ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yukito Ichinose
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshino, I.
Right arrow Articles by Ichinose, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshino, I.
Right arrow Articles by Ichinose, Y.

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1021-1025
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: General Thoracic

Skip Metastasis to the Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Ichiro Yoshino, MD, Hideki Yokoyama, MD, Tokujiro Yano, MD, Takashi Ueda, MD, Eiji Takai, MD, Kazuki Mizutani, MD, Hiroshi Asoh, MD, Yukito Ichinose, MD

Department of Chest Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan

Accepted for publication May 8, 1996.


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. Whether any difference exists in clinical characteristics between resected non–small cell lung cancer with either skip or ordinary mediastinal lymph node metastases (N2 disease) needs to be clarified.

Methods. There were 110 patients with stage IIIA N2 disease. Thirty-three patients demonstrating no metastasis at the hilar nodes [skip (+) group] were compared with the other 77 patients [skip (-) group]. To investigate the extent of nodal involvement, we classified the mediastinal lymph nodes into three regions (superior, inferior, or aortic).

Results. There were no significant differences regarding histologic type, T status, or the site of the primary tumors between the skip (+) and the skip (-) N2 groups. In the skip (+) group, mediastinal node metastasis was found in only one region (level 1) in 30 patients (90.9%) and in two regions (level 2) in 3 (9.1%), whereas 28 patients (36.4%) from the skip (-) group revealed mediastinal metastasis at two or three regions (level 2 or 3). The overall survival rate at 5 years after operation was 35% in the skip (+) group and 12.7% in the skip (-) group (p = 0.054). This favorable clinical outcome in the skip (+) group could be explained partially by the higher proportion of patients with level 1 metastases. Furthermore, regarding patients with level 1 disease, the skip (+) group tended to have a better prognosis than the skip (-) group (p = 0.096).

Conclusions. These results suggest that patients with skip mediastinal lymph node metastases represent a unique subgroup of N2 disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Mediastinal lymph node metastasis (N2 disease) is found in approximately 20% to 40% of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [1, 2] and is one of the most important adverse factors for prognosis [3]. Until now, many physicians have thought that resection is not indicated when mediastinal lymphatic involvement is found, because of the poor prognostic outcome. However, N2 disease may include various degrees of disease status, such as radiologically detected or undetected disease or mediastinoscopically positive or negative disease, and some of these lesions demonstrate a favorable prognosis after complete surgical resection [46]. The hilar lymph nodes are anatomically positioned upstream from the mediastinal lymph nodes; however, N2 disease is also seen without lymph node metastasis in the hilar region, which is called skip metastasis [7, 8]. The clinical significance as well as the basic mechanism of skip metastasis have yet to be clarified.

In this study, skip metastasis was found in approximately 30% of the N2 cases. To elucidate the clinical significance of skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis in NSCLC, we compared N2 patients without hilar lymph node metastasis with other N2 patients in terms of the site and extent of mediastinal lymph node metastasis, the location of the primary tumor, and the overall survival rate. We also discuss the mechanism of skip metastasis.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Patients
Between 1982 and 1993, a total of 619 patients with NSCLC underwent operative resection with mediastinal lymph node dissection at the Department of Chest Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center. Of these, 110 patients had stage IIIA with N2 disease based on the TNM classification [3]. Of these 110 patients, 33 were found to have no metastasis in the hilar lymph node upon histopathologic examination; such cases are referred to as "skip metastasis." The patient profiles are shown in Table 1Go. The histologic diagnosis of the tumors was based on the criteria of the World Health Organization [9].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. . Profile of the Patientsa
 
All patients had standard operations such as lobectomy or pneumonectomy, with a complete dissection of the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Either computed tomography or a chest roentgenogram revealed N2 disease preoperatively (clinical N2) in 9 patients from the skip (+) group (27.3%) and in 22 from the skip (-) group (28.5%). A complete resection was performed in 30 patients from the skip (+) group (90.9%) and in 68 from the skip (-) group (88.3%), whereas the other patients underwent an incomplete resection because of residual disease. All characteristics described earlier or in Table 1Go showed no statistical differences between the groups.

Classification of Mediastinal Nodes and Grade of Mediastinal Metastases
The mediastinal lymph nodes were identified by the lymph node map for lung cancer [10] and were classified into three regions as follows: (1) superior nodes, consisting of the highest mediastinal, paratracheal, pretracheal or retrotracheal and tracheobronchial nodes; (2) aortic nodes, consisting of the subaortic and paraaortic nodes; and (3) inferior nodes, consisting of the subcarinal, paraesophageal, and pulmonary ligament nodes. The extent of metastasis in the lymph nodes was scored as follows: level 1, mediastinal node metastasis was proved in one region; level 2, metastasis was found in two regions; and level 3, metastasis was seen in three regions.

Follow-Up of Patients
In general, a follow-up examination was done every 2 months for the first 2 years and thereafter every 3 to 4 months. The examination included a physical examination, complete blood count, blood chemistry, and chest roentgenography. Although a few patients routinely received screening examinations by computed tomography or radionuclide bone scanning once or twice per year after the operation, the majority of patients underwent computed tomography or a radionuclide bone scan only when symptoms related to recurrence appeared. Recurrent disease was then confirmed by biopsy if clinically feasible. For patients in whom this was not feasible, radiographic evidence (roentgenography, computed tomography, or radionuclide scan) was accepted.

Statistical Analysis
The skip (+) and skip (-) groups were compared regarding several variables, and the differences between them were evaluated using either Student's t test or the {chi}2 test. Survival curves were prepared using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. The data were considered significant when the p value did not exceed 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Site and Extent of Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastases
The sites of metastases to the mediastinal lymph nodes were similar between the skip (+) and skip (-) groups, as demonstrated in Table 2Go. Metastasis to the superior nodes was observed predominantly in patients with primary tumors in the right upper lobe, and metastasis to the aortic nodes was found frequently in patients with primary tumors in the left upper lobe. In the patients with primary tumors located in the right middle or lower lobe, both the superior and inferior nodes were involved by tumor metastasis, regardless of the group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. . Sites of Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis
 
The extent of mediastinal lymph node metastasis is summarized in Table 3Go. In the skip (+) group, 30 patients (90.9%) exhibited level 1 metastasis, and only 3 patients (9.1%) demonstrated level 2 metastasis. On the other hand, the skip (-) group had a significantly higher proportion of level 2 mediastinal metastasis (25 patients, 32.5%) than the skip (+) group. Level 3 metastasis was observed in 3 patients (9.1%) from the skip (-) group but in no patients from the skip (+) group. In the skip (-) group, level 2 or 3 metastasis was especially prevalent in patients with primary tumors located in the right middle or lower lobe (14 of 28, 50%) and in the left upper lobe (12 of 24, 50%), whereas only 1 of 22 patients (4.5%) showed level 2 metastasis in identical subgroups of the skip (+) group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. . Grade of Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis
 
Overall Survival
The overall survival curves of both the skip (+) and skip (-) groups are shown in Figure 1Go. The 5-year overall survival rate was 35% and 13%, respectively. Although the difference did not achieve statistical significance, the skip (+) group was considered to have a better prognosis than the skip (-) group (p = 0.054). This result was partially explained by the difference in the proportion of patients with level 1 mediastinal involvement. Of all the patients with N2 disease (110 patients), 79 with level 1 metastasis showed a relatively higher survival rate at 5 years after operation than the 31 patients with level 2 or 3 metastasis (24.6% versus 7.0%; p = 0.116) (Fig 2Go). More significantly, however, regarding the patients with level 1 metastasis, the skip (+) group also tended to have a better prognosis than the skip (-) group (p = 0.096) (Fig 3Go). The mean number of lymph node stations [10] involved in the patients with level 1 metastasis was similar between the groups (1.37 per patient in the skip (+) group versus 1.27 in the skip (-) group; p = 0.441). Therefore, other factors may also affect the better prognosis of the skip (+) group.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . Overall survival curves of the skip (+) and skip (-) groups (p = 0.054).

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. . Survival curves of patients with level 1 mediastinal involvement and those with level 2 or 3 (p = 0.116).

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. . Survival curves of the patients with level 1 mediastinal metastasis in the skip (+) and skip (-) groups (p = 0.096).

 
Site of First Recurrence
The sites of the first recurrence could be determined in 12 patients from the skip (+) group and in 43 from the skip (-) group. In the skip (+) group, the sites were distant organs in 8 patients, the intrathoracic region in 3, and both sites in 1; in the skip (-) group, the sites were distant organs in 31, local in 10, and both sites in 2. No significant difference was observed in the distribution of the recurrent sites between the groups.


    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
In the present study, skip metastasis in mediastinal lymph nodes was recognized in approximately 30% of the resected N2 cases, as reported previously [8]. The skip (+) group demonstrated less mediastinal lymph node involvement than the skip (-) group, which may be one of the reasons why the skip (+) group had a better prognosis than the skip (-) group. These findings indicate that skip mediastinal metastasis is a unique subgroup of N2 disease in NSCLC, and this supports complete dissection of the regional lymph nodes as a standard procedure even though no metastasis is apparent in the hilar lymph nodes at the time of thoracotomy.

One possible mechanism of skip metastasis may be the existence of direct lymphatic channels to the mediastinum. Riquet and co-workers [11] reported that subpleural lymphatics have direct passages to the mediastinal lymph nodes in 22.2% of the segments in the right lung and in 25% of the segments in the left lung. These investigators also stated that the direct passages were observed more frequently in the upper lobes [11]. In the present study, however, both the location of the primary tumors and the distribution of the metastatic nodal sites were similar between the skip (+) and the skip (-) groups. These results imply that factors other than anatomic characteristics might also contribute to the skip metastasis phenomenon. For instance, the biologic features of tumor cells or lymph nodes may be considered an important factor of such a phenomenon because the settlement of tumor cells onto lymphatic endothelial cells is mediated by the proliferative potential of tumor cells and by adhesion molecules of both tumor cells and endothelial cells, and thus is affected by the cytokine and growth factor environment [12, 13]. In this study, when comparing patients with the same extent (level 1) of mediastinal metastasis, we found that the skip (+) group showed a longer survival than the skip (-) group. This result suggests that some such biologic factors are likely related to both the phenomenon of skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis and the favorable outcome of patients with skip mediastinal metastases.

Another possible reason for skip nodal metastasis is that small metastatic foci of the hilar lymph nodes are often overlooked in a routine histopathologic examination. In fact, a pathologic examination of the regional lymph nodes is usually performed only at the largest slice of each node, and reevaluations of serial sectioning have revealed up to 20% with false-negative results [14]. Recently, advanced techniques such as immunohistochemistry [15, 16] or polymerase chain reaction [1719] have been performed in the laboratory to detect micrometastases or circulating tumor cells. Passlik and associates [15] reported that using immunohistochemical techniques, cytokeratin-expressing lung carcinoma cells in the bone marrow were detected in 22.5% of patients who were found to have negative conventional histologic examinations. Gerhard and colleagues [19] demonstrated that polymerase chain reaction techniques can detect a single carcinoembryonic antigen–expressing tumor cell among 2 to 5 x 107 normal bone marrow cells. To clarify this issue, such advanced systems should be introduced to improve the detection of micrometastases in the dissected regional lymph nodes.

In conclusion, patients with NSCLC with skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis are considered to represent a unique subpopulation of N2 disease. Further study is needed to clarify the clinical significance and basic mechanisms of this phenomenon.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We thank Dr Brian T. Quinn, Kyushu University, for his critical review and Ms Yumiko Oshima for her expert help in the preparation of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Address reprint requests to Dr Ichinose, Department of Chest Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, 3-1-1 Notame, Minami-ku, Fukuoka 815, Japan.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Massen W. Accuracy of mediastinoscopy. In: DeLarue NL, Eschapasse H, eds. International trends in general thoracic surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1985:42–53.
  2. Martini N, Flehniger BJ, Zaman MB, Beattie EJ Jr. Results of resection in non–oat cell carcinoma of the lung with mediastinal lymph node metastases. Ann Surg 1983;198:386–97.[Medline]
  3. Mountain CF. A new international staging system for lung cancer. Chest 1986;89:225–33.
  4. Miller DL, McManus KG, Allen MS, et al. Results of surgical resection in patients with N2 non–small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1095–101.[Abstract]
  5. Daly BT, Mueller JD, Faling LJ, et al. N2 lung cancer: outcome in patients with false-negative computed tomographic scans of the chest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:904–11.[Abstract]
  6. Patterson GA, Piazza O, Pearson FG, et al. Significance of metastatic disease in subaortic lymph nodes. Ann Thorac Surg 1987;43:155–9.[Abstract]
  7. Ishida T, Yano T, Maeda K, Kaneko S, Tateishi M, Sugimachi K. Strategy for lymphadenectomy in lung cancer three centimeters or less in diameter. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:708–13.[Abstract]
  8. Tateishi M, Fukuyama Y, Hamatake M, Kohdono S, Ishida T, Sugimachi K. Skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non–small cell lung cancer. J Surg Oncol 1994;57:139–42.[Medline]
  9. The World Health Organization. Histological typing of lung tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 1982;57:471–6.
  10. Naruke T, Suemasu K, Ishikawa S. Lymph node mapping and curability at various levels of metastasis in resected lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978;76:832–9.[Abstract]
  11. Riquet M, Hidden G, Debesse B. Direct lymphatic drainage of lung segments to the mediastinal nodes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:623–32.[Abstract]
  12. Fidler IJ. Origin and biology of cancer metastasis. Cytometry 1989;10:673–80.[Medline]
  13. Springer TA. Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature 1990;346:425–34.[Medline]
  14. Gusteron B. Are micrometastases clinically relevant? Br J Hosp Med 1991;47:247–8.
  15. Mansi JL, Mesker W, van Driel-Kulker AMJ, et al. Automated screening of bone marrow smears for micrometastases. J Immunol Methods 1988;112:105–11.[Medline]
  16. Passlick B, Izbicki JR, Kubuschok B, et al. Immunohistochemical assessment of individual tumor cells in lymph nodes of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:1827–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Delfau MH, Kerckaert JP, Collyn H, et al. Detection of minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia patients after bone marrow transplantation by polymerase chain reaction. Leukemia 1990;4:1–5.[Medline]
  18. Smith B, Selby P, Southgate J, et al. Detection of melanoma cells in peripheral blood by means of reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction. Lancet 1991;338:1227–9.[Medline]
  19. Gerhard M, Juhl H, Kalthoff H, Schreiber HW, Wagener C, Neumaier M. Specific detection of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing tumor cells in bone marrow aspirates by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:725–9.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Misthos, E. Sepsas, J. Kokotsakis, I. Skottis, and A. Lioulias
The Significance of One-Station N2 Disease in the Prognosis of Patients With Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1626 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Z. Mansour, E. A. Kochetkova, N. Santelmo, X. Ducrocq, E. Quoix, J.-M. Wihlm, and G. Massard
Persistent N2 Disease After Induction Therapy Does Not Jeopardize Early and Medium Term Outcomes of Pneumonectomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 86(1): 228 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Minamiya, M. Ito, Y. Hosono, H. Kawai, H. Saito, Y. Katayose, S. Motoyama, and J.-i. Ogawa
Subpleural injection of tracer improves detection of mediastinal sentinel lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 32(5): 770 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. A. Whitson, S. S. Groth, and M. A. Maddaus
Surgical Assessment and Intraoperative Management of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 1059 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Riquet, P. Bagan, J. Assouad, C. Foucault, and C. Danel
Reply.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1947 - 1948.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Ohta, Y. Shimizu, H. Minato, I. Matsumoto, M. Oda, and G. Watanabe
Results of Initial Operations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Single-Level N2 Disease
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 427 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Casali, A. Stefani, P. Natali, G. Rossi, and U. Morandi
Prognostic factors in surgically resected N2 non-small cell lung cancer: the importance of patterns of mediastinal lymph nodes metastases
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 28(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Riquet, J. Assouad, P. Bagan, C. Foucault, F. Le Pimpec Barthes, A. Dujon, and C. Danel
Skip Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis and Lung Cancer: A Particular N2 Subgroup With a Better Prognosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 225 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. G. Soltesz, S. Kim, R. G. Laurence, A. M. DeGrand, C. P. Parungo, D. M. Dor, L. H. Cohn, M. G. Bawendi, J. V. Frangioni, and T. Mihaljevic
Intraoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping of the Lung Using Near-Infrared Fluorescent Quantum Dots
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 269 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. M. Keller, M. G. Vangel, H. Wagner, J. H. Schiller, A. Herskovic, R. Komaki, R. S. Marks, M. C. Perry, R. B. Livingston, and D. H. Johnson
Prolonged survival in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer and single-level N2 disease
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2004; 128(1): 130 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F. Tanaka, K. Takenaka, H. Oyanagi, T. Fujinaga, Y. Otake, K. Yanagihara, H. Ito, and H. Wada
Skip mediastinal nodal metastases in non-small cell lung cancer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 1114 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. Misthos, E. Sepsas, K. Athanassiadi, S. Kakaris, and I. Skottis
Skip metastases: analysis of their clinical significance and prognosis in the IIIA stage of non-small cell lung cancer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 502 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
M. Tomita, Y. Matsuzaki, M. Edagawa, T. Shimizu, M. Hara, and T. Onitsuka
Lack of prognostic significance of tumor angiogenesis in resected pN2 non-small cell lung cancer
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2003; 2(2): 201 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F. M.A. Melfi, A. Chella, G. F. Menconi, F. Givigliano, G. Boni, G. Mariani, P. Sbragia, and C. A. Angeletti
Intraoperative radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 23(2): 214 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. E. Schmidt, E. A. Woltering, W. R. Webb, O. M. Garcia, J. E. Cohen, and M. H. Rozans
Sentinel nodal assessment in patients with carcinoma of the lung
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 74(3): 870 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. J. Liptay
Commentary on sentinel lymph node identification with technetium-99m tin colloid in non-small cell lung cancer
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2002; 124(3): 428 - 430.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. J. Liptay, S. C. Grondin, W. A. Fry, C. Pozdol, D. Carson, C. Knop, G. A. Masters, R. M. Perlman, and W. Watkin
Intraoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Improves Detection of Micrometastases
J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2002; 20(8): 1984 - 1988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. B. Hosch, N. H. Stoecklein, U. Pichlmeier, A. Rehders, P. Scheunemann, A. Niendorf, W. T. Knoefel, and J. R. Izbicki
Esophageal Cancer: The Mode of Lymphatic Tumor Cell Spread and Its Prognostic Significance
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2001; 19(7): 1970 - 1975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. J. Liptay, G. A. Masters, D. J. Winchester, B. L. Edelman, B. J. Garrido, T. R. Hirschtritt, R. M. Perlman, and W. A. Fry
Intraoperative radioisotope sentinel lymph node mapping in non-small cell lung cancer
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 384 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Yano, Y. Fukuyama, H. Yokoyama, S. Kuninaka, Y. Terazaki, T. Uehara, H. Asoh, and Y. Ichinose
Long-term survivors with pN2 non-small cell lung cancer after a complete resection with a systematic mediastinal node dissection
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 1999; 14(2): 152 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. G. Little, A. DeHoyos, D. M. Kirgan, T. R. Arcomano, and K. D. Murray
INTRAOPERATIVE LYMPHATIC MAPPING FOR NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: THE SENTINEL NODE TECHNIQUE
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1999; 117(2): 220 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. J. M. Chan, MB, U. Pastorino, MD, and P. Goldstraw, FRCS
SYSTEMATIC NODAL DISSECTION IN THE INTRATHORACIC STAGING OF PATIENTS WITH NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1999; 117(2): 246 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Okada, N. Tsubota, M. Yoshimura, and Y. Miyamoto
PROPOSAL FOR REASONABLE MEDIASTINAL LYMPHADENECTOMY IN BRONCHOGENIC CARCINOMAS: ROLE OF SUBCARINAL NODES IN SELECTIVE DISSECTION
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1998; 116(6): 949 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yukito Ichinose
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshino, I.
Right arrow Articles by Ichinose, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshino, I.
Right arrow Articles by Ichinose, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS