ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Domenico Rocco
Beverley J. Hunt
Martin J. Elliott
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, M. J.

Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:497-503
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Article: Cardiovascular

Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of High-Dose Aprotinin in Pediatric Cardiac Operations

Michael J. Davies, FRCS, Alison Allen, BScHons, Henry Kort, BS, Nihal A. Weerasena, FRCS, Domenico Rocco, MD, Claire L. Paul, BScHons, Beverley J. Hunt, FRCP, Martin J. Elliott, FRCS

Cardiothoracic Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London; Research Haematology, Heart Science Centre, Harefield Hospital, Middlesex; and Clinical Research, Bayer PLC, Bayer House, Strawberry Hill, Newbury, United Kingdom

Accepted for publication September 19, 1996.


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. Perioperative aprotinin decreases postoperative blood loss in adults undergoing cardiac operations, but its role is less clear in children. Therefore, a trial of aprotinin in pediatric cardiac operations was conducted to study the efficacy of its use in children.

Methods. Forty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive either high-dose aprotinin or placebo. Aprotinin efficacy was assessed using time from protamine administration to skin closure, postoperative blood loss and hemoglobin loss, and postoperative transfusion requirements. Measures of fibrinolysis (fibrin degradation product titers) and platelet preservation (ß-thromboglobulin levels) were also assessed.

Results. There were no statistically significant differ-ences between groups in any of the blood loss or transfusion parameters. Fibrin degradation product levels, measured 4 hours postoperatively, had increased significantly for control patients, but remained unchanged for the aprotinin group (p < 0.02). ß-Thromboglobulin levels increased more rapidly during cardiopulmonary bypass in the control group (p = 0.03).

Conclusions. Aprotinin appears to provide no clinical benefit in routine pediatric cardiac operations. A reduction in fibrinolysis, with perhaps an early preservation of platelet structure, is seen in the aprotinin group.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
High-dose aprotinin has been shown to reduce perioperative bleeding in adult patients undergoing cardiac operations using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) [15]. There are a number of special features of pediatric cardiac operations that may warrant the use of an agent such as aprotinin if it were proved to be effective. Patients with congenital heart disease, particularly infants with cyanotic heart disease, are at increased risk of bleeding because of their fragile hemostatic balance [6, 7]. Other features include the relative friability of the tissue, proportionately long suture lines, poor tolerance to postoperative hemorrhage, and long complex surgical procedures with hypothermic CPB. There is also an increasing incidence of redo operation, especially for the replacement of conduits in multistaged reparative procedures.

Aprotinin is a basic polypeptide, 58 amino acid residues long and of bovine origin, that inhibits a wide variety of serum proteases. The main mechanism of action of aprotinin is probably as an inhibitor of plasmin. The high-dose aprotinin regimen also inhibits kallikrein, produced from prekallikrein during activation of factor XII by the artificial surfaces of the bypass equipment and the exposed surfaces of surgically cut vessels [8]. The antiplasmin action of aprotinin coupled with inhibition of kallikrein-mediated activation of plasminogen provides a significant antifibrinolytic effect [9]. By inhibiting kallikrein, aprotinin reduces the activation of complement, the angiotensin system, and bradykinin. It also acts as a weak anticoagulant by inhibiting the positive feedback of kallikrein on the activation of factor XII, thus reducing production of coagulation factors and it prolongs the activated partial thromboplastin time [10, 11].

There are few published data concerning the use of aprotinin in children. In 1982 Papov-Cenik and colleagues [6] suggested that aprotinin given perioperatively may reduce perioperative bleeding in pediatric patients and studies [7, 12] have indicated that aprotinin may reduce hemorrhage in patients at high risk of hemorrhage. Boldt and associates [13], however, recently published a prospective, randomized study that used a low-dose aprotinin regimen (less than 35,000 kallikrein inhibiting units [KIU]/kg [4.9 mg/kg]) and showed no reduction in perioperative bleeding. Davis and Whittington [14] published a recent review of aprotinin administration in cardiac operations and suggested that more studies were required to investigate its use in the pediatric population. Our group has published results from a pilot study in pediatric cardiac operations using a high-dose aprotinin regimen (dosage adjusted for body surface area in a similar manner to Royston's study in adults) and comparing with historical controls [15]. This suggested that although the aprotinin did not reduce postoperative hemorrhage or transfusion requirement in children undergoing the arterial switch operation, the drug may be effective in reducing the time from protamine administration to skin closure after CPB. This time is normally spent in obtaining surgical hemostasis before closing the chest and may be important in morbidity and mortality. Certainly, it has been shown that increasing surgical operating time is associated with a postoperative decline of left ventricular function [16]. Children who are returned quickly to the intensive care unit are likely not to have suffered from so much handling of delicate tissues, and therefore, cardiac function may be better preserved in the immediate postoperative period.

As a result of this pilot study [15], and with power calculations based on its data, we have conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in children less than 16 years of age undergoing open heart operations with CPB. The study was designed to assess the efficacy of aprotinin in reducing postoperative blood loss and the time of operation, as well as to investigate changes in areas of the coagulation scheme.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in 42 patients aged less than 16 years and undergoing open heart operation with CPB at the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London. Ethical approval was obtained from the Hospital Research Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from the parents of each child.

Any child at this center under the age of 16 years undergoing open heart operation with CPB was considered eligible for entry into the study. Patients prospectively excluded from the study included children with a known bleeding disorder; those taking aspirin, dipyridamole, or anticoagulants 7 days before operation; those with a known metabolic disorder, sepsis, or renal failure; patients previously exposed to aprotinin or with a known allergy to aprotinin; and patients with a hemoglobin level of more than 19 g/dL. In addition, during the period in which this study was conducted, two of three staff surgeons thought that the benefits of aprotinin in patients undergoing the arterial switch operation was such that the majority of these patients, who were otherwise eligible for the study, received aprotinin; therefore, they were excluded from the study.

The study population was stratified into three groups as defined: group I included children 1 year of age or less undergoing a major open heart operation with hypothermic (<22°C), low-flow (<1.3 L • m-2 • min-1), nonpulsatile CPB. Group II included children between 1 and 5 years of age and undergoing a major reconstructive open heart operation (eg, repair of tetralogy of Fallot, with or without pulmonary artery reconstruction, or the Fontan procedure) with hypothermia, intermittent low-flow, nonpulsatile CPB. Group III included children more than 1 year of age and undergoing a redo open heart operation using a median sternotomy.

Within each of the groups defined above (I, II, and III) patients were allocated to receive either aprotinin or placebo using a predetermined computer-generated randomization protocol.

Dosages and Duration of Treatment
For children with a body surface area of 1.16 m2 or less, aprotinin was administered after induction of anesthesia. A loading dose of 140 KIU/m2 was given as an intravenous bolus over 20 minutes, with a pump priming dose of 240 KIU/m2 and a continuous central venous infusion of 56 KIU • m-2 • h-1 from the beginning of operation until skin closure at the end of operation. Control (placebo) patients were given an equivalent volume protocol of 0.9% saline solution.

For children with a body surface area of more than 1.16 m2, aprotinin was administered as a loading dose of 250 KIU/m2 given as an intravenous bolus over 20 minutes, with a pump priming dose of 280 KIU/m2, and a continuous central venous infusion of 70 KIU • m-2 • h-1 (9.8 mg • m-2 • h-1) from the beginning of operation until skin closure at the end of operation. Again, control patients were given an equivalent volume protocol of 0.9% saline solution.

Premedication, anesthetics, and perfusion techniques were similar for all patients. Pethidine-Co, (pethidine, 25 mg, plus promethazine, 6.25 mg, plus chlorpromazine, 6.25 mg/mL) at a dose of 0.07 mL/kg body weight and atropine, 0.3 mg, were given intramuscularly. Induction of anesthesia used cyclopropane and oxygen followed by intubation after paralysis with a mixture of suxamethonium, 1 mg/kg, and pancuronium bromide, 0.1 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained during cardiopulmonary bypass using nitrous oxide and oxygen together with intermittent doses of pancuronium bromide, 0.1 mg/kg, and incremental doses of fentanyl to a maximum of 20 µg/kg or morphine to a maximum dose of 0.1 mg/kg.

The bypass machine was primed with a mixture of fresh (less than 5 days old), whole, cytomegalovirus-free citrate-phosphate-dextrose blood, mixed with crystalloid to achieve a predicted hematocrit of 20% to 25% in the patients undergoing deep hypothermic CPB, 25% in patients undergoing moderate hypothermia, and 30% in patients undergoing bypass at 32°C. The crystalloid component of the prime was Plasmalyte 148 (Travenol, UK) with added heparin (2,500 IU per unit of blood, and 1,500 IU per 500 mL of crystalloid), sodium bicarbonate (8.4% at 60 mL/L of prime), and 20% mannitol (2.5 mL/kg).

Perfusion techniques were standardized and the patient core temperature was lowered to the appropriate level using arteriovenous cooling on bypass. Flow rates were maintained at 2.4 L • m-2 • min-1 using a nonpulsatile roller occlusive pump. The activated clotting time was maintained at more than 400 seconds by intermittent bolus doses of heparin in the control group. Those receiving high-dose aprotinin had the activated clotting time maintained at more than 750 seconds by the anesthetist. The surgeons remained blinded to the activated clotting time levels throughout the study, and ultrafiltration was not used.

Perioperatively the patients received prophylactic antibiotics (gentamicin and flucloxacillin) and some required cardiosupportive drugs (dopamine and nitroprusside). To standardize the blood transfusion regimen postoperatively, blood was transfused to maintain the patients' hematocrit at more than 35%.

Time from protamine administration to skin closure (hours) was measured. Surgeons were asked for a subjective impression of the status of the operative field as "very dry," "dry," "normal," or "wet." Over the first 24 hours postoperatively, total blood drainage loss (mL/kg), total hemoglobin loss (g/kg), and total amount of fluid, blood, and blood products given (mL) were measured.

Blood samples were taken preoperatively and at the times given below to compare renal function (serum levels of urea, creatinine, lactate, sodium, and potassium), liver function (alkaline phosphatase, alanine transferase, bilirubin, and total protein), and hematologic functions (hemoglobin, hematocrit, white cell count and differential, platelet count, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrin(ogen) degradation product titers, and ß-thromboglobulin). Sequential blood samples were taken in the ratio of 9:1 into 3.8% sodium citrate at the following times: (A) after anesthesia, (B) before heparin administration, (C) before starting bypass, (D) while on bypass, (E) at the beginning of the rewarming period, (F) at the end of the rewarming period, (G) after protamine administration, (H) 4 hours postoperatively, (I) 12 hours postoperatively, and (J) 24 hours postoperatively.

Adverse events recorded during this study were classified as "early" if they occurred within 24 hours of operation and "delayed" if they occurred more than 24 hours after operation.

Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were applied to data from the treatment and nontreatment groups and compared using Wilcoxon two-sample tests, Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance as appropriate. Results are given as median values with interquartile range or as mean ± 1 standard deviation. Statistical significance has been taken as a probability of 0.05 or less.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Patient Characteristics
A total of 42 patients were recruited into the study. Ten patients were entered into group I (aprotinin n = 4, placebo n = 6), 22 into group II (aprotinin n = 10, placebo n = 12), and 10 into group III (aprotinin n = 5, placebo n = 5). The demographic details are summarized in Table 1Go. There were no statistically significant differences in age, weight, or body surface area within the groups (I, II, and III), but obvious differences between groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. . Demographic Details of the Patients Entered Into the Studya
 
Two patients died during the course of the study and were withdrawn from postoperative analysis. One, randomized to the aprotinin group, had a cardiac arrest and died on the operating table after deteriorating cardiac function. The other patient, who also received aprotinin, suffered heart failure and subsequently died on the second postoperative day. Neither of these events were considered by the investigators to be related to the study drug. One patient in the control group was removed from the postoperative analysis because full data were not collected in the postoperative period.

Operative details are summarized in Table 2Go. The most common surgical procedure to occur in group I was closure of ventricular septal defect. In group II the most common procedure was repair of tetralogy of Fallot. In group III the most common procedure was redo valve replacement and repair.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. . Operation Details of the Patients Entered Into the Study
 
Adverse Clinical Events and Safety
There were no episodes of anaphylaxis in any of the patients who received aprotinin. There were five "early" adverse events in the aprotinin group (29%). One patient (6%) was recorded in each of the following categories: complete heart block, cardiac arrest, heart failure, hypotension, and tachycardia. There were two "early" adverse events in the placebo group (9%). Both patients had ventricular arrhythmia.

There were nine "delayed" adverse effects in the aprotinin group (53%). Three patients (18%) were in heart failure, 2 patients (12%) had pulmonary edema, and 1 patient (6%) was recorded in each for acidosis, complete heart block, hypoxia, and tachycardia. There were six "delayed" adverse events in the placebo group (27%). These were 2 patients (9%) who had pleural effusions and 1 patient (5%) was recorded in each with pulmonary edema, heart failure, paralysis, and tachycardia. None of these adverse events were considered by the investigators to be related to the study drug.

There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups for any of the measures of renal, hepatic, or basic hematologic function (see below).

Efficacy of Aprotinin
There were no statistical differences in any of the three surgical groups (I, II, and III) in timing from administration of protamine to skin closure (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. . Time From Administration of Protamine to Skin Closure (hours)a
 
Table 4Go summarizes the drainage losses in the first 24 hours after operation. There were no differences in the drainage loss between controls and the aprotinin-treated groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference between surgical groups in drainage volume loss. Group III, the redo operation group, had a significantly lower drainage volume in the first 24 hours postoperatively than either group I or group II.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. . Drainage Volume Loss for the First 24 Hours Postoperatively (mL • kg-1 • 24 h-1)a
 
Mean drainage hemoglobin loss in the first 24-hour postoperative period is summarized in Table 5Go. Although the aprotinin groups tended toward a lower hemoglobin loss, there were no statistically significant differences either within or between groups. This was particularly the case in the redo operation group who received aprotinin (0.26 ± 0.16 g • kg-1 • 24 h-1) compared with the redo patients who did not receive aprotinin (0.69 ± 0.32 g • kg-1 • 24 h-1). However, because of the low numbers (5 patients in each group) this failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.06).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. . Drainage Hemoglobin Loss for the First 24 Hours Postoperatively (g • kg-1 • 24 h-1)a
 
There were no statistically significant differences in mean whole blood and packed red cell transfusion administration throughout the first 24-hour postoperative period as shown in Table 6Go. Patients who received a blood transfusion often received both whole blood and packed red cells, depending on availability. Eleven patients in the aprotinin group (65%) and 10 patients in the placebo group (45%) received whole blood. Seven patients (42%) in the aprotinin group and 11 patients (50%) in the placebo group received packed red blood cells.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. . Blood Transfusons Administered During the First 24 Hours Postoperatively (m • kg-1 • 24 h-1)a
 
One patient in the aprotinin group (6%) and 7 patients in the placebo group (32%) received fresh frozen plasma. Although clinically significant, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11). Policy at the time of this study was to use fresh frozen plasma for volume replacement in addition to its use in the correction of hemostatic anomalies. One patient (6%) in the aprotinin group and no patients in the placebo group received platelets. All patients in the aprotinin group and 19 patients (86%) in the placebo group received 5% albumin.

Subjective assessment of the surgical field by the surgeon is summarized in Table 7Go. There was a trend toward a drier surgical field assessment in the aprotinin group, and a greater tendency toward the surgical field being "wet" in the placebo group than in the aprotinin group. The surgeons commented that in 2 patients in the control group closure was delayed by bleeding. Both of these patients were in group III, the redo operation group. No patients in the aprotinin group had closure delayed by bleeding.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. . Surgical Evaluation of Operative Fielda
 
There was a statistically significant difference between treatment groups for plasma fibrin degradation product titers at the 4-hour postoperative point (H) (Fig 1Go). The median level had not changed in the aprotinin group, whereas the median level in the placebo group had risen by 100% to 250 µg/mL (interquartile range, 250 to 500 µg/mL; p < 0.02). There was also a statistically significant difference between treatment groups in the change of ß-thromboglobulin from postanesthesia levels (A) to the levels during cardiopulmonary bypass (D) (Fig 2Go). Median levels increased to 18.6 IU/mL (14.3 to 44.3 IU/mL) for the aprotinin group and increased to 43.3 IU/mL (30.0 to 53.0 IU/mL) for the placebo group during the early bypass period (p = 0.03). This difference, however, lost significance during the period of CPB (Fig 2Go).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . Perioperative and 24-hour postoperative fibrin(ogen) degradation products (FDP) titers. (A = after anesthesia; B = before heparin administration; H = 4 hours postoperatively; I = 12 hours postoperatively; J = 24 hours postoperatively; *p < 0.02 for aprotinin group versus control group.)

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. . Perioperative and 24-hour postoperative ß-thromboglobulin (bTG) levels. (A = after anesthesia; D = while on bypass; G = after administration of protamine; H = 4 hours postoperatively; *p = 0.03 for aprotinin group versus control group.)

 

    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
This study, like that of Boldt and colleagues [13], has shown no beneficial clinical effects of the use of aprotinin in routine pediatric cardiac operations. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups for drainage volume loss, drainage hemoglobin loss, blood and blood product transfusions, or the time from protamine administration to skin closure. In those patients undergoing a redo operation, the drainage volume loss in the first 24 hours postoperatively did not differ clinically between the two groups (Table 4Go). However, when hemoglobin loss was assessed a clinically significant reduction was seen in those patients receiving aprotinin (Table 5Go). This failed to reach statistical significance, possibly because of the small size of the group. A larger study group would help to investigate this further.

The results of this study are at odds with those generated from studies in adults [3, 9, 14, 17, 18]. The reasons for this are uncertain. First, it may be that there is less postoperative bleeding in children because they are returned to the intensive care unit only after obsessional hemostasis [15]. Second, perhaps the study size was too small. In surgical group I, some patients were excluded from randomization because of the reluctance of two surgeons to perform the arterial switch operation without aprotinin. This may explain why the results were also at odds with the results of our pilot study that concentrated on the effects of aprotinin in neonatal switches, and found a decrease in the time taken to close the chest [15]. Unfortunately, because of the strong suggestion from this earlier pilot study, the policy of this unit is to use aprotinin in the arterial switch operation. We were unable to investigate this finding further. Third, a child's hemostatic balance is different from that of an adult in that children have high levels of nonspecific inhibitors. Aprotinin is thought to reduce perioperative bleeding in adults by acting as an antifibrinolytic agent, but there are no studies of fibrinolysis in children to suggest that their hemostatic function perioperatively is the same as in adults. The mechanism of aprotinin has been extensively debated. Current opinion is that the main mode of action is as an antiplasmin agent. The failure of fibrin degradation product titers to increase in the aprotinin group (see Fig 1Go) confirms that in children high-dose aprotinin decreases fibrinolytic activity. There were also significantly lower plasma levels of ß-thromboglobulin, a product of platelet activation, during cardiopulmonary bypass in the aprotinin group (see Fig 2Go), suggesting that it may have an effect on platelet function at least at the beginning of bypass. This, however, contrasts with the lack of effect of aprotinin on platelet aggregation in children undergoing CPB [13] and the recent evidence in adults [19]. A larger study in a pediatric population would help to elucidate this further.

Our study has also given contrasting results compared with the study by Herynkopf and associates [7] in children, which showed a reduction in blood transfusion and increased diuresis in the aprotinin-treated group, but like our study showed no significant difference in drainage loss. This may be because of differences in the threshold for blood transfusion between the centers. Our results, however, are similar to those of Boldt and colleagues [13], who showed no significant differences in blood loss when compared with controls.

Some studies have suggested that aprotinin may contribute to renal failure [5, 20]. Our data do not substantiate the concerns regarding the effects of aprotinin on renal function in pediatric patients.

In conclusion, this study has demonstrated no benefit in the routine use of aprotinin in pediatric cardiac operations. Our policy is now to restrict the use of aprotinin to redo operations, because of the strong clinical suggestion of reduced hemoglobin loss in this group (see Table 5Go), to those patients undergoing first time arterial switch operation [15], and to those patients judged to be especially vulnerable to hemorrhage. Further studies are required to examine perioperative hematologic changes in children undergoing CPB and in the use of high-dose aprotinin in other areas of pediatric cardiac surgery, such as transplantation.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We thank Jaroslav Stark, MD, and Marc R. de Leval, MD, Consultant Cardiac Surgeons, for allowing us to include their patients in this study. Also, we thank the staff of the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, for their support with the study and their continued dedication to patient management. We also thank the Medical Statistics Group of Bayer Research, Bayer PLC, Newbury, United Kingdom, for their help in the statistical analysis of this data.

This study was funded by Bayer Diagnostics, Bayer PLC, Evans House, Basingstoke, United Kingdom.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Address reprint requests to Mr Elliott, Cardiothoracic Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Royston D, Bidstrup BP, Taylor KM, Sapsford RN. Effects of aprotinin on need for blood transfusion after repeat open-heart surgery. Lancet 1987;2:1289–91.[Medline]
  2. Van Oeveren W, Jansen NJG, Bidstrup BP, et al. Effects of aprotinin on hemostatic mechanisms during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:640–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bidstrup BP, Royston D, Taylor KM. Reduction in blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass with high dose aprotinin (Trasylol). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:364–72.[Abstract]
  4. Havel M, Teufelsbauer H, Knobl P, et al. Effect of intraoperative aprotinin administration on postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:968–72.[Abstract]
  5. Blauhut B, Gross C, Necek S, Doran JE, Spath P, Lundsgaard-Hansen P. Effects of high dose aprotinin on blood loss, platelet function, fibrinolysis, complement and renal function after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:958–67.
  6. Papov-Cenic S, Urban AE, Noe G. Studies on the cause of bleeding during and after surgery with a heart-lung machine in children with cyanotic and acyanotic congenital cardiac defects and their prophylactic treatment. In: Role of chemical mediators in the pathophysiology of acute illness and injury. New York: Raven Press, 1982:229–42.
  7. Herynkopf F, Lucchese F, Pereira E, Kalil R, Prates P, Nesralla IA. Aprotinin in children undergoing correction of congenital heart defects. A double-blind pilot study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:517–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Tanaka K, Takao M, Yada I, Yusa H, Kusagawa M, Deguchi K. Alterations in coagulation and fibrinolysis associated with cardio-pulmonary bypass during open-heart surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1989;3:181–8.
  9. Hunt BJ, Yacoub M. Aprotinin and cardiac surgery: reduces perioperative blood loss. Br Med J 1991;303:660–1.
  10. Hunt BJ, Segal H, Yacoub M. Aprotinin and heparin monitoring during cardio-pulmonary bypass. Circulation 1992;86(Suppl 2):410–2.
  11. Francis JL, Howard C. The effect of aprotinin on the response of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) to heparin. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1993;4:35–40.[Medline]
  12. Jaquiss RD, Huddleston CB, Spray TL. Use of aprotinin in pediatric lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 1995;14:302–7.[Medline]
  13. Boldt J, Knothe C, Zickmann B, Wege N, Dapper F, Hempelmann G. Comparison of two aprotinin dosage regimens in pediatric patients having cardiac operations. Influence on platelet function and blood loss. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:705–11.[Abstract]
  14. Davis R, Whittington R. Aprotinin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in reducing blood loss associated with cardiac surgery. Drugs 1995;49:954–83.[Medline]
  15. Elliott MJ, Allen A. Aprotinin in paediatric cardiac surgery. Perfusion 1990;5(Suppl):73–6.
  16. Bjorkhem G, Lundstrom NR. Echocardiographic studies of children operated on for congenital heart disease; evaluation in the immediate postoperative period. Europ J Cardiol 1979;10:429–51.
  17. Dietrich W, Henze R, Barankay A, Niekau E, Sebening F, Richter JA. High-dose aprotinin application reduces homologous blood requirement in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1989;3(Suppl 1):79.[Medline]
  18. Hunt BJ, Yacoub M. Aprotinin and cardiac surgery [Letter; Comment]. Br Med J 1991;303:1401.[Free Full Text]
  19. Orchard NA, Goodchild DF, Prentice CRN, et al. Aprotinin reduces cardiopulmonary bypass induced blood loss and inhibits fibrinolysis without influencing platelets. Br J Haematol 1993;85:533–41.[Medline]
  20. Verstraete M. Clinical application of inhibitors of fibrinolysis. Drugs 1985;29:236–61.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
D. Klugman, M. Donofrio, D. Zurakowski, and R. Jonas
Postoperative complications following the Fontan procedure: the role of aprotinin
Perfusion, November 1, 2011; 26(6): 529 - 535.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. A. Guzzetta, F. M. Evans, E. S. Rosenberg, T. M. Fazlollah, M. J. Baker, E. C. Wilson, A. M. Kaiser, S. R. Tosone, and B. E. Miller
The Impact of Aprotinin on Postoperative Renal Dysfunction in Neonates Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Retrospective Analysis
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2009; 108(2): 448 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. P. Eaton
Antifibrinolytic Therapy in Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1087 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. M. Arnold, D. A. Fergusson, A. K.C. Chan, R. J. Cook, G. A. Fraser, W. Lim, M. A. Blajchman, and D. J. Cook
Avoiding transfusions in children undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials of aprotinin.
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 731 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
R. M. Grounds, C. Seebach, C. Knothe, P. Paluszkiewicz, T. S. Smith, E. Kasal, R. Lecumberri, R. Urbanec, T. Haas, M. Wujtewicz, et al.
Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII (Novoseven) in Trauma and Surgery: Analysis of Outcomes Reported to an International Registry
J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 27 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. M. Costello, C. L. Backer, A. de Hoyos, H. J. Binns, and C. Mavroudis
Aprotinin reduces operative closure time and blood product use after pediatric bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1261 - 1266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Mossinger, W. Dietrich, S. L. Braun, M. Jochum, H. Meisner, and J. A. Richter
High-dose aprotinin reduces activation of hemostasis, allogeneic blood requirement, and duration of postoperative ventilation in pediatric cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 430 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. R. Stephenson Jr and J. L. Myers
Pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2176 - 2177.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
L. Shore-Lesserson
Monitoring the Hematologic Complications of Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2001; 5(3): 207 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
H. A. Hennein
Inflammation After Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Therapy for the Postpump Syndrome
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2001; 5(3): 236 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
L. A. Gramlich and S. D. Barnes
Aprotinin Use in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2001; 5(1): 117 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Chauhan, B. A. Kumar, B. H. Rao, M. S. Rao, B. Dubey, N. Saxena, and P. Venugopal
Efficacy of aprotinin, epsilon aminocaproic acid, or combination in cyanotic heart disease
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2000; 70(4): 1308 - 1312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
M. Codispoti and P. S Mankad
Management of anticoagulation and its reversal during paediatric cardiopulmonary bypass: a review of current UK practice
Perfusion, May 1, 2000; 15(3): 191 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
A. K Biswas, L. Lewis, and J. F Sommerauer
Aprotinin in the management of life-threatening bleeding during extracorporeal life support
Perfusion, May 1, 2000; 15(3): 211 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
San Antonio, California abstracts
Perfusion, March 1, 1999; 14(2): 149 - 155.
[PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. E. Miller, S. R. Tosone, V. K.H. Tam, K. R. Kanter, N. A. Guzzetta, J. M. Bailey, and J. H. Levy
Hematologic and economic impact of aprotinin in reoperative pediatric cardiac operations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1998; 66(2): 535 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. P. Carrel, M. Schwanda, P. R. Vogt, and M. I. Turina
Aprotinin in pediatric cardiac operations: a benefit in complex malformations and with high-dose regimen only
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1998; 66(1): 153 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Pouard
Review of Efficacy Parameters
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1998; 65(90060): S40 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Mossinger and W. Dietrich
Activation of Hemostasis During Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Pediatric Aprotinin Dosage
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1998; 65(90060): S45 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Domenico Rocco
Beverley J. Hunt
Martin J. Elliott
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, M. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS