Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1853-1855
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
How To Do It
Coronary Reoperation via Small Laparotomy Using Right Gastroepiploic Artery Without CPB
Jan G. Grandjean, MD,
Massimo A. Mariani, MD,
Tjark Ebels, MD, PhD
Thoraxcenter, University Hospital of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Accepted for publication February 13, 1996.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
The elective use of the right gastroepiploic artery as an in situ graft has been well established in coronary surgery. We propose a surgical technique for patients undergoing coronary reoperations with a patent mammary graft to the left anterior descending artery. The gastroepiploic artery is used through a small laparotomy when only the right coronary artery or the posterior descending artery needs revascularization. The described technique allows avoidance of both resternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The use of the right gastroepiploic artery (GEA) as an elective pedicle graft for coronary operation, along with the internal mammary arteries, has been recently established in large series of patients [13]. However, the routine use of the internal mammary artery at the first coronary operation may create a troublesome situation during reoperations, in particular if a patent arterial graft lies in the midline, behind the sternum [4]. Alternative techniques, eg, the small anterior left thoracotomy, have been used to avoid both resternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass in these patients [5]. We propose a surgical technique for patients undergoing coronary reoperations with patent mammary graft to the left anterior descending artery and in need of revascularization of the right coronary artery or posterior descending artery.
 |
Technique
|
|---|
The patient is prepared and positioned as for the standard midline sternotomy. The perfusionist is on stand-by and the heart-lung machine is not primed. An incision of 10 to 15 cm is made on the inferior aspect of the previous sternotomy (approximately two-thirds of the length of the incision caudally and one-third cephalad to the xyphoid). The xyphoid is removed, freeing it from the adhesions by means of electrocautery, and a conventional sternal retractor is used to provide adequate exposure. Then the peritoneum is opened in the midline and the GEA is harvested by dividing the branches with electrocoagulation between two surgical clips on both sides (stomach and omentum) [2]. The fat pedicle is then infiltrated with a 0.1 mg/mL papaverine solution. Then the undersurface of the last 5 cm of the sternum is freed from the adhesions, a T-shaped incision is made in the lower part of the sternum with the oscillating saw (Fig 1
), and the conventional spreader is positioned and gently opened, spreading only the lower part of the sternum. The diaphragmatic surface of the heart is dissected free from the diaphragm, thus exposing the posterior descending artery or the right coronary artery.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 1. . Surgical access: The skin incision of 10 to 15 cm is made onto the lower part of the previous sternotomy (approximately two-thirds of the length of the incision caudad and one-third cephalad to the xyphoid). If present, the lowest sternal wire is removed. The thick lines represent the T-shaped incision made with the oscillating saw in the lower part of the sternum. Then a conventional sternum spreader can be positioned and gently opened, spreading the lower part of the sternum.
|
|
Systemic heparinization is given at one-third (1.0 mg/kg instead of the conventional 3 mg/kg required for cardiopulmonary bypass) to keep the activated clotting time longer than 250 seconds. Then the distal part of the GEA is ligated and divided and a 0.1 mg/mL papaverine solution is gently injected into the graft.
Two stay sutures are applied to the diaphragmatic pericardium and pulled upward. Two additional stay sutures are used to pull caudally the free anterior edge of the diaphragm, thus providing good exposure of the inferior aspect of the heart. Like in all our patients where we use the GEA, the GEA is routed anterior to the pylorus and left liver lobe and enters into the pericardium through a hole in the diaphragm anterior of the inferior caval vein. The target coronary vessel is then surrounded with two 5-0 polypropylene looping sutures (Prolene; Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ), proximally and distally to the site of the arteriotomy [5]. The GEA-to-coronary anastomosis is then performed using a running 7-0 Prolene suture on the beating heart. The pedicle is fixed next to the anastomosis. Heparin is reversed with the equivalent dose of protamine at the end of the operation. The peritoneum is then closed with an absorbable running suture, and soft tissues are closed as routinely. For closing the T-shaped incision of the sternum one sternal wire is used to approximate the inferior part of the sternum.
 |
Results
|
|---|
From June 1994 to November 1995, 5 patients with previous coronary operations (Table 1
) and recurrence of angina underwent coronary reoperation according to the above-described technique. Preoperatively they all were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III, regardless of full pharmacologic treatment. Cardiac catheterization (Fig 2
) showed in 4 cases the occlusion of previous venous grafts to the right coronary artery and in 1 case progression of atherosclerotic disease affecting a previously undiseased right coronary artery. In all cases the left internal mammary graft to the left anterior descending artery was found to be patent.

View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 2. . Preoperative angiography: injection of the right coronary artery in left anterior oblique projection, showing diffuse disease of the medium tract of the artery.
|
|
All patients gave informed consent to the operation and underwent coronary reoperation according to the above-described technique. No electrocardiographic changes were recorded during the periods of partial coronary occlusion needed for performing the anastomoses. There were neither deaths nor perioperative myocardial infarctions.
Postoperative course was uneventful in all cases. One-month postoperative treadmill stress test and the following treadmill tests were negative for recurrence of angina. In patients 1 and 2, 1-year postoperative angiographic study showed the patency of the GEA graft to the posterior descending artery (Fig 3
). Patients 3 and 4 refused the study. Patient 5 was not selected for angiographic study due to the presence of an aorto-bifemoral prosthesis, previously implanted for the surgical treatment of Leriche syndrome. All patients underwent postoperative color-Doppler echographic imaging [6] of the GEA, which showed a pattern of diastolic flow indicating the patency of the pedicled graft.

View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 3. . Postoperative angiography. (A) Selective injection of the celiac trunk, with the visualization of the proximal part of the pedicled gastroepiploic artery graft. (B) Gastroepiploic artery-to-right coronary artery anastomosis in left anterior oblique projection.
|
|
 |
Comment
|
|---|
Coronary reoperations are associated with increased mortality and morbidity [7]. This is due in part to the detrimental effect of the cardiopulmonary bypass in these patients [8]. Favorable results of coronary reoperations without cardiopulmonary bypass have been reported [5]. In addition, the possibility to avoid resternotomy and the related risks is attractive, in particular in those patients who have a patent internal mammary graft to the left anterior descending artery. In fact, there is a consistent risk of damage to the mammary graft while dividing the sternum where the graft crosses the midline. The need to free the mammary graft from adhesions and to occlude it during cardioplegic delivery adds further risk to the procedure.
The surgical technique that we describe is effective to avoid all the above-mentioned risks and can be used safely in patients undergoing coronary reoperations with patent mammary graft to the LAD and with the need for revascularization of the right coronary artery or posterior descending artery with a certain diameter of more than 1 to 1.5 mm. Some experience in operating on the beating heart is fundamental.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Address reprint requests to Dr Grandjean, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Suma H, Wanibuchi Y, Terada Y, et al. The right gastroepiploic artery graft: clinical and angiographic midterm results in 200 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:61523.[Abstract]
- Grandjean JG, Boonstra PW, Den Heyer P, et al. Arterial revascularization with the right gastroepiploic artery and internal mammary arteries in 300 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:130916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Jegaden O, Eker A, Montagna P, et al. Risk and results of bypass grafting using bilateral internal mammary grafting and right gastroepiploic arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:95560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Joyce FS, McCarthy PM, Taylor PC, et al. Cardiac reoperations in patients with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Benetti FJ, Ballester C, Sani G, Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG. Video assisted coronary bypass surgery. J Cardiac Surg 1995;10:6205.[Medline]
- Nishida H, Endo M, Koyanagi H, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting with the right gastroepiploic artery and evaluation of flow with transcutaneous Doppler echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:5329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Grover FL, Johnson RR, Marshall G, et al. Factors predictive of operative mortality among coronary artery bypass subsets. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:1296307.[Medline]
- Moshkovitz Y, Lusky A, Mohr R. Coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass: analysis of short-term and mid-term outcome in 220 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:97987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Tavilla and E. F. Bruggemans
Avoiding sternotomy in repeat coronary artery bypass grafting: Feasibility, safety, and mid-term outcome of the transabdominal off-pump technique using the right gastroepiploic artery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
July 1, 2012;
144(1):
124 - 129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Glineur, P. Noirhomme, A. Poncelet, C. Hanet, P. Astarci, R. Verhelst, P. Y. Etienne, and G. El Khoury
Gastroepiploic Artery Minimally Invasive Grafting in Reoperative Patients With Patent Mammaries
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
May 1, 2005;
79(5):
1606 - 1609.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Takahashi, M. Minakawa, N. Kondo, S. Oikawa, and M. Hatakeyama
Coronary artery bypass surgery by the transdiaphragmatic approach
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
September 1, 2002;
74(3):
700 - 703.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. T. Lloyd, A. M. Calafiore, P. Wilde, R. Ascione, L. Paloscia, C. R. Monk, and G. D. Angelini
Integrated left anterior small thoracotomy and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
September 1, 1999;
68(3):
908 - 911.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Fonger, J. R. Doty, J. D. Salazar, P. L. Walinsky, and N. W. Salomon
Initial experience with MIDCAB grafting using the gastroepiploic artery
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
August 1, 1999;
68(2):
431 - 436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Grandjean, C. Canosa, M. A. Mariani, and P. W. Boonstra
Reversed-J inferior sternotomy for beating heart coronary surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
May 1, 1999;
67(5):
1505 - 1506.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Akhter, T. Z. Lajos, G. Grosner, J. Bergsland, and J. Visco
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using the right gastroepiploic artery without pump
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,
October 1, 1998;
14(Supplement_1):
S58 - S61.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Bonatti, R. Ladurner, H. Hangler, and F. Katzgraber
Anatomical studies concerning technical feasibility of minimally invasive axillocoronary bypass grafting
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,
October 1, 1998;
14(Supplement_1):
S71 - S75.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Watanabe, T. Misaki, K. Kotoh, A. Yamashita, and K. Ueyama
Bilateral Thoracoscopic Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Internal Thoracic Arteries
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
June 1, 1998;
65(6):
1673 - 1675.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Doty, J. D. Salazar, J. D. Fonger, P. L. Walinsky, M. S. Sussman, and N. W. Salomon
Reoperative MIDCAB grafting: 3-year clinical experience
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,
June 1, 1998;
13(6):
641 - 649.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Voutilainen, K. Verkkala, A. Jarvinen, M. Kaarne, P. Keto, P. Voutilainen, and S. Mattila
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using the Right Gastroepiploic Artery
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
February 1, 1998;
65(2):
444 - 448.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. B. Doty, G. B. DiRusso, and J. R. Doty
Full-Spectrum Cardiac Surgery Through a Minimal Incision: Mini-Sternotomy (Lower Half) Technique
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
February 1, 1998;
65(2):
573 - 573.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|