|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:624
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
The Sanger Clinic, PA, 1001 Blythe Blvd, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 20803
To the Editor:
I appreciate the "Reply" of Øvrum and Tangen [1]; however, the contents of my previously published article are still misinterpreted. To state that I recommended potassium termination of electric-shock--resistant ventricular fibrillation only and that Øvrum and associates introduced it as a novel primary procedure is not factual. My article stated as follows: "The method was used under elective conditions (without even trying electrical defibrillation) in six additional patients with immediate and satisfactory results" [2].
References
Oslo Heart Center, Pilestredet 32, 0027 Oslo, Norway
To the Editor:
We still are convinced that substantial differences exist between the method described by Dr Francis Robicsek and our method, when treating postischemic ventricular fibrillation. Doctor Robicsek's technique includes repeated cross-clamping of the ascending aorta, infusing warm potassium cardioplegic solution into the coronary system, and, after having achieved cardiac arrest, pacing the heart by the ventricular mode [1]. In contrast to this somewhat complicated procedure, our article reports on the effects of the very simple measure of just adding a bolus of potassium chloride to the oxygenator reservoir of the extracorporeal circuit [2]. This technique does not involve the surgeons at all, who may proceed uninterrupted with the operation. When both articles [1, 2] are studied carefully, the disparity of the two techniques appears quite clear, although they share the almost universal biochemical principle of potassium depolarization.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |