ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Kenton J. Zehr
Peter W. Cho
A. Marc Gillinov
Duke E. Cameron
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, D. E.

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:328-335
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Platelet Activating Factor Inhibition Reduces Lung Injury After Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Kenton J. Zehr, MD, Robert S. Poston, MD, Paul C. Lee, BA, Kay Uthoff, MD, Pankaj Kumar, BmBCh, Peter W. Cho, MD, A. Marc Gillinov, MD, J. Mark Redmond, MD, Jerry A. Winkelstein, MD, Ahvie Herskowitz, MD, Duke E. Cameron, MD

Divisions of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiology, and Pediatric Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

Accepted for publication August 5, 1994.


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Because cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) produces a diffuse inflammatory reaction that may injure multiple organs and complicate cardiac surgical procedures, we examined the use of a competitive inhibitor of platelet activating factor (SDZ HUL-412) in a porcine model of CPB as a means to ameliorate pulmonary injury after CPB. Thirteen pigs (35 to 40 kg) underwent CPB at 28°C for 2 hours, followed by 2 hours of observation. Group I (n = 6) received SDZ HUL-412 (a quinolinium compound) intravenously (3 mg/kg loading dose and 2 mg • kg-1 • h-1 continuous infusion) starting before sternotomy. Group II (n = 7) received a saline vehicle. Peak airway pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, left atrial pressure, and arterial blood gases were measured and flow cytometry evaluated surface expression of adhesion molecule subunit CD18 on circulating neutrophils. Pulmonary function was significantly improved in group I. Fifteen minutes after CPB, dynamic lung compliance in group I was 91% ± 12% of baseline versus 49% ± 5.2% in group II (p = 0.06 by analysis of variance). After CPB, the arterial oxygen pressure was also significantly better in group I than in group II (425 ± 61 versus 234 ± 76 mm Hg) (p < 0.05). The rise in pulmonary vascular resistance after CPB was less in group I (p < 0.05) (323 ± 55 to 553 ± 106 dynes • s • cm-5) than in group II (531 ± 177 to 884 ± 419 dynes • s • cm-5) at the end of the observation period. CD18 up-regulation increased similarly in the two groups during CPB. Histologic evaluation revealed normal pulmonary architecture in group I, but group II had marked intraalveolar hemorrhage, abundant neutrophils, and edema fluid. Significant edema was present in group I fields (41.0% ± 11.7%) versus group II fields (5.05% ± 1.5%) (p < 0.02). This study demonstrates that platelet activating factor inhibition during CPB (1) decreases pulmonary vascular resistance after CPB, (2) increases the arterial oxygen pressure, and (3) decreases histologic lung damage, but (4) has no effect on surface expression of CD18. Platelet activating factor inhibition may have clinical applicability in the amelioration of organ damage after CPB.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
C linical cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may result in a diffuse increase in vascular permeability and multiple organ dysfunction [1, 2]. This diffuse inflammatory reaction involves activation of neutrophils, platelets, and endothelium, as well as the complement, kinin, and coagulation cascades [36]. Neutrophils have been implicated as the primary mediators of this generalized response [7, 8]; serum levels of neutrophil products (elastase, myeloperoxidase, and lactoferrin) are increased during and after CPB [911]. Increased oxygen-derived free radical production and up-regulation of neutrophil adhesion integrins also reflects increased neutrophil activity [1214].

Platelet activating factor (PAF) is a potent mediator of neutrophil integrin (CD11b/CD18) expression [12, 15]. It is a glycerol phospholipid (1-o-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphorylcholine) synthesized by many cells, including platelets, granulocytes, and endothelial cells [16]. Circulating PAF is increased by 350% after CPB [17]. The role of PAF in acute inflammatory injury [18] and organ rejection has been well demonstrated. Platelet activating factor antagonists attenuated hyperacute rejection in both presensitized allograft and xenograft rat cardiac transplant models [19]. When used as a preservation adjunct, PAF antagonists also improve pulmonary function after transplantation [20].

SDZ HUL-412 (a quinolinium compound) is an established competitive inhibitor of PAF binding on the neutrophil receptor [21, 22]. We used SDZ HUL-412 in a porcine CPB model to determine the relationship between PAF and neutrophil integrin (CD11b/CD18) expression and to examine whether it protected against neutrophil-mediated lung injury after CPB.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Operative Procedure
Thirteen Yorkshire pigs (35 to 40 kg) were sedated with ketamine (40 mg/kg intramuscularly), anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg intravenously), and maintained on halothane (0.25% to 0.75%) throughout the experiment. A tracheostomy was performed and ventilation established using a volume cycle ventilator at 10 to 20 mL/kg total volume and an inspired oxygen fraction of 1. Polyethylene monitoring lines were placed in the external jugular vein and the femoral artery and vein. A Swan-Ganz catheter and esophageal and rectal temperature probes were inserted. Median sternotomy was performed and the thymus removed. After systemic heparinization (300 U/kg), an 18F arterial cannula was placed in the ascending aorta and a 24F venous cannula placed in the right atrium.

The CPB circuit was primed with 1,000 mL of lactated Ringer's solution and 25 mEq of NaHCO3. A Bentley bubble oxygenator, a 40-µm millipore arterial filter, and Sarns roller pumps made up the extracorporeal circuitAu: need manufacturers' name, city & state. Cardiopulmonary bypass was initiated and a left ventricular vent was placed through the apex. By surface and core cooling temperature was lowered to 28°C. Lungs were ventilated during CPB with room air. Mean systemic arterial pressure was maintained at 50 to 55 mm Hg with extracorporeal flow rates of 70 to 80 mL/kg when the temperature was more than 32°C and 50 to 60 mL/kg when the temperature fell to less than 32°C. Phenylephrine hydrochloride was given as needed to maintain arterial blood pressure. During the last 30 minutes of CPB, the animals were rewarmed to 37°C. The total CPB time was 2 hours. All pigs were weaned from CPB on isoproterenol infusion (0.1 to 0.2 µg • kg-1 • min-1). The CPB cannulas then were removed, the animals were allowed to stabilize for 15 minutes, and isoproterenol administration was discontinued. Physiologic measurements were recorded before and during CPB and for 2 hours after CPB. The animals remained under general anesthesia and were sacrificed at the close of the experiment. All animal care and operative procedures were in accordance with the Animal Care and Use Committee of The Johns Hopkins Hospital and the ``Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals'' published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication 85-23, revised 1985).

Pharmacologic Intervention
Before sternotomy group I animals (n = 6) received SDZ HUL-412 (1 mg/mL in normal saline solution) intravenously through the femoral vein (3 mg/kg) for 0.5 hours, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion for 4 hours at 2 mg • kg-1 h-1. Group II animals (n = 7) received similar volumes of normal saline solution. SDZ HUL-412 was provided as a gift from Sandoz Corporation (East Hanover, NJ).

Platelet Aggregometry
Platelet activating factor inhibition was verified by measurement of platelet aggregation ex vivo before and after infusion of SDZ HUL-412. Samples were collected before sternotomy and before CPB. Platelet-rich plasma was obtained by centrifuging whole blood at 2,000 rpm for 4 minutes at room temperature and aspirating the supernatant. The plasma (450 µL) was incubated for 3 minutes at 37°C. Aggregation was induced by the addition of 50 µL of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (10 and 5 µmol/L concentration) and PAF (50, 5, and 0.05 µmol/L). Inhibition of PAF-induced platelet aggregation was expressed as percent of pretreatment values. ADP-induced platelet aggregation is independent of PAF and therefore served as a posttreatment control for platelet function. Aggregation curves were recorded for 5 minutes on a dual channel aggregometer (Bio/Data Corp, Philadelphia, PA) within 2 hours of blood sample collection.

Physiologic Measurements
Arterial blood gases analyses were performed on a Radiometer ABL-30 analyzer (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). Blood pressure and dynamic peak airway pressure were recorded on an eight-channel monitoring system (Hewlett-Packard 7758B; Hewlett-Packard, Andover, MA). Cardiac output was determined by thermodilution technique using an Edwards Laboratories 9520 cardiac output computer (Edwards Laboratories, Santa Ana, CA). Tidal volume was measured by microspirometry (Micro Medical Ltd, Rochester, Kent, England). Physiologic measurements were recorded before sternotomy, immediately before cannulation, at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes of CPB, and 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after CPB. Dynamic lung compliance was calculated as tidal volume (mL) divided by peak airway pressure (mm Hg). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was determined according to the equation PVR = 79.92 x (Mean pulmonary artery pressure - Mean left atrial pressure)/Cardiac output (L/min). Arterial pressure, pump flow rate, and temperature were monitored continuously throughout the experiment.

CD18 Expression
Heparinized blood samples (100 µL) were placed in polypropylene tubes and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline without Ca2+ and Mg2+ (Dulbecco-PBS [D-PBS]; 500 µL). Blood was resuspended in PBS (100 µL). The primary antibody was a murine monoclonal immunoglobin G raised from a hybridoma cell line specifically against porcine CD18 (gift from Dr James E. K. Hildreth) [23]. Primary antibody (100 µL) was added and cells were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 minutes. The cells were washed twice with D-PBS (500 µL). The secondary antibody was a fluorescein-labeled goat antimouse FC receptor-specific immunoglobulin G (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). A secondary antibody (10 µL) was added and the incubation step repeated. Erythrocytes were lysed using the Coulter Whole Blood Lysing Reagent Kit (Coulter Immunology, Coulter Corp, Hialeah, FL) and vortexed, then incubated at room temperature in the dark for 12 minutes. Cells were centrifuged at 1,800 rpm for 6 minutes. The supernatant was removed and cells washed with D-PBS (500 µL), vortexed, and centrifuged at 1,800 rpm for 6 minutes. The white blood cell pellet was fixed with 0.5% paraformaldehyde (500 µL). Suspended cells were stored at 4°C in the dark. CD18 receptor quantification was determined using an EPICS-Profile II flow cytometer (Coulter Corp, Miami, FL). The increase in receptor expression was determined by comparison of mean channel fluorescence. Results were expressed as percent increase over presternotomy samples, with each animal serving as its control. Ten thousand neutrophils were counted at each time point.

Cell Counts
Neutrophil counts were determined by Coulter Counter, but differentials were performed manually. Absolute granulocyte numbers were adjusted for hemodilution. Blood was collected simultaneously during physiologic measurements. Pulmonary leukosequestration after CPB was determined by analysis of blood samples drawn simultaneously from left and right atria 30, 60, and 120 minutes after CPB.

Tissue Analysis
Biopsy was performed, removing a small portion of the right upper lobe of the lung, before CPB and 2 hours after CPB. Biopsy specimens were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and myeloperoxidase assay was performed later in the following manner. Tissue was disrupted by homogenization at 4°C and placed into 0.5% hexyldecyltrimethylammonium bromide in 50 mmol/L of potassium phosphate solution, pH 6.0 (1 mL/100 mg lung tissue). Tissue was disrupted further by sonication and then underwent three freeze (liquid nitrogen bath)–thaw (37°C water bath) cycles. The solution was centrifuged at 18,500 g for 20 minutes at 4°C. Aliquots (0.040 mL) of supernatant were added to 0.960 mL of assay buffer (0.17 mg/mL o-dianisidine, 0.05% H2O2, 50 µmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 6.0). Absorbance at 460 nm was measured after 5 minutes of incubation by spectrophotometry (Beckman, Silver Springs, MD). Lung tissue myeloperoxidase activity was expressed as percent increase over baseline. All activity was normalized to normal lung dry weight of 16%.

After animal sacrifice, a portion of right lung (20 to 30 g) was removed for determination of wet lung weight. The sample was incubated at 100°C for 48 hours and reweighed. Percent wet weight was determined as follows: % wet weight = (wet weight - dry weight)/wet weight.

The left lung was perfusion-fixed using 10% formalin, 0.5% cacodylate solution. In each animal, five representative samples were taken from several pulmonary areas and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic analysis.

A blinded quantitative analysis of the percentage of high-power fields (x200) affected with alveolar edema was performed by examination of the five lung specimens from each animal using light microscopy. Quantification of percent of alveolar spaces affected by edema was also performed by examination of contiguous highpower fields (x200) and the use of a 10 x 10 reticle grid.

Statistical Analysis
All measurements are reported as mean ± standard error of the mean. Comparisons between groups were made using analysis of variance for repeated measures. Myeloperoxidase activities, differential right and left atrial neutrophil counts, and percent wet weight were compared with a Student's t test. Significance was assumed at a p value less than 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Platelet Aggregometry
Platelet aggregation in each animal 15 minutes after the SDZ HUL-412 loading dose was compared with pretreatment aggregation (Fig 1Go). Platelet counts were similar between samples in each animal. After treatment with SDZ HUL-412, addition of exogenous 50 µmol/L PAF induced 54% ± 25% of baseline aggregation and 5 µmol/L PAF caused 21% ± 13% of baseline aggregation, whereas 0.5 µmol/L PAF solution failed to induce aggregation. Control animals exhibited 104% ± 28%, 109% ± 27%, and 25% ± 16% of baseline aggregation with addition of PAF in concentrations of 50, 5, and 0.5 µmol/L, respectively. Thus, SDZ HUL-412 inhibited PAF-induced platelet aggregation significantly at 50, 5, and 0.5 µmol/L concentrations (p < 0.05). ADP-induced aggregation was measured as a control for platelet function. At 10- and 5-µmol/L concentrations of ADP, inducible aggregation was 150% ± 37% and 160% ± 42% of baseline, respectively, in group I. In group II controls, ADP induced 68% ± 10% and 88% ± 21% of baseline aggregation at concentration of 10 and 5 µmol/L, respectively (p = not significant).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . Ex vivo platelet aggregation before and after in vivo platelet activating factor (PAF) inhibition with SDZ HUL-412. Exogenous platelet activating factor in concentrations of 50, 5, and 0.05 µmol/L were used.

 
Physiologic Measurements
Baseline arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) (inspired oxygen fraction of 1) was similar in group I (598 ± 33 mm Hg) and group II (603 ± 18 mm Hg) (Fig 2Go). Fifteen minutes after conclusion of CPB, PaO2 in group I was 401 ± 47 mm Hg and remained stable to the end of the experiment: at 120 minutes PaO2 was 425 ± 61 mm Hg. In group II (15 minutes after CPB) PaO2 was 276 ± 62 mm Hg and decreased further to 234 ± 76 mm Hg by 120 minutes (p < 0.05). Baseline PVR was 255 ± 50 dynes • s • cm-5 in group I and 269 ± 29 dynes • s • cm-5 for group II. Pulmonary vascular resistance rose dramatically in group II when compared with group I after CPB (Fig 3Go). Fifteen minutes after CPB, PVR rose to 531 ± 177 dynes • s • cm-5 in group II versus 323 ± 55 dynes • s • cm-5 in group I. Group II PVR rose further to 884 ± 419 dynes • s • cm-5 by the end of the post-CPB observation period, whereas in group I PVR increased to 553 ± 106 dynes • s • cm-5 (p < 0.05).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. . Oxygen tension (PaO2) before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (Post CPB). Baseline refers to before sternotomy and 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes refer to time points after discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass.

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. . Pulmonary vascular resistance before and after cardiopulmonary bypass ( Post CPB).

 
Dynamic compliance was not significantly different between groups, although there was a trend toward better compliance in group I (p = 0.06) (Fig 4Go). Fifteen minutes after separation from CPB, group I compliance decreased to 91% ± 12% of baseline, compared with 49% ± 5.2% of baseline in group II. At 120 minutes after CPB, compliance decreased to 69% ± 3.6% of baseline in group I and to 56% ± 6.4% in group II.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. . Lung compliance before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (Post CPB).

 
CD18 Expression
Cardiopulmonary bypass–related changes in density of CD18 subunit expression on the neutrophil surface were determined by comparing percent increase of mean channel fluorescence to levels before CPB. CD18 up-regulation increased to a similar extent in both groups during CPB (group I, 32% ± 14.5% versus group II, 24% ± 2.3%) and 2 hours after CPB (group I, 83% ± 19.5% versus group II, 118% ± 12.4%) (p = not significant) (Fig 5Go). In both groups, the greatest increase occurred during cooling (the first 30 minutes of CPB) and during the last 30 minutes of rewarming, before weaning from CPB.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. . CD18 receptor expression before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). (Pre-stern = before sternotomy; Post-stern = after sternotomy; CPB 30, 60, 90, and 120 min = time points during cardiopulmonary bypass; Post CPB 120 min = 120 minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass.)

 
Cell Counts
Profound neutropenia was observed at the onset of CPB in all animals (Fig 6Go); the most rapid reduction occurred during the first 60 minutes of CPB: neutrophil counts fell from 5,304 ± 478 to 1,253 ± 271 cells/µL in group I and from 6,964 ± 1,984 to 1,335 ± 247 cells/µL in group II (p = not significant). Neutropenia persisted throughout the remainder of the experiment. Two hours after CPB, neutrophil counts were 1,037 ± 176 cells/µL in group I and 1,805 ± 376 cells/µL in group II. Pulmonary leukosequestration (assessed by difference in granulocyte counts in samples drawn simultaneously from left and right atria was greater in group I (Fig 7Go). Thirty minutes after CPB, RA-LA neutrophil differentials were 477 ± 173 cells/µL in group I and 1,286 ± 324 cells/µL in group II (p < 0.05). This difference between groups ceased by 1 hour after CPB.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. . Granulocyte counts before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass ( CPB). Time points are as in Figure 5Go. (15, 30, and 60 min Post CPB = 15, 30, and 60 minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass.)

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 7. . Pulmonary leukosequestration after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Abbreviations are as in Figures 5 and 6GoGo. At 30 minutes, p < 0.05.

 
Tissue Analysis
The increase in myeloperoxidase activity above baseline was 79.8% ± 12.9% in group I and 197% ± 59.3% in group II when normalized to normal lung dry weight of 16% (p < 0.05).

Wet lung weight was similar between groups. Group I lungs were 87.9% ± 1.0% water, whereas group II lungs contained 88.9% ± 1.7% water (p = not significant).

Histologic evaluation of group II lungs revealed marked intraalveolar hemorrhage, edema, and abundant intraalveolar neutrophils. Extensive neutrophil extravasation caused disruption of normal pulmonary parenchyma (Fig 8Go). Capillary plugging by neutrophils gave the interstitium a hypercellular appearance. In group I animals, there was preservation of normal pulmonary parenchyma (Fig 9Go), with only occasional small foci of fluid without cells into alveolae. There were abundant intracapillary neutrophils but no interstitial migration. Quantitative microscopy at x200 revealed that 5.05% ± 1.54% of group I fields had edema, compared with 41.0% ± 11.7% of group II (p < 0.02). By grid analysis, percentage of alveolar spaces affected by edema was significantly different between groups I and II at all percentile comparisons (Table 1Go)tab 1.



View larger version (191K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 8. . Medium-power photomicrograph taken from a control animal showing diffuse intraalveolar edema and extravasated red blood cells. Interstitial vessels are congested, and frequently contain increased numbers of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (arrows). (Hematoxylin and eosin; x250 before 28% reduction.)

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 9. . Medium-power photomicrograph taken from a treated animal showing normal alveolar spaces. Note the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes within the interstitial capillary bed (arrows). (Hematoxylin and eosin; times;250 before 28% reduction.)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. . Percentage of Microscopic Fields (x200) Affected by Inflammation and Edema
 

    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The generalized inflammatory response resulting from CPB and its postoperative pathophysiology have been well documented [1, 2, 4]. Clinical and experimental studies have shown impaired pulmonary function after CPB, as evidenced by increased arteriovenous oxygen difference, increased PVR, and decreased pulmonary compliance [7, 8]. Increased vascular permeability leads to organ edema with subsequent dysfunction, particularly in the renal, pulmonary, and cerebral systems. In its most severe form, this clinical constellation has been termed ``postperfusion'' syndrome by Kirklin [1]. Multiple components of the inflammatory response have been identified, including activation of the classic and alternative complement pathways. Complement is consumed during CPB and increased levels of C5a and C3b have been measured throughout CPB and the postoperative period [3, 4]. Furthermore, profound neutropenia is observed frequently during CPB and several direct activators of neutrophils (leukotriene B4, kallikrein, and PAF) have been observed in the circulation during and after CPB [6, 17]. Synthetic surfaces also appear to activate neutrophils [5]. Products of neutrophil activation are increased in serum during and immediately after CPB; these include oxygen-derived free radicals, myeloperoxidase, elastase, and lactoferrin [10, 11]. These observations suggest a prominent role of neutrophils in CPB-related inflammation and tissue injury.

Early experimental efforts to reduce neutrophil-mediated CPB injury included mechanical filtration to remove circulating neutrophils; this resulted in improved pulmonary function after CPB [24]. More recently, neutrophil activation and neutrophil-mediated tissue injury have been shown to be dependent on neutrophil adhesion to activated endothelium [2527]. This raised the possibility that inhibition of neutrophil adhesion might decrease pulmonary injury after CPB.

Neutrophil activation and subsequent diapedesis into tissue is dependent on adhesion to activated endothelium [13, 15]. The adhesion molecules primarily responsible for this have been termed ``integrins.'' The B2 integrin family consists of three glycoprotein heterodimers (CD11a/CD18, CD11b/CD18, and CD11c/CD18), each containing different units but sharing the same B2 subunit. Although all three integrins are present on neutrophils, the receptor most frequently implicated in neutrophil activation, chemotaxis, and diapedesis is CD11b/CD18 (also known as MAC-1, CR3, or Mo-1 receptor) [26]. This receptor is present within intracytoplasmic vesicles, but appears on the neutrophil surface within minutes of activation. Binding of neutrophils to endothelium alters actin cytoskeletal properties and intracellular activity, resulting in conformational change and ultimately in diapedesis, an oxidative respiratory burst, and neutrophil degranulation [25, 26]. Recently, we demonstrated that CD18 is up-regulated by 150% during CPB [28]. Pharmacologic inhibition of up-regulation of CD18 in vivo in a porcine CPB model decreased pulmonary leukocyte sequestration, myeloperoxidase activity, and free radical generation during CPB [8]. Postoperative pulmonary function was also improved.

The precise mechanism of neutrophil activation and adhesion receptor up-regulation during CPB remains unclear. There is evidence to suggest several potential mediators: PAF, exposure to foreign surfaces, C5a, leukotriene B4, and kallikrein [2, 6, 9, 17]. Platelet activating factor seems an important mediator of neutrophil activation because of its known physiologic effects. It is known to increase PVR and decrease vascular permeability [18], but whether these effects are direct or mediated through neutrophils is unknown.

A variety of PAF competitive inhibitors have been used to delineate the role of PAF in inflammation. In canine lung transplantation, PAF antagonists given before organ reperfusion improve postoperative pulmonary function and decrease edema [29]. Platelet activating factor inhibition can reverse the inflammation of the guinea pig arthus reaction [30] and reduce hyperacute rejection in presensitized cardiac rat recipients and rat recipients of guinea pig hearts [19]. Platelet activating factor inhibition also has reduced ischemia/reperfusion injury in the myocardium [31] and gut [32, 33].

Platelet activating factor is a potent up-regulator of CD11b/CD18 expression on neutrophils in vitro [12, 15]. Neutrophils possess a specific PAF receptor, as do pulmonary capillary membranes in guinea pig and human [34]. Experimental intravenous injection of PAF results in pulmonary leukosequestration [35] and the neutrophil oxidative burst [3640].

Our porcine model of CPB produces a reproducible pulmonary injury similar to the pathophysiologic effects of PAF: increased PVR, pulmonary edema, and pulmonary leukosequestration, along with complement activation, generation of oxygen free radicals, and profound neutropenia.

In this study, SDZ HUL-412 significantly reduced pulmonary injury after CPB. Pulmonary vascular resistance and PaO2 were better in treated animals than in controls. Although there was no significant difference in wet lung weight, there was a trend toward more pulmonary edema in the control lungs. A large section of lung was used to determine wet lung weight. This contained subsegmental atelectatic areas in both groups. These areas would tend to imply greater wet lung weight because of edema associated with atelectasis even in animals with no alveolar membrane disruption and thus eliminate a significant difference between the groups by this parameter. Smaller nonatelectatic lung sections were examined by quantitative light microscopy, and intraalveolar edema fluid was less in treated animals and normal pulmonary parenchymal architecture was preserved. In both groups, intracapillary neutrophils were seen in all microscopic fields, and similar degrees of circulating neutropenia were seen during and after CPB. In treated animals, there were no intraalveolar and few interstitial neutrophils and there was significantly less pulmonary leukosequestration at 30 minutes after CPB. The latter finding was supported by qualitative histology showing a marked increase in intraalveolar and interstitial neutrophils in the untreated group. More important, there was less lung tissue myeloperoxidase in treated animals after CPB than in controls.

Because the increase in CD18 expression on circulating neutrophils was similar in control and experimental groups, PAF antagonism probably did not inhibit neutrophil adhesion significantly, although it may have inhibited diapedesis. This is consistent with previous findings that PAF is an important neutrophil chemotactic agent [35, 41, 42]. However, other studies have shown PAF to be a primary inducer of CD11b/CD18 expression [12, 15]. Several possibilities may account for this discrepancy. The complement component C5a [43] and arachodonic pathway product leukotriene B4 [44, 45] have been shown to result in increased neutrophil adhesion to endothelium. We did not inhibit these cascades in our experiment. The neutrophils measured are circulating and may not reflect the surface expression of CD11b/CD18 on the sequestered pool of neutrophils in the pulmonary and other vascular endothelium. This is a problem that vexes all current studies of neutrophil adhesion. The antibody we used to measure the adhesion molecules binds to the CD18 ß-subunit. This subunit is also a component of CD11a/CD18 and CD11c/CD18 and the antibody has been shown to bind to CD11a/CD18 [23]. CD11a/CD18 is known to be constitutively expressed on activated neutrophils, although it is not thought to contribute directly to the diapedesis process. The measurement of this adhesion molecule may contribute to the equal increase in expression of CD18 in groups I and II. It has been shown that the CD11b/CD18 molecule can mediate neutrophil adhesion and modulate degranulation independent of its quantitative cell surface expression thought to be attributable to a conformational change in the glycoprotein during neutrophil activation [46]. Finally, neutrophil adherence may result in part in both groups from a process involving P-selectin. This may account for binding without diapedesis in group I.

In summary, a competitive PAF inhibitor (SDZ HUL-412) ameliorated CPB-induced pulmonary injury in a porcine model. It decreased extravascular diapedesis of neutrophils without affecting their CD11b/CD18 integrin expression. These data suggest that PAF is an important neutrophil chemotactic agent in CPB-mediated lung injury, and PAF inhibition may have some usefulness in clinical strategies to reduce organ injury in cardiac operations.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We acknowledge the technical assistance of Melissa Haggerty, Jeffrey Brawn, Andrea J. Swift, Joseph Dinitale, and Ernest King, and the assistance of Lori Garrison in manuscript preparation.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Address reprint requests to Dr Cameron, Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Blalock 618, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Kirklin JK. The postperfusion syndrome: inflammation and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. In: Tinker JH, ed. Cardiopulmonary bypass: current concepts and controversies. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1989:131.
  2. Westaby S. Organ dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass. A systemic inflammatory reaction initiated by the extracorporeal circuit. Intensive Care Med 1987;13:89–95.[Medline]
  3. Chenoweth DE, Cooper SW, Hugli TE, Stewart RW, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW. Complement activation during cardiopulmonary bypass: evidence for generation of C3a and C5a anaphylatoxins. N Engl J Med 1981;304:497–503.[Abstract]
  4. Kirklin JK, Westaby S, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Chenoweth DE, Pacifico AD. Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:845–57.[Abstract]
  5. Hammerschmidt DE, Stroncek DF, Bowers TK, et al. Complement activation and neutropenia occuring during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;81:370–7.[Abstract]
  6. Kongsgaard UE, Smith-Erichsen N, Geiran O, Amundsen E, Mollnes TE, Garred P. Different activation patterns in the plasma kallikrein-kinin and complement systems during coronary bypass surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1989;33:343–7.[Medline]
  7. Dreyer WJ, Michael LH, Nguyen T, et al. Neutrophil-mediated pulmonary injury in a canine model of cardiopulmonary bypass: evidence for a CD18-dependent mechanism. Circulation 1992;86(Suppl 1):629.
  8. Gillinov AM, Redmond JM, Zehr KJ, et al. Inhibition of neutrophil adhesion during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:126–33.[Abstract]
  9. Addonizio VP Jr, Strauss JF III, Chang LF, Fisher CA, Colman RW, Edmunds LH Jr. Release of lysosomal hydrolases during simulated extracorporeal circulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;84:28–34.[Abstract]
  10. Wachtfogel YT, Kucich U, Greenplate J, et al. Human neutrophil degranulation during extracorporeal circulation. Blood 1987;69:324–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Riegel W, Spillner G, Schlosser V, Horl WH. Plasma levels of main granulocyte components during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;95:1014–9.[Abstract]
  12. Tonnesen MG, Anderson DC, Springer TA, Knedler A, Avdi N, Henson PM. Adherence of neutrophils to cultured human microvascular endothelial cells. Stimulation by chemotactic peptides and lipid mediators and dependence upon the Mac-1, LFA-1, p150,95 glycoprotein family. J Clin Invest 1989;83:637–46.
  13. Smith CW, Marlin SD, Rothlein R, Toman C, Anderson DC. Cooperative interactions of LFA-1 and Mac-1 with intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in facilitating adherence and trans-endothelial migration of human neutrophils in vitro. J Clin Invest 1989;83:2008–17.
  14. Luscinskas FW, Brock AF, Arnaout MA, Gimbrone MA Jr. Endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule-1-dependent and leukocyte (CD11/CD18)-dependent mechanisms contribute to polymorphonuclear leukocyte adhesion to cytokine-activated human vascular endothelium. J Immunol 1989;142:2257–63.[Abstract]
  15. Tonnesen MG. Neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions: mechanisms of neutrophil adherence to vascular endothelium. J Invest Dermatol 1989;93:53S–8S.[Medline]
  16. Benveniste J, Roubin R, Chignard M, Jouvin-Marche E, Le Couedic J-P. Release of platelet-activating factor (PAF-acether) and 2-lyso PAF-acether from three cell types. Agents Actions 1982;12:711–6.[Medline]
  17. Hoshikawa-Fujimura AY, Auler JOC Jr, Da Rocha TRF, et al. PAF-acether, superoxide anion and beta-glucuronidase as parameters of polymorphonuclear cell activation associated with cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass. Braz J Med Biol Res 1989;22:1077–82.[Medline]
  18. Imai T, Vercellotti GM, Moldow CF, Jacob HS, Weir EK. Pulmonary hypertension and edema induced by platelet-activating factor in isolated, perfused rat lungs are blocked by BN52021. J Lab Clin Med 1988;111:211–7.[Medline]
  19. Makowka L, Chapman FA, Cramer DV, Qian S, Sun H, Starzl TE. Platelet-activating factor and hyperacute rejection. Transplantation 1990;50:359–65.[Medline]
  20. Corcoran PC, Wang Y, Katz NM, et al. Platelet activating factor antagonist enhances lung preservation. J Surg Res 1992;52:615–20.[Medline]
  21. Handley DA, Van Valen RG, Melden MK, Houlihan WJ, Saunders RN. Biological effects of the orally active platelet activating factor receptor antagonist SDZ 64-412. J Pharm Exp Ther 1988;247:617–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Havill AM, Van Valen RG, Handley DA. Prevention of non-specific airway hyperreactivity after allergen challenge in guinea-pigs by the PAF receptor antagonist SDZ 64-412. Br J Pharmacol 1990;99:396–400.[Medline]
  23. Hildreth JEK, Holt V, August JT, Pescovitz MD. Monoclonal antibodies against porcine LFA-1: species cross-reactivity and functional effects of B-subunit specific antibodies. Mol Immunol 1989;26:883–95.[Medline]
  24. Bando K, Pillai R, Cameron DE, et al. Leukocyte depletion ameliorates free radical-mediated lung injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:873–7.[Abstract]
  25. Harlan JM. Neutrophil-mediated vascular injury. Acta Med Scand 1987;715(Suppl):123–9.
  26. Root RK. Leukocyte adhesion proteins: their role in neutrophil function. Trans Am Climatol Assoc 1989;101:207–24.
  27. De La Ossa JC, Malago M, Gewertz BL. Neutrophil–endothelial cell binding in neutrophil-mediated tissue injury. J Surg Res 1992;53:103–7.[Medline]
  28. Gillinov AM, Bator JM, Zehr KJ, et al. Neutrophil adhesion molecule expression during cardiopulmonary bypass with bubble and membrane oxygenators. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:847–53.[Abstract]
  29. Conte JV Jr, Katz NM, Wallace RB, Foegh ML. Long-term lung preservation with the PAF antagonist BN 52021. Transplantation 1991;51:1152–6.[Medline]
  30. Issekutz AC, Szpejda M. Evidence that platelet activating factor may mediate some acute inflammatory responses. Studies with the platelet-activating factor antagonist, CV3988. Lab Invest 1986;54:275–81.[Medline]
  31. Montrucchio G, Alloatti G, Mariano F, et al. Role of platelet-activating factor in polymorphonuclear neutrophil recruitment in reperfused ischemic rabbit heart. Am J Pathol 1993;142:471–80.[Abstract]
  32. Kubes P, Ibbotson G, Russell J, Wallace JL, Granger DN. Role of platelet-activating factor in ischemia/reperfusion-induced leukocyte adherence. Am J Physiol 1990;259:G300–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Filep J, Braquet P, Mozes T. Significance of platelet-activation factor in mesenteric ischemia-reperfusion. Lipids 1991;26:1336–9.[Medline]
  34. Dent G, Ukena D, Sybrecht GW, Barnes PJ. [3H]WEB 2086 labels platelet activating factor receptors in guinea pig and human lung. Eur J Pharmacol 1989;169:313–6.[Medline]
  35. Hultkvist-Bengtsson U, Anderson GP, Morley J. Intrathoracic accumulation of 111In-labeled neutrophils in guinea pigs in response to PAF. J Appl Physiol 1991;70:2368–77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Shaw JO, Pinckard RN, Ferrigni KS, McManus LM, Hanahan DJ. Activation of human neutrophils with 1-o-hexadecyl/octadecyl-2-acetyl-sn-glyceryl-3-phosphorylcholine (platelet activating factor). J Immunol 1981;127:1250–5.[Abstract]
  37. Jouvin-Marche E, Poitevin B, Benveniste J. Platelet-activating factor (PAF-acether), an activator of neutrophil functions. Agents Actions 1982;12:716–20.[Medline]
  38. Takahashi S, Yoshikawa T, Naito Y, Tanigawa T, Yoshida N, Kondo M. Role of platelet-activating factor (PAF) in superoxide production by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Lipids 1991;26:1227–30.[Medline]
  39. Suematsu M, Tsuchiya M. Platelet-activating factor and granulocyte-mediated oxidative stress. Lipids 1991;26:1362–8.[Medline]
  40. Gay JC, Beckman JK, Zaboy KA, Lukens JN. Modulation of neutrophil oxidative responses to soluble stimuli by platelet-activating factor. Blood 1986;67:931–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Dillon PK, Fitzpatrick MF, Ritter AB, Duran WN. Effect of platelet-activating factor on leukocyte adhesion to microvascular endothelium. Time course and dose-response relationships. Inflammation 1988;12:563–73.[Medline]
  42. Kurihara K, Wardlaw AJ, Moqbel R, Kay AB. Inhibition of platelet-activating factor (PAF)-induced chemotaxis and PAF binding to human eosinophils and neutrophils by the specific ginkgolide-derived PAF antagonist, BN 52021. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:83–90.[Medline]
  43. Till GO, Johnson KJ, Kunkel R, Ward PA. Intravascular activation of complement and acute lung injury. Dependency on neutrophils and toxic oxygen metabolites. J Clin Invest 1982;69:1126–35.
  44. Till GO, Ward PA. Systemic complement activation and acute lung injury. Fed Proc 1986;45:13–8.[Medline]
  45. Meyer JD, Yurt RW, Duhaney R, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-enhanced leukotriene B4 generation and chemotaxis in human neutrophils. Arch Surg 1988;123:1454–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Schleiffenbaum B, Moser R, Patarroyo M, Fehr J. The cell surface glycoprotein Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) mediates neutrophil adhesion and modulates degranulation independently of its quantitative cell surface expression. J Immunol 1989;142:3537–45.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. Salenger, J. S. Gammie, and T. J. Vander Salm
Postoperative Care of Cardiac Surgical Patients
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 439 - 469.
[Full Text]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
G. Asimakopoulos
The inflammatory response to CPB: the role of leukocyte filtration
Perfusion, March 1, 2002; 17(2_suppl): 7 - 10.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
H. A. Hennein
Inflammation After Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Therapy for the Postpump Syndrome
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2001; 5(3): 236 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
E. Appachi and E. B. Mossad
Inflammatory Mediators and S-100{beta} Protein Concentrations in Neonates and Infants With Congenital Heart Disease
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2001; 5(3): 256 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. P. Taggart
Effects of a platelet-activating factor antagonist on lung injury and ventilation after cardiac operation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2001; 71(1): 238 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. J. Chai, R. Nassar, A. E. Oakeley, D. M. Craig, G. Quick Jr, J. Jaggers, S. P. Sanders, R. M. Ungerleider, and P. A. W. Anderson
Soluble Complement Receptor-1 Protects Heart, Lung, and Cardiac Myofilament Function From Cardiopulmonary Bypass Damage
Circulation, February 8, 2000; 101(5): 541 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
L. H. Ketai
Invited Commentary
RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1532 - 1533.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
G. Asimakopoulos
Mechanisms of the systemic inflammatory response
Perfusion, July 1, 1999; 14(4): 269 - 277.
[PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. L. Picone, C. J. Lutz, C. Finck, D. Carney, L. A. Gatto, A. Paskanik, B. Searles, K. Snyder, and G. Nieman
Multiple sequential insults cause post-pump syndrome
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1999; 67(4): 978 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. J. Lodge, P. J. Chai, C. W. Daggett, R. M. Ungerleider, and J. Jaggers
METHYLPREDNISOLONE REDUCES THE INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE TO CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS IN NEONATAL PIGLETS: TIMING OF DOSE IS IMPORTANT
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1999; 117(3): 515 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Asimakopoulos and K. M. Taylor
Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on leukocyte and endothelial adhesion molecules
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1998; 66(6): 2135 - 2144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. R. Snapper, W. Lu, P. L. Lefferts, and J. S. Thabes
Effect of platelet-activating factor-receptor antagonism on endotoxin-induced lung dysfunction in sheep
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 1998; 84(5): 1610 - 1614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
W. J. Dreyer, A. R. Burns, S. C. Phillips, M. L. Lindsey, P. Jackson, and G. L. Kukielka
Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Regulation In The Canine Lung After Cardiopulmonary Bypass
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1998; 115(3): 689 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. P. Cochran, K. S. Kunzelman, C. R. Vocelka, H. Akimoto, R. Thomas, L. O. Soltow, and B. D. Spiess
Perfluorocarbon Emulsion in the Cardiopulmonary Bypass Prime Reduces Neurologic Injury
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1997; 63(5): 1326 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Nathan, Y. Denizot, K. J. Zehr, and D. E. Cameron
Platelet-Activating Factor Antagonist and Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1995; 60(3): 744 - 745.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Kenton J. Zehr
Peter W. Cho
A. Marc Gillinov
Duke E. Cameron
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, D. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS