|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:811-817
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Division of Thoracic Diseases and Department of Radiology, New England Deaconess Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. Transaxial computed tomographic images, two-dimensional nonstandard multiplanar reconstruction images, and three-dimensional images obtained from patients with tracheobronchial disease were prospectively evaluated for the relationship to adjacent structures, lesion characterization, and surgical anatomic correlation before invasive procedures.
Results. Compared with conventional transaxial computed tomographic images, multiplanar reconstructions and three-dimensional shaded surface displays provided a correlative map of bronchoscopic and surgical anatomy in patients with benign and malignant tracheobronchial pathology. The longitudinal extent of abnormalities are better demonstrated on the multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional images, whereas the transverse extent of disease and relationships to adjacent structures were better shown on axial computed tomographic sections.
Conclusions. Three-dimensional and multiplanar two-dimensional images are additive to transaxial computed tomography for evaluation of diseases involving the central airways. They are beneficial for planning invasive procedures. More importantly, they provide consistent, highly accurate measurements for routine follow-up and for future clinical trials.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 1992, Weber and Grillo [1] recommended a wide variety of radiologic testing for determining airway pathology. These tests ranged from the standard chest roentgenography and tomography to angiography [1]. Around the same time, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were being evaluated for the same purpose. Shepherd and McLoud [2] noted that the multiplanar techniques of MRI showed significant progress in evaluating the airways because of the ability of MRI to change the traditional orientation of the scan and show pathology along the length of the trachea. At that time, CT had no such capability. However, within the past few years, improvements in technology now allow CT scanning to provide similar images for airway visualization without the need for intravenous contrast [3, 4]. Two recent reports demonstrated the usefulness of multiplanar techniques for the evaluation of tracheobronchial stenosis [5, 6]. This report demonstrates the applicability of multiplanar techniques and three-dimensional (3-D) reconstructions for accurate anatomic depiction of other airway pathology in addition to tracheobronchial stenosis.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A second data set was collected for multiplanar reconstructions and 3-D imaging. The scan parameters were 137 kVp at 180 mAs. Three-millimeter slices were obtained at a table speed of 5 mm/second for a total exposure of 32 seconds (two overlapping spirals for full thoracic coverage). The superior extent of the scan was the lung apices (except for cervical tracheal pathology, in which case the superior extent was the larynx), and the inferior extent was the posterior costophrenic sulcus. Reconstructions were performed only in the high-resolution mode with 3-mm increments over normal areas of the chest and 1-mm to 2-mm increments over the area of pathology. These images were presented either as sagittal or coronal reconstructions. In addition, 3-D and minimum intensity projection images of the airways were generated specifically for definition of the type of airway pathology present.
All scans were reviewed prospectively before invasive procedures. Invasive procedures were planned to document the pathology as completely as possible. All endoluminal pathology had photographic documentation during endoscopy. Other pathology, where possible, was documented by intraoperative photography. Detailed operative notes along with photographic documentation were used to compare with the CT findings.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Computed tomographic scanning also demonstrated some distinct advantages. Carr and associates [8] examined 17 patients with cystic fibrosis. They found that CT images more clearly detected bronchiectasis, bronchial thickening, and mucous plugging. Several reports have shown the usefulness of MRI for detecting the high fat content in aspirated peanuts [9, 10] and in carcinoid tumors [11]. However, as 1 of the patients in this series demonstrates, increased fat content also is detectable by CT scanning.
Other techniques for airway evaluation are sometimes useful, including xenon-133 nuclear scans for detection of bronchopleural fistulas [12], examination of tracheal wall morphology by high-end (20 and 30 MHz) ultrasound [13], and Doppler detection of pulmonary sequestration in an atelectatic lung [14]. However, these techniques have very limited applicability and would not be useful as general tools to evaluate the wide variety of airway pathology.
With improvement in CT design and postacquisition software, multiplanar techniques previously limited to MRI can now be matched by CT scanning. Newmark, Costello, Kinsella, Quint, and Whyte and their associates have demonstrated how these techniques using a helical or spiral CT scanner may be applied [36,15]. Although transaxial planar reconstruction is the usual method of presentation of patient information, these data can be displayed at any angle and degree of rotation so that all segments of the airway column in the trachea and bronchi can be visualized. This degree of flexibility not only makes detection and characterization of a stenosis easy but also, as we have demonstrated, defines all forms of airway pathology equally well including extrinsic compression, intraluminal lesions, and fistulas.
Three-dimensional reconstruction adds the final piece to the puzzle. This technique, described in the last 2 years by Costello [4], Lacrosse and associates [16], and Manson and colleagues [17], provides the spatial relationships that are necessary to plan surgical procedures. In the case of the patient with a tracheal hamartoma, the sessile nature of the lesion's base led to a decision to perform a segmental resection of the trachea. Preoperative determination that the lesion was most likely a hamartoma allowed planning for a shorter tracheal resection. In the patient with the postpneumonectomy empyema, discovery of a persistent bronchopleural fistula led to postponement of the muscle flap interposition until definitive transsternal bronchial closure could be accomplished.
As suggested by Pujol and associates [18], 3-D reconstruction CT scanning will allow definitive follow-up and evaluation of the efficacy of therapies without the need for even simple invasive procedures such as bronchoscopy. This was illustrated in the patient with recurrent carcinoma causing extrinsic compression of the airway. Bronchoscopy was performed only for brachytherapy and was not required for the diagnosis of extrinsic compression.
Some problems remain with these new scanning techniques. Secretions retained within the airway may obscure the mass or enhance a mass present within the lumen. They may also cause false images suggestive of a mass, as in the case of our second example. All detailed scanning for such reconstructions requires acquisition of data over 30 seconds; thus, it requires a cooperative, quiet, breath-holding patient. Certain individuals with significant dyspnea may not be able to cooperate fully to obtain proper images. This problem can be addressed in part by using variable-mode spiral (helical) acquisition. Three separate continuous scans, each acquired over 10 seconds, can be used. Because each breath may be different, meshing the images may be difficult. Another potential solution is to increase the pitch of the spiral from 3 mm to 8 mm. Much fewer data are acquired and thus there is lower resolution to the images. Finally, some dynamic components of obstruction may be missed during breath holding. Thus, patients with symptoms of significant obstruction, not confirmed by CT scan, may require aerodynamic testing, bronchoscopy, or other imaging modalities for clarification.
Time and cost are always an important consideration today. Because the patient has a complete routine CT scan before the specially detailed spiral (helical) scan, the patient time is doubled. The time for special reconstructions is only 5 minutes per view. Additional charges vary from hospital to hospital, but the Deaconess Hospital adds no additional charges for the technical component or the professional component.
As earlier generation scanners are upgraded, CT will become the primary radiologic test for airway pathology, supplanting all other testing. After a standard chest roentgenogram, a combination of the standard transaxial image obtained on a machine capable of spiral or helical CT and sagittal imaging with multiplanar and optional 3-D reformations should be obtained. Because additional intensive scanning with the spiral (helical) CT must be performed to produce these images, the radiologist should be alerted to any patient with suspected airway pathology at the time of the survey CT scan. This will allow the patient to have the appropriate additional scanning performed at the same time. Intravenous contrast is not required for these specialized scans but may be beneficial in certain situations to better define adjacent vascular structures [19].
Standard tomograms or laminograms and bronchography are superfluous and increasingly unavailable in the modern radiology suite. Magnetic resonance imaging is rarely needed. In the case of dynamic obstruction, pulmonary function testing with flow-volume loops, video bronchoscopy, and cine CT or MRI may be necessary to elucidate the exact nature of the problem.
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Address reprint requests to Dr LoCicero, General Thoracic Surgery, New England Deaconess Hospital, 110 Francis St, Suite 2C, Boston, MA 02215 (E-mail: locicero{at}harvarda.harvard.edu).
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W K Chooi and S K Morcos High resolution volume imaging of airways and lung parenchyma with multislice CT Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(suppl_1): S98 - S105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ernst, D. Feller-Kopman, H. D. Becker, and A. C. Mehta Central Airway Obstruction Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2004; 169(12): 1278 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Boiselle, K. F. Reynolds, and A. Ernst Multiplanar and Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Central Airways with Multidetector CT Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 301 - 308. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Y.P. Wan, T. W. Lee, H. C.K. Lam, V. Abdullah, and A. P.C. Yim Tracheobronchial Stenting for Tuberculous Airway Stenosis* Chest, July 1, 2002; 122(1): 370 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.A. Verschakelen, J. Bogaert, and W. De Wever Computed tomography in staging for lung cancer Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 40S - 48s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Chen, A. Tatsumi, and Y. Miyamoto Successful treatment of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the carina Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2001; 71(1): 366 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Refaely and D. Weissberg Surgical Management of Tracheal Tumors Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1997; 64(5): 1429 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |