slows the rate of spontaneous firing in the isolated sinoatrial node by a reduction in the diastolic depolarization of the cells [5], was administered by bolus injection over 1 minute. The midportion of the left anterior descending artery distal to the first diagonal branch was then dissected and prepared for anastomosis. Injection of S16257 decreased the mean heart rate from 120 beats/min to a mean of 60 beats/min. In 1 swine, the bradycardic agent had no effect because of atrial fibrillation. The mean arterial pressure before anesthesia in swine is 85 ± 2 mm Hg, and it was 73 ± 3 mm Hg after anesthesia. The blood pressure after injecting the bradycardic drug was 70 ± 4 mm Hg (p = not significant).
A snare was placed proximal to the anastomotic site using a 4-0 Gore-Tex suture with a 24-mm half-circle needle (W.L. Gore, Flagstaff, AZ). A double loop was passed under the coronary artery and buttressed with a 1-cm piece of silicone tubing. The same maneuver was performed distal to the anastomotic site. The distance between the snares varied between 2.5 and 3 cm. After snaring down of the sutures with sufficient tension to ensure a clean operative field, a 4-mm arteriotomy was performed. Then, a standard end to side left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery (average diameter 1.5 mm) anastomosis was performed using a running suture of 6-0 polypropylene. After a 30-minute period of coronary occlusion to mimic a worse than average clinical situation, the coronary artery was reperfused by release of the proximal and distal coronary snares and unclamping of the internal mammary artery for a 30-minute period (Fig 1
). Defibrillation with 20 J energy was performed in all animals during the coronary occlusion period (mean 1.2 ± 1.1 applications) and during the reperfusion period (3.2 ± 1.7 applications). All hearts had evidence of localized ischemia during the coronary occlusion, which subsequently improved during reperfusion. Electrocardiographic monitoring showed an increase in ST segment during the occlusion, 80% recovery of the changes at 12 ± 1 minutes, and return to baseline at 24 ± 4 minutes. There was no bleeding at the sites of passage of the Gore-Tex suture after reperfusion.
|
(range, 2 x 10-6 to 10-5 mol/L) was added to achieve a contraction averaging 50% of the maximal contraction to KCl. Ketanserin was added 40 minutes before the addition of serotonin (10-9 to 10-5 mol/L). When the relaxation to serotonin did not achieve 100% of the contraction to prostaglandin F2
, bradykinin 10-8 mol/L was then added.
Drugs
All solutions were prepared daily. Prostaglandin F2
, 5-hydroxytryptamine creatinine sulfate (serotonin), ketanserin, bradykinin, indomethacin, and propranolol were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co (St.-Quentin Falavier, France). The S16257 was synthesized at the Servier Research Institute (Suresnes, France).
Statistical Analysis
Relaxation was expressed as a percentage of contraction to prostaglandin F2
for each group and is presented as mean ± standard error of the mean; n refers to the number of animals studied. One-factor analysis of variance was used for comparison of contractions to potassium chloride and prostaglandin F2
. Two-factor analysis of variance was used to compare dose-relaxation curves. Linear regression with repetition was performed for estimation of median effective concentration (EC50) values. Values of p less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
among all segments of the left anterior descending coronary artery, namely at the site of proximal snare application, the anastomotic site that incurred ischemia and reperfusion, the distal snare application site, and the control segment (Table 1
in 9 of 10 control rings (90%), 6 of 10 proximal snare rings (60%), 8 of 9 ischemia-reperfusion rings (88%), and in 6 of 10 distal snare rings (60%). The further addition of bradykinin in those rings achieved 100% relaxation in all cases. The EC50 values were not significantly different between all four experimental groups.
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Enthusiasm has increased recently for the extension of these minimally invasive approaches to coronary artery revascularization in the hope of minimizing patient discomfort and shortening hospital stay, leading to an accelerated return to active life. The definition of what constitutes a minimally invasive approach is still blurry and includes the following: left anterior small thoracotomy with performance of internal mammary to coronary artery anastomosis "off pump" on the beating heart after administration of bradycardic agents [1, 2], the same procedure with harvest of the internal mammary artery graft through videothoracoscopic techniques, port access CABG procedures performed on bypass with endoluminal aortic clamping [9], and "on bypass" coronary revascularization on the arrested heart but without cross-clamping [10]. Other techniques may be used to try to lessen the ischemic insult on the heart or the inflammatory response caused by cardiopulmonary bypass. An intraluminal shunt may be used, with the attendant concern for the potential endothelial cell denudation associated with any endoluminal manipulation [11]; left heart bypass may be useful to optimize the operating conditions [12]; or the revascularization may be performed through a standard sternotomy or ministernotomy without bypass [13, 14]. The place of each of these techniques will, one hopes, be clarified as the method for minimizing the invasiveness of CABG is more precisely identified. Our current opinion is that it is far more important to avoid myocardial ischemia associated with aortic cross-clamping and to limit the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass than to switch from sternotomy to thoracotomy.
One way of avoiding ischemia is clearly to keep the heart beating, without cross-clamping the aorta. This in turn necessitates manipulation of the target coronary vessel and the use of hemostatic techniques to achieve a dry operative field, and a period of ischemia-reperfusion of the coronary segment on which the anastomosis is performed. Endothelial cells play a key role in the regulation of vascular homeostasis [15, 16]. Internal mammary artery clamping with commercially available clamps may injure the vascular endothelium, with resulting denudation of the endothelial cell coverage and decreased endothelium-dependent relaxation [17]. Similar vascular injury can occur through direct application of bulldog clamps or gas jet insufflation of the operative field [3] used during continuous blood cardioplegia. Likewise, concerns have been expressed over the occurrence of coronary arterial lesions at the site of encircling snares during off-pump bypass grafting operations [18]. Loss of endothelial cell coverage may be important clinically because regenerated endothelium presents a selective dysfunction with decreased endothelium-dependent relaxation mediated by pertussis toxinsensitive G-proteins. These alterations may accelerate the occurrence of vasospasm and atherosclerosis [19, 20]. Ischemia-reperfusion of coronary arteries has also been implicated in a selective endothelial dysfunction involving G-proteinmediated relaxation [4, 21, 22].
The current study shows that the hemostatic technique involving snaring of the proximal and distal left anterior descending coronary artery with double looping of a Gore-Tex suture over a silicone tubing, with sufficient tension to achieve a clear operative field, does not cause endothelial dysfunction. The present data also demonstrate that the coronary artery segment undergoing a 30-minute period of occlusion and 30 minutes of reperfusion does not exhibit decreased endothelium-dependent relaxation compared with a control coronary artery segment. Longer periods of ischemia (60 minutes) followed by reperfusion may lead to acute endothelial dysfunction [2123].
As regards the acute impact on endothelial function per se in healthy blood vessels, the present results validate the safety of encircling snares on the beating heart for minimally invasive CABG. Obviously, caution must be used when extrapolating this conclusion to atherosclerotic vessels, which may already demonstrate endothelial dysfunction and may have a lesser tolerance to both operative manipulation and ischemia-reperfusion [24]. These observations concur in indicating a minimal risk for localized endothelial injury and thus of subsequent vasospasm and development of intimal hyperplasia at the site of operative manipulation of the coronary artery [18]. Other techniques such as extravascular balloon occlusion may have the same advantages with regard to short-term consequences on endothelial function.
Another issue not addressed by the present study is the patency of coronary anastomosis on a beating heart. Indeed, as long as these anastomoses are not subject to systematic postoperative control, concerns can legitimately be expressed about the risk of compromising the high standards of quality currently achieved by conventional revascularization procedures [25]. Whatever the case may be, it is already reassuring that the techniques currently used for control of the target coronary artery and the ischemia-reperfusion cycle necessary for performance of coronary artery revascularization on the beating heart in minimally invasive CABG do not cause acute alteration of endothelium-dependent relaxation. We advocate the same type of assessment for validating alternative techniques that may be developed for achieving hemostasis during beating heart CABG operations.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Doctor Perrault is supported by the Clinician Scientist program from the Medical Research Council of Canada.
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Hangler, L. Mueller, E. Ruttmann, H. Antretter, and K. Pfaller Shunt or Snare: Coronary Endothelial Damage due to Hemostatic Devices for Beating Heart Coronary Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 86(6): 1873 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Collison, A. Agarwal, and N. Trehan Controversies in the use of intraluminal shunts during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1559 - 1566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wippermann, J. M. Albes, R. Bruhin, M. Hartrumpf, R. Vollandt, H. Kosmehl, and T. Wahlers Chronic ultrastructural effects of temporary intraluminal shunts in a porcine off-pump model Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 543 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. Hangler, K. Pfaller, E. Ruttmann, D. Hoefer, T. Schachner, G. Laufer, and H. Antretter Effects of intracoronary shunts on coronary endothelial coating in the human beating heart Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 776 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gerosa, T. Bottio, M. Valente, G. Thiene, and D. Casarotto Intracoronary artery shunt: An assessment of possible coronary artery wall damage J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2003; 125(5): 1160 - 1162. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hsi, H. Cuenoud, B. R Soller, H. Kim, J. Favreau, T. J Vander Salm, and J. M Moran Experimental Coronary Artery Occlusion: Relevance to Off-Pump Cardiac Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2002; 10(4): 293 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-C. Riess, R. Bader, P. Kremer, C. Kuhn, J. Kormann, D. Mathey, S. Moshar, T. Tuebler, N. Bleese, and J. Schofer Coronary hybrid revascularization from January 1997 to January 2001: a clinical follow-up Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 73(6): 1849 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Diodato, J. E. Scarborough, P. W. Domkowski, M. L. Smith, S. S. Biswas, T. Schwartz, and K. P. Landolfo Robotically assisted versus conventional freehand technique during beating heart anastomoses of left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 825 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Demaria, S. Fortier, and L. P. Perrault Risk of coronary artery occlusion with snares during OPCAB. Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 344 - 345. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Demaria, S. Fortier, and L. P. Perrault Coronary endothelial damage during off-pump CABG related to coronary-clamping and gas insufflation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 20(6): 1270 - 1271. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Capdeville and J. H. Lee Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Revival of an Old Technique Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, November 1, 2001; 5(4): 345 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Demaria, S. Fortier, M. Carrier, and L. P. Perrault Early multifocal stenosis after coronary artery snaring during off-pump coronary artery bypass in a patient with diabetes J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2001; 122(5): 1044 - 1045. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. P. Perrault, C. Nickner, N. Desjardins, and M. Carrier Effects on coronary endothelial function of the Cohn stabilizer for beating heart bypass operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 1111 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Cartier From Idea to Operating Room: Surgical Innovation, Clinical Application, and Outcome Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, July 1, 2000; 4(2): 103 - 109. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. S. Gill, L. A. Higginson, G. S. Maharajh, and W. J. Keon Early and follow-up angiography in minimally invasive coronary bypass without mechanical stabilization Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2000; 69(1): 56 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. L. Stanbridge and L. K. Hadjinikolaou Technical adjuncts in beating heart surgery Comparison of MIDCAB to off-pump sternotomy: a meta-analysis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 16(suppl_2): S24 - S33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yavuz, M A. Celkan, C. Eris, M. Mavi, T. Turk, O. Tiryakioglu, Y. Ata, V. Koca, and I A. Ozdemir Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass: Experience in 114 Patients Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1999; 7(3): 177 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Chavanon, L. P. Perrault, P. Menasche, M. Carrier, and P. M. Vanhoutte Endothelial Effects of Hemostatic Devices for Continuous Cardioplegia or Minimally Invasive Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 68(3): 1118 - 1120. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tanemoto, K. Kuroki, Y. Kanaoka, and T. Murakami Septal branch right ventricular fistula: a complication in coronary artery snaring Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1999; 68(1): 246 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. P. Perrault, P. Menasche, and P. M. Vanhoutte High-flow gas insufflation to facilitate MIDCAB Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1999; 67(3): 893 - 893. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Izzat, A. P.C. Yim, and M. H. El-Zufari Snaring of a coronary artery causing distal atheroma embolization Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1998; 66(5): 1806 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-C. Riess, J. Schofer, P. Kremer, A. G. Riess, H. Bergmann, S. Moshar, D. Mathey, and N. Bleese Beating heart operations including hybrid revascularization: initial experiences Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 1076 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jaber, P. Spence, and S. Pagni Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1998; 65(5): 1518 - 1518. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Jayakrishnan, T. Rameshwara, G. A. Pillai, H. D. Waikar, V. L. Pathi, G. A. Berg, and K. J. D. MacArthur Emergency Coronary Bypass on a Beating Heart Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1997; 64(2): 591 - 592. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |