ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mohammad Bashar Izzat
Inderpaul Birdi
Alan J. Bryan
Gianni D. Angelini
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Izzat, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Angelini, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Izzat, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Angelini, G. D.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1048-1052
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Small CarboMedics Aortic Prostheses Using Dobutamine-Stress Doppler Echocardiography

Mohammad Bashar Izzat, FRCS, Inderpaul Birdi, FRCS, Peter Wilde, FRCR, Alan J. Bryan, FRCS, Gianni D. Angelini, FRCS

Departments of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiac Radiology, University of Bristol and Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom

Accepted for publication April 29, 1995.


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. The well-known correlation between prosthetic valve orifice area and transvalvular gradients has raised concerns about the presence of significant residual gradients when the size of the prosthesis that can be implanted is limited by the presence of a small aortic annulus.

Methods. Dobutamine-stress Doppler echocardiography was used to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of small CarboMedics aortic prostheses (19 mm and 21 mm) in 18 patients (16 women; mean age, 64 years) who had undergone aortic valve replacement 23.5 ± 19 months (standard deviation) previously. Dobutamine infusion was started at a rate of 5 µg • kg-1 min-2 and increased to 10 and 20 µg • kg-1 min-2 at 15-minute intervals. Pulsed and continuous wave Doppler studies were performed at rest and at the end of each stage. Effective orifice area, performance index, and discharge coefficient of both valves were calculated, and peak and mean velocity and pressure drop across the prostheses were measured.

Results. Heart rate and cardiac output increased by 74% and 94%, respectively, and mean arterial blood pressure decreased by 9% at maximum stress. Effective orifice area, discharge coefficient, and performance index were comparable in both valve sizes at rest and maximum stress. Also, there was no significant difference in mean transvalvular pressure drop (gradient) for 19-mm and 21-mm prostheses at rest (8.1 ± 8.4 and 4.8 ± 3.8 mm Hg) or maximum stress (15.1 ± 14.2 and 8.8 ± 5.8 mm Hg, respectively). No significant correlation could be demonstrated between transvalvular pressure drop and patient's body surface area.

Conclusions. These data show that 19-mm and 21-mm CarboMedics aortic prostheses exhibit equally favorable hemodynamic performance with minimal pressure gradient, both at rest and under stress conditions.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
See also page 1052.

The hemodynamic characteristics of prosthetic heart valves constitute an important part of their functional assessment. The performance of a range of prosthetic valves has been investigated in vitro and in vivo at rest [1, 2]. However, it has been suggested that in vivo resting assessments are inadequate to characterize valve performance fully [3]. Current methods for the in vivo assessment of prosthetic heart valves under high flow conditions are dependent on exercise, and are not entirely suitable for wider clinical use.

The CarboMedics valve prosthesis is an all-pyrolytic carbon bileaflet valve that incorporates several design characteristics that should result in improved performance. The implantation of small mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement, however, raises concerns about potential for residual transvalvular gradient and impaired long-term outcome. Therefore, this study was performed to evaluate the in vivo hemodynamic performance of small size (19 and 21 mm) CarboMedics aortic prostheses under high cardiac output (CO) conditions, using dobutamine-stress Doppler echocardiography.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Eighteen patients (2 men and 16 women; mean age, 64 years; range, 50 to 74 years) who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with a size 19-mm or 21-mm CarboMedics prosthesis at our institution were studied. Patients' characteristics are presented in Table 1Go. All patients were in sinus rhythm, and on no medication other than anticoagulation. Normal coronary arteries had been documented previously in all subjects by preoperative coronary angiography.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. . Patient Characteristics
 
Dobutamine-Stress Protocol
The study protocol was approved by the United Bristol Healthcare Trust Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients underwent stress echocardiography after a 3-hour fast. After a detailed history and physical examination to exclude the presence of any contraindication to stress testing [4], complete prestress two-dimensional echocardiography was performed to exclude prosthetic valve malfunction, other valvular disease, or severe left ventricular dysfunction. Apical four-chamber views were then acquired from which baseline (rest) Doppler measurements of transvalvular flow were obtained (see below).

Using a peripheral venous cannula, a graded infusion of dobutamine was administered intravenously at increments of 5, 10, and 20 µg • kg-1 • min-2 at 15-minute intervals. During the study, patients underwent continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, and blood pressure was recorded at 5-minute intervals with an automated cuff. Criteria for stopping the dobutamine infusion included (1) hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg), (2) dyspnea, or (3) significant ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias. Repeat (stress) Doppler measurements were obtained before each incremental increase in the infusion rate. After the completion of the final assessment at a dose of 20 µg • kg-1 • min-2 (maximum stress), dobutamine infusion was discontinued, and the patient was monitored for a minimum of 20 minutes or until heart rate (HR) had returned to prestress values.

Doppler Measurements and Calculations
All tests were performed by an experienced investigator (M.B.I.) who was blinded as to the size of the prosthesis inserted. Echocardiography was carried out using an Aloka SSD-830 ultrasound system with a 2.5-MHz transducer (Aloka, Japan) with facilities for continuous-wave and pulsed-wave Doppler. Parasternal long-axis views were obtained and the early systolic diameter (D) of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) was measured just below the prosthetic valve using an inner edge-to-inner edge method. For each patient, an average of three diameter measurements was used. The LVOT cross-sectional area (CSA) was calculated as . The pulsed-wave Doppler cursor was then placed in the LVOT immediately proximal to the aortic valve, and pulsed-Doppler flow velocity was recorded. Peak and mean velocities in the LVOT were then measured.

Cardiac output was calculated as , where VTI is the velocity time integral in the LVOT and HR is the heart rate per minute. This method of noninvasive cardiac output measurement correlates closely with that obtained with both the thermodilution and Fick methods [5].

Systolic valve flow (Q) was also calculated as . Flow velocity across the valve was obtained by means of continuous-wave Doppler from the apical view. Great care was taken to orient the transducer so that the angle between the Doppler cursor and the LVOT was as close to 0 degrees as possible, and to obtain the highest possible velocity signal. Peak velocity was measured, averaging from three velocity envelopes, and mean velocity was calculated by on-line averaging of the instantaneous velocities measured throughout the velocity complexes. Measurements were made in triplicate in each stage to ensure reproducibility. The modified Bernoulli equation was used to calculate peak and mean pressure drop (gradient) across the prosthesis as , where {Delta}P is pressure drop, and VCW and VPW are the velocities (peak and mean) across the valve (using continuous-wave Doppler) and in the LVOT (using pulsed-wave Doppler), respectively.

Velocity ratio (VR) is the ratio of mean subaortic to mean transaortic velocity, and gives an approximate guide to orifice behavior, independent of measurements of LVOT diameter [6].

The prosthetic valve effective orifice area (EOA) was calculated using the modified continuity equation as . This simplified equation has shown an extremely good correlation with that of the original continuity equation [7, 8].

Effective orifice area index (EOAI) is a measure of how well the flow area of the valve matches the body size, and is calculated as , where BSA is patient's body surface area. This index is used to detect mismatch between valve size and BSA.

Discharge coefficient (Cd) is a measure of how effectively the valve uses its nominal flow area, and is calculated as , where AOA is the actual (nominal) orifice area, as provided by the manufacturer.

Performance index (PI) is a measure of how effectively the external dimension of the valve is used in providing forward flow, and is calculated as , where SRA is the sewing ring area of the prosthesis, as provided by the manufacturer.

Statistical Analysis
Parameters were calculated for each patient at each level of dobutamine infusion, and data are presented as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise stated. Rest and maximum stress results were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlation between two variables was analyzed using Pearson and Spearman correlation tests.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Both groups matched in terms of age, sex, BSA, and New York Heart Association functional class (Table 1Go). Dobutamine infusion protocol was very well tolerated. The test had to be stopped at 10 µg • kg-1 • min-2 in 2 patients (1 from each group) due to dyspnea, otherwise the only side effect was the development of infrequent atrial or ventricular ectopic beats (60% of patients). All patients achieved a significant increase in HR, CO, and systolic valve flow that was comparable between the two groups. Mean blood pressure, however, remained unchanged (Table 2Go). Although a significant difference in the time after operation was present between the two groups, there was no evidence of a significant difference in the time-related remodeling of the LVOT as indicated by the similar flow velocity across the LVOT in the two groups (Table 2Go), which also excludes differences in the constriction of the LVOT in response to the beta effect of dobutamine. The contribution of this response to gradients across the LVOT is taken into account in the modified Bernoulli equation (see above).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. . Hemodynamic and Doppler Data at Rest and Maximum Stress With Dobutamine for Both 19-mm and 21-mm CarboMedics Prosthesesa
 
On stepwise multiple regression univariate or multivariate analysis, only cardiac output was selected to have linear correlation with gradient (r = 0.69). Peak transvalvular velocities were similar in both 19-mm and 21-mm valve groups at rest (2.09 ± 1.14 m/s and 1.65 ± 0.82 m/s) and at maximum stress (2.91 ± 1.49 m/s and 2.78 ± 0.94 m/s, respectively). Similarly, peak pressure drop (gradient) across the prostheses were comparable in both 19-mm and 21-mm groups at rest (17.1 ± 17.5 mm Hg and 11.02 ± 9.8 mm Hg) and maximum stress (33.5 ± 33.5 mm Hg and 23.4 ± 16.3 mm Hg, respectively, both p = 0.05 stress versus rest) (Fig 1Go). Results of mean transvalvular velocities and gradients are presented in Table 2Go. No significant correlation was found between patients' BSA and transvalvular pressure drop (r = 0.26 for 19-mm prosthesis and r = 0.11 for 21-mm prosthesis), or between BSA and EOA in either group (r = 0.36 for 19-mm valves and r = 0.23 for 21-mm valves).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . Changes in peak gradient (mm Hg) for 19-mm (open circle) and 21-mm (open box) CarboMedics prostheses with dobutamine stress. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

 
Velocity ratio for the 19- and 21-mm valves were identical at all times, and EOA for the two valve groups were comparable, both at rest and stress (Fig 2Go). This remained true when valves were indexed for BSA (EOAI). Because of the smaller nominal orifice area of the 19-mm compared with the 21-mm prosthesis, the former appeared to achieve a better use of its actual flow area, expressed as discharge coefficient and PI, although neither of these values reached statistical significance at rest or stress (Table 2Go).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. . Changes in effective orifice area (mm2) for 19-mm (open circle) and 21-mm (open box) CarboMedics prostheses with dobutamine stress. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The well-known correlation between prosthetic valve orifice area and transvalvular gradients has raised concerns about the presence of significant residual gradients when the size of the prosthesis that can be implanted is limited by the presence of a small aortic annulus [911]. High residual gradients may effectively produce LVOT obstruction, and could account for the unexplained occasional late deterioration of cardiac function or sudden death reported in this group of patients [12, 13]. Furthermore, the well-documented increase in gradients across valve prostheses at high stroke volumes, such as during exercise, has highlighted the importance of the evaluation of prosthetic valves under various flow conditions [3, 14]. Until now, such data have been very limited, because exercise testing requires a considerable degree of patient cooperation and reliable images are difficult to obtain in the tachypneic exercising patient.

Recently, we have used dobutamine-stress echocardiography in the evaluation of the hemodynamic performance of aortic valve prostheses [15]. The safety and benign side effects of pharmacologic stress with dobutamine have been confirmed [16], and it has proved to be a valid alternative to treadmill exercise testing with a higher diagnostic yield [17]. With this method, patients remain in the supine position throughout the study period, and body position can be optimized to obtain high-quality echocardiographic images and precise Doppler measurements. It is important to note that invasive studies have shown that bileaflet prostheses produce localized high flow velocity and pressure-drop between the two leaflets, with a significant early pressure recovery downstream. Whereas in catheter studies, gradients are measured a few centimeters from the valve plane where pressure recovery has occurred, continuous-wave Doppler imaging interrogates the area between the valve leaflets when searching for the highest velocities in the clinical situation, hence recording higher gradients [1820]. It should be borne in mind, therefore, that Doppler studies of bileaflet valves could overestimate catheter-derived gradients.

The CarboMedics prosthesis was first introduced into clinical practice in 1986. It incorporates several design characteristics that should result in improved performance. Among these is the elimination of pivot guards, struts, and orifice projection that are thought to reduce turbulence and leaflet excursion promoting a more rapid and synchronous movement [21, 22]. Considering the possibility of Doppler overestimation of transvalvular gradients, this study indicates that size 19-mm and 21-mm CarboMedics prostheses show efficient use of the orifice area and have equally favorable hemodynamic performance, even under high flow conditions. Our results are consistent with the few studies available in the literature reporting in vivo Doppler assessment of CarboMedics valves, both at rest and during exercise [14, 18, 19]. However, we were unable to demonstrate the increase in EOA for the 19-mm prostheses during exercise reported recently by DePaulis and associates [14].

Higher gradients were said to occur more frequently with a small prosthesis inserted in a patient with a large body surface area [9], and EOA of a specific prosthetic valve corrected for BSA (EOAI) provides a more useful index of its performance in an individual patient. From the hemodynamic data of valve behavior at rest and the expected increase in CO with exercise, an EOAI more than 0.9 cm2/m2 has been predicted as a requirement to minimize the postoperative transvalvular gradient [9, 23]. Although the EOAI at maximum stress in this unselected group of patients were 0.82 cm2/m2 (19 mm) and 0.73 cm2/m2 (21 mm), nevertheless, values less than the theoretic index recommended above were not associated with unacceptably high transvalvular gradients even at high flow conditions. This probably implies that the orifice of the CarboMedics valve is effectively used to provide forward flow with minimal production of gradient.

In conclusion, 19- and 21-mm CarboMedics aortic bileaflet prostheses appear to have equally favorable hemodynamic performance in most patients with only minimal pressure gradient generation across the prostheses, under both rest and stress conditions.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation and the Garfield Weston Trust.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Address reprint requests to Dr Izzat, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, United Kingdom.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Fisher J. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the size 19 mm and 21 mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus bileaflet heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:75–80.[Medline]
  2. Teoh KH, Fulop JC, Weisel RD, et al. Aortic valve replacement with a small prosthesis. Circulation 1987;76(Suppl 3):123–31.
  3. Tatineni S, Barner HB, Pearson AC, Halbe D, Woodruff R, Labovitz AJ. Rest and exercise evaluation of St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Circulation 1989;80(Suppl 1):16–23.
  4. Mertes H, Sawada SG, Ryan T, et al. Symptoms, adverse effects, and complications associated with Dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 1993;88:15–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ihlen H, Molstad P. Cardiac output measured by Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. Eur Heart J 1990;11:399–402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chambers J, Fraser A, Lawford P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Simpson I. Echocardiographic assessment of artificial heart valves: British Society of Echocardiography position paper. Br Heart J 1994;71(Suppl):6–14.
  7. Otto GM, Pearlman AS, Comess KA, Reamer RP, Janko CL, Huntsman LL. Determination of the stenotic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:509–17.[Abstract]
  8. Chafizadeh ER, Zoghbi WA. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve in the aortic position using the continuity equation. Circulation 1991;83:213–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis--patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58:20–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Jones EL, Craver JM, Morris DC, et al. Hemodynamic and clinical evaluation of the Hancock xenograft bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (with emphasis on the management of the small aortic root). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978;75:300–8.[Abstract]
  11. Schaff HV, Borkon AM, Hughes C, et al. Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the 19-mm Bjork-Shiley aortic valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1981;32:50–7.[Abstract]
  12. Bristow JD, Kremkau EL. Hemodynamic changes after valve replacement with Starr-Edwards prostheses. Am J Cardiol 1975;35:716–24.[Medline]
  13. Arom KV, Goldenberg IF, Emery RW. Long term clinical outcome with small size standard St. Jude Medical valves implanted in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:531–6.[Medline]
  14. DePaulis R, Sommariva L, Russo F, et al. Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic annulus and valve prosthesis--body surface area mismatch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:57–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Izzat MB, Wilde P, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics 21mm aortic prostheses using dobutamine-stress echocardiography [Abstract]. Br Heart J (in press).
  16. Marcovitz PA, Armstrong WF. Accuracy of Dobutamine stress echocardiography in detecting coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:1269–73.[Medline]
  17. Mertes H, Sawada SG, Ryan T, et al. Symptoms, adverse effects, and complications associated with Dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 1993;88:15–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ihlen H, Molstad P, Simonsen S, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position: comparison of non invasive and invasive techniques. Am Heart J 1992;123:151–9.[Medline]
  19. Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer L, Maurer G. Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. Circulation 1990;82: 1467–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Chambers J, Cross J, Deverall P, Sowton E. Echocardiographic description of the CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart valve. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:398–405.[Abstract]
  21. Richard G, O'Bannon W, Moore RB. An in vitro comparison of 29mm mitral CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical artificial heart valves. In: Bodnar E, ed. Surgery for heart valve disease. Proceedings of the 1989 symposium. UK: ICP Publications, 1989:628--34.
  22. Robinson G. Opening remarks. CarboMedics. Proceedings of the Second International Clinical Symposium. Toronto, Canada, 1990:1--2.
  23. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, Beauchemin J. Validation and application of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:637–43.[Abstract]

Related Article

Thoracic Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995 60: 1052. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
G. R. Rezaian, K. Aghasadeghi, and J. Kojuri
Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of St.Jude Mitral Prostheses: A Pilot Study by Dobutamine-Stress Doppler Echocardiography
Angiology, January 1, 2005; 56(1): 81 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
I. Kadir, C. Walsh, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Comparison of exercise and dobutamine echocardiography in the haemodynamic assessment of small size mechanical aortic valve prostheses
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 692 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. Kadir, I. Y.P. Wan, C. Walsh, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Hemodynamic performance of the 21-mm Sorin Bicarbon mechanical aortic prostheses using dobutamine Doppler echocardiography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 72(1): 49 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
I. Knez, R. Rienmuller, R. Maier, P. Rehak, B. Schrottner, H. Machler, M. Anelli-Monti, and B. Rigler
Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 19(6): 797 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. D. Maslow, J. M. Haering, S. Heindel, J. Mashikian, R. Levine, and P. Douglas
An Evaluation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Using Transesophageal Echocardiography: The Double-Envelope Technique
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, I. Kadir, B. Reeves, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Patient-prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small-size aortic valve prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1657 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
N. Cam, H. Gercekoglu, S. Celik, M. Gursurer, G. Tayyareci, H. Karabulut, A. Narin, T. Tezel, and B. Yigiter
Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 166 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-F. Obadia, Y. A. Martelloni, O. H. Bastien, G. M. Durand de Gevigney, and J.-F. Chassignolle
Long-Term Follow-up of Small (Size 20 and 21) Medtronic-Hall Aortic Valve Prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1997; 64(2): 421 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat and A. P. C. Yim
Assessment of the hemodynamic performance of small-size aortic valve prostheses
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1997; 113(6): 1121 - 1122.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. R. Gonzalez-Juanatey
Assessment of the hemodynamic performance of small-size aortic valve prostheses
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1997; 113(6): 1122 - 1123.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. Kadir, M. B. Izzat, P. Wilde, B. Reeves, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Dynamic Evaluation of the 21-mm Medtronic Intact Aortic Bioprosthesis by Dobutamine Echocardiography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1997; 63(4): 1128 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Carrel, U. Zingg, R. Jenni, B. Aeschbacher, and M. I. Turina
Early In Vivo Experience With the Hemodynamic Plus St. Jude Medical Heart Valves in Patients With Narrowed Aortic Annulus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1996; 61(5): 1418 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, M. Caputo, and G. D. Angelini
Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Stentless Porcine Aortic Valves
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1461 - 1461.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mohammad Bashar Izzat
Inderpaul Birdi
Alan J. Bryan
Gianni D. Angelini
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Izzat, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Angelini, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Izzat, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Angelini, G. D.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS