|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1890-1891
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
The Heart Institute, 15 East St, Kilpauk Garden Colony, Madras 600 010, India
To the Editor:
We read with interest the concern of Dr Grover [1] about the escalating cost of cardiac surgery and the innovation of fast-track surgery by Dr Engelman [2] to cut down costs.
When Dr Victor was in the United States during 1969 to 1970 to observe open heart operations, he was ashamed to see patients from India coming to America for such operations. He returned to India in 1971 to establish open heart surgery at the Government General Hospital, Madras, which caters mostly to the poor and middle class. The challenges [3, 4] then were (1) too many patients, (2) lack of equipment (there were no ventilators or blood gas analyzers), (3) lack of trained nurses, and (4) meager funds.
This led us to evolve, since 1971, the KISS (Keep It Simple and Safe) approach [35] to open heart surgery, to help more patients with available funds, equipment, and staff.
Doctor Victor had learned from Mr Donald Ross, at the National Heart Hospital, London, that reliance on a bedside clinical commonsense approach was more important than dependence on gadgets. It was also realized that in "standard" practice of cardiac surgery, we alter physiologic situations, create problems, and spend time and money trying to revert back to normal physiology. We cool and rewarm; we sedate heavily and ventilate; we infuse too much and use diuretics and dialyzers to correct fluid and electrolyte imbalances. We paralyze the myocardium and await its recovery. In the KISS approach, we try to keep as close to normal physiology as possible, aiming to see an alert postoperative patient, fully warm, off the ventilator, and without inotropic support.
We find it is more satisfying to concentrate on patients who can be either cured or given excellent long-term palliation rather than to subject critically ill patients with incurable lesions to ego-satisfying operations that result in economic ruin of the family, emotional problems, and inevitable early demise of the patient.
The essential features of the KISS approach [35] are as follows:
Unfortunately medicine has passed from an altruistic era of charity [1], exemplified by Osler, the Mayo Brothers, and Albert Schweitzer, who set up gold standards for us to follow while we were medical students, to an era of industrialization and commercialization of medical care. Nations spend more on warfare than on welfare and health care. The profit motive drives industries, insurance companies, financial institutions, hospitals, and individuals.
The most hard-hit are patients in developing countries like India, where 300 million people live in poverty earning about US $20 per month. Even patients in the middle class find the cost of an open heart operation exceeding their life's savings, despite the cost in India being about US $2,000 compared with more than $20,000 in the United States. The KISS approach is more relevant today than in the 1970s [13, 14], with about half of humanity living without basic needs of life.
References
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center and the Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4200 E Ninth Ave, Denver, Co 80262
To the Editor:
I have read with interest the letter from Dr Solomon Victor and his colleagues from Madras, India. This is a very timely letter given our changing health care environment with increasing emphasis on cost savings while at the same time trying to maintain quality health care delivery. Victor and associates appropriately emphasize keeping operations "simple and safe" and also emphasize selecting patients who are most likely to benefit from cardiac surgical procedures, so as not to waste scarce resources on those with a low expectation for a satisfactory outcome.
Victor and associates stress short bypass times and early extubation, minimizing the use of analgesics, muscle relaxants, and hypothermia. They advise simplifying the cardiopulmonary bypass set up, minimizing the use of disposables, avoiding invasive monitoring unless deemed necessary in higher risk patients, and not performing relatively unnecessary diagnostic procedures. By using these methods they have been able to hold the cost of cardiac surgical procedures to approximately $2,000 US dollars per case.
Doctor Victor has been far ahead of most of us by implementing "fast track" efficient cardiac surgery since the early 1970s. Many of us in industrial nations can learn much from our colleagues who perform their work in an environment of scarce resources.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Ghosh Setting Up an Open Heart Surgical Program in a Developing Country Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2005; 13(4): 299 - 301. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |