|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1372-1376
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, GATA Gülhane School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
Accepted for publication January 10, 1996.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. We prospectively studied the effect of postoperative low-dose aprotinin (2 million kallikrein inactivator units [280 mg]) on blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to three groups: prophylactic high-dose aprotinin (group 1), postoperative aprotinin (group 2), or a nonmedicated control group (group 3).
Results. The three groups were comparable in all demographic and operative variables. Postoperative chest tube drainage was significantly decreased in both aprotinin groups compared with that in the control group (295 mL in group 1 and 325 mL in group 2 versus 411 mL in group 3; p< 0.05). No significant difference was seen between the two aprotinin groups. The use of homologous blood products was significantly less in group 1 and group 2 than in group 3 (1.15 ± 1.13 U and 1.35 ± 1.30 U versus 2.55 ± 1.09 U; p < 0.05).
Conclusions. Our results suggest that postoperative aprotinin reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements comparably with prophylactic high-dose aprotinin. Thus, one can restrict its use to patients with excessive postoperative bleeding.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although earlier studies reported few side effects related to the use of the drug, more recent studies have questioned its overall safety for prophylactic systemic therapy. With increasing systemic use have come higher incidences of adverse effects on aorta-coronary bypass graft patency, anaphylactic reactions during subsequent exposures, renal impairment, and disseminated intravascular coagulation after profound hypothermia [79]. Furthermore, the high cost of aprotinin restricts routine prophylactic use in many centers, especially in the United States because of potential limitations in reimbursement to all health care providers [10].
It has been reported that excessive postoperative bleeding is seen in 5% to 25% of patients undergoing CPB, but in only 3% to 5% of all patients requiring reoperation for bleeding [11, 12]. This supports our contention that the majority of patients who are treated with aprotinin are unnecessarily exposed to the side effects of the drug. This problem has already led investigators to research alternative means of applying aprotinin on a selective basis. We developed the concept of topical aprotinin use in the pericardial cavity to prevent the adverse reactions to systemic aprotinin and to eliminate the need for prophylactic use [13]. Another effective strategy to achieve these goals would be to restrict the use of aprotinin exclusively to patients with established postoperative bleeding. Angelini and colleagues [14] reported that aprotinin given postoperatively in 6 cases reduced bleeding that had failed to respond to conventional treatment. More recently, Kallis and associates [15] demonstrated that postoperative use of aprotinin in patients with established bleeding reduced blood loss. However, the effect of aprotinin once the fibrinolysis is in progress and platelets are activated is not well clarified and remains to be determined.
This prospective, randomized clinical study was performed to investigate the effect of aprotinin given after CPB on postoperative blood loss.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Operative procedures performed in groups 1, 2, and 3 were as follows: coronary artery bypass grafting in 16, 21, and 17; aortic valve/mitral valve replacement in 6, 2, and 6; and adult congenital operations in 3, 2, and 2, respectively. All patients were operated on and cared for by the same team.
The anesthetic management and conduct of CPB were standardized. The extracorporeal circuit consisted of a hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator (Terumo Copiox E; Terumo Co., Tokyo, Japan). Polyvinyl chloride tubing was used throughout the circuit except for the roller pump tubing, which was silicone rubber. Before CPB, the patients were given 300 U/kg bovine lung heparin; whenever the activated clotting time (ACT) was shorter than 480 seconds, additional doses of heparin were given. All measurements were performed using a Hemochron 400 (International Technidyne Co, Edison, NJ). The ACT was measured using standard ACT tubes (CA 510; International Technidyne Co) with 2 mL of blood.
Mild to moderate hypothermia, cold crystalloid cardioplegia (Plegisol; Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) for induction, and cold blood cardioplegia for maintenance every 20 minutes were infused for myocardial protection. Before declamping the aorta, we administered warm blood cardioplegia (500 mL at 37°C). The cardioplegic solution (either crystalloid or blood cardioplegic solution) was returned to the circuit. Left internal mammary artery grafts were used routinely in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The saphenous vein was harvested as needed. The left pleural space was opened during internal mammary artery harvesting and was emptied as far as possible by suction before chest closure. During systemic heparin administration, blood was routinely returned to the pump-oxygenator and reinfused. Finally, all blood remaining in the venous tubing and in the oxygenator after CPB was collected and reinfused when necessary, intraoperatively or in the intensive care unit. At the end of CPB, heparin was reversed with protamine sulfate at a 1:1 ratio.
Hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen level, and D-dimers were measured in all patients preoperatively and when they arrived in the intensive care unit. D-dimers were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Asserachom D-dimer; Diagnostico stago, Asnières, France). Intraoperative blood loss was measured by adding the volume of the blood in the suction and the weight of the sponges. The shed mediastinal blood was collected in a commercially available volumetric collection system, and the amount was measured every half hour for the first day and hourly thereafter. The mediastinal and thoracic drains were removed when the total drainage was less than 100 mL over the previous 8 hours.
Homologous packed red blood cells were administered only when the hematocrit value fell to less than 24%. Patients received fresh frozen plasma when excessive blood loss was accompanied by a prolonged (greater than 1.5 times the normal value) prothrombin time; additional protamine was administered if the ACT/control ratio was more than 1.5. Platelet transfusions were not used. Autotransfusion of shed blood was not used in any of the patients during this study. Reoperation for bleeding was undertaken if the blood loss exceeded 500 mL for 2 consecutive hours without signs of decrease despite appropriate therapy.
Cardiopulmonary bypass time, total operation time, amount of total chest tube drainage, incidence of reoperation for bleeding, cause of bleeding, and need for donor blood transfusion or fresh frozen plasma were recorded for all patients. The course of the blood hemoglobin content during hospitalization was analyzed in each patient. For diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction, we used postoperative electrocardiograms and serial measurements of creatine kinase myocardial band isoenzymes.
All results are expressed as the mean and standard deviation. Results were compared by analysis of variance with subsequent pairwise comparisons according to Duncan's multiple range test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were done using the Nwastatpak (Northwest Analytical, Inc, Portland, OR) statistical software package.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
After heparin administration and during CPB, ACTs were significantly higher in group 1, with all patients having ACTs of more than 700 seconds. There was no evidence of postoperative myocardial infarction as determined by electrocardiogram and serial measurements of creatine kinase myocardial band isoenzymes in this study population. Serum creatine kinase myocardial band isoenzyme levels were found to be elevated postoperatively in all groups. However, the three groups did not differ significantly in the peak levels (32.2 ± 6.3 U/L versus 26.7 ± 8.1 U/L versus 28.8 ± 9.7 U/L).
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-aminocaproic acid, and desmopressin [10]. Patient selection regarding the use of aprotinin in individuals undergoing CPB remains a key question. Because of the potential for complications and the high cost of aprotinin, it will be logical to use aprotinin on a selective basis in patients with established bleeding. In the present study, neither postoperative blood loss nor transfusion requirements differed significantly between the prophylactic high-dose aprotinin group and the post-CPB aprotinin group; both were significantly lower than in the control group. The reduction of postoperative blood loss, to our surprise, is comparable to that in other studies in which the aprotinin was applied prophylactically [24]. It has been suggested that aprotinin has a beneficial effect only when given before extracorporeal circulation [1, 17]. However, Gram and colleagues [18] demonstrated the presence of an enhanced fibrinolytic state after the neutralization of heparin in patients undergoing open heart operations. They suggested that substantial amounts of tissue-type plasminogen activator are incorporated into fibrin generated after the neutralization of heparin, and thereby may cause degradation of cross-linked fibrin until at least 24 hours after operation even though tissue-type plasminogen activator returns to baseline levels much earlier. It is also known that activation of fibrinolysis is accelerated 100-fold in the presence of fibrin or fibrin monomers [19]. This creates a positive feedback cascade and increases the risk of postoperative bleeding. The decreased fibrin split product D-dimer levels observed in group 1 and group 2 indicate a lower level of fibrinolytic activity. Whether aprotinin influences hyperfibrinolysis in the early postoperative period can be elucidated by measurement of plasmin release in the plasma. Increased plasmin levels in the plasma reflect fibrinolytic activity, so that quantification of plasmin levels is essential to detect a current fibrinolytic state.
Of great interest is a recent report by Kallis and associates [15], who demonstrated the efficacy of aprotinin for hemostasis when used postoperatively on patients with pronounced bleeding. Sixty patients were randomized to receive either aprotinin or placebo in addition to conventional treatment. The patients in the aprotinin group bled significantly less. The tissue plasminogen activator antigen decreased and the fibrinogen level increased in the aprotinin group. In addition, aprotinin increased the platelet surface expression of glycoprotein Ib (36% versus 5%; p < 0.01) and maintained the platelet von Willebrand factor activity. Kallis and associates suggested that aprotinin, by inhibiting excessive fibrinolysis and reducing plasmin levels, allows replenishment of the platelet surface glycoprotein Ib receptors from intraplatelet pools. Michelson and Barnard [20] also showed that platelets recover from plasmin as soon as it is neutralized by redistribution of the platelet glycoprotein Ib receptor. Thus, postoperative aprotinin may restore platelet function in addition to its direct antifibrinolytic effect.
Endothelial cells play an important role in the regulation of hemostasis. Protein C is a major regulatory protein of thrombus formation; it also promotes fibrinolysis by inactivating the plasminogen activator inhibitors [21]. Aprotinin has been shown to inactivate protein C [22]. Boldt and associates [23] suggested that aprotinin contributes to preserve endothelial function during CPB. Postoperative aprotinin may also exert an antifibrinolytic action by modulating endothelial cell function. However, the complex interactions among the fibrinolytic system, platelets, and the endothelial aspects of coagulation, and the effect of aprotinin on these systems when applied postoperatively, require more comprehensive investigations.
It has been shown that a much lower dosage is required to inhibit the enzyme activity of plasmin as compared with plasma kallikrein (50 versus 200 KIU/mL [7 versus 28 µg/mL]) [24]. In the present study, we used the low-dose regimen (2 million KIU [280 mg]) because low-dose aprotinin is sufficient to obtain the required antiplasmin effect and to preserve glycoprotein Ib receptors [24, 25].
Despite the small size of our patient population, our study shows that even when administered after activation of the hemostatic system, aprotinin is effective in reducing blood loss. The data from the current study, combined with those of Kallis and associates [15], suggest that its mode of action seems to be not only the inhibition of fibrin degradation, but also stabilization of the hemostatic plug through the enhancement of platelet surface receptors and preservation of von Willebrand factor levels. These results suggest that aprotinin could be used in patients with post-CPB bleeding refractory to conventional treatment. The comparable efficacy of postoperative infusion also allows us to minimize the overzealous use of prophylactic aprotinin and to restrict its use to patients with established postoperative bleeding. However, because our patient population is at the lower end of the bleeding-risk spectrum and the routine use of aprotinin in this group is not advocated, the results cannot simply be applied universally. Higher-risk patients need to be investigated regarding the comparative efficiency of postoperative aprotinin administration.
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-aminocaproic acid before cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:110813.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Brown, N. J.O. Birkmeyer, and G. T. O'Connor Meta-Analysis Comparing the Effectiveness and Adverse Outcomes of Antifibrinolytic Agents in Cardiac Surgery Circulation, June 5, 2007; 115(22): 2801 - 2813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Fergusson, K. C. Glass, B. Hutton, and S. Shapiro Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding? Clinical Trials, June 1, 2005; 2(3): 218 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Alvarez, L. R. Jackson, C. Chatwin, and J. J. Smolich Low-dose postoperative aprotinin reduces mediastinal drainage and blood product use in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting who are taking aspirin: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2001; 122(3): 457 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Ray, M. M. Hales, L. Brown, M. F. O'Brien, and E. G. Stafford Postoperatively administered aprotinin or epsilon aminocaproic acid after cardiopulmonary bypass has limited benefit Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 521 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Forestier, S. Belisle, D. Robitaille, R. Martineau, L. P. Perrault, and J.-F. Hardy Low-dose aprotinin is ineffective to treat excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 452 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |