ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mark D. Iannettoni
Richard I. Whyte
Mark B. Orringer
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iannettoni, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Beer, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iannettoni, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Beer, D. G.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1460-1465
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Article: General Thoracic

Detection of Barrett's Adenocarcinoma of the Gastric Cardia With Sucrase Isomaltase and p53

Mark D. Iannettoni, MD, Stanley S. Lee, MS, Mark R. Bonnell, MS, Timothy L. Sell, MD, Richard I. Whyte, MD, Mark B. Orringer, MD, David G. Beer, PhD

Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. Routine surveillance for dysplastic epithelium in patients with Barrett's esophagus has markedly improved prognosis. Many patients with short segments of Barrett's mucosa near the esophagogastric junction remain undiagnosed and at risk for the development of Barrett's adenocarcinomas (BA). Sucrase isomaltase (SI), an intestinal enzyme, is highly expressed in intestinal-type Barrett's mucosa and frequently expressed in dysplastic Barrett's mucosa and BA. Sucrose isomaltase is not expressed in normal esophageal or gastric mucosa. Alterations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene are frequent events in dysplastic Barrett's mucosa and BA and result in nuclear protein accumulation. The purpose of this study was to determine the presence or absence of these markers of Barrett's mucosa in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction or cardia.

Methods. Expression of SI and p53 were examined in 40 BAs and 25 cardia adenocarcinomas using immunohistochemical techniques.

Results. Sucrose isomaltase analysis revealed positive staining in 55% (22/40) of the BAs and 44% (11/25) of the cardia adenocarcinomas. Of 14 cardia adenocarcinomas that were SI negative, 100% (14/14) had no associated Barrett's mucosa. However, in 21 cardia adenocarcinomas with no associated Barrett's mucosa, 7/21 (33%) were SI positive. This suggests that SI-positive tumors may represent BA without the standard definition of Barrett's esophagus being met. P53 was present in 65% of BAs and 64% of cardia adenocarcinomas, demonstrating the importance and similarity of this gene alteration in both tumor types. Staining was positive for SI or p53 in 77% (50/65) of all tumors. Tumors of lower stage expressed SI more often than higher stage tumors.

Conclusions. These data suggest that a subset of cardia adenocarcinomas represent BAs. Surveillance endoscopy incorporating additional esophagogastric junction biopsies and assessment of SI or p53 may improve detection of intestinalized Barrett's mucosa and early dysplastic changes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
See also page 1465.

The prevalence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is increasing at one of the most rapid rates of all visceral cancers in the United States [1]. This alarming trend represents a 100% increase in distal-third esophageal adenocarcinomas in the last two decades, with most patients receiving only limited palliation with operation or multimodality therapy [2]. Historically, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus was observed only in a limited number of patients with esophageal cancer. However, esophageal adenocarcinoma now accounts for up to 70% of esophageal cancers in the United States, surpassing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [3]. Unlike squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma does not appear to be as related to the obvious risk factors of smoking and alcohol abuse. The development of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is closely associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux and the eventual replacement of the normal esophageal squamous cell epithelium by columnar-lined epithelium known as Barrett's metaplasia [4, 5]. Barrett's metaplasia is categorized into three histologic types: the gastric-fundic type, in which there are clusters of glands with parietal and chief cells similar to those found in the gastric body mucosa; the junctional type, which contains deep clusters of mucosa glands identical to those found at the gastric cardia; and the specialized or intestinal type, which is characterized by villi and tubules lined by intestinal-type goblet cells and other columnar epithelial cells. It is the specialized Barrett's metaplasia that has been most closely associated with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus [6]. By convention, Barrett's esophagus is diagnosed by the demonstration of biopsy-proven columnar epithelium at least 3 cm above the anatomic gastroesophageal junction. Routine surveillance endoscopy and biopsy have been recommended for patients with Barrett's esophagus because of the increased risk of adenocarcinoma [7]. Currently, esophagectomy is recommended for patients with Barrett's epithelium containing high-grade dysplasia, because of the presence of carcinoma in situ in as many as 50% of resected specimens [8].

Unlike cancer of the stomach, which has dramatically decreased in incidence, adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia (CA) and Barrett's adenocarcinoma (BA) of the distal esophagus are occurring with increasing frequency [3, 9]. This suggests that the etiologic factors resulting in the development of adenocarcinoma in both of these areas may be similar. Consistent with this, recent reports have demonstrated the presence of Barrett's metaplasia in greater than 80% of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus [10]. These observations have prompted investigators to suggest that use of the "3-cm rule" for defining Barrett's metaplasia may not identify all individuals with this condition. As a result, the finding of intestinal-type mucosa anywhere in the distal esophagus has been suggested to be indicative of Barrett's metaplasia [5, 11, 12].

The development of distal esophageal adenocarcinoma from intestinal-type metaplastic Barrett's epithelium is supported by the expression of intestinal specific enzymes such as sucrase isomaltase (SI), not only in Barrett's esophagus, but also in associated adenocarcinoma [13, 14]. Sucrase isomaltase is an intestinal disaccharidase that is abundantly expressed in more than 80% of patients with specialized Barrett's epithelium [13]. However, this protein is not expressed in normal esophageal mucosa, squamous cell carcinomas, or normal gastric mucosa. Thus the presence of this enzyme in intestinal-type Barrett's metaplasia, dysplasia, and the adenocarcinomas developing from this mucosa suggests a common cell of origin, although expression is often decreased in more advanced tumors [13].

Mutation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene clearly plays an important role in the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Mutations in p53 are observed in dysplastic Barrett's epithelium and in 60% to 70% of esophageal adenocarcinomas [141417]. The protein product of the mutated p53 gene is more stable than the wild-type p53 protein, causing it to accumulate in the nuclei of affected cells and allowing detection. In the absence of the wild-type protein, cells no longer undergo a G1-S phase DNA checkpoint arrest and thus may be predisposed to further DNA alterations, suggesting that p53 gene alterations are significant early events in the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma [18].

Previous studies have supported the conclusion that at least a subset of adenocarcinomas of the gastric cardia may actually represent BAs [6, 11]. The purpose of the present study was to examine the potential of SI expression and p53 nuclear accumulation to identify CAs that may have origin in Barrett's epithelium, perhaps explaining why BA and CA are clinically and histologically such similar tumors [10]. Twenty-five adenocarcinomas arising in the gastric cardia without preoperatively documented Barrett's epithelium and 40 adenocarcinomas arising in Barrett's epithelium were retrospectively identified and examined for these markers.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Patients
Retrospective review of 65 patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus was performed evaluating clinical, pathologic, and survival data. There were 40 patients who were diagnosed with Barrett's esophagus, which was defined by biopsy demonstration of specialized intestinal epithelium greater than 3 cm above the anatomic gastroesophageal junction; 35 (87.5%) were men and 5 (12.5%) were women. The age of patients in the BA group ranged from 45 to 85 years (mean, 65 years). There were 25 patients with CAs, defined as lesions arising within 3 cm of the gastroesophageal junction; 22 (88%) were men and 3 (12%) women. The age range in the CA group was 32 to 77 years (mean, 63 years). None of the patients with CA had endoscopic evidence of Barrett's mucosa or had been evaluated with surveillance endoscopy for gastroesophageal reflux at regular intervals.

The barium swallow, computed tomography of the chest and abdomen, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and original biopsy report confirming cancer were reviewed. There were 64 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy and 1 who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy, all with cervical esophagogastric anastomoses. Biopsy specimens had been harvested in the operating room from the resected specimen and included samples from the proximal stomach, the tumor, and the normal distal esophagus immediately adjacent to the tumor. No patient in this study had received preoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Statistics
Results are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis for actuarial survival with confidence intervals at 95%. Comparisons between groups was performed with {chi}2 analysis. Follow-up was based on the most recent office visit or telephone contact for patients without recent follow-up data.

Immunohistochemical Analysis
All specimens were processed immediately after resection. Tissue was frozen in OCT compound with isopentane cooled to the temperature of liquid nitrogen. The following procedures were standardized to maintain uniform conditions for assessment of SI and nuclear p53 immunostaining as described previously [13, 14]. Five-micrometer cryostat tissue sections were mounted on poly-L-lysine–treated glass slides. For SI staining, the slides were fixed in acetone at 4°C for 10 minutes. For p53 staining, a 1:1 mixture of acetone and 100% methanol was used at the same time and temperature. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation of slides in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) for two changes of 15 minutes each. The slides were then rinsed twice in PBS for 5 minutes each followed by incubation with 0.1% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 10 minutes. The Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) was used. Nonspecific binding was blocked using horse serum at the recommended dilution in PBS for 45 minutes. For SI staining, a monoclonal-antihuman SI primary antibody (a gift from Drs Ward Olsen and Mark Lloyd, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) was added at a 1:100 dilution in bovine serum albumin/PBS and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. The primary antibody used for p53 protein detection was PAb 1801 (Oncogene Science Inc, Cambridge, MA) at a 1:100 dilution. This antibody recognizes residues 46–55 of human p53 and will react with both wild type and mutant p53. The tissues were washed twice for 5 minutes in PBS followed by biotinylated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody incubation at the recommended dilution for 45 minutes. The sections were again washed twice for 5 minutes each in PBS followed by incubation with avidin-biotin complex for 30 minutes. After two washes for 5 minutes each in PBS, the chromogen diaminobenzidine was applied for 5 minutes. The tissues being tested for SI were rinsed for 5 minutes in distilled water, lightly counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO), dehydrated, placed in toluene, and mounted with coverslips in Permount medium. Sections being tested for p53 were lightly counterstained with fast green (Sigma Chemical Co). All antibody incubation steps were performed in humidified chambers at room temperature. The positive control was a section of tissue previously determined to be positive for either SI or p53. The negative control was a section of each tissue that did not receive the primary antibody processed concurrently.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Reflux symptoms were present in 27/40 patients (68%) in the BA group and 9/25 patients (36%) in the CA group (p < 0.001). H2 blockade or regular antacid use was documented in 32/40 patients (80%) with BA and in 15/25 patients (60%) in the CA group. Significant dysphagia was found in 19/40 (48%) in the BA group and in 20/25 (80%) in the CA group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted between groups with regard to age, duration of symptoms, or weight loss.

All tumors were staged according to the TNM classification (Table 1Go). In the BA group 31/40 (78%) were either stage II or III, and 19/25 (76%) of the CAs were stage II or III. Tumors were defined as stage IV based on celiac lymph node metastases in 8, liver metastases in 2, and metastasis to cervical lymph nodes in 1. Mean survival was 25 ± 3 months (range, 2 to 50 months) for all patients. All patients with stage I tumors are alive at 5 to 42 months after operation, and survival for stage II, III, and IV disease was 38 ± 4, 16 ± 3, and 12 ± 3 months, respectively. Actuarial survival curves based on tumor stage were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis for survival. Actuarial survival at 48 months was 100% for stage I, 59% for stage II, and 10% for stage III tumors. No patient with stage IV disease survived longer than 25 months (Fig 1Go). Mean survival was 22 ± 3 months for adenocarcinoma associated with Barrett's epithelium and 27 ± 4 months for cardia tumors. The overall actuarial survival curves for both groups are shown in Figure 2Go. There was no significant difference in survival between these groups or stages when appropriate statistical analysis could be carried out.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. . Pathologic Staging for Patients With Barrett's Adenocarcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Cardia
 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival based on tumor stage. Percentages for each stage are based on 48 months of follow-up for each group.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. . Comparative overall Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival for patients with Barrett's adenocarcinoma versus patients with cardia adenocarcinoma. No statistical difference in survival was observed.

 
Sucrase isomaltase expression was found in 33 of the 65 patients (51%): in 22/40 in the BA group (55%) and in 11/25 in the CA group (44%). The characteristic staining of SI within the epithelial brush border in some patients' tumors was observed; however, staining was often predominantly cytoplasmic in both the BAs and the CAs (Figs 3A, 3BGoGo). The tumors that were of lower stage showed more extensive SI expression than higher stage tumors. Tumors were considered positive for SI even if expression was observed in a small percentage of the tumor cells. Of the CAs that were negative for SI, all (14/14) were histologically negative for Barrett's epithelium as well. There were 7/21 CAs (33%), however, that had no previously detectable Barrett's epithelium but stained positively for SI. Four of 25 patients with CA were found on histologic examination to have Barrett's epithelium at the level of the esophagogastric junction, but did not fulfill endoscopic criteria to be classified as Barrett's esophagus; all were positive for SI.



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. . Immunocytochemical analysis of sucrase isomaltase (SI) and p53 nuclear protein accumulation in Barrett's adenocarcinomas (A, C) and cardia adenocarcinomas (B, D). (A) Intense brush border staining of SI (arrow) in a section of Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Also, note the loss of SI expression within other tumor cells in this specimen. (B) Strong cytoplasmic staining of SI in essentially all cells within this cardia tumor is observed, although some apical SI staining (arrow) is also present. (C) Abundant expression of the p53 nuclear protein in a section of a Barrett's adenocarcinoma. (D) Cardia tumor cells showing invasion through the muscularis mucosa (m) and containing increased nuclear P53 expression. (x100 before 24% reduction.)

 
Increased nuclear expression of the mutant form of the p53 suppressor gene protein product was seen in 42/65 patients (65%) in 16/25 with CA (64%) and 26/40 with BA (65%). These tumors demonstrated intense nuclear staining, with similar immunohistochemical patterns found in both BA and CA (Figs 3C, 3DGoGo). There was no correlation between the intensity of p53 expression and the stage of disease for either tumor type, nor was there a significant survival advantage.

The expression of tumor markers fell into four separate categories: SI negative/p53 negative, SI negative/p53 positive, SI positive/p53 negative, and SI positive/p53 positive for the BA and CA groups (Table 2Go). Of 24 stage I and II tumors, there was SI expression in 15 stage III tumors (63%), as compared with 16/41 stage III tumors (39%) (p < 0.005). This difference in expression associated with stage was not appreciated with p53, in which 17/24 stage I and II (70%) tumors expressed p53 compared with 25/41 stage III and IV tumors (61%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. . Expression of Sucrase Isomaltase and p53 in Barrett's Adenocarcinoma and Cardia Tumors
 

    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux results in complications in up to 20% of patients [19]. The most important of these complications is columnar metaplasia (Barrett's esophagus), with its potential for dysplasia and malignant degeneration to adenocarcinoma [20, 21]. In patients with Barrett's esophagus, there is a 20-fold to 125-fold risk of adenocarcinoma [3, 6, 8, 16, 20, 21]. Because of this increased risk of adenocarcinoma, periodic surveillance endoscopy has been recommended for those patients with documented Barrett's metaplasia [22]. Barrett's mucosa is found on endoscopy in 5% to 10% of patients with reflux. This incidence can be as high as 40% in those patients with an esophageal reflux stricture [23]. More frequent surveillance with endoscopy and biopsy has been recommended for those patients with increasing degrees of dysplasia. In patients with high-grade dysplasia, esophagectomy is advised because of the frequency of associated carcinoma in situ. With this approach, patients with high-grade dysplasia and associated carcinoma in situ have similar survival rates as those undergoing esophagectomy for benign disease.

The current definition of what constitutes Barrett's mucosa clearly excludes some patients who have this condition and are at significant risk of the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Presently, the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus is dependent on the endoscopic biopsy documentation of columnar epithelium at a minimum of 3 cm above the anatomic gastroesophageal junction [24, 25]. Patients so diagnosed then undergo more rigorous endoscopic surveillance. In our study, none of the patients with CA had Barrett's mucosa identified preoperatively, yet many of the CA group had similar genetic expression of SI (44%) and p53 (64%), markers also present in BA.

Two clinically significant differences in patients with BA and CA were identified: symptomatic reflux and dysphagia. Reflux symptoms were present in a significantly higher proportion of patients with previously documented Barrett's mucosa than in those with tumors of the gastric cardia. Symptomatic reflux is a relatively subjective finding, which may have selected patients to seek medical evaluation earlier. There was also a higher incidence of dysphagia in those patients with CA; these tumors tended to be of higher stage at the time of presentation. Although these clinical differences were significant, the long-term survival was no different for those patients with BA (22 ± 3 months) compared with those with CA (27 ± 4 months).

Sucrase isomaltase and other intestinal enzymes have previously been described as sensitive markers for Barrett's intestinalized epithelium [13, 14]. Sucrase isomaltase is expressed in the majority of adenocarcinomas associated with intestinal Barrett's epithelium; however, it is not present in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. It has also been described in intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma [26] but is absent in normal gastric mucosa [13]. In the present study, all CAs that stained negatively for SI were also histologically negative for Barrett's mucosa. There were four tumors at the gastric cardia with small foci of Barrett's epithelium that was not appreciated preoperatively. These four tumors all stained positively for SI. Of the 21 tumors that had no pathologically reported evidence of Barrett's mucosa in the resected specimens, 7 of 21 (33%) were found to stain positively for SI. Our findings suggest that these tumors may have arisen from specialized Barrett's epithelium, and that during the growth of the tumor, "cannibalization" of any associated Barrett's mucosa may have occurred. It has been shown previously that Barrett's specialized intestinal epithelium may be found preoperatively in more than 80% of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, and that high-grade dysplasia is found in the majority of these [6, 10]. Clark and associates [6] have shown that the association of Barrett's specialized epithelium with cardia tumors is equally as high, although the frequency of high-grade dysplasia is somewhat lower. Our study demonstrates that some adenocarcinomas arising within 3 cm of the esophagogastric junction have genetic characteristics similar to traditional BAs, specifically the expression of SI in 44% and p53 in 64%. Expression of the intestinal enzyme SI is present in those patients with both metaplastic intestinal-type Barrett's epithelium and dysplastic changes of the esophageal epithelium [13]. During the events accompanying dysplasia in intestinalized Barrett's mucosa, this epithelium appears to become less differentiated, and the level of SI expression is often decreased [13]. This may account for the decreased level of SI expression in many of the higher stage tumors evaluated in our study. Sucrase isomaltase tended to be expressed in a greater percentage of tumors of lower stage: 63% of stage I and II tumors compared with 39% of stage III and IV tumors.

Nuclear accumulation of the p53 protein was almost equal in both BA and adenocarcinoma arising at the gastric cardia: 65% and 64%, respectively. This confirms the importance of this genetic alteration in tumors arising in Barrett's epithelium as well as cardia tumors. P53 mutations are frequently found in Barrett's mucosa with dysplasia and increase in frequency with the degree of dysplasia [16]. Alterations of this tumor suppressor gene may be an early marker for those patients at risk for the development of adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. A long-term evaluation has not yet been performed to determine what percentage of patients with p53 gene alterations in Barrett's mucosa without dysplasia will go on to have development of Barrett's adenocarcinoma or dysplasia.

More than 70% of gastric cardia adenocarcinomas express SI, p53, or both; therefore, these markers may be of use in the early detection of these neoplasms. Our results support previous suggestions that many CAs may actually represent a subset of BA [5, 6, 27]. This subset may not have been detected preoperatively because these patients failed to fulfill current endoscopic criteria for defining Barrett's esophagus. The presence of p53 nuclear protein accumulation and expression of SI in a patient with Barrett's metaplasia may be of value in predicting patients at risk for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. These markers may implicate the presence of higher risk specialized epithelium, even if the endoscopic criterion of a 3-cm length of Barrett's mucosa is not evident.

Our findings suggest that it may no longer be appropriate to diagnose Barrett's metaplasia of the distal esophagus strictly on the basis of an endoscopic measurement of the length of the abnormal mucosa. The risk of adenocarcinoma of either the gastric cardia or the distal esophagus may be equivalent in those patients with specialized columnar epithelium at any level. Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's mucosa has allowed early identification of patients with low-grade malignancies and has improved survival with distal esophageal cancer. In patients without obvious Barrett's epithelium, immunohistochemical biopsy of the cardia and staining for p53 and SI may augment current surveillance techniques and have a positive impact on survival.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Presented at the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Orlando, FL, Jan 29–31, 1996.

Address reprint requests to Dr Iannettoni, Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, 2120 Taubman Center, Box 0344, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0344.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Blot WJ, Devesa SS, Keneller RW, et al. Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA 1991;265:1287–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Orringer MB, Forastiere AA, Perez-Tamayo C, et al. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy before transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:348–55.[Abstract]
  3. Kirby TJ, Rice TW. The epidemiology of esophageal carcinoma. The changing face of a disease. In: Rice TW, Kirby TJ, eds. Chest surgery clinics of North America. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994;4:217–25.
  4. Kalish RJ, Clancy PE, Orringer MB, Appelman HD. Clinical, epidemiologic, and morphologic comparison between adenocarcinomas arising in Barrett's esophageal mucosa and in gastric cardia. Gastroenterology 1984;86:461–7.[Medline]
  5. Spechler SJ, Zeroogian JM, Antonioli DA, Wang HH, Goyal RK. Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Lancet 1994;344:1533–6.[Medline]
  6. Clark GW, Smyrk TC, Burdiles P, et al. Is Barrett's metaplasia the source of adenocarcinomas of the cardia? Arch Surg 1994;129:609–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Streitz JM Jr, Williamson WA, Ellis FH Jr. Current concepts concerning the nature and treatment of Barrett's esophagus and its complications. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:586–91.[Abstract]
  8. Pera M, Trastek VF, Carpenter HA, et al. Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: an indication for esophagectomy? Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:199–204.[Abstract]
  9. Fuchs CS, Mayer RJ. Gastric carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1995;333:32–41.[Free Full Text]
  10. Appelman HD, Kalish RJ, Clancy PE, et al. Distinguishing feature of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus and in the gastric cardia. In: Spechler SJ, Goyal RK, eds. Barrett's esophagus: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. New York: Elsevier, 1985:167–87.
  11. Schnell TG, Sontag SJ, Chejfec G. Adenocarcinomas arising in tongues or short segments of Barrett's esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 1992;37:137–43.[Medline]
  12. Appelman HD. Barrett's esophagus: Morphologic considerations. In: Zuidema GD, ed. Surgery of the alimentary tract. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996:244–59.
  13. Wu GD, Beer DG, Moore JH, Orringer MB, Appelman HD, Traber PG. Sucrase-isomaltase gene expression in Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 1993;105:837–44.[Medline]
  14. Moore JH, Lesser EJ, Erdody DH, Natale RB, Orringer MB, Beer DG. Intestinal differentiation and p53 gene alterations in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer 1994;56:487–93.[Medline]
  15. Stemmermann G, Heffelfinger SC, Noffsinger A, Hui YZ, Miller MA, Fenoglio-Preiser CM. The molecular biology of esophageal and gastric cancer and their precursors: oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and growth factors. Hum Pathol 1994;25:968–81.[Medline]
  16. Hamelin R, Flejou JF, Muzeau F, et al. TP53 gene mutations and p53 protein immunoreactivity in malignant and premalignant Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 1994;107:1012–8.[Medline]
  17. Imazeki F, Omata M, Nose H, et al. P53 gene mutations in gastric and esophageal cancers. Gastroenterology 1992;103:892–6.[Medline]
  18. Casson AG, Mukhopadhyay T, Clearly KR, et al. P53 gene mutations in Barrett's epithelium and esophageal cancer. Cancer Res 1991;51:4495–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Tytgat GNJ. Long-term therapy for reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1148–50.[Free Full Text]
  20. Altorki NK, Sunagawa M, Little AG, et al. High-grade dysplasia in the columnar-lined esophagus. Am J Surg 1991;161:97–9.[Medline]
  21. Streitz JM, Jr, Andrews CW, Ellis FH, Jr. Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus: does it help? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;102:383–8.
  22. Streitz JM Jr, Williamson WA, Ellis FH Jr. Current concepts concerning the nature and treatment of Barrett's esophagus and its complications. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:586–91.[Abstract]
  23. Finley RJ, Gelfand G. Adenocarcinoma in the columnar-lined esophagus. In: Pearson FG, Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ, Hiebert CA, McKneally MF, Urschel HC, eds. Esophageal surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1995:594–9.
  24. Casson AG, McKneally MF. Epidemiology In: Pearson FG, Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ, Hiebert CA, McKneally MF, Urschel HC, eds. Esophageal surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1995:551–9.
  25. Skinner DB, Walther BC, Riddell RH, et al. Barrett's esophagus: comparison of benign and malignant cases. Ann Surg 1983;198:554–65.[Medline]
  26. Matsukura N, Suzuki K, Kawachi T, et al. Distribution of marker enzymes and mucin in intestinal metaplasia in human stomach and relation of complete and incomplete types of intestinal metaplasia to minute gastric carcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980;65:132–6.
  27. Hamilton SR, Smith RRL, Cameron JL. Prevalence and characteristics of Barrett esophagus in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction. Hum Pathol 1988;19:942–8.[Medline]

Related Article

Discussion
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996 62: 1465-1466. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. K. Ferguson and K. S. Naunheim
RESECTION FOR BARRETT'S MUCOSA WITH HIGH-GRADE DYSPLASIA: IMPLICATIONS FOR PROPHYLACTIC PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 1997; 114(5): 824 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mark D. Iannettoni
Richard I. Whyte
Mark B. Orringer
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iannettoni, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Beer, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iannettoni, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Beer, D. G.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS