|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:143-146
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Departments of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nephrology, and Abdominal and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Accepted for publication July 23, 1996.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. We reviewed our experience in 45 patients (33 male and 12 female) who underwent open heart operations after previous renal transplantation. Thirty-one patients (group I) received coronary artery bypass grafting and 14 (group II) underwent valve replacement. Mean age at the time of operation was 55 ± 9 years. The interval between renal transplantation and cardiac operation was 57 ± 39 months (range, 5 days to 174 months). All patients had functioning renal allografts with preoperative serum creatinine levels ranging from 100 to 338 mol/mL (mean ± standard deviation, 195 ± 86).
Results. Overall early operative mortality (30 days) was 8.8% (group I, 1 patient; group II, 3 patients). Underlying causes of death were septic endocarditis (n = 2, group II), necrotizing enterocolitis (n = 1, group I), and myocardial infarction (n = 1, group II). One further patient in group II also died of septic endocarditis after 69 days (in-hospital death). The mean follow-up of the 40 surviving patients was 44 ± 31 months. There was another late death (24 months postoperatively) caused by coagulopathy. Four patients had returned to hemodialysis at intervals of 27 to 83 months (mean, 51 months) because of renal transplant failure. In all patients, the function of the renal allograft was not impaired by open heart operation.
Conclusions. Open heart operations in renal transplant recipients have acceptable mortality and morbidity rates. In almost all patients, function of the transplanted organ can be maintained at the preoperative level.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Charts were reviewed for factors relating to the patients' end-stage renal disease, including cause, date of initiation of dialysis, date of renal transplantation, and immunosuppression therapy. Perioperative data included indication for operation, type of procedure, date of procedure, postoperative course, and complications. In addition, preoperative New York Heart Association functional classification and cardiac catheterization data were reviewed, and the severity of coronary artery disease or heart valve disease was assessed.
The mean age of the patients at cardiac operation was 55 ± 9 years, and the interval between renal transplantation and OHO was 57 ± 39 months. Before renal transplantation, the patients had dialysis treatment for 58 ± 46 months. The causes of end-stage renal disease are summarized in Table 1
. Three of 45 patients had received a second renal graft. Immunosuppression therapy included cyclosporin A, prednisolone, and azathioprine. Single-drug therapy was used in 1 of the 45 patients and triple therapy in 5; the rest (39/45) had a double immunosuppression protocol. Preoperative serum creatinine levels ranged from 100 to 338 mol/L (mean, 186 ± 81 mol/L), and blood urea nitrogen levels ranged from 5.6 to 28.2 mmol/L (mean, 14.7 ± 6.2 mmol/L). There was no significant difference between groups I and II.
|
70% luminal stenosis) triple-vessel disease in 7, double-vessel disease in 19, and single-vessel disease in 5 patients. One of these patients also had a left ventricular aneurysm. In 14 patients, an open heart operation was necessary because of heart valve disease. Aortic valve disease was found in 11 patients, mitral valve failure in 7, and tricuspid insufficiency in 1. Four patients had native valve endocarditis. The preoperative New York Heart Association functional classification was I in 1 patient, II in 14 patients, III in 20 patients, and IV in 10 patients (Table 2
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thirty-one patients underwent CABG (group I), 13 patients had isolated valve operations, and 1 had a combined valvular and coronary operation (group II). For coronary revascularization (group I), 10 patients received saphenous veins for all bypasses, and in 21 patients the left internal mammary artery also was used. A mean of 3.0 grafts were bypassed. In 1 patient, patching of a left ventricular aneurysm was done simultaneously, and another patient had carotid endarterectomy. The valve operations (group II) included AVR in 4 patients; AVR plus replacement of the ascending aorta in 2 patients; isolated MVR in 3 patients; combined AVR and MVR in 2 patients; combined AVR, MVR, and ventricular myotomy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in 1 patient; and AVR, MVR, and reconstruction of a tricuspid valve in 1 patient. Bioprosthetic valves were used in 2 patients in the aortic position and in 1 patient for MVR.
There were slight differences in the hemodynamic indices between group I and group II. Cardiac index, ejection fraction, and cardiac output were significantly lower in group II, while the mean pulmonary artery pressure was higher (see Table 3
). The mean operating time was 173 ± 55 minutes (group 1, 175 ± 58 minutes; group 2, 170 ± 53 minutes), bypass time was 86 ± 34 minutes (group 1, 80 ± 28 minutes; group 2, 100 ± 43 minutes), and cross-clamping time was 49 ± 21 minutes (group 1, 41 ± 15 minutes; group 2, 67 ± 27 minutes). Intraoperative urine production ranged from 200 to 2,800 mL (945 ± 700 mL) and was significantly different between group I (1,195 ± 719 mL) and group II (472 ± 317 mL). Patients were extubated after a mean of 19 ± 21 hours postoperatively. Postoperative urine production was 3,030 ± 1,400 mL in the first 24 hours, and the drainage through chest tubes was 450 ± 260 mL.
Compared with the surviving patients, the patients who died had a significantly lower cardiac output (5.8 ± 1.4 versus 4.0 ± 0.2 L/min), a significantly lower cardiac index (3.3 ± 0.7 versus 2.2 ± 0.3 L min-1 m-1, a significantly longer cross-clamping time (70.5 ± 25.8 versus 46.3 ± 20.8 minutes), and a lower postoperative urine output (3,315 ± 1,260 versus 1,750 ± 1,525 mL) during the first 24 hours.
Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen returned to preoperative values after 5 postoperative days. Leukocytes were only slightly elevated on the fifth postoperative day, with no difference between group I and group II. No graft rejection episodes were observed.
At a mean follow-up of 44 ± 31 months, the cumulative 1-year patient survival was 88%; 5-year survival was 85%. Thirty-three patients were free of cardiac symptoms and returned to New York Heart Association classes I and II. Six patients in group I had return of angina on exertion. One patient after MVR and 3 patients after CABG had returned to hemodialysis at intervals of 27 to 83 months.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Renal transplantation and cardiac operation are both well-established procedures. However, few data are available about the risk and the mortality rate in patients after successful renal transplantation who undergo open heart operations. Several questions are still not answered in the literature: (1) Is the transplanted kidney able to cope with the massive trauma and the physiologic alterations associated with cardiopulmonary bypass? (2) Is there an increased risk of rejection, infection, and impairment of wound healing due to steroid treatment?
In 1975 and 1976, Lamberti and associates [3], Nakhjavan and colleagues [16], and Beauchamp and co-workers [17] published the first case reports concerning this issue. Other groups [1821] also reported cardiac surgical procedures in patients after renal transplantation, although the numbers were limited. Bolman and colleagues [22] published the results of 14 patients. The operative aim in all of our patients was to reduce the incidence of cardiac-related death and to provide symptomatic improvement and a better life expectancy.
In the literature, the reported hospital mortality rates for patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing open heart operations range between 0% and 20% [12, 2327]. Bolman and colleagues [22] reported a perioperative death rate of 14%. The overall mortality rate in our study was 8.8% (in-hospital, 11.1%), with a significant difference between group I (3.2%) and group II (21.4%; in-hospital, 28.6%). However, the severity of cardiac impairment, and therefore the general operative risk, in group II was also higher than in group I. Native valve endocarditis was a major risk factor; 3 of 4 patients with endocarditis died of sepsis after valve replacement. In our study, the overall cumulative patient survival was 88% for the first year and 85% at 5 years.
Patients undergoing CABG after successful renal transplantation had a 96.8% survival rate at 5 years. This exceeds the survival rates of dialysis patients [28] undergoing CABG (91.7%). After CABG, the New York Heart Association functional classification of most of our patients improved dramatically, as reported for dialysis patients [2, 79, 28] and for patients with normal renal function [27, 29]. As in dialysis patients, renal transplant recipients are more likely to require myocardial revascularization procedures than a valve replacement [1]. In our study, the ratio of CABG to valve replacements was 2:1; Bolman and colleagues [22] reported 11 CABG and only three valve operations. We generally preferred mechanical heart valves over bioprosthetic valves because of the young age (mean, 55 ± 11 years) of the patients and to avoid the increased risk of calcification as seen in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels in renal transplant recipients showed only a moderate rise postoperatively and returned in the majority of patients to preoperative values within the first 5 postoperative days. This is in agreement with the observations of Bolman and colleagues [22]. Consistent with others [3, 16, 18, 19], we saw no rejection episodes in our patients postoperatively. Obviously, the risk of rejection is not enhanced when immunosuppressive therapy is maintained throughout the perioperative period. Cardiac operations have many risk factors for sepsis, including major tissue trauma, prolonged exposure to air, and physiologic aberrations induced by the mechanical circulatory assist system. Despite all of these risk factors and immunosuppressive therapy, the incidence of wound infection or septicemia was comparable with that in patients not having transplantation. Only patients with endocarditis have a high risk of sepsis. Our study showed that renal transplant recipients can cope with the stress of cardiac operations. Only minimal disturbances in renal graft function were detectable. The risk of rejection is efficiently controlled by continuing the immunosuppression protocol.
We conclude that patients with functioning renal allografts undergoing open heart operations have acceptably low mortality and morbidity rates. Cardiac diagnostic studies and necessary open heart operations should be performed without delay when cardiac symptoms occur. Renal transplant recipients should be treated in the same manner as patients not having transplantation, with particular attention to maintaining kidney graft function by conventional therapeutic means.
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. I. Khalpey, R. B. Ganim, and J. D. Rawn Postoperative Care of Cardiac Surgery Patients Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 465 - 486. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Deb, C. J. Mullany, P. S. Kamath, J. A. Dearani, R. C. Daly, T. A. Orszulak, and H. V. Schaff Cardiac Surgery in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients Mayo Clin. Proc., July 1, 2006; 81(7): 917 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhang, J. M. Garcia, P. C. Hill, E. Haile, J. A. Light, and P. J. Corso Cardiac Surgery in Renal Transplant Recipients: Experience from Washington Hospital Center Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1379 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gupta, Y. Birnbaum, and B. F. Uretsky The renal patient with coronary artery disease: Current concepts and dilemmas J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1343 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Herzog, J. Z. Ma, and A. J. Collins Long-Term Outcome of Renal Transplant Recipients in the United States After Coronary Revascularization Procedures Circulation, June 15, 2004; 109(23): 2866 - 2871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ono, R. K. Wolf, D. C. Angouras, D. A. Brown, A. H. Goldstein, and R. E. Michler Short- and long-term results of open heart surgery in patients with abdominal solid organ transplant Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 21(6): 1061 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hirose, A. Amano, A. Takahashi, and N. Nagano Complicated Cardiac Surgery in Renal Transplant Patient Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2001; 9(1): 45 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |