ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Angelillo Mackinlay, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Angelillo Mackinlay, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1626-1630
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Article: General Thoracic

VATS Debridement Versus Thoracotomy in the Treatment of Loculated Postpneumonia Empyema

Tomás A. Angelillo Mackinlay, MD, Gustavo A. Lyons, MD, Domingo J. Chimondeguy, MD, Miguel A. Barboza Piedras, MD, Gustavo Angaramo, MD, Juan Emery, MD

Division of Thoracic Surgery, British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Accepted for publication January 30, 1996.


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. There are approximately 60,000 new cases of postpneumonic empyema every day in the United States. Usually the fibrinopurulent stage of this complication has been treated by either tube thoracostomy or thoracotomy and debridement. According to the literature, thoracoscopic treatment has not been used often for this disease.

Methods. Sixty-four cases of postpneumonic fibrinopurulent empyema were operated on at our institution: 33 cases (group I) by means of a formal thoracotomy and 31 cases (group II) by thoracoscopy. In the thoracoscopic subset the data were collected prospectively since 1992. These results were compared with those of a historical series treated by thoracotomy between 1985 and 1991. Both populations were similar in terms of age (mean, 49 years), number of cases (33/31), sex (2.1 male/female), and comorbid status.

Results. Mean preoperative length of the medical management (11.5 versus 17 days) (p = 0.03) and chest tube removal (4.3 versus 6.1 days) were shorter in group II than in group I (p = 0.02). Morbidity and mortality were identical: one death and five complications in each group. Mean operative time was similar in both groups, and hospital stay was shorter in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group (6.8 versus 11.2 days) (p = not significant). Three patients from group II needed utilitary thoracotomies for debridement completeness (10% conversion rate).

Conclusions. We conclude that video-assisted thoracic surgical treatment has the same rate of success as open thoracotomy but offers substantial advantages over thoracotomy in terms of resolution of the disease, hospital stay, and cosmesis. A prospective and randomized study is needed to confirm the findings of this nonrandomized initial experience.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
See also page 1630.

Ever since Hippocrates (200 BC), empyema thoracis has been a well-recognized disease. Its occurrence is most commonly associated with pneumonia [1]. During the First World War, empyema cases among United States military forces resulted in an almost two thirds mortality (61%). This fact led to the creation of the "Empyema Commission" made up of distinguished doctors, among whom was young Evarts Graham [2]. The final recommendation of the Commission was that closed surgical drainage was the most appropriate treatment, lowering the lethal outcome to 9.5%. There are approximately 1.2 million new cases of pneumonia every year in the United States. About 40% of them will have an accompanying pleural effusion; 35% will resolve "ad integrum" with antibiotic treatment (stage I), and 5% (around 60,000 patients) will be contaminated by bacterial infection and develop fibrinopurulent effusion (stage II), complicated effusion [3], or empyema.

The gold-standard treatment for these complicated effusions has been early drainage, either by means of a chest tube or through a limited thoracotomy and debridement in the fibrinopurulent stage (phase II of Light [4]). Organization of the fibrinous clots into fibrotic peel causes lung encasement (phase III of Light), which requires a major thoracotomy and open decortication. Delay in draining these pleural effusions has resulted, even recently, in as much as a 22% mortality rate [5].

The introduction of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in 1991 has offered a less traumatic alternative by means of closed chest debridement of fibrinopurulent loculated cases (early decortication). The purpose of this presentation is to assess the role of VATS debridement in the treatment of postpneumonia fibrinopurulent empyema (phase II) and to compare its results with those of a previous similar series dealt with by open thoracotomy and debridement.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Patients
Sixty-four cases of postpneumonia empyema in clinical phase II [3] were operated on by our team during the last decade (1985 to 1994). Thirty-three of them (group I) were treated by means of a thoracotomy between 1985 and 1991 (7-year span) at a rate of 4.7 per year. The data concerning this group were obtained retrospectively from the medical records. The other 31 cases (group II) were treated thoracoscopically in a 3-year period (1992 to 1994) at a rate of 10.3 per year. They were recorded prospectively into a computer program using the same items available in the historical series. These two series were operated on during different time periods and therefore were not randomized. Sex, age, localization, preoperative length of the disease and other comorbid factors are expressed in Table 1Go. In all cases the diagnosis was established (1) on clinical grounds (fever, cough, dyspnea, and chest pain), (2) by thoracocentesis (pH less than 7.00, glucose level less than 40 mg/dL, and lactate dehydrogenase level greater than 1,000 IU/L), and (3) by computed tomographic (CT) scans showing a loculated effusion. In the first group only 28 of 33 were studied by CT scans. The 5 remaining patients underwent thoracotomy before our institution had a scanner, so they had linear tomographic evaluation instead.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. . Patient Features
 
Surgical Technique
The whole series (64 patients) was operated on under general anesthesia, using a double-lumen tube for selective ventilation. This was preceded by fiberoptic endoscopy for anatomic assessment and bronchial toilet. The usual vital parameters (eg, median arterial pressure, arterial blood gases, electrocardiogram, hourly urinary output) were always registered. In group I the thorax was approached through muscle, sparing lateral thoracotomies with or without rib resection long enough (15 cm) to allow the surgeon to introduce one hand for manual exploration of the whole pleural cavity. By this rather blind method all fibrin septae were distroyed and the fissures were liberated completely. After digital and instrumental debridement was accomplished, one or two large-bore chest tubes were placed in the lower part of the cavity through separate incisions. In group II the first incision was placed rather high (fourth or fifth intercostal space) to permit adequate visual exploration of the base of the lung and diaphragm as well as costophrenic and costovertebral recesses. The first trocar was then inserted after digital exploration. Additional ports (usually two or three) were placed according to the location of the loculations. Only one trocar was used for the telescope; in the rest of the ports the instruments were introduced directly through the skin incision. Long bowel forceps (Pfoerster), curettes, and specially designed high-pressure suction cannulas were used to gently remove fibrin clots and septae from both visceral and parietal pleural surfaces, including all fissues and recesses. Great care was exerted to avoid damage to the lung, especially when the parenchyma was still pneumonic. In some instances, one of the port incisions had to be extended a few centimeters to facilitate digital maneuvers, either to permit the use of standard instruments for the removal of large quantities of semiorganized fibrin or to perform limited decortications. When fibrotic peel was found (3 cases), one of the ports was extended up to 10 cm, allowing enough room to remove the encasing membrane using combined open and videoscopic maneuvers. The lung was reexpanded and checked for air leakage; one or two drainage tubes were left in place under endoscopic vision.

Patients from both series were sent either to the intensive care unit or to the room floor depending only on the degree of illness, not on the procedure itself. Antibiotics were administered for at least 3 weeks; clinical course, body temperature, leukocyte count, and duration of chest tube were always recorded. Chest roentgenograms were obtained at different intervals, from immediately postoperative up to 6 months later, when patients were definitively discharged.

Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed at mean values ± standard deviation. Student's t test for paired data was employed for quantitative variables and either the {chi}2 or Fisher's test for qualitative variables. Statistical significance was determined at a p value of less than 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Table 2Go compares for both groups: the length of preoperative treatment and postoperative chest tube duration, hospital stay, operating time, bacteriology, and morbidity and mortality. Six patients in each group were treated preoperatively by unsuccessful chest drainage during a mean period of 6.3 days in group I (range, 1 to 12 days) and 6.3 days in group II (range, 2 to 13 days) (p = not significant). The mean preoperative duration of the effusion was longer in the thoracotomy subset (17.5 days versus 11.4 days).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. . Results
 
Three patients required a 10-cm utilitary thoracotomy for complete debridement (10% conversion rate).

Culture and gram staining revealed bacteria in 31.2% of the whole series (33.3% in group I and 29% in group II). Table 3Go shows the identified bacteria in both groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. . Bacteriology
 
Morbidity and mortality were identical: 1 patient died and 5 patients had complications in each group. In the thoracotomy subset, the death was an 82-year-old male patient who had a cerebrovascular accident with right hemiplegia on the fifth postoperative day and died 49 days later. The complications were 4 cases of residual collections that had to be drained by CT scan-guided tube insertion (12% relapse rate) and 1 case of wound infection.

In the VATS subset an 83-year-old man, severely ill with bilateral parapneumonic empyema, died 4 days after VATS debridement on the right side and chest tube drainage on the left. The complications were requirement of mechanical respiratory assistance for 5 days postoperatively in a 63-year-old woman with bilateral debridement, 2 cases of prolonged febrile syndrome (>7 days), and 2 cases of mild wound infection. In no case did empyema recur after VATS technique was applied. All complications in both groups resolved well without further consequences.


    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The treatment of postoperative empyema should achieve permanent control of the infection by evacuating loculated pus and fibrin debris, thus preventing late functional restriction, which results from lung fibrous encasement.

After reviewing the medical literature, several facts emerge clearly: (1) Operation should be indicated early [410]. (2) Conservative treatments using lytic agents are of little value and are associated with long hospitalizations and greater morbidity and mortality than operation [11]. (3) There are few publications regarding the use of VATS for treatment of loculated pleural empyema [1215].

Low-pH (<7.00) parapneumonic effusions with or without positive bacterial cultures and radiologic evidence of fibrinous loculation are likely to evolve into fibrotic organization resulting in lung encasement. This is the fibrinopurulent stage, Light phase II complicated effusion or empyema. Light [3] makes a distinction between complicated effusion and empyema depending on whether bacterial cultures are negative or positive. Because the lower pH seems to be caused [16] by both leukocyte phagocytosis and bacterial metabolism, it constitutes in our view a consistent indirect evidence of pleural fluid infection. By far, most of these patients have been treated previously with antibiotics, which may prevent bacterial isolation, making pleural fluid Gram stains negative. Consequently we prefer the term "empyema" because it is indicative of pleural fluid infection; it also suggests more strongly the indication for early operation even when the bacterial cultives are negative. The evolution of a parapneumonic pleural effusion from the exudative stage to the fibrotic encasement represents a continuous spectrum and has no sharply defined boundaries. Fibrin deposition within the pleural cavity is variable and may take only a few days [17]. This variability would depend on individual biological reaction, but seems to be earlier and more pronounced when anaerobic bacteria alone or in combination with aerobic germs are the causative agents [18]. This explains the similar surgical findings in both series having different preoperative lengths.

The most suggestive sign of empyema on a chest radiograph is an encapsulated effusion in an atypical position. On CT scans empyemas usually are encapsulated and biconvex, showing thickening of the parietal pleura and the endothoracic fascia along with increased contrast uptake of the parietal pleura as shown by Kirsh and colleagues [19]. In their experience CT scans were unable to differentiate between early and late phases of empyema.

Strictly speaking, many of these loculated effusions or empyemas contain no frank pus but a lot of fibrin clots and membranes forming several compartments filled with seropurulent fluid. Whether frank pus exists or not, the final outcome will be the same: fibroblast invasion and fibrotic peel lung encasement. Therefore, early operation remains the gold standard of treatment.

Long before we started the series described here we had developed the concept that any loculated empyema will not respond to tube thoracostomy. In those cases the indication was a limited lateral thoracotomy, long enough to introduce one hand and perform a rather blind debridement to achieve (1) complete evacuation of fibrin clots, septae, and fluid from the pleural cavity including fissures and recesses; (2) a fully expansible lung; and (3) proper positioning of dependent tube drainage. If fibrotic peel was found, the thoracotomy was extended as much as necessary to allow a complete pulmonary decortication.

In 1992 we realized that these same goals could be obtained by the use of VATS instead of a limited thoracotomy but with the following advantages: (1) more accurate magnified inspection of the whole pleural cavity, (2) direct vision for all surgical maneuvers, and (3) avoidance of a thoracotomy and its sequelae. Modified liposuction cannulas angled in different curvatures attached to a high negative pressure source are the most effective tools that permit expeditious removal of parietal and visceral debris without injuring the lung parenchyma. On comparing the results of both series the superiority of the VATS treatment (group II) over the thoracotomy approach becomes evident. Definitive resolution was obtained in all patients in group II, whereas in group I 4 patients (12%) had to be retreated for debridement completion. Three patients in the VATS group required the extention of one port up to 10 cm as a utilitary thoracotomy (10% conversion rate) because of firmly adherent fibrinous membranes; earlier referral of patients to operations could have avoided this undesirable contingency. Mean operative time, morbidity, and mortality were identical in the two groups.

Pain was not assessed in either group; nevertheless, clinical impression would favor group II. Cosmetic results were far better in group II. The most striking difference between the two surgical modalities was the duration of the entire process, resulting from the sum of the preoperative length of medical management plus the postoperative hospital stay. The data so collected rendered a mean value of 33.72 days for thoracotomized patients and 18.3 days for the thoracoscopy group (p < 0.001). This difference was due to a much quicker acceptance of operation by both the referring physician and the patient when a mini-invasive procedure was proposed. In general, when comparing VATS technique versus traditional open procedures, higher cost is one of the main objections to this mini-invasive approach. This is not true in empyema, where expenses are in fact lower than in the thoracotomy group because (1) no special instruments are needed (cheap reusable cannulas and forceps are the most appropriate tools), (2) operative time is equal, (3) there is no need for or fewer intensive care unit admissions, (4) hospital stay is shorter, and (5) patients return to work earlier.

Even though these two series are not strictly comparable because of their chronologic difference and the lack of randomization, we conclude that for the treatment of fibrinopurulent low-pH empyema (1) complete surgical debridement has proved to be the most successful treatment, (2) CT scans are the best method to detect fibrin septae and must be obtained early whenever a pleural effusion complicates any pneumonic process, and (3) VATS debridement offers results equal to those of thoracotomy in terms of resolution of the disease but seems to be more advantageous in terms of surgical sequelae, cosmesis, costs, and labor impediment. At our institution, VATS is at present the treatment of choice for loculated postpneumonic empyema (Fig 1Go). A prospective and randomized multiinstitutional study is needed to confirm the findings of our initial experience.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . Strategic algorithm. (CT = computed tomographic; VATS = video-assisted thoracic surgery.)

 


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Presented at the Third International Symposium on Thoracoscopy and Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery, Luxembourg, June 11-13, 1995.

Address reprint requests to Dr Angelillo Mackinlay, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Perdriel 74, 1280 Buenos Aires, Argentina.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Major RH. Hippocrates. In: Major classic descriptions of disease. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1965.
  2. Graham EA. Some fundamental considerations in the treatment of empyema thoracis. St. Louis: Mosby, 1925:60-1.
  3. Light RW. Parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Clin Chest Med 1985;6:55–62.[Medline]
  4. Pothula V, Krellenstein DJ. Early aggressive surgical management of parapneumonic empyemas. Chest 1994;105:832–6.[Medline]
  5. Kelly JW, Morris MJ. Empyema thoracis: medical aspects of evaluation and treatment. South Med J 1994;87:1103–10.[Medline]
  6. Benfield JR. Invited commentary on Ridley PD, Braimbridge MV. Thoracoscopic debridement and pleural irrigation in the management of empyema thoracis. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;51:461–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cham CW, Haq SM, Rahamin J. Empyema thoracis: a problem with late referral? Thorax 1993;48:925–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hoover EL, Hsu HK, Webb H, Toporoff B, Minnard E, Cunningham JN. The surgical management of empyema thoracis in substance abuse patients: a 5-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;46:563–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kaplan DK. Treatment of empyema thoracis. Thorax 1994;49:845–6.[Free Full Text]
  10. Miller JI. Empyema thoracis. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:343–4.[Free Full Text]
  11. Hutter JA, Harari D, Braimbridge MV. The management of empyema thoracis by thoracoscopy and irrigation. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;39:517–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Striffeler H, Ris HB, Würsten HU, Hof VI, Stirnemann P, Althaus U. Video-assisted thoracoscopic treatment of pleural empyema. A new therapeutic approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:585–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ferguson MK. Thoracoscopy for empyema, bronchopleural fistula and chylothorax. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:644–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Liu HP, Chang CH, Lin PJ, Hsieh HC, Chang JP, Hsieh MJ. Video-assisted thoracic surgery. The Chang Gung experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:834–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hurley JP, McCarthy J, Wood AE. Retrospective analysis of the utility of video-assisted thoracic surgery in 100 consecutive procedures. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:589–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sahn SA, Reller LB, Taryle DA, et al. The contribution of leukocytes and bacteria to the low pH of empyema fluid. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;128:811–5.[Medline]
  17. Landay MJ, Christensen EE, Bynum LJ, Goodman C. Anaerobic pleural and pulmonary infections. AJR 1980;134:233–40.[Abstract]
  18. Brook I, Frazier EH. Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of empyema. A retrospective review in two military hospitals. Chest 1993;103:1502–7.[Medline]
  19. Kirsh E, Guckel C, Kaim A, Steimbrich W. The findings and value of computed tomography in pleural empyema. Rofo Forstchr Geb Rontsgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1994;162:404–11.

Related Article

Invited Commentary
Joseph I. Miller, Jr
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996 61: 1630. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. A. Shin, Y. S. Chang, T. H. Kim, S. J. Haam, H. J. Kim, C. M. Ahn, and M. K. Byun
Surgical decortication as the first-line treatment for pleural empyema
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2013; 145(4): 933 - 939.e1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Surgery for Non-Neoplastic Disorders of the Chest: a Clinical UpdateHome page
H. B. Ris, E. Pezzetta, T. Krueger, and D. Lardinois
Surgical treatment of pleural infections: the surgeon's point of view
Surgery for Non-Neoplastic Disorders of the Chest: a Clinical Update, June 28, 2010; 181 - 198.
[Abstract] [Fulltext] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
F. Tacconi, E. Pompeo, E. Fabbi, and T. C. Mineo
Awake video-assisted pleural decortication for empyema thoracis
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 2010; 37(3): 594 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. C. Tong, J. Hanna, E. M. Toloza, M. W. Onaitis, T. A. D'Amico, D. H. Harpole, and W. R. Burfeind
Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Decortication
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2010; 89(1): 220 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
G. Cardillo, F. Carleo, L. Carbone, M. Di Martino, L. Salvadori, L. Petrella, and M. Martelli
Chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema: comparative merits of thoracoscopic versus open decortication
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, November 1, 2009; 36(5): 914 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Interact CardioVasc Thorac SurgHome page
F. Edwin and K. Frimpong-Boateng
eComment: Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery really superior to open decortication for empyema thoracis?
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, July 1, 2009; 9(1): 78 - 78.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clinical Infectious DiseasesHome page
S. A. Sahn
Diagnosis and Management of Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyema
Clinical Infectious Diseases, December 1, 2007; 45(11): 1480 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. T.L. Chan, A. D.L. Sihoe, S. Chan, D. S.F. Tsang, B. Fang, T.-W. Lee, and L.-C. Cheng
Surgical Treatment for Empyema Thoracis: Is Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery "Better" Than Thoracotomy?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 225 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. Farjah, R. G. Symons, B. Krishnadasan, D. E. Wood, and D. R. Flum
Management of pleural space infections: A population-based analysis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 346 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
G. F. Tassi, R. J. O. Davies, and M. Noppen
Advanced techniques in medical thoracoscopy.
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2006; 28(5): 1051 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. N. Wurnig, V. Wittmer, N. S. Pridun, and P. H. Hollaus
Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Pleural Empyema
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 309 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
R. W. Light
Parapneumonic effusions and empyema.
, January 1, 2006; 3(1): 75 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MMCTSHome page
H.-B. Ris and T. Krueger
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and open decortication for pleural empyema
MMCTS, January 1, 2006; 2006(0109): mmcts.2004.000273 - mmcts.2004.000273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Lardinois, M. Gock, E. Pezzetta, C. Buchli, V. Rousson, M. Furrer, and H.-B. Ris
Delayed Referral and Gram-Negative Organisms Increase the Conversion Thoracotomy Rate in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Empyema
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 1851 - 1856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
I M Balfour-Lynn, E Abrahamson, G Cohen, J Hartley, S King, D Parikh, D Spencer, A H Thomson, D Urquhart, and on behalf of the Paediatric Pleural Diseases Subco
BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection in children
Thorax, February 1, 2005; 60(suppl_1): i1 - i21.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
C. Ozcelik, R. Ulku, S. Onat, Z. Ozcelik, I. Inci, and O. Satici
Management of postpneumonic empyemas in children
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, June 1, 2004; 25(6): 1072 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
T. L. Ray, J. W. Berkenbosch, P. Russo, and J. D. Tobias
Tissue Plasminogen Activator as an Adjuvant Therapy for Pleural Empyema in Pediatric Patients
J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 44 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Ozcelik, I. Inci, O. Nizam, and S. Onat
Intrapleural fibrinolytic treatment of multiloculated postpneumonic pediatric empyemas
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 1849 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. R. Roberts
Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of empyema: intraoperative decision making
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 225 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. A. Waller and A. Rengarajan
Thoracoscopic decortication: a role for video-assisted surgery in chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 71(6): 1813 - 1816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. B. Hammer
Pediatric Thoracic Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2001; 92(6): 1449 - 1464.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. C. Cassina, M. Hauser, L. Hillejan, D. Greschuchna, and G. Stamatis
VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPY IN THE TREATMENT OF PLEURAL EMPYEMA: STAGE-BASED MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1999; 117(2): 234 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Striffeler, M. Gugger, V. Im Hof, A. Cerny, M. Furrer, and H.-B. Ris
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Fibrinopurulent Pleural Empyema in 67 Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1998; 65(2): 319 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Angelillo Mackinlay, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Angelillo Mackinlay, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS