|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1039-1040
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Anesthesiology, St. Louis Regional Medical Center, St. Louis, MO 63112
To the Editor:
The general efficacy of postthoracotomy pain management using continuous epidural analgesia (narcotic plus bupivacaine) has been supported enthusiastically by review of 1,324 patient examples recently published in The Annals [1].
Would it be more than a quibble to discuss some aspects of these methods of Lubenow and associates [1]? A thoracic epidural catheter was placed in all their patients. But in a randomized, double-blind comparison of (simpler, safer) lumbar versus thoracic epidural infusion of fentanyl (without bupivacaine), excellent and equal analgesia was found, after thoracotomy, by either approach [2].
An incidence of urinary retention sufficient ``to warrant the routine use of urinary catheters'' [1] is attributable directly to the mu opioids (morphine, fentanyl) chosen for epidural injection [3]. The 14% incidence of pruritis [1] also reflects mu opioid action.
For postthoracotomy epidural analgesia I prefer to administer the kappa opioid butorphanol. Although a cesarean section is not a thoracotomy, ``the adequacy of [epidural] analgesia was indistinguishable between morphine and butorphanol'' [4]. Butorphanol causes neither pruritis nor urinary retention; alone it provides excellent (lumbar) epidural postthoracotomy analgesia.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |